Friday, September 26, 2025
spot_img
spot_img
Home Blog Page 11

Build For a General Strike!

 

Workers have the power to shut down production and the profit pipeline of the billionaire class; labor and community united can stop Trump’s march toward war and fascism.

Freedom Socialist newspaper, Vol. 46, No. 4, August to September 2025,

socialism.com

By Linda Averill

The U.S. working class is in motion. In the time from January to July, weekend protests by thousands of people have ballooned into massive marches of millions.

And in cities from Los Angeles to New York, flash points are causing sparks to fly and spread.

Unions are starting to bring their discipline and weight to battles over free speech, immigration, federal workforce cuts and more. This was evident when the California president of Service Employees International Union (SEIU), David Huerta, was arrested during workplace raids by agents of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Labor’s response was swift and strong. (See “Los Angeles ignites: from raids to resistance” at socialism.com.)

But mass protests alone won’t stop Donald Trump’s wrecking ball. Neither can the courts, where all roads lead to the Supremes. And Congress is part of the problem.

While U.S. capitalism rapidly devolves, ordinary working-class folks won’t stand by as critical programs and services get the DOGE. People want to know what is next. What will reverse this descent into austerity and war or fascism?

Historically in such times of crisis, workers have turned to their greatest power, by withholding their labor in mass strikes. And this is what is needed now.

 

Workers’ greatest power

A general strike involves shutting down many industries, public and private, from transportation to finance. It can include workers running essential services for public benefit. Such strikes are typically started by unions but joined by the vast majority of workers — unionized or not. Students and community, families, neighbors and the unemployed also play a pivotal role.

History shows how one struggle can widen. This happened in 1934, when dockworkers in San Francisco/Oakland were attacked by police. The whole labor movement responded with a citywide strike.

General strikes can last one day or many. From 2019 to 2021, India, France and Haiti were all rocked by work stoppages to protest spiraling prices and attacks on labor and civil rights.

Walkouts can evolve into a struggle for workers’ power as happened in the Russian Revolution. Or they can force reforms as labor did in the U.S. during the 1930s through general and sit-down strikes. This led to the National Labor Relations Act and birth of the modern U.S. labor movement.

In 2025 U.S. workers have come full circle. Decades of reliance upon the Democratic Party and capitalist labor laws have weakened labor’s muscle.

But Trump’s juggernaut is awakening a sleeping giant; the mood is warming toward strikes, and even the possibility of initiating a labor party.

 

Don’t mourn, organize

Organizing for a general strike is a concrete next step that workers can take to push back against imperialist war and encroaching fascism. It’s also a way to build solidarity and class consciousness for the battles that assuredly lie ahead.

To gain traction requires support from some international unions or high-profile leaders. Sara Nelson, president of the Association of Flight Attendants (AFA-CWA), is one North Star. In March, she declared the labor movement has “very few options but to join together to organize for a general strike.”

Nelson’s call was in response to the Department of Homeland Security stripping workers in the Transportation Safety Administration of their collective bargaining rights.

Rank-and-filers can amplify her urgent appeal by bringing resolutions to their unions, and to county and state labor councils to coordinate solidarity.

Members can ask their unions to establish education committees; coordinate workplace trainings on how to defend coworkers during ICE raids; and mobilize members for labor and community protests.

Labor organizations can be urged to form united fronts for mutual defense of unions and communities that are under attack, including immigrant workers, refugees, communities of color, public-worker unions, women and transgender people.

Forming caucuses within unions is a great way for rank-and-filers to organize and educate on the shop floor. For example, Purple for Palestine, a national caucus within SEIU, has moved the international union on support for Palestine. Through uniting around a program, caucuses can amplify ideas and demands by distributing educational statements, organizing for union meetings, developing strategies to win over coworkers, and defending free speech.

 

Crisis brings opportunity

The Democratic Party has served as a conservatizing brake on labor. This pattern was on full display in 2022, when former President Joe Biden blocked a national railroad strike. But this summer, two labor leaders resigned from the Democratic National Committee. American Federation of Teachers (AFT) President Randi Weingarten left the DNC on June 5. President Lee Saunders of the 1.3-million-member public-sector American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) called his departure a move to meet the urgency of the moment. “These are new times. They demand new strategies, new thinking, and a renewed way of fighting for the values we hold dear,” he said.

This new independence could open opportunities for labor bodies to initiate town halls or assemblies where workers and unions can discuss how to build labor’s power, including through strikes and independent political action.

 

Shut it down!

At every level, from rural towns to big urban areas, workers are demonstrating a readiness to leap forward. Associations of gig drivers are contesting the power of companies like Uber and Lyft. Baristas are taking on Starbucks. Unionized grocery workers are preparing to strike their giant employers. Federal workers are uniting across unions to defend their jobs and stop privatization.

In Washington state, Organized Workers for Labor Solidarity (OWLS) is campaigning for a general strike. One member of the cross-union labor group has worked with others in her local to send a resolution from Office and Professional Employees Local 8 to the Washington State Labor Council 2025 Convention. It calls for labor and progressive forces to “take whatever actions are necessary up to and including a general strike to protect free speech, all workers’ rights, our democracy and the Constitution.”

Labor has the power to turn the tide in its favor. As sung in the beloved union anthem Solidarity Forever:In our hands is placed a power greater than their hoarded gold, greater than the might of armies, multiplied a thousand-fold.” There’s no time to waste.

 

SAMPLE RESOLUTION

Mobilize to defend workers under attack

This sample resolution developed by Freedom Socialist Party labor activists can be brought to unions and other worker and community organizations to help build momentum for a general strike. Groups can adapt it to fit their own or changing circumstances. Please share your results, news or feedback by emailing FSPus@socialism.com.

Whereas the Trump administration and its billionaire backers are waging unprecedented assaults on the working class, such as laying off federal workers and cutting back public services; gutting the National Labor Relations Board and collective bargaining rights; conducting ICE raids and mass detentions of immigrant workers, including union organizers; arresting critics; and deploying the military against protesters in Los Angeles; and

Whereas Congress and the courts have proven incapable or unwilling to defend workers’ rights, free speech and basic democratic institutions; and

Whereas it is time to build united fronts of unions and community groups to defend those under attack, including immigrant workers, refugees, communities of color, public employee unions, women, and transgender people; and

Whereas workers joining together to withhold their labor is a greater power than the political machinations of any aspiring despot, and, as Association of Flight Attendants President Sara Nelson has said, workers “have very few options but to join together to organize for a general strike”;

Be it therefore resolved that (insert organization) will support the call for a general strike; and

Be it further resolved that (organization) will form an action committee to prepare members for a general strike; coordinate worksite trainings on how to defend coworkers during ICE raids; and mobilize members to participate in labor and community rallies and actions; and

Be it finally resolved that (organization) will advocate for a general strike by taking this call to affiliates and labor councils, and urging the AFL-CIO to organize for a general strike.

Op-Ed: The Inverted Stars and Stripes: A Signal of Distress, Not Disrespect

0

 

By Dr. Lawrence J. Gist II, Esq.

In the quiet morning haze of a divided America, an upside-down U.S. flag flapping in the wind is jarring, even offensive to some. To others, it is the only truthful symbol left — a distress call from a republic strained by division, misinformation, and a loss of faith in its foundational systems. And as difficult as it may be to accept, flying the flag upside down may now be an entirely appropriate gesture — not out of contempt, but as an urgent SOS from within.

According to the United States Flag Code (36 U.S.C. § 176), an inverted flag is a signal of “dire distress in instances of extreme danger to life or property.” For decades, Americans have associated that gesture with sinking ships, lost hikers, and wartime emergencies. But in 2025, should we not ask: What qualifies as extreme danger if not the slow, choking fracture of our democracy?

The U.S. is not at peace with itself. Partisan media has replaced public discourse. Facts have lost ground to feelings. Courts are politicized, elections are doubted, and legislation often resembles performance art more than governance. When truth is no longer agreed upon and the shared civic culture that once bound red and blue together has frayed into tribal chaos, we must admit we are in distress — culturally, institutionally, and spiritually.

Flying the flag upside down is not a rejection of America — it is an appeal to her conscience. It is not a call to burn the Constitution, but to remember it. It is not anti-veteran, but a plea to honor the sacrifices made in the name of a functioning republic, not just an aesthetic one. Just as a lifeguard waves a red flag to signal danger, Americans who invert their flag are signaling a nation in peril.

Some will say it’s disrespectful. That is fair — they are entitled to that feeling. But perhaps we should also ask: what is more disrespectful — the symbolic flipping of cloth, or the slow corrosion of democratic norms? When elected officials openly flirt with authoritarian rhetoric, when violent conspiracy theorists are welcomed into mainstream discourse, and when millions are convinced the system is rigged regardless of evidence, it becomes clear that we’re not merely in political disagreement — we are in institutional distress.

If ever there were a time to heed the Flag Code’s exception for “extreme danger,” it is now. The upside-down flag is not a partisan act. It is not left or right. It is not red or blue. It is the signal of a republic that still breathes but is struggling to remember how to stand.

Symbols matter. And when used with intent and reverence, they can cut through noise like no speech ever could. The inverted flag is one such symbol. We must not ignore it, mock it, or criminalize it. We must listen to what it tells us about the state of our union.

Because if America is not in distress now — then what, truly, would qualify?

Why Lelo Juarez Chose Self-Deportation

How the current conditions of immigrant detention and Trump Administration policies impelled a farmworker organizer to return to Mexico.

When I spoke with Alfredo Juarez Zeferino, known as “Lelo,” while he was imprisoned in the Northwest Detention Center in Tacoma, Washington, he had to be very careful about what he said. Calls to detainees are monitored. “My freedom of speech here is very limited,” he warned me. Lelo had been held there since his detention in March, and I interviewed him in July.

Two weeks after our conversation, Lelo agreed to “voluntary departure” — the term used by immigration authorities for self-deportation. In early August, by telephone from Santa Cruz Yucucani, his hometown in the southern Mexican state of Guerrero, he was able to describe the conditions in this enormous immigrant detention center, which today holds more than 1,500 people awaiting deportation.

“It’s a really terrible place,” Lelo told me. He said bad food was probably the worst problem: The Geo Group, a private corporation that runs the detention center, is supposed to provide three meals a day, but often the last meal would come at one or two in the morning. “The rice was hard, like it never touched hot water, and the beans were never cooked all the way,” Lelo said. “That was the main food they gave us. Chicken was so undercooked that sometimes it dripped blood, and people got sick during the night. One time, everybody turned in their trays and we wouldn’t take the food.”

The second week he was there, Lelo started having vision problems because the lights were always on at night, making it hard to sleep. He signed up for the “sick call” list to get eye drops. “I waited a long time to see a doctor,” he recalled, “and finally an officer told us to go back to our unit. They only had one doctor, and we weren’t going to be seen. After that I didn’t sign up again, but other folks in my unit would wait hours and hours and still not get seen. I’d share an apple or something sweet for people who were diabetic. But day after day it was the same thing. Sign up and maybe tomorrow somebody will see you.”

The Tacoma immigrant detention center is run by the Geo Group, founded as a division of the Wackenhut Corporation, with ties to U.S. intelligence agencies going back to the Cold War. Since discovering in the 1980s the huge profits to be made in federal contracts, the company has become one of the two largest corporations running immigrant detention centers in the United States. Much of those profits are earned by keeping operating costs at a minimum; as a result Geo has been repeatedly charged with short staffing at the prisons it runs. “Geo does this on purpose to make it hard for folks, while maximizing their profit by not having more employees,” Lelo said. Bad conditions serve to coerce people detained at the Northwest Detention Center into self-deportation.

Self-deportation is an important arm of the Trump administration’s immigration policy. According to Mark Krikorian, executive director of the anti-immigrant Center for Immigration Studies, “Any successful strategy to cut the illegal population significantly will have to combine two things: ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] arresting and removing illegal aliens, and other illegal aliens leaving on their own. … Preliminary data suggest nearly one million illegal aliens have departed the country since President Donald Trump’s Inauguration.”

That number is highly questionable, and the center provides no data to support it. It is undeniable, however, that the government is pressuring people to self-deport. Fear of deportation and family separation, as well as hopelessness about any prospect for legal status, has led many people to leave the United States.

In a highly-publicized immigration raid at Glass House Farms on California’s central coast, chaos and fear were deliberately used as weapons to terrorize workers and their families. One man, Jaime Alaniz Garcia, fell to his death desperately fleeing ICE agents. The terror produced by the raids is also a weapon to get people to leave on their own. Gregory Bovino, a Border Patrol official in charge of the Southern California region, responded to criticism of the Glass House raid. “Illegal aliens had the opportunity to self deport,” he said. “Now we’ll help things along a bit.”

“They are trying all they can to get folks out of the country,” Lelo said, “whether through deportation or asking folks to self deport.” Inside the Tacoma detention center, ICE agents took another tactic. “They went to my unit three times, saying that if people gave up their right to fight their case and self-deported, they’d send them $1,000 after 60 days. People got really mad because a lot have lived here for many years. We have families and we’re part of the community. What is $1,000 compared to 20 years of your life?”

Nevertheless, the constant pressure took its toll on his family, and eventually on Lelo himself. In early March, his family decided to return to their hometown, Santa Cruz Yucucani. At that point, Lelo had not yet been detained. Later, as he languished inside, he described their reasons.

“It was a hard decision because my parents had lived in Washington for 18 years,” he explained. “My siblings were born in the United States. They were going to school there. All their friends are there. But as we saw ICE begin to round up more and more folks, we did not want to put my family through the trauma of separation. So we decided they would leave, which they did on March 16 from Santa Maria, [California, a town from which many people leave to go back to Mexico] on the bus. It’s hard to describe the feeling. We always had this plan for my siblings to go to school and have a better life, more opportunity than my parents had. It was like we had to start all over again.”

Then, on March 25, as he was driving his compañera to work in the tulip fields of the Washington Bulb Company, in the Skagit Valley north of Seattle, he was stopped by immigration agents. When he asked for a warrant, they broke the car window and dragged him out. Within hours he was in the Tacoma Northwest Detention Center, and in line for a flight back to Mexico. Only a wave of public outrage, including calls from U.S. Rep. Rick Larson, Democrat of Washington, and Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson, also a Democrat, kept him from being loaded onto a deportation plane.

Those protests acknowledged that Lelo’s arrest was not random. ICE later said he had been detained because of an earlier deportation order, but Lelo called the charge a pretext. “Before my detention, I had no idea that there was a removal order for me from 2017, under the first Trump Administration. If they’d really wanted to remove me, they could have, but they didn’t. They waited until Trump was president again to go after me. I was never given the opportunity to respond or fully defend myself. There was never any due process.”

Lelo was targeted because of his history as a farmworker organizer. He was a cofounder of Washington’s new union, Familias Unidas por la Justicia, and helped organize many of the campaigns by Community to Community, the state’s advocate for agricultural workers. One of these was for a cap on rents, and another for the Keep Washington Working Act to protect the rights of farmworkers.

But it was his public criticism of the H-2A contract labor program that earned Lelo the greatest hostility among growers. That program allows growers to recruit workers in Mexico for a season’s work, after which they must return. Workers are very vulnerable, and can be fired and blacklisted for organizing, or simply for failing to meet production quotas. Almost one-third of farmworkers in Washington state have now been replaced by contractors using the H-2A program.

“Growers like WAFLA [the Washington Farm Labor Association — a large labor contractor] know me very well,” he recalled, “and were very upset at our opposition to the H-2A program. I would talk to local workers about losing jobs because of it, and to the H-2A workers themselves when they called to report abuses. That made me a big target. But I don’t regret anything I’ve done. It was all supporting workers.”

In the end, however, months in detention took their toll. In mid-July, Lelo decided to leave the country voluntarily. He and many others faced the same situation, worn down by the impact of dehumanizing conditions and hopelessness for any solution to their cases. “It’s very hard to bring legal cases from within this place,” he explained during our conversation while he was still in Tacoma. “There are many people here and they’re all losing [their cases] and getting deported. Two people even won their cases, and they’re going to be deported anyway. A lot of people here have legal status. They have good jobs. They’ve been paying taxes for many years. But at the end of their last hearing, they get removed from the country anyway.”

In that sense, Lelo’s case was no different. “Winning from within just doesn’t seem possible,” he said. “Even if I went through all the legal steps and had a decision in my favor, there is no guarantee I will be released after that. Signing the voluntary departure is the only option I have.”

At the end of the ordeal, however, Lelo found himself in Santa Cruz Yucucani, an Indigenous Mixtec community that he only remembered as a child, but which still remembered him. “I went to town a couple of days ago and people recognized me and invited me to eat,” he told me. “I’ve had a lot of really good food here. There are other families in Santa Cruz that have come back as well, and folks are excited that we’re back.”

Lelo’s family are farmers, and on his return he began going out to the fields with his father and grandfather, where they plant corn, green beans, pumpkins and bananas. “My grandpa sells a little bit of it, but it’s mostly just for the family. We clean the fields and take care of the crops.”

As a union organizer of farmworkers in the United States who labors for wages in industrial agriculture, it has been a revelatory experience. “The big difference is that here we don’t work for anybody, because the fields belong to the family,” he says. “We can take a break whenever we want, and when it gets hot we just go find shade. It’s a huge change from being a farmworker working for a boss.”

But he doesn’t forget the union and the community from which he was taken by force. “I haven’t stopped feeling part of an immigrant community that’s trying to defend itself. As a farmworker, it’s heartbreaking to see pictures of the military chasing us in the fields. We’ve never been able to legalize, and now we have to leave. It’s not right. People have to pay attention to what’s happening and speak up. Don’t look the other way.”

In the meantime, though, Lelo simply has to live. “Tomorrow I’m going to the banana field. It’s going to be the first time in 18 years,” he says.

A former union organizer for thirty years, David Bacon’s photo essays and stories seek to capture the courage of people struggling for social and economic justice in countries around the world.

A Return to Patronage

 

How Civil Service Gains Are Being Rolled Back a Century Later

On his first day back in office, the felon occupying the Oval Office symbolically declared war on labor and the middle class by reviving Schedule F, an executive order he first issued at the end of his initial term. The measure stripped civil service protections from tens of thousands of policy-influencing federal employees, making them “at-will” and easier to fire. This time, the Office of Personnel Management formally proposed rules to reclassify 50,000 federal workers.

Also on Jan. 20, 2025, he imposed a hiring freeze that halted nearly all federal civilian hiring. The freeze has since been extended twice and now runs through Oct. 15, with only limited exemptions for national security and public safety roles. A July memorandum further required that new hires receive approval from agency leadership — typically political appointees — centralizing control of the civil service.

That same day, he issued Executive Order 14151, mandating the immediate termination of all federal Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accessibility programs. Employees in those roles were placed on leave, DEI offices were eliminated, public materials removed and grant funding canceled. Separate orders rolled back affirmative action requirements for federal contractors and banned consideration of race, sex or gender in hiring, calling such practices “radical and wasteful.”

By day five, he fired 17 inspectors general, watchdog officials charged with rooting out fraud and abuse. The “Friday-night purge,” as it came to be known, disrupted oversight and likely violated statutory protections.

On day 29, Executive Order 14215 required independent agencies to submit major regulations to the White House and to follow legal interpretations issued by the president or attorney general — further eroding their autonomy.

The Office of Personnel Management estimated that 300,000 federal workers — about 12.5% of the workforce — would leave or be dismissed in 2025 as part of a sweeping downsizing initiative. At the IRS, one-quarter of the workforce departed amid politically motivated restructuring, while three senior executives were dismissed.

An OPM memo recommended reclassifying Chief Human Capital Officer positions from career-reserved to more politicized “SES general,” allowing political appointees to fill them and move against career officials deemed disloyal.

The Department of Education cut staff and resources in its Office for Civil Rights, closing regional offices and prioritizing investigations that cast diversity efforts as unfair advantages, while complaints from marginalized students went unresolved.

Changes to the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program penalized public service workers if their employers engaged in “illegal” activities, such as supporting transgender youth — putting teachers, nurses and social workers at risk of losing benefits.

The commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Erika McEntarfer, was removed after releasing jobs data that did not align with the administration’s narrative, raising fears of politicized manipulation of economic reporting. At Yosemite National Park, a scientist was fired in another move seen as politically motivated retaliation against conservation work, threatening public service missions.

Not since the dawn of the 20th century, before the civil service system was fully established, have government jobs been dispensed this way.

A 1913 series in the San Pedro News Pilot told the story of Peter Pearce, a respected janitor who lost his city hall position after more than three years when the Los Angeles Civil Service Commission barred him from taking the janitorial exam, citing his age. Pearce, who had migrated from Guernsey in the Channel Islands with his wife Alice around 1884, was by then a pioneer San Pedran. His removal was linked to patronage politics that rewarded allies with government jobs.

Civil service reforms, beginning with the Pendleton Act of 1883, were designed to prevent such abuses. Age limits and merit exams were originally intended to ensure competence, maturity, and reliability, and to curb patronage systems that privileged loyalty to party over public service.

Now, more than a century later, history threatens to repeat itself.

Fortunately, pro-labor movements have stepped up the fight. Federal worker unions such as the American Federation of Government Employees, the National Treasury Employees Union and AFL-CIO affiliates have filed lawsuits challenging the executive orders and lobbied allies in Congress to block or defund anti-worker policies.

Unions and labor coalitions have justifiably framed these attacks on the civil service as a threat to democracy, warning that politicizing the workforce undermines stability and fairness. They have launched media campaigns highlighting federal workers’ roles during crises such as the pandemic response, natural disasters and veterans’ care.

Labor organizers are also working with civil rights, environmental and good-government groups to argue that undermining the civil service system damages not only workers, but also public accountability.

Political action committees and grassroots groups are targeting pro-management candidates in elections and backing pro-labor challengers, especially in swing districts. They use union scorecards to mobilize members and families against lawmakers supporting rollbacks of civil service protections.

Federal employee unions have organized days of action, rallies and informational pickets at agencies such as the Department of Veterans Affairs, IRS, and Social Security Administration. While federal workers face legal limits on striking, they have used demonstrations, petitions and “work-to-rule” tactics to resist changes.

The stakes are clear: if the civil service falls, so does the principle that government exists to serve the public, not a party or a president.

Hahn Calls on Congress to Act on Gun Violence

 

LOS ANGELES Los Angeles County Supervisor Janice Aug. 27 issued a statement urging Congress to pass gun violence prevention legislation after a shooting Wednesday morning during Mass at a Minneapolis Catholic school, killing two children and injuring 17 other people.

“The American people have had enough thoughts and prayers from politicians,” said Hahn in a social media post. “These children were literally in Mass when they were murdered. Congress has the power to act on gun violence—what’s missing is the courage.”

School Threat Assessment Response Team

Hahn is also raising awareness about LA County’s School Threat Assessment Response Team or START as the school year gets underway in Los Angeles County.

START is a team of county mental health professionals who partner with local law enforcement to respond to calls about possible threats against schools across the county. The aim is to intervene before a threat of school violence becomes a reality.

“Whether you are a parent or a student and you hear something that doesn’t sound right, I urge you to contact START,” said Supervisor Hahn. “Specially trained County mental health professionals and their law enforcement partners will respond quickly, make sure to keep people out of danger, and get the person in crisis the help they need.”

Hahn has led an effort on the board to expand the START program to allow professionals to more quickly respond to any reported threats against schools or students. In 2023, Hahn worked with the Department of Mental Health to launch a countywide ad campaign aimed at educating young people about how to report a school threat to START.

Teachers, school administrators, parents, and students who have experienced or witnessed an actual or implied threat of school violence, are urged to contact the START program by calling 213-739-5565 or emailing START@dmh.lacounty.gov.

Details: https://dmh.lacounty.gov/start-youth

Open Call: Art Exhibit to Explore Life in Long Beach

 

The Long Beach Creative Group announces an open call for artists to submit work that relates to, represents, or challenges the idea of Long Beach. The exhibition, titled Long Beach Vibez, was proposed by Michael Biagiotti, who will serve as one of three jurors. Submissions are currently open, and will be accepted through Sept. 3 at 10 p.m.

The exhibition will open on Oct. 11 and run through Nov. 15 in the Rod Briggs Gallery.

“Long Beach is a gritty city by the sea that’s unapologetically authentic,” Biagiotti said. “Our city has many faces, and with this show I want to capture both the diversity and the common thread that unites us.”

Long Beach Creative Group board president Travis Stock-Tucker agrees. “Long Beach isn’t just a backdrop,” he said. “It’s the main character in thousands of untold stories. I really hope to see historic icons, tattoo culture, beach life, urban landscapes, the food scene, and the vibrant global intersections represented in the works that artists submit,” Stock-Tucker continued.

Original works of art in the following media are welcome: sculpture and assemblage; paintings, drawings, and collage; photographs, digital art, or videos; and printmaking. All work must have been produced within the last five years and may not exceed 36 inches in any dimension, including the frame. Work produced or significantly altered by AI is not being accepted for this show.

To submit work, visit: https://artist.callforentry.org/festivals_unique_info.php?ID=15801

During exhibits, the gallery is open to the public. No appointment is required.

facebook.com/LongBeachCreativeGroup, and on IG @LongBeachCreativeGroup.

Time: 1 to 4pm Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, Oct 11 to Nov. 15

Cost: Free

Details: LongBeachCreativeGroup.org

Venue: Rod Briggs Gallery, 2221 E Broadway in Long Beach

Nature Enthusiasts, Join the Los Serenos de Point Vicente Open House, Sept. 3

 

Calling all nature lovers.

Los Serenos de Point Vicente is hosting an open house, Sept. 3, to introduce community members to how they can become and participate as volunteer docents. Los Serenos de Point Vicente is in search of adults who are eager to learn about the local geology, flora and fauna, and history, and share their knowledge with museum visitors.

The open house will be held at the Point Vicente Interpretive Center at 7 pm.

Membership is open to those interested in learning about the nature and history of the local area and sharing this knowledge by conducting tours of the Point Vicente Interpretive Center and various trails scattered on the Palos Verdes Peninsula.

A full description of docent duties and responsibilities is available here :

www.losserenosrpv.org/become-a-docent

The 501(c)(3) non-profit organization Los Serenos de Point Vicente has assisted and supported the City of Rancho Palos Verdes’ objectives for the Point Vicente Interpretive Center since 1984. It operates various educational programs for children between 2 and 18 years of age. It also provides learning opportunities for the general public through monthly docent guided nature walks which are held at Abalone Cove Shoreline Park, Forrestal Nature Preserve/Ladera Linda Community Center, the Trails at Ocean Trails Nature Reserve and Alta Vicente Nature Reserve. Los Serenos de Point Vicente docents and volunteers provide interpretive and educational services to the community regarding the unique features and natural and cultural history of the Palos Verdes Peninsula, and the migrating Gray whales that could be easily viewed from the Center’s outstanding vantage point by the Center’s many visitors.

Time: 7 p.m., Sept. 3

Cost: Free

Details: www.losserenosrpv.org/become-a-docent/

Venue: Point Vicente Interpretive Center, 31501 Palos Verdes Dr W, Rancho Palos Verdes

A Targeted Reform to Protect California Communities

0

By: Marcel Rodart

In California, we pride ourselves on second chances. Our system of post-release community supervision (PRCS) reflects that value, giving those leaving state prison an opportunity to reintegrate into society under local supervision. But compassion must be balanced with accountability. When individuals repeatedly violate the terms of their release—committing new crimes while on supervision—our communities are put at risk.

We learned this in the most painful way possible in 2017, when Whittier Police Officer Keith Boyer was killed while responding to what should have been a routine traffic collision. His killer, Michael Mejia, was on PRCS in Los Angeles County. Mejia’s time under supervision was marked by defiance and escalating danger. He had multiple violations, repeated “flash” incarcerations, and committed new crimes. After his third violation, probation sought to revoke his PRCS, recommending 90 days in jail plus mandatory treatment. But during plea negotiations, the custodial time was cut to 30 days in jail, with no treatment, and without probation’s input. He served just 10 days. A week after his release, Mejia murdered his cousin and Officer Boyer.

This sequence revealed a dangerous flaw in the law: repeated violations, even when accompanied by new crimes, don’t automatically require a revocation of supervision. SB 759, authored by Senator Archuleta, fixes that flaw.

SB 759 sets a clear and consistent standard: after a third violation that involves a new misdemeanor or felony, the supervising county agency must petition the court to revoke, modify, or terminate PRCS. This is not about eliminating intermediate sanctions—short jail stays and treatment programs remain available for first and second violations. But at the third violation, a clear standard applies.

The wisdom of that approach is reinforced by California’s own criminal justice research. A 2017 analysis prepared for the American Probation and Parole Association found that more than half of individuals on post-release community supervision (PRCS) in California were booked into jail at least once during their first year, and more than a quarter were booked two or more times. Probation experts agree these high-frequency violators account for a disproportionate share of public safety risks. Incarcerating low-frequency violators is neither cost-effective nor necessary—but when a supervisee’s record shows a pattern of serious or repeated noncompliance, stronger action is warranted. SB 759 follows that evidence by focusing on the number of individuals who persistently defy the rules and endanger the community, rather than sweeping in those who make a single mistake.

This is also in line with the “swift, certain, and proportional” model of sanctions proven to be most effective. Flash incarceration was designed for quick responses to violations, creating certainty of consequence. SB 759 extends that same certainty to the point where someone has repeatedly chosen to disregard the law and the terms of their release. When that point is reached, the question becomes not whether the system should act, but how quickly.

The tragedy in Whittier shows what happens when that certainty is missing. Each decision to reduce consequences for Mejia left him more emboldened and the public less safe. SB 759 ensures that the warning signs are not ignored a fourth time, in Whittier or anywhere else in California.

This is not a return to blanket “tough on crime” policies. It is a targeted, evidence-based reform aimed squarely at the individuals who have demonstrated—through repeated violations and new criminal conduct—that they are unwilling or unable to comply. Those who take the opportunity for rehabilitation seriously will still have access to support, resources, and a fair chance to succeed. But those who continually endanger others will face consistent, decisive consequences.

For Officer Boyer, for the victims we can still protect, and for the safety of neighborhoods across California, the Legislature should pass SB 759. It is a measured, common-sense step to ensure that our compassion does not come at the expense of public safety.

Marcel Rodarte is the Executive Director of California Contract Cities Association (CCCA), an organization representing over 80 cities throughout Los Angeles County and the Inland Empire.

Pier B Rail Facility Project Update Meeting Set for Sept. 3

 

The Pier B On-Dock Rail Support Facility project team will update the public on the status of the Port of Long Beach project during a virtual community meeting at 10 a.m., Sept. 3.

Click here to register: https://tinyurl.com/Pier-B-mtg

Join this virtual meeting from a computer, phone and other mobile devices. A recording of the meeting will be posted at www.polb.com/PierB for those unable to participate. Requests for translation must be received by Aug. 27. Contact Veronica Morales at 562-283-7722 or veronica.morales@polb.com for translation or assistance registering for the event. Comuníquese con Veronica Morales al 562-283-7722 o veronica.morales@polb.com antes del miércoles 27 de agosto para obtener servicios de interpretación o asistencia con el registro.

The planned Pier B On-Dock Rail Support Facility is the centerpiece of the Port of Long Beach’s rail capital improvement program. It will shift more cargo to “on-dock rail,” where containers are taken to and from marine terminals by trains. Moving cargo by on-dock rail is cleaner and more efficient, as it reduces truck traffic. No cargo trucks would visit the facility.

The facility will be built in phases and as each is completed, they will enhance capacity and operations. The project began construction in 2024 and completion of the entire project is expected in 2032. View the project fact sheet and more information at the project page at: https://tinyurl.com/Pier-B-Dock-Rail

Details: www.polb.com/environment.

Senators Announce Over $158 Million to Bolster California Airport Infrastructure

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senators Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff (both D-Calif.) Aug. 21 announced that 72 California airports were awarded a combined $158.4 million in grant funding from the Federal Aviation Administration or FAA to bolster aviation infrastructure. The funding comes primarily through two FAA programs: the Airport Infrastructure Grant or AIG program, funded by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, and the Airport Improvement Program or AIP.

Both programs fund airport upgrades for runways and taxiways. AIG also funds projects related to safety and sustainability, airport transit connections, and roadways, while AIP also invests in infrastructure projects for noise cancellation and airport signage, lighting, and markings.

California airports in the local region receiving funding include:

  • Long Beach (Daugherty Field) Airport — $24.32 million: This project expands the existing terminal by 6,000 square feet, including two exterior holding areas. This expansion will facilitate the movement of passengers and baggage to bring the airport into conformity with current standards. This project reconstructs the existing terminal by replacing 11 gate hold areas, restrooms, a service animal relief area, and a back-up generator.
  • Palm Springs International Airport — $21.55 million: This project reconstructs the existing terminal by installing a new baggage handling system to improve the movement of passengers and baggage. This grant funds a portion of phase 1, which consists of site enabling work, building expansion, and proposed electrical work.

A complete list of airport infrastructure awards to California is available here.