Sunday, October 12, 2025
spot_img
spot_img
Home Blog Page 71

Senator Padilla Urges Approval of Yosemite Visitor Plan, Criticizes Trump’s Cuts to National Park Service

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) March 11 urged Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum to approve Yosemite National Park’s Visitor Access Management Plan, while underscoring the threat that the Trump Administration’s reckless National Park Service or NPS staff cuts pose to a successful summer season. Yosemite’s visitor access plan to use a reservation system is essential to providing the world-class experience that visitors and park lovers expect, while also ensuring that Yosemite remains protected for generations to come.

As the Trump Administration creates chaos at Yosemite and other national parks by advancing a dangerous hiring freeze, rescinding job offers, and eliminating seasonal employees, Padilla emphasized that the park cannot implement its plan or effectively manage visitor overflow and traffic congestion without sufficient staffing.

“Moving forward with a permanent reservation system, as envisioned by the Plan and the public, is a necessary step toward creating a more sustainable and positive experience for all visitors,” wrote Senator Padilla. “The uncertainty surrounding the Plan’s approval is directly affecting visitors who are trying to make their summer plans now, as well as gateway businesses who depend on summer tourism to survive.”

“The Plan can only succeed if Yosemite has the necessary staff. The Administration’s decision to eliminate seasonal employees, rescind job offers, and reduce staffing has created critical gaps in park operations, which will only worsen during the summer,” continued Padilla. “Without sufficient staff, visitors will face long lines, trash will accumulate, and vital water and wastewater systems will be neglected. Additionally, reduced staffing will severely hinder Yosemite’s ability to manage wildfire risks, jeopardizing both the park and surrounding communities. With rangers stretched thin, visitor safety and the successful implementation of the reservation system are at serious risk.”

Yosemite is California’s most visited National Park, with an average of 3.3 million visitors per year and 4.2 million visitors just last year. But for decades, overcrowding, vehicle congestion, limited parking, and long lines have diminished what should be a world-class experience, particularly for first time visitors. In response to these challenges, Yosemite has implemented temporary reservation systems during peak summer months and conducted a transparent civic and stakeholder engagement process to advance a permanent reservation system. Last week, the National Park Service released its 2024 visitation data, showing that with its new system, Yosemite welcomed pre-pandemic visitor numbers but without the excessive congestion. The reservation system helped distribute visitors more evenly throughout the day, week, and peak summer season.

Details: Full text of the letter is available here

Padilla, Dem Immigration Leaders Challenge Constitutional Basis of Trump’s “Invasion” Declaration

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Sen.Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Immigration Subcommittee, joined other Democratic immigration leaders March 11 in challenging the constitutional basis of President Trump’s sham “invasion” proclamation, which the President believes would allow his Administration to circumvent federal immigration law.

In a letter to the President, the lawmakers characterized his desperate attempts to use emergency authorities as a pretext to avoid complying with immigration laws passed by Congress. The legislators then analyzed the President’s incorrect interpretation of the term “invasion,” which is contradicted by longstanding precedent from previous executive proclamations involving Presidents Roosevelt, Polk, and Lincoln.

“As a legal matter, migration is not an invasion.’ As courts have consistently held, an ‘invasion’ under the Constitution requires ‘armed hostility from another political entity, such as another state or foreign country that is intending to overthrow the [] government.’ Courts’ requirement of an armed attack is consistent with how the term ‘invasion’ is used throughout the Constitution, alongside language like ‘insurrection’ and ‘rebellion,’” wrote the lawmakers. “Proclaiming a rhetorical ‘invasion’ would degrade protections throughout the Constitution—lowering the bar for suspending the writ of habeas corpus and even expanding the circumstances in which states may ‘engage in War’ without the approval of the federal government. Under our constitutional design, these exceptional powers are reserved for times of armed conflict; they are not available to respond to migration or other non-military matters.”

The legislators refuted the President’s incorrect statement that he can suspend or disregard the laws Congress passed, and called on him to rescind his unfounded proclamation.

“[T]he idea that the president has broad inherent power over immigration that allows him to override duly-enacted laws is unfounded and damaging. Congress, not the president, has the authority to make laws, including our immigration laws. And as the courts have long recognized, Congress has created a ‘comprehensive scheme governing all aspects of immigration and naturalization,’” continued the lawmakers. “The president has no authority to abandon or rewrite this comprehensive scheme; to the contrary, the president’s constitutional role is to take care that our immigration laws are faithfully executed.”

“The United States is not being invaded, it is not at war with migrants, and you must uphold our duly-enacted immigration laws. We have full faith that the courts will stand firm in the face of your attacks on the separation of powers. We call on you to rescind your Proclamation and work with Congress to pass much-needed, overdue bipartisan immigration reform that respects immigrants’ dignity and the rule of law,” concluded the lawmakers.

President Trump’s proclamation was riddled with falsehoods to enact his anti-immigrant agenda. Similarly, the Administration’s previous attempts to apply Title 42 authorities to migrants had no basis in public health.

The letter is supported by the Brennan Center for Justice and the American Civil Liberties Union.

Details: Full text of the letter is available here

ACLU Files Lawsuit Regarding NEA Requirements

 

Americans For the Arts or AFTA on March 6 shared an update on a significant development regarding the National Endowment for the Arts and recent changes to its grant requirements.

Key Development

On March 6 the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Rhode Island filed a lawsuit challenging the National Endowment for the Arts or NEA’s new assurance of compliance requirements stemming from Executive Order: Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity. The new requirements force NEA grant applicants to certify that they do not “promote gender ideology.”

Legal Context

  • A preliminary injunction has been requested to halt enforcement of these restrictions before the NEA’s Grants for Arts Projects applicant portal submission deadline of March 24.
  • The ACLU argues that the new certification requirement and funding prohibition violates:
    • The Administrative Procedure Act
    • The First Amendment
    • The Fifth Amendment
  • These changes create new barriers to federal arts funding, particularly for organizations serving historically marginalized communities.

Co-Plaintiffs

National Queer Theater, Rhode Island Latino Arts, Theatre Communications Group, and The Theater Offensive have joined as co-plaintiffs to challenge these new restrictions.

AFTA’S incoming CEO Erin Harkey has issued the following statement:

“The National Endowment for the Arts is critical in supporting the arts and communities nationwide. The current Administration’s new Executive Order has implications beyond the NEA and raises serious constitutional issues, and we support any effort to address these concerns. We hope the NEA and the courts will clarify any guidance on their enforcement before the upcoming grant deadlines.”

Information on DEI Compliance with NEA FY2026 Grant Opportunities

  • A preliminary injunction issued on Feb. 21, 2025, by the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland has temporarily suspended the DEI-related certification requirements.
  • While this injunction remains in effect:
    • NEA applicants are NOT required to certify compliance with Executive Order No. 14173
    • This applies to both NEA-funded projects and other organizational activities
    • No DEI-related certifications or representations are currently required for grant awards

AFTA remains committed to supporting the NEA’s vital role in funding the arts, advocating for the entire arts and culture field and maintaining open dialogue with all stakeholders

For a comprehensive understanding of recent executive orders affecting the arts and culture sector, please refer to AFTA’s FAQ document: “Understanding Recent Executive Orders and Their Impact on Arts & Culture Organizations.

Port of Los Angeles Names Stephanie Magnien Rockwell as Chief of Staff to the Executive Director

 

LOS ANGELES – Mar. 11, 2025 – The Port of Los Angeles has appointed Stephanie Magnien Rockwell as chief of staff to the executive director. In this position, Magnien Rockwell will manage special projects, act on executive and administrative matters, provide executive-level staff support and represent the port before City of Los Angeles officials and other stakeholders. The port’s internal audit division will also directly report to her in this new capacity.

“Stephanie brings a highly diversified set of skills and experience to this important position,” said Port of Los Angeles Executive Director Gene Seroka. “With her proven track record of leadership and results, we’re thrilled to elevate her into this new role.”

At the Port of Los Angeles, Magnien Rockwell most recently served as legislative representative in the workforce and government affairs division, where she served as the port’s liaison to City Hall. In that role, she was responsible for providing legislative, policy and operational support across a wide expanse of port’s priorities. She first joined the port in 2018 in the contracts and purchasing division.

Magnien Rockwell began her career by taking on increasing roles of responsibility for elected officials. These included the Office of California State Assembly Member Judy Chu 49th District; the Office of the City Councilmember Jan Perry, Ninth District; and the Office of City Councilmember Bob Blumenfield, Third District. Two years prior to joining the port, she also served as principal project coordinator with the office of the city administrative officer in Los Angeles.

Magnien Rockwell earned her bachelor’s degree in international relations with a minor in business from the University of Southern California and a Master of Public Administration from California State University, Northridge.

LAPD Probed Over Alleged Racist, Sexist Remarks and McOsker Responds

 

LAPD Officers Under Investigation for Alleged Racist and Sexist Remarks

On March 10, secret recordings surfaced, allegedly capturing Los Angeles Police Department or LAPD officers making racist, sexist, and homophobic remarks. An LAPD complaint states these recordings were made by an officer in the department’s recruitment office over several months. The recordings reportedly include derogatory comments about Black police applicants, female colleagues, and LGBTQ+ coworkers.

The LAPD’s Professional Standards Bureau and the inspector general’s office have begun an investigation into the recordings. Several officers, a lieutenant and a sergeant, have been placed on leave during the investigation. The complaint also alleges that time cards were falsified and confidential information was improperly shared.

The city’s personnel department is also investigating to assess the impact on recruitment efforts.

 

Councilmember McOsker’s Statement on LAPD Recordings Revealing Racist, Sexist, Homophobic Comments

“I am angry and disappointed. While I have not heard the recordings, these reports—if true—contradict everything we have worked toward with the LAPD and the City for far too many years,” said Councilmember Tim McOsker. “We need an inclusive, thoughtful, community-based public safety agency—one that respects and engages every neighborhood and group in LA. For the recruitment office to engage in this behavior and language is completely contrary to who we are entrusted to be in order to provide competent and constitutional public safety. Discipline and corrective action in this matter must be pursued vigorously—not only regarding the alleged speakers, but also with respect to the failed leadership that would condone such behavior.”

Sen. Shannon Grove Introduces Classic Car Legislation with Jay Leno’s Support

 

SACRAMENTO— Sen. Shannon Grove (R-Bakersfield) march 4 announced the introduction of Senate Bill 712, also known as Leno’s Law, to remove unnecessary and burdensome smog check requirements for classic vehicles, ensuring they remain a celebrated part of California’s culture and economy. Leno’s Law is sponsored by renowned car enthusiast and television icon Jay Leno, and seeks to fully exempt collector motor vehicles at least 35 model years or older from the biennial smog check program provided they are insured as collector vehicles.

“California has a rich automotive heritage, with some of the first classic cars rolling off assembly lines right here in our state,” said Senator Shannon Grove. “These rolling pieces of history are more than just vehicles—they have strong cultural ties in our communities and supply thousands of jobs in the aftermarket parts industry. Senate Bill 712 will update the current law to include all classic cars that are 35 years or older, allowing enthusiasts to enjoy their hobby without burdensome restrictions that are driving some collectors and industry businesses out of the state.”

Jay Leno, a lifelong collector and advocate for automotive culture, is backing the bill as its official sponsor.

“California’s rich classic car culture, sparked by the post-war hot rod boom and boosted by Hollywood’s love for chrome and horsepower, has made it a paradise for enthusiasts like me. From the start, California has been a driving force in shaping car culture, with deep ties to classic cars and a global reputation as a hub for these timeless machines,” said Jay Leno. “California’s smog check laws for classic cars need to be updated—they vary too much from state to state, and California’s rules don’t match up with neighboring ones. Our classic cars are only driven for special occasions, weekend drives and car shows. I am excited to work with Senator Grove on SB 712 to make it simpler for us to preserve these pieces of history.”

The legislation addresses smog check requirements that often hinder classic car owners. California’s automotive legacy dates back over a century, with early manufacturers like Studebaker and Pontiac setting up shop in the state. Today, the aftermarket parts industry for these vehicles generates billions annually, supporting jobs and small businesses. SB 712 aims to safeguard this economic engine while honoring the state’s pioneering role in car culture.

California has a thriving specialty automotive aftermarket industry. This industry significantly contributes to the state’s economy, generating $40.44 billion in economic impact. This translates to supporting 149,325 jobs, $13.47 billion in total wages and benefits, and $6.16 billion in taxes paid.

The bill is expected to move through the legislative process in the coming months, with strong backing from car clubs, industry leaders, and enthusiasts statewide.

DA Hochman Announces Felony Charges Against Trio in Major Fentanyl Bust

 

LOS ANGELES — District Attorney Nathan J. Hochman announced March 11 that felony charges were filed against three individuals — including two siblings — accused of possessing a total of more than 50 pounds of fentanyl with an intent to sell.

Priscilla Gomez (DOB 11/27/81) of Torrance faces three counts of possession for sale of a controlled substance and one count sale/transportation/offer to sell controlled substance.

Carlos Manuel Mariscal (DOB 5/2/86) of Huntington Park faces two counts of possession for sale of a controlled substance; one count of possession of a silencer; and one count of unlawful possession of ammunition prohibited by a prior conviction.

Gustavo Omar Gomez (DOB 7/17/77) of Huntington Park faces two counts of possession for sale of a controlled substance. He and Priscilla Gomez are siblings.

It is further alleged that the weight of the substance containing fentanyl exceeded 20 kilograms.

The People have recommended bail be set at $60,000 for Mariscal; $35,000 for Priscilla Gomez; and $10,000 for Gustavo Gomez. Preliminary hearing for Mariscal and Omar Gomez is set for March 20, Dept. 38 of the Clara Shortridge Foltz Criminal Justice Center. Priscilla Gomez is in federal custody.

If convicted as charged, Mariscal faces 31 years, eight months in prison; Priscilla Gomez faces 28 years, eight months in prison; and Gustavo Gomez faces 24 years in prison.

On Jan. 22, Downey police officers located a total of more than 50 pounds of fentanyl and nearly 12 pounds of opium in a car and in a Downey apartment. The approximate street value of the seized fentanyl if sold by the gram would be between $453,000 to $1,360,000.

UPDATE, Murder Investigation Arrest– Locust Ave. LB

0

Homicide detectives have made an arrest for the Feb. 18, 2025 murder of Durell Shell in the 1400 block of Locust Avenue.

Through their investigation, homicide detectives identified the suspect as Edgar Melgar Salazar, a 28-year-old resident of Long Beach. On March 6, special investigations division detectives, with the assistance of the special weapons and tactics team, arrested suspect Melgar Salazar at a residence in the city of Long Beach. He was transported to the Long Beach City Jail where he was booked for murder. Bail is set at $3,000,000.

While the investigation remains ongoing, detectives do not believe the suspect and victim were previously known to one another. The motive and circumstances of the incident remain under investigation.

Anyone with information regarding this incident is urged to contact homicide detective Juan Carlos Reyes at 562-570-7244 or anonymously at 800-222-8477, www.lacrimestoppers.org.

Original News Release Feb.19
Homicide detectives are investigating the murder of a male adult victim that occurred on Feb. 18, 2025 in the 1400 block of Locust Avenue.

At approximately 9:04 p.m., officers responded to the 1400 block of Locust Avenue regarding a shots call. Upon arrival, officers located a crime scene and evidence that a shooting occurred. Shortly after arriving on scene, officers were notified that a male adult victim with gunshot wounds had been transported to a local hospital by a private party. Officers determined the victim was from the shooting incident on Locust Avenue.

The victim, identified as Durell Shell, a 38-year-old resident of Long Beach, later succumbed to his injuries at the hospital.

Homicide detectives believe the incident to be gang related; however, the motive for the shooting and the circumstances of the incident are currently under investigation.

Five Years Later: COVID-19’s Lasting Toll on Frontline Grocery Workers

0

 

LOS ANGELES — On the fifth anniversary of COVID-19 being declared a global pandemic and a national health emergency, the United Food and Commercial Workers or UFCW Local 770 union and the Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy or LAANE are releasing the results of a survey examining the experiences of frontline essential grocery store and drug retail workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and its lasting effects on employees five years later.

Results show that in the five years since the pandemic began, more than half the respondents felt that their lives had changed dramatically, with 51.7% saying their mental health has suffered, 43.8% said they are worse off financially, and 31.07% surveyed feel their physical health had suffered.

Throughout the pandemic, frontline grocery store workers were deemed essential employees, just like first responders, yet they lacked the privilege of sheltering in place.

While grocery store corporations reaped massive record profits during and after the pandemic, these employees – especially Latina women – did not share in those profits. Instead, they bore the brunt of COVID’s devastating impacts, some of which continue to impact them today.

Furthermore, the survey shows that employers failed to provide emotional support for dealing with difficult customers and exposed workers to COVID-19 through a lack of timely and effective protective measures.

Key Survey Findings:

  1. Mental Health Impact on Workers: Contracting COVID-19 brought significant physical challenges, but the mental and emotional toll of the pandemic was even harder to endure. The mental anguish often outweighed the physical strain of the illness itself.
  2. COVID-19 Infections: A high number of workers were infected at work, many contracting COVID more than once.
  3. Financial Strain: Many workers reported being worse off financially now than before the pandemic.
  4. Customer Treatment of Workers: Nearly 50% of workers felt customers treated them worse during and after COVID-19.
  5. Safety Concerns: Employers failed to inspire confidence that worker safety was a priority.

Quotes from some of the anonymous respondents:

“It was scary. I felt a lot of anxiety. I was scared and angry. At the onset of the pandemic three of my co-workers and I walked out of our store. We felt unsafe when management let large crowds of people into our store despite the Health Department mandates on safety protocols. I refused to work under these conditions. I felt unsafe and walked off in protest. Then, I got into my car and broke down in a full-blown panic attack. There were many days where I just couldn’t avoid crying and had to take several weeks off because I felt so overwhelmed and unsafe. I got infected with Covid three times and my mental health was severely affected. I didn’t fully recover. I don’t feel like I am the same person I was before COVID.”

“I’m a checker. The first days were surreal. The lines went to the back of the store. We had limits on certain items, and there were regular conflicts between management and customers who challenged the limits rule. A number of customers challenged the mask and social distancing requirements in lines, so I had to become an enforcer, largely on top of my checking duties. It was ugly.
Many of us checkers developed stress-related physical ailments. But, I knew that it was my duty to keep showing up, because our community needed us at this time.”

“I am now, and have been, homeless since the pandemic. It caused me to have a mental breakdown several times due to stress not knowing how I was going to pay rent and then I lost my place to live due to all the stress. I lost my car as well so it really left me homeless and on the streets. I’m still dealing with homelessness and I’ve been using all the resources I know of in my area.”

“Customers are more impatient and rude than ever before. All manners have been lost by customers. People still come into the Pharmacy even though they have Covid, with no regard to us working here. It’s disappointing and awful.”

“Even though the stores made money since the pandemic, they have been cutting hours and scheduling less help in the stores.”

“Our employer loved to say to the public that we employees were ‘heroes’ for working during the pandemic, however, they have not shown any appreciation for the risks we took, in our pay or quality of life standards at work.”

“Customers were so rude and mean to us because they were in a panic. They did not realize that we were scared too, but we had to be there. It was just a horrible thing to live through all around. They did not think that we were heroes or essential just because we worked at a grocery store. And I believe that the company made more money than they ever did during this crisis. They should’ve compensated us better for risking our lives.”

“[It] gave me PTSD.”

A total of 476 union workers responded to the survey. The survey was launched on Nov. 12, 2024 and closed on Dec.15, 2024.

About UFCW Local 770

The United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Local 770 represents nearly 30,000 members in Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, Ventura, San Luis Obispo, San Bernardino, Riverside, and Kern counties across industries such as grocery, cannabis, retail drug, healthcare, and meatpacking.

More than 20,000 of these members are grocery store workers in Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, Ventura, and San Luis Obispo counties and are currently in negotiations with Kroger, Albertsons, Stater Bros., Gelson’s, and Super A Foods, demanding fair wages, secure health benefits, reliable retirement plans, adequate hours, and proper staffing levels. These efforts aim to address many of the working conditions that have deteriorated even further since the COVID-19 pandemic.

LAANE is an organizing and advocacy institution committed to economic, environmental, and racial justice. www.laane.org.

ICAN Releases Key Reports on Child Welfare in Los Angeles County

 

LOS ANGELES The Los Angeles County Inter-Agency Council on Child Abuse and Neglect or ICAN convened its latest Policy Committee meeting, bringing together leaders, agencies, and advocates dedicated to protecting the children of Los Angeles County.

Los Angeles County Sheriff Robert Luna, who serves as ICAN co-chairperson, delivered remarks emphasizing the critical need for cross-agency collaboration to protect vulnerable children and support at-risk families. ICAN serves as the official organization in Los Angeles County dedicated to the prevention, intervention, and treatment of child abuse.

Sheriff Luna highlighted the far-reaching impacts of child abuse, noting its connection to numerous social challenges, including educational struggles, mental health crises, and future involvement in the criminal justice system. Sheriff Luna pointed out that many individuals incarcerated in Los Angeles County jails have histories of childhood trauma, underscoring the long-term consequences of untreated abuse.

Findings presented by the ICAN child death review team further illustrated the tragic cycle of abuse, with nearly half of individuals responsible for fatal child abuse cases having been victims themselves within the Department of Children and Family Services or DCFS system. These findings emphasize the urgent need for early intervention and supportive services for children and families in crisis.

At the meeting, ICAN released three comprehensive reports:

  • The State of Child Abuse in Los Angeles County
  • The ICAN Child Death Review Team Report
  • The Report on Safely Surrendered and Abandoned Babies

These reports were accompanied by policy and practice recommendations developed by ICAN’s committees, which focus on enhancing prevention efforts, strengthening intervention strategies, and improving outcomes for children and families.

Among the key findings highlighted in the reports, ICAN drew attention to the significant impacts of domestic violence on children, as well as the devastating effects of opioid addiction on parents and children of all ages. The reports reflect input from a wide range of professionals across multiple fields, whose expertise and frontline experience are essential to ICAN’s mission.

In 2023, 197 children under 18 died from homicide, suicide, accidents, or undetermined causes. Six were killed by parents or caretakers, primarily biological fathers, often in domestic violence cases. Over half of these offenders had experienced childhood abuse.

Suicide claimed 26 children, with firearms surpassing hanging as the leading method. Overdoses, accounting for nearly 20% of cases, more than doubled the five-year average. Many victims had histories with child welfare or mental health services.

Motor vehicle accidents were the top cause of accidental deaths, followed by overdoses, which surged by 87.5%. Unsafe sleep practices led to 24 infant deaths. Children under two remain the most vulnerable to abuse.

Each year, 1,000 newborns are identified as substance-affected and referred to child protective services. In 2024, 73% of 22 child abduction cases involved domestic violence. As of January 2025, 147 child abduction cases remain active. Since its inception, the Safe Surrender Program has placed 282 infants into adoptive homes.

The collaborative work of ICAN’s teams, committees, and public awareness campaigns continues to play a vital role in saving lives and protecting the county’s most vulnerable residents.

Following the release of these reports, ICAN executive director Deanne Tilton Durfee provided an overview of key findings and highlighted the importance of continued collaboration, innovation, and community engagement in the fight to end child abuse in Los Angeles County.

“Child Abuse is not a law enforcement, or a mental health, or a child welfare issue, it’s a system-wide issue, a community issue, a neighborhood issue, and a personal issue, said Tilton Durfee. “Preventing harm to a child can be as simple as reaching out to a stressed neighbor struggling with 3 small children or picking up the phone and calling the Child Abuse Hotline. In fact, this very outreach might have saved the lives of child victims included in the reports of the ICAN Child Death Review Team. Isolation is a key risk factor for young victims, never seen outside of the home before their tragic death.”