Home Blog Page 7

Driven by the Wind: Displaced Ukrainian Sailor Finds Her Course in San Pedro

By Cris Miller, Columnist

It takes a lot to be an individual representing a country. All countries require dedication to get to an international level. In the summer of 2019, the White House delayed roughly $400 million in military assistance to Ukraine, which was approved by Congress to assist in resisting the Russian attack on Ukraine. This was followed by a freeze of funds in January and March of last year.

In July 2022, the Mykolaiv and Kharkiv regional central yacht clubs of Ukraine were struck and heavily damaged, followed by the Odessa Yacht Club in October of 2023. In a world where yacht clubs are about promoting the sport of sailing and a world where the White House seems to have more heart for Russia, Ukraine was hit with what may have seemed an end.

Out of the rubble, the inspirational Ukrainian Olympic hopeful, Alina Shapovalova, has continued to rise. This is despite the displacement of her family from Ukraine to Switzerland in her early teens because of the attack in 2022. Alina is currently well on track to be the first Ukrainian woman to compete in the International Laser Class Association (ILCA)/Laser class, a boat with a long history made in numbers that outweigh all other boat lines. Olympians have to qualify in races hosted all over the world to secure a spot in the Olympics. Two recent events hosted in July, the ILCA North American Championships – Los Angeles and the Olympic Class Regatta, both took place in San Pedro’s Hurricane Gulch with upwards of 300 boats participating from all around the globe.

One of our local clubs, the Cabrillo Beach Yacht Club (CBYC), hosted and sponsored Alina and allowed her to post her link to fundraising on their page. It is a testament to CBYC’s pursuit and the undeniable effort that Alina makes. Fundraising in this sport is relentless. In America, tier 1 athletes receive $30,000, and tier two athletes receive $15,000, to which Alina replied, “Yes, but it’s not nearly enough; usually you spend $150,000 to $250,000” in order to represent their country and go on to qualify for a race series where they receive no prize money.

Alina noted that athletes raise all that money for no monetary return in the end.

“It is a labor of love no doubt,” Alina said. “Imagine trying to sustain that.”

Alina does, despite the many challenges. For the generation that grew up with Caitlyn (formerly Bruce) Jenner on a Wheaties box, Alina is a throwback who walks farther… faster… with an otherworldly drive that we all tend to admire.

Imagine Russia bombing your home country, you and your whole family being displaced, America saying but not delivering, and continuing to be competitive in a single-person boat.

Alina can. And she has. She has won gold, silver and bronze in international competition. When asked if she felt special or like she had an advantage compared to countries that have many competitors, she says, “It gives me a bit less stress compared to USA or Italy, but to look at it on the other hand, when you don’t have strong sailors in your country, in your class, you always have to search for training partners outside.”

Alina has sailed since she was 9 years old. Her experience since she first sailed in the Gulch last year in 2025, when the wind was steady, lead her to this double series. In this double series, out of a dozen races, the first series was in conditions of low wind and the second series was high wind. So three races were inside and the rest were outside of the breakwater, past the lighthouse, where the ocean claims its persona as the current and wind strengthen.

“Now all of us know each racing area because there are definitely different things you can highlight. Outside of the breakwater turning right going up to the wind, or outside of the breakwater going to port, or inside. Having all three routes made a huge impact in preparation for the Olympics because we still don’t know where we will race,” Alina said.

It depends on the day. “When I was here last year we had one type of condition, but this year we had all conditions, which gave me a lot of information about how the wind works and how current influenced what tactics would be.”

I asked if she felt like racing inside took her height advantage and played it against her, and she said it was an eye-opener to sail in “light and patchy winds.” And I know by racing in the Cal 20 fleet hosted by CBYC’s Richard Welch that there are places where a sailor can go ‘inside to die’. It can turn off, and any sailor can become a bathtub on the water if they make the wrong decision.

Alina’s talent is rare; she has a hard time finding competition, yet competes at a high level. She goes worldwide to find it. Her family was displaced, but it did not disrupt her for long. She has competed in steady wind here in San Pedro and has experienced low wind. She has learned how the current works. She faces teams that have multiple sailors, and she has succeeded even when she is alone.

Alina is a true competitor who embodies what all competitors want. Maybe the cancellation of U.S. funding while her country was bombed drove her. Maybe the destruction of her Yacht Club could have stopped her. Perhaps having little competition made her attitude right. It may be that her relationship with her sisters means she keeps perspective on the race course.

When asked what drives her the most, there were a couple of things she mentioned, but the main one of them was competition.

“I was surprised in a good way when we went racing outside with a lot of current and chop. Two top tens out of three races.” She explained that teams with larger networks work the rulebook to their advantage. “That makes me want to beat them,” she said.

When asked if she felt lucky or special, she replied, “Of course.” Then she pointed to her support.

“I have the best parents in the world. It’s all about family. My parents were always striving to show us the world.” Her family is her lighthouse.

At 19 years old, Alina has faced adversity beyond her years. Perhaps the ocean is the current and the country is the wind, and the sailor is where the wind and the ocean shake hands.

‘Keep Your Hands Off’: Californians Rally to Defend Coastal Commission

 

When the Trump administration’s Department of Commerce ordered a review of California’s oversight of coastal resources involving industrial uses such as offshore oil production, rocket testing and desalination, more than 300 people turned out Aug. 10 to tell the administration to keep its hands off.

Since 1972, California has preserved, protected, developed and, where possible, restored or enhanced its coastal zone through the California Coastal Commission. The special hearing, organized by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), was the Trump administration’s first step toward taking that authority away. Since taking office, the administration has slashed funding for the federal agency and curtailed its regulatory authority while shifting decision-making power from scientists to political appointees.

The administration is seeking to open the state’s waters and shoreline to offshore drilling, new underwater pipelines and other environmentally damaging changes, potentially rolling back environmental protections established over the past 50 years.

Even before the hearing began, California state officials, tribal leaders and environmental groups organized a raucous rally of 100. Another 15,000 people added their voices by submitting online statements opposing the review. While several elected officials spoke, most speakers represented environmental organizations, ranging from the Natural Resources Defense Council to the LA Maritime Institute. Approximately 150 people from dozens of organizations up and down the coast signed up to make statements.

Before NOAA hearing officers, Pete Stauffer, senior ocean protection manager for the Surfrider Foundation, described the organization as a grassroots environmental group dedicated to protecting and enjoying oceans, waves and beaches for all people.

“I want to express Surfrider’s strongest objection to the federal administration’s reopened and targeted review of California’s Coastal Management Program,” Stauffer said.

Stauffer and representatives of other environmental organizations called the review “politically motivated,” arguing that the administration was targeting California’s ability to protect its coastline and posing an existential threat to the state’s ability to protect ocean health, beach access and coastal communities. They said California’s program is a national model with a proven record of protecting the state’s coastal and ocean resources.

Irene Cook, representing the Society of Fearless Grandmothers in Santa Barbara, said the review was “not a process that’s a legitimate part of our democracy.”

“Like so many other vital underpinnings of our society in 2026, this review is just another tool of an authoritarian regime corrupted by extreme wealth, intent on serving only their corporate donors to the sole purpose of profit at the expense of public health and safety,” Cook said.

Kevin Schmidt, a scientist with the Wichita Chumash Foundation, said he opposed NOAA’s review of the California Coastal Management Program.

Schmidt argued that the projects under consideration would “strip-mine California’s coast” at an incalculable cost to cultural resources, Indigenous lifeways, local economies, commercial and recreational fisheries, tourism and the state’s aesthetic beauty.

“California state regulatory bodies have long managed coastal developments carefully, balancing conservation efforts with economic development,” he said.

Justin Cummings, a Ph.D. biologist and co-chair and founder of Save My Coast Coalition, who served on the Coastal Commission for several years, spoke in support of maintaining the program. He said that between 2010 and 2022, more than 7,300 oil spills occurred in federal waters, averaging more than one spill per day for 12 years.

“By expanding offshore drilling off our coast, it’s not a question of if an oil spill will happen but when,” Cummings said.

Others pointed out that for 57 years, California has rejected new offshore oil leasing in state waters and for more than four decades has consistently opposed new federal leasing.

Lisa Gillfilan of Oceana, an international advocacy organization dedicated to ocean conservation, said, “Everyone in this room knows the federal government is considering new offshore oil and gas.”

Grant Bixby of the Business Alliance for Protecting the Pacific Coast said the organization represents more than 65,000 businesses, hundreds of thousands of employees and millions of customers who believe offshore oil and gas development is bad for business.

Kate Huckleberry, former head of the California Coastal Commission, said 90.7% of projects were approved through what she described as a rigorous process.

The organization Azul pointed to a national poll of Latino voters that found 80% were more likely to vote for candidates they viewed as ocean champions. Seventy-eight percent supported bans on new offshore oil and gas drilling.

Leah Yananton, representing Codepink, asked NOAA to reject plans to weaken the Coastal Management Program and respect the 10th Amendment (in laymen’s terms, the federal government cannot take power not expressly granted by the U.S. Constitution. Those powers are expressly reserved to the states, or the people).

Yananton called what the Trump administration is trying to do beyond “politically motivated” but an example of corporate tyranny like the corporate-driven militarization of space that this administration has taken up.

“Corporations with federal contracts are given more rights than we the people,” Yananton said.

This columnist, who is also an educator with the LA Maritime Institute and member of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, likened the administration’s anti-science, climate-change-denial attack on the California Coastal Commission to the ongoing dismantling of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institutes of Health, our unions and progressive environmental legislation.

The Sierra Club distributed a set of talking points noting that the Trump administration is putting private industry interests, fossil fuels and corporate projects ahead of federal and state laws to protect our coastlines, marine ecosystems and the communities and commerce that depend on them.

The Sierra Club accused the Commerce Department of ordering a performance evaluation focused solely on spaceport infrastructure, offshore oil production, pipeline maintenance, desalination projects and undersea cables. It said the directive made clear that the commission was being targeted because of its refusal to find offshore oil drilling and SpaceX rocket launches from Vandenberg consistent with the California Coastal Act.

Mark Friedman is an educator at the LA Maritime Institute and a member of the International Association of Machinists.

What Does it Take for Voters to Support Progressive Candidates

For a long time, we’ve heard that if only people had information about progressive, left-of-center candidates, the majority of voters would support them. Now, though, everybody has an iPhone, and everybody surfs the internet.

You can no longer blame people getting inadequate information about candidates for why more than 77 million people voted for Trump in 2024. To get a sufficient number of anti-Trump voters to the polls this upcoming election, we need to understand exactly what Trump voters were voting for.

You 77 million trump voters, you knew that Trump told more than 30,000 lies during his first term as president. That’s not even counting all the lies he’s told in his lifetime, or the ones he told between 2020 and 2025. You knew that, no excuses. You voted for him anyway.

You knew that he was convicted of 34 felonies. You knew that, no excuses. You voted for him anyway.

You knew he encouraged an armed lynch mob to “fight like Hell” at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, where that mob voiced its intention to murder the vice president and House Speaker. You knew that. You had no excuse. You voted for him anyway.

You knew he was impeached for encouraging that armed, angry lynch mob. You knew that; no excuses. You voted for him anyway.

You knew he was caught with rooms full of classified government documents hoarded at his Mar-a-Lago country club, many of which were not supposed to be removed from a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF). (If you don’t know what a SCIF is, Google it). You knew that, no excuses. You voted for him anyway.

You knew he ran his businesses into bankruptcy six times, so much for “business acumen.”

You knew that, no excuses. You voted for him anyway.

You knew he was lying when he said he was going to impose tariffs and make other countries pay them. (If you don’t know what a tariff is, or you don’t understand what it is, Google it. Keep Googling until you do understand it). You knew that; no excuses. You voted for him anyway.

You knew he cheated on his first wife with his second, got a messy divorce from his first, cheated on his second wife with his third, got a messy divorce from his second, and cheated on his third wife too. You voted for him anyway, so don’t lecture us about ‘traditional values.”

You knew he was the closest friend of convicted sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein for 10 years, and Trump bragged, “He likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them on the younger side.” You knew that, no excuses. You voted for him anyway.

You knew he was caught on tape telling the Georgia Secretary of State, “All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11, 780 votes … I only need 11,000 votes,” and making threats about “a big risk to you. You knew that; no excuses. You voted for him anyway.

You knew he was impeached for telling the head of a foreign government, “I would like you to do us a favor, though.” You knew that, no excuses. You voted for him anyway.

What else? There’s about 30,000 “what else’s,” but we have to end this list somewhere. Apparently, for 77 million of you, the man can’t do enough criminal things for you to think he’s a criminal. Apparently the man can’t do enough sadistic things for you to think he’s sadistic. Apparently he can’t do enough just-plain-stupid things for you to think he’s just plain stupid. Either that, or criminal, sadistic, and just-plain-stupid is your idea of “real leadership” or something.

Either 77 million Trump supporters – across dozens of entire states, including seven that voted blue in 2020 – flatly and stubbornly refuse to seek out information about left-of-center candidates, or else they honestly share the morals and values of dangerous, sleazy, and narrow-minded conservative Republicans like Trump.

What happened to that blue majority in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, Nevada, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Minnesota that made Biden president in 2020? Harris couldn’t get them back to the polls in 2024. Democrats need to get them back – about 5 million of them – this November, and we’ve got less than 90 days to do it.

Random Happening: Micro Gallery Debut: ‘gallery a’ featuring works by Ashley Tesfamariam

 

Join the debut of ‘gallery a’, Angels Gate Cultural Center’s new micro exhibition space. Modeled after neighborhood mini libraries, this free-standing art gallery is located outside of Building A, AGCC’s gallery and offices. ‘gallery a’ features the work of local, emerging, and underrepresented artists showing small but mighty works.

‘gallery a’ will host its debut and opening reception August 22 in conjunction with the closing reception of Built on Water.

In recent years Long Beach and neighboring communities have seen the emergence of a number of micro galleries thanks to local artist and creator of Micro Galleries of Long Beach, Dave Clark. These sizable spaces have established a vibrant community of mini neighborhood arts districts, creating accessible spaces to show and enjoy artwork. AGCC has partnered with Dave Clark to bring our very own micro gallery to campus.

gallery a’s debut exhibition will feature works from Los Angeles-based metalsmith Ashley Tesfamariam. Through interpretations and micro recreations of street signs, the artist invites you to reconsider the ways we interact with and move through our urban environment. Tesfamariam’s work investigates public displays of language as shared communication, and how this language defines how we move through space.

Angels Gate Micro Gallery Opening.

Time: 1 p.m., Aug. 22

Cost: Free

Details: https://tinyurl.com/Micro-Gallery-debut

Venue: AGCC, 3601 S. Gaffey St., San Pedro

Dodson Alum Alyssa Grace Proffitt Rises on Charts With ‘bloodstream’

By Hannah G. Morris, Columnist

Alyssa Grace Proffitt, a 19-year-old singer-songwriter and former Dodson Middle School student, is rising in the music charts with her hit song bloodstream.

The young folk-pop artist has a sizable and quickly growing fan base, with nearly 6.4 million monthly listeners on popular music streaming platform Spotify. However, her fame began on TikTok, where she sports more than 890,000 followers.

A song that her early TikTok fans once begged her to release, bloodstream currently has more than 64 million streams on Spotify. An ode to putting yourself first even when you love who’s hurting you, vivid emotion surges through the song with each voice crack and passionate refrain.

Capturing the desperation of a failing relationship, Alyssa sings, “I’m crying on my mama’s floor, why don’t you want this anymore? / And I’m craving you to change for me / You’re saying, ‘I hear you, and I love you, but my heart, it hurts for you / And I just cannot give you what you need.’”

As the raw emotion in her voice rings out alongside her acoustic guitar, Alyssa captures the intertwined passion, frustration and deep sadness characteristic of a toxic relationship.

Yet, her lyrics find strength in the pain as she cries out, “And something deep inside of me tells me that you’re not better now / And I’m sorry that I couldn’t help, but I’m so glad I made it out.”

Throughout bloodstream, auditory surges and declines carry the listener through the powerful highs and lows of a strained romance. But still, the highest high comes as the singer finds the strength to stop begging for love and answers.

In a recent interview with Genius about bloodstream, Alyssa said, “The only way that I was going to get better, in that sense, was by kind of focusing on myself and following my own journey. It’s helped validate a lot of my feelings and in a lot of different ways.” She added that “it’s just kind of cool that I get to go through that journey with the people that listen to my music, too.”

As Alyssa’s emotionally honest style has resonated with more and more listeners, she has not only released her debut EP “spilling my guts” on July 24 with music label Artist House but also signed with Warner Records — one of the “big three” of record labels.

She will also be opening for singer and TikTok star Alex Warren this fall in Australia and New Zealand during his world tour “Finding Family on the Road.”

Iced, Hot or Mushroom-Infused, Smart Drip Wants Coffee Your Way

Earlier this month, I saw firsthand how far iced coffee enthusiasts will go for their fix. The last time was when a friend sold iced coffee from her apartment during 100-plus-degree weather. Neighbors and customers in cars rang the doorbell every 10 minutes, seemingly driven entirely by word of mouth.

Smart Drip Coffee gave me the same vibe at its Aug. 3 hard opening. Located on N. Gaffey Street, a block north of Target, the shop is bare-bones: snacks to the left, large jugs of coffee to the right, and the menu and cash register front and center.

I ordered the Arthur Douglas, a tall espresso over ice topped with velvety cold foam, honey, and a dusting of cocoa. Next thing I know, one person after another kept walking in. Initially asking for a cup of hot coffee until they saw my satisfied face sipping on my Arthur Douglas on ice, happy as can be. It was so good, I actually started boasting about how good my coffee-flavored iced drink was in the nearly 90-degree heat.

For founder Rashawn Vaughn, coffee isn’t simply a beverage. It’s a ritual — one he doesn’t expect customers to abandon just because he’s offering something different.

“If you’re a drip kind of guy, you can use our coffee and drip it,” he said. “If you’re an espresso kind of guy, we can meet you there. You like French press? We got that too.”

That philosophy is at the heart of Smart Drip Coffee, which combines traditional, micro-roasted coffee with mushroom-infused blends while preserving the familiar taste and rituals of coffee drinking.

Vaughn’s path into the coffee business began with entrepreneurship. After studying people who successfully sold products online, he began exploring what he could sell himself. Coffee and chocolate stood out because they were products he genuinely enjoyed.

The idea took shape after he discovered mushroom coffee. He liked the concept but rejected many of the products he tried because, as a longtime coffee drinker, he didn’t want to replace his daily ritual with something that didn’t taste like coffee.

That led him to a neighbor who sold ginseng coffee. The neighbor introduced him to its manufacturer, who eventually became Vaughn’s mentor and taught him about mushrooms and their use in coffee.

Smart Drip starts with actual coffee rather than powdered coffee products. Its traditional coffee is micro-roasted in small batches in Pomona, and some blends are infused with mushroom extracts and ginseng.

The mushroom coffee contains reishi, also known as Ganoderma, along with ginseng. Vaughn is careful to distinguish the product from medicine, emphasizing that Smart Drip Coffee does not prescribe or claim to treat medical conditions.

The goal is to offer coffee drinkers an enhanced version of something they already enjoy.

“We’re real coffee first,” he said.

That distinction also informs the company’s approach to flavor. Rather than masking the coffee with strong mushroom flavors, Smart Drip’s mushroom-infused blends are designed to taste like coffee.

The menu includes familiar coffeehouse staples such as lattes, cappuccinos, mochas and Americanos, along with signature drinks.

The Smart Affogato is a variation on the Italian dessert traditionally made by pouring espresso over vanilla gelato. Smart Drip’s version combines dark chocolate, two scoops of gelato, espresso, caramel and coconut.

The Arthur Douglas is a triple-shot espresso sweetened with honey and topped with cold foam and cocoa dust.

The mushroom mocha latte offers another distinctive option, combining chaga, lion’s mane, cordyceps and reishi with monk fruit and coconut creamer. The plant-based ingredients provide lighter sweetness without overpowering the coffee.

Smart Drip also offers French and Italian roast profiles and individual pour-over sachets for people who want freshly brewed coffee without conventional brewing equipment.

The sachets reflect another part of the company’s philosophy: Coffee should fit into people’s lives rather than require them to change their routines.

That extends to cold coffee. Vaughn sees iced coffee as an important part of the menu, particularly during warmer months, and plans to develop additional cold offerings.

Smart Drip also offers noncoffee beverages and other items intended to make the space accessible to people who aren’t coffee drinkers.

The business initially is operating through a pop-up model, with plans for a more permanent location. A larger space could create opportunities for private dinners, community gatherings and potentially poetry and music performances.

For Vaughn, those possibilities connect the coffee business to a larger goal. Coffee is a product people already incorporate into their daily lives, while a physical space can become a place where people, businesses and creative communities intersect.

“I am a connector of dots,” he said.

At its core, Smart Drip Coffee isn’t asking people to abandon the coffee they know. It’s asking them to keep the ritual — and change what’s in the cup.

Brunch Around the Harbor: Reef, Think Prime and Neon Sun Offer Something Different

By Gretchen Williams, Columnist

The Reef on the Water opened in 1958 as the flagship of David Tallichet’s Specialty Restaurant empire. Ports O’ Call on the Main Channel in San Pedro was another of Tallichet’s themed restaurants. Later restaurants took advantage of spectacular waterfront locations. Tallichet had been an accomplished pilot during World War II and continued to fly his own planes for the rest of his life, surviving several crashes. His restaurants often incorporated his fascination with aviation, as well as tropical and tiki themes.

The Reef on the Water is now offering an à la carte menu instead of its former buffet. Leading the list is classic eggs Benedict, along with hot-honey fried chicken and waffles. The truly awesome Brunch Board for Two includes Wagyu beef steak cooked to your preference, snow crab, shrimp and crispy smoked bacon. Add bottomless mimosas or unlimited rosé for a festive afternoon. The Reef is well known for its excellent bar. A perfectly mixed Bloody Mary or Ramos Fizz, a view of ships and cranes, sunshine on the ocean — life around the harbor is good.

The Reef on the Water
880 Harbor Scenic Drive, Long Beach
562-435-8013

Think Prime is the place for steaks, with a Tuesday prime rib special, terrific happy hour and the wonderful nostalgia of the Tasman Sea days. Brunch on Saturday and Sunday is Kashi’s weekend wow: omelets of your choice, waffles, pancakes and every type of crepe filling, huevos rancheros, chilaquiles and Norwegian smoked salmon for the breakfast of your dreams.

Amazing spaghetti Bolognese with eggs or linguine with clams may not be everyone’s idea of brunch, but they sound delicious at Think Prime. “Steak Up” your brunch with prime rib and eggs, or do an Erling Haaland with a fabulous tomahawk steak and eggs. The Bloody Mary is royally crowned with shrimp and bacon. For truly royal fare, try the filet mignon, lobster and king crab legs special.

Think Prime
29601 S. Western Ave., Rancho Palos Verdes
310-221-0415

Neon Sun is a surprise, a mystery and a delight, all rolled into one. Located on lower Ninth Street next to Citibank, it is a restaurant, a gallery and a neighborhood gathering place. Neon Sun is a collaboration, incorporating culinary skills as well as an artistic vision. The dining room is modest, highlighting artwork, fabric art, pottery, fine art and photography. The menu is equally eclectic, with contributions from many cultures.

The brunch menu offers omelets with interesting fillings. The Basque has Spanish chorizo and smoked Idiazabal cheese, while the Irish omelet is filled with black pudding (Irish blood sausage), Irish cheddar cheese and potato crisps. The Middle Eastern omelet has sujuk (Middle Eastern dried sausage) and feta cheese. The Korean scramble incorporates fried Spam, furikake, sriracha, garlic aioli and green onion.

Burrata is topped with tasty Spanish chorizo, toasted pepitas, pickled red onion, shaved fennel, micro arugula, cocoa-infused balsamic vinegar, a honey drizzle and a squeeze of citrus. The Neon Sun breakfast burrito has beans, potato crisps, house-made chorizo, salsa, cheddar cheese and scrambled egg. Breakfast sandwiches include prosciutto, tomato, arugula and hard-cooked egg, or fried egg with kimchi, hoisin sauce and Spam.

The chicken sandwich features chicken thigh, Japanese house-made pickles, curry sauce and marinated cabbage. Ceviche is a different take on the Mexican favorite, with shrimp, dragon fruit, kiwi, mint and cilantro. Neon Sun is different, fascinating and fun, with a new approach to brunch. Wine and beer are now available.

Neon Sun
524 W. Ninth St., San Pedro
310-872-3616

Battle of Los Angeles Fishing Tournament Brings Families Together at Legg Lake

0

The fourth annual Battle of Los Angeles Fishing Tournament and Family Festival brought together youth, families, anglers, volunteers, sponsors and community partners for a day of fishing, education and community building at Whittier Narrows Legg Lake. Hosted by Reel Hope Inc., the event continues the organization’s mission of empowering youth and strengthening families through fishing, outdoor education, conservation and mentorship.

Young anglers reeled in impressive bluegill and catfish, while adult competitors landed standout catches, including a large carp and a trophy-sized crappie. The day emphasized teamwork, mentorship and community spirit.

“This event isn’t just about catching fish,” said Eldridge Hardley, founder and director of Reel Hope Inc. “It’s about bringing people together, mentoring young people, creating opportunities and showing families that the outdoors can change lives. We are incredibly grateful to every volunteer, sponsor and community partner who made this event possible.”

Hardley also serves as a Fishing 101 instructor through Los Angeles County Parks and Recreation at Magic Johnson Lake. Classes are held every Saturday from 9 to 11 a.m. through September and offer hands-on instruction in safety, casting, knot tying, fish identification, conservation and practical fishing skills. Registration is required through Los Angeles County Parks and Recreation.

For more information or to register for Fishing 101, visit RealHopeInc.org or call Hardley at (323) 572-9103.

Defending California’s Coast: A Diverse Alliance of Leaders Speaks Out

On Aug. 10, Rep. Nanette Barragán joined other California leaders to rally opposition to Trump’s latest and most sweeping attack on the state — the first ever federal challenge to a state’s right to protect its own coastline via its Coastal Management Program.

Thirty-four states have CMPs, established under the 1972 Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA), a law passed in response to the 1969 Santa Barbara oil spill, which affected 300 miles of coastline, from Pismo Beach to northern Mexico, and still haunts California’s memory to this day.

In more than 50 years, neither California nor any other state has had its CMP challenged, as the Trump administration is now doing. Significantly, California’s 2019 CMP went unchallenged during Trump’s first term. The challenge threatens to open up the coast to reckless offshore oil drilling, deep-sea mining, and who knows what other corrupt backroom deals Trump comes up with.

“Trump’s attempts to regulate our coast are for his own corrupt reasons,” Barragán said. “It’s to look out for his billionaire friends, big oil, and for his bottom line. That’s going to devastate our economy and our communities.”

California’s program had undergone a regular review in 2024, and a draft report by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) found that California had successfully implemented and enforced its federally approved program. But a final report was never issued.

Instead, on May 10, Trump’s Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick — best known for lying about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein — lied about California’s model environmental stewardship. He ordered NOAA to ignore its previous evaluation and “conduct a full, formal review of California’s coastal management program,” falsely claiming that California had a “long record of obstructing technological innovation, economic development, and related Federal efforts in the name of environmental extremism” — a claim glaringly at odds with Trump’s approval of its 2019 plan.

Setting that aside, the charge of extremism was “a sham,” said Natural Resources Defense Council senior attorney Joel Reynolds, speaking along with Barragán in advance of a public hearing NOAA held in Santa Monica on Aug. 10.

“If it’s extremism they’re after, clearly they should take a look closer to home,” Reynolds said. “Because what we’re seeing at the highest levels of our federal government — denial of climate change, deregulation of environmental safeguards, disdain for the rule of law and disregard for science and even for basic facts — what we’re seeing since January 2025 isn’t normal policy disagreement. It’s chaos. An attack on democracy driven by resentment, incompetence, corruption and a contempt for the United States Constitution.”

The only limit, Barragán noted, was “When Florida Republicans stood up and said, ‘Not our coast,’” and when that happened, “They said, ‘We’ll go after California.’ Talk about the corruption,” she said. “Talk about singling out California.”

 

Speakers Focus On Coast’s Value More Than Threats

While the attack was clearly bogus, speakers focused more on what was being threatened — California’s coast as central to the state’s shared identity, as well as a thriving, diversified economy. Tina Calderon, culture bearer of Gabrielino Tongva, Chumash and Yoeme descent, set the tone in her opening remarks. “We are community, and it doesn’t matter how you connect to the ocean, where your passions lie. The point is that we all love our beautiful salt waters,” Calderon said. “These are sacred waters and it’s up to us to be the voice. It’s up to us to cause no more human harm. We’ve done enough.”

 

DefendingCoast

Instead, she said, “We need to wake up. We need to protect our waters and our lands and we need to do this together.”

“This is a critical unprecedented moment.” said Wade Crowfoot, California secretary of natural resources. “Never before in the five decade history of this federal act has this sudden baseless review taken place on any state’s coastal management program. And never before in the history of this act has a coastal management program ever been revoked.”

And as for justifications, there were none, he added. “Make no mistake, there is no science involved. There is no established policy involved with this sudden review. It is politics.”

In his official written comments, Crowfoot refuted every accusation that California was stifling the activities that Lutnick cited in his letter — “spaceport infrastructure, offshore oil production, pipeline maintenance, desalination projects, and undersea cables” — with a mix of historical information and cold hard facts.

Regarding spaceport infrastructure, for example, he pointed to Vandenberg Space Force Base, “an essential installation to our national security and an important launch site for space-bound travel,” and noted that California’s Coastal Commission has reviewed over 135 space launch projects, and only objected to two of them, which nonetheless “did not prevent these projects from moving forward.”

In short, Crowfoot concluded, “California has a clear and verifiable track record of responsibly exercising its authority under the CZMA to enable balanced coastal development. There is no legal basis to decertify California’s CMP.”

Other speakers spoke to the importance of the coast to California’s identity, culture and economy, and how the state’s stewardship of the coast had protected these.

“Reckless proposals to sell out our coastline threaten what we all know is so important: our thriving coastal economy, our unparalleled biodiversity, and the natural beauty that we treasure,” said County Supervisor Lindseay Horvath. “Los Angeles County rejects any and all efforts to allow oil and gas drilling or deep seabed mining off the California coast.”

Coastal Economy Threatened

Grant Bixby, with the Business Alliance for Protecting the Pacific Coast, spoke to the general economic importance of protecting the coast, while two other speakers — Vipe Desai and Anupa Asokan — spoke on behalf of the specific coastal economies which their organizations represented: Surf Industry Members Association and Fish On.

Bixby spoke first, giving a sense of the sweep of businesses involved. “We are chambers of commerce, visitors bureaus, realtors associations, fishing groups, outdoor retailers, major national and international brands, mom and pop shops, hotel ears, restaurant tours, businesses of all stripes and sizes, and we are the engine that drives the California coastal economy,” he said.

From a business perspective, he explained, the choice was clear.

“What businesses want is a clear understanding of the rules, predictability in governance, and the ability to plan,” he said, which is what they have had for 50 years, building a coastal economy worth $50 billion a year.

On the other hand, “The federal government, if they take unilateral action here to weaken the CCMA or to decertify California outright, the new regulatory landscape that will result will be one of chaos and unpredictability,” Bixby warned. “This is not what we want.”

“Surfing is so deeply woven into the identity of this state that it is officially recognized as the state sport of California,” said Desai. “On behalf of the California surf industry, our message is clear. Protecting our coast is protecting our businesses, our communities, our way of life, and an incredibly valuable piece of the California economy. We have far too much riding on this coastline to put it at unnecessary risk.”

While fishing is only a small part of the coastal economy, “For many people, it’s also a way to put food on the table, to connect with family, create community, and experience the ocean firsthand,” said Asokan. “We cannot be sacrificing an economy that supports millions of Californians and a coast that belongs to all of us in order to make it easier for a handful of polluting industries to develop here. … The coast belongs to all of us, and we should be the ones deciding what happens to it.”

“The brand of California is not offshore oil and gas. Nor should it be. Offshore mineral resources make up 1%,” Bixby noted. “Should we put 99% of the other employment at risk for the benefit of one dirty industry that can close and devastate all other businesses? I don’t think so,” he said. “It’s pretty simple math, right? 1%. 99%.”

A Broader, Deeper View

Tony Cordiero, an Indigenous representative on the board of Sacred Places Institute for Indigenous Peoples, shifted focus to a broader perspective: “The perspective of those of us who have called this coast our home since time immemorial.”

While it’s true the coast is “a source of sustenance and livelihoods … a place to recreate and to find respite from our hectic and stressful lives,” she said, “To us, it is much more than that. It is a vital part of our homelands, and all of its inhabitants are our relatives. They are part of our family. They make us whole. Our circle is not complete without them. And the ocean provides for us as a mother provides for her children.”

And Marcela Gutierrez Groudin, a board member at the State Coastal Conservancy, spoke to the history of how Californians have protected the coast.

“Our governance programs in California that have been around for 50 years take beautiful intentions and beautiful words into everyday reality,” she said. “We do this while burgeoning and supporting one of the most important economies in the world, a $50 billion economy. This is the California that we know. This is what we need to expand and grow further,” she said. “California’s coast is for the people, not for crony capitalism.”

The coast is “an essential part of what it means to be a Californian,” Orange County Rep. David Min noted, and not just for those who live on it. “When I talk to folks from all over California, including in the Inland Empire in places like Corona and Riverside, they all have a beach that they identify as their own. That’s part of what we are as Californians. It’s why access to the coastline and to our beaches is part of our constitution.”

In the end, he said, “It’s not lost on me that Republicans like to talk about states’ rights and local control, until it comes to California and our coastline here. So, I’m asking the folks in NOAA, please respect the will of California’s voters. Protect states’ rights. Let local control govern. Stop this rigged review.”

“As the crook in the White House continues to bribe energy companies with taxpayer dollars to terminate offshore wind projects, including one off the central coast to reinvest those funds into fossil fuels, we’re going to continue to stand up and we’re going to continue to fight back,” Barragán said. And she promised that when Democrats get power back in November, “We’re gonna hold those crooks accountable. And we’ll continue to fight.”

Left/“Socialist” Surge Expands In Midwest, Despite Corporate Media Spin

“‘Socialism’ is a scare word they have hurled at every advance the people have made in the last 20 years. ‘Socialism’ is what they called public power. ‘Socialism’ is what they called Social Security. ‘Socialism’ is what they called farm price supports. ‘Socialism’ is what they called bank deposit insurance. ‘Socialism’ is what they called the growth of free and independent labor organizations. ‘Socialism’ is their name for almost anything that helps all the people.” —President Harry Truman, Oct 10, 1952

Working class people should be first in government.” —Francesca Hong, defining what “democratic socialist” means, Aug 11, 2026

Peggy Flanagan’s landslide win over a much better-funded centrist in Minnesota’s US Senate primary, along with Francesca Hong’s razor-thin loss in the Wisconsin Governor primary, is further evidence of a growing leftward, “socialist” shift in Democratic politics, spreading well beyond New York City, where it was supposedly limited to, according to the corporate media.

What’s more, the intra-party focus misses the larger picture of the entire electorate shifting left, as red states like Kansas, Nebraska, Iowa, Ohio, Texas, Alaska and even South Carolina show neck-and-neck Senate races underway. And Democratic primary turnout has dwarfed the GOP, breaking records in some states.

While the New York Times headline read, “A Stunning Loss in Wisconsin Shows the Limits of the Left,” the reality on the ground was quite different—perhaps even the opposite—as Hong is arguably now the frontrunner for the 2028 US Senate race to unseat Ron Johnson. And Flanagan—backed by Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Ilhan Omar—appears to be a shoo-in for Senate this year.

Hong was a state legislator, just as Zorhan Mamdani was, running for governor, not mayor, and without the impressive big name endorsements he (or Flanagan) had. She was a self-described “wild-card” candidate. For comparison, imagine if Mike Gipson, Josh Lowenthal, or Al Muratsuchi were to run for governor and lose the primary by a few thousand votes. Would that seem like a defeat to you, or more like an unbelievable miracle?

Hong clearly inclined toward the latter.

“The last 11 months have been one of the greatest joys of my life,” she wrote on social media the morning after, in a brief message where she congratulated Crowley and pledged to support him to defeat the GOP nominee, election-denier Congressman Tom Tiffany.

“This campaign was not about getting one person into office,” Hong went on to say. “It is about building a movement for permanent affordability and a government that puts working people first. Our movement is strong, and the work isn’t done. I am overwhelmingly proud of our team and the work they have done to achieve that goal.”

As if to confirm what she was saying, Crowley almost echoed her.

“For the past few months, you’ve heard a lot of people try to define this election as a battle between the left and the center, between progressives and the establishment, between insiders and outsiders,” he said. “That narrative misses the entire point of what we’re doing. Because when I traveled across Wisconsin, I didn’t meet people who introduced themselves that way.”

“I met parents wondering how they’ll afford childcare,” he continued. “I met workers who want wages that keep up with the pace of living. I met farmers trying to preserve family traditions. I met small business owners trying to keep their doors open. And I met seniors who deserve security and dignity after a lifetime of work. I met young people who simply want a fair chance to build a life right here in this great state we call Wisconsin.”

In his campaign, Crowley promised to push for building more housing, improving the health care system and raise the state wage to $20/hr from the current $7.25 by 2030—an agenda that’s clearly better characterized as “progressive,” rather than “centrist,” as the corporate media would want you to believe.

In turn, Hong had no difficulty in enthusiastically supporting Crowley after he won, joining him in a unity rally the day after election day, and campaigning with him afterwards—hardly the sign of a bitter factional fight.

Hong’s loss by less than four thousand votes meant that any number of things could have made the difference, but one of them, repeated constantly by voters, was fear that she couldn’t win—which had nothing to do with support for her or her agenda. Rather, it was based on the out-of-date notion that more moderate candidates do better, along with past statements that could be used against her which surfaced in the campaign’s last days.

One example is that she once said she thought we should cancel Thanksgiving. But when asked if she was prepared for attacks framing her as far too extreme, Hong effortlessly shifted focus from the symbolic to the real, attacking the GOP nominee for his record:

What’s extreme is Congressman Tiffany, a longtime DC congressman, has voted against the interests of Wisconsinites over and over again. What’s extreme is that he is an election denier. What’s extreme is he continues to protect Epstein and pedophiles. What’s extreme is that he has voted to help raise gas prices and make life harder for Wisconsinites.

In contrast, Flanagan, whose ancestry is both Irish and Indigenous has shared Thanksgiving recipes in the past. She’s a member of the White Earth Nation of Ojibwe, and her Ojibwe name, as she always introduces herself, is Gizhiiwewidamikwe — “speaks in a loud and clear voice woman.”

Rather than facilely contrast them in static opposition, one should see them both reflecting ongoing dialogues that enrich us, and should welcome, institutionally within the Democratic Party, and culturally throughout America. They both represent a politics of listening to and representing people, while fighting against the power of concentrated wealth.

And while Flanagan didn’t identify herself as a Democratic socialist, she got her start in politics working for Senator Paul Wellstone, who did, long before it had its current visibility. She began working on his campaign while in college, and later joined Wellstone Action as a trainer of activists, organizers, and candidates to carry his legacy. She may not share the label, but she’s shared the work on common goals. And she may have served as Lt. Governor, but that didn’t really make her part of the establishment. The campaign spending figures show that: she was outspent about 3-1, but won by almost 20%, due to her grassroots campaign.

As the primary season nears its end, “What we’re seeing across the country, including in Los Angeles, is that voters are fed up with the political establishment,” Nithya Raman campaign spokeswoman Liz Garcia said. “That’s exactly why Nithya Raman is running against the current mayor, who has shown time and time again that she is beholden to corporations and special interests. In June, Nithya proved that campaigns win when people see city government as a tool to bring about the change, and we’re just getting started.”

Whether Raman wins or loses, there is no question she’s part of something much larger, including people with different labels who have much more that unites them than the labels might suggest. And this election cycle, at least, the voters seem to recognize that.