Friday, October 10, 2025
spot_img
spot_img
Home Blog Page 53

LA Expands No-Cost Legal Aid, Empowering Small Businesses

LOS ANGELES —The Los Angeles County Department of Economic Opportunity or DEO, Bet Tzedek Legal Services, and Public Counsel are providing no-cost legal services to small business owners and entrepreneurs across LA County through the LA Regional small business legal aid program. LA County and DEO have invested $3 million in the American Rescue Plan Act and partnered with the City of Los Angeles Economic and Workforce Development Department to expand the program and provide a no wrong door approach for legal services for small businesses countywide and at scale.

The LA Regional small business legal aid program (legal aid program) has addressed long-standing gaps in access to legal services for entrepreneurs, especially women, immigrants, and communities of color. By offering free multilingual resources and tailored counsel through one centralized point of entry, the program empowers small business owners to overcome barriers, navigate challenges, and thrive. The legal aid program’s comprehensive suite of services include contract review, business structuring, employment law guidance, intellectual property protection, and support navigating government relief programs. It also provides business education through workshops and Academies, 1:1 counseling, and referrals for representation. Together, these services have been a lifeline for many entrepreneurs, especially amid ongoing economic uncertainty caused by natural disasters and structural inequities.

Since 2022, the program has provided 1:1 legal counsel to over 1,400 unique businesses and hosted 48 legal education workshops and Academies, reaching over 4,211 unique businesses. In the current fiscal year alone, 322 small businesses have already accessed 1:1 legal counseling and 1,085 have attended legal education workshops.

DEO is highlighting the legal aid program and other small business services this May for Small Business Month.

Business owners in LA County seeking Legal Aid Program assessment, legal education workshops or counsel, and referrals for representation can visit opportunity.lacounty.gov/legalaid or lalegalhelp.org, call 866-375-9511, or email sblhelp@bettzedek.org. All services are offered at no-cost, in language, and on an ongoing basis.

Gov. Newsom Announces Judicial Appointments

SACRAMENTO – Gov. Gavin Newsom last week announced his nomination of three Court of Appeal Justices: Associate Justice Helen Zukin as Presiding Justice of the Second District Court of Appeal, Division Four, Judge Mark Hanasono as Associate Justice of the Second District Court of Appeal, Division Three, and, pending confirmation of Justice Helen Zukin to the role of Presiding Justice, Judge Armen Tamzarian as Associate Justice of the Second District Court of Appeal, Division Four.

The Governor also announced his appointment of 12 Superior Court Judges: one in Fresno County; five in Los Angeles County; one in Orange County; one in Sacramento County; one in San Diego County; one in Santa Barbara County; one in Santa Clara County; and one in Ventura County.

 

Second District Court of Appeal

Associate Justice Helen Zukin, of Los Angeles County, has been nominated to serve as presiding justice of the Second District Court of Appeal, Division Four. She has served as an associate justice in Division Four since 2023. She served as a judge in the Los Angeles County Superior Court from 2018 to 2023. Justice Zukin was a partner at Kiesel Law LLP from 2006 to 2018. She worked as a solo practitioner at the Law Offices of Helen E. Zukin from 1995 to 2006. She was a partner at Simke, Chodos, Silberfeld & Anteau, Inc. from 1990 to 1995. Justice Zukin worked as an associate at Greene, O’Reilly, Agnew & Broillet from 1985 to 1990. Justice Zukin received a Juris Doctor degree from Loyola Law School. She fills the vacancy created by the retirement of presiding justice Brian Currey. This position requires confirmation by the Commission on Judicial Appointments, which consists of Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero, Attorney General Rob Bonta, and Senior Presiding Justice Arthur Gilbert. Justice Zukin is a Democrat.

Judge Mark Hanasono, of Los Angeles County, has been nominated to serve as an associate justice of the Second District Court of Appeal, Division Three. He has served as a judge in the Los Angeles County Superior Court since 2013. Judge Hanasono served as a deputy alternate public defender at the Los Angeles County Alternate Public Defender’s Office from 2004 to 2013. He was a deputy public defender at the Los Angeles County Public Defender’s Office from 2000 to 2004. He was a judicial law clerk in the District of Columbia Superior Court from 1999 to 2000. Judge Hanasono received a Juris Doctor degree from Georgetown University. He fills the vacancy created by the retirement of Justice Luis A. Lavin. This position requires confirmation by the Commission on Judicial Appointments, which consists of Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero, Attorney General Rob Bonta, and Senior Presiding Justice Arthur Gilbert. Judge Hanasono is a Democrat.

Judge Armen Tamzarian, of Los Angeles County, has been nominated to serve as an associate justice of the Second District Court of Appeal, Division Four. He has served as a judge in the Los Angeles County Superior Court since 2013. Judge Tamzarian was a lead appellate court attorney at the Second District Court of Appeal, Division Three from 2008 to 2013. He was an associate and later a partner at Case, Knowlson, Jordan & Wright LLP from 1997 to 2008. He was a research attorney at the Los Angeles Superior Court from 1996 to 1997. Judge Tamzarian received a Juris Doctor degree from Southwestern Law School. Pending her confirmation, he will fill the vacancy created by the elevation of Justice Helen Zukin to presiding justice. This position requires confirmation by the Commission on Judicial Appointments, which consists of Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero, Attorney General Rob Bonta, and Senior Presiding Justice Arthur Gilbert. Judge Tamzarian is a Democrat.

The compensation for each of these positions is $280,052.

 

Los Angeles County Superior Court

Syna Dennis, of Los Angeles County, has been appointed to serve as a judge in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Dennis has served as a commissioner in the Los Angeles Superior Court since 2023. She has served in various roles at the Los Angeles County Counsel Office including as a principal deputy county counsel from 2005 to 2023 and a senior deputy county counsel from 1999 to 2005. She worked as an associate attorney at the Law Offices of Atkins and Evans from 1989 to 1999. Dennis received a Juris Doctor degree from the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. She fills the vacancy created by the retirement of Judge Harvey A. Silberman. Dennis is a Democrat.

 

Hoa Hoang, of Los Angeles County, has been appointed to serve as a judge in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Hoang has served as a lead appellate court attorney at the Second District Court of Appeal, Division Seven since 2018. Hoang served in various roles at the Second District Court of Appeals, including as a senior appellate court attorney from 2017 to 2018 and an appellate court attorney from 2011 to 2017. Hoang worked as an associate for Hogan Lovells US LLP from 2002 to 2010. She served as a law clerk at the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California from 2000 to 2002. Hoang received a Juris Doctor degree from UCLA School of Law. She fills the vacancy created by the appointment of Judge Michelle W. Court to the Federal Court. Hoang is a Democrat.

Lara Bazán, of Los Angeles County, has been appointed to serve as a judge in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Bazán has served as a deputy district attorney at the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office since 2012. She worked as an associate at Jones Day from 2008 to 2012. Bazán received a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Southern California School of Law. She fills the vacancy created by the elevation of Justice Michelle C. Kim to the Court of Appeal. Bazán is a Democrat.

Brenda C. Robinson, of Los Angeles County, has been appointed to serve as a judge in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Robinson has worked as a senior attorney at the Children’s Law Center of California since 2015. She served as a senior policy deputy for the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors from 2013 to 2014. Robinson worked at the Children’s Law Center as a supervising attorney from 2007 to 2012 and as a staff attorney from 2001 to 2007. Robinson was a Partner at Robinson, Wright, and Newsom from 1998 to 2001. Robinson received a Juris Doctor degree from Golden Gate University School of Law. She fills the vacancy created by the elevation of Justice Anne K. Richardson to the Court of Appeal. Robinson is a Democrat.

Maria Jhai, of Los Angeles County, has been appointed to serve as a judge in the Los Angeles Superior Court. Jhai has served as an Assistant United States Attorney at the Office of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California since 2019. She worked as an attorney for Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP from 2014 to 2019. Jhai held a temporary position as a deputy city attorney at the Office of the Los Angeles City Attorney in 2017. She served as a law clerk at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit from 2013 to 2014. Jhai served as a Law Clerk for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan from 2011 to 2013. Jhai received a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Michigan Law School. She fills the vacancy created by the retirement of Judge Douglas W. Sortino. Jhai is a Democrat.

ALERT: California Coast Mussels May Be Toxic — Do NOT Eat If Harvested Recreationally

Residents are advised of a California Department of Public Health or CDPH mussel quarantine order effective May 1 through Oct. 31, 2025. During the quarantine, all species of mussels gathered by recreational sport harvesters from California’s ocean shore should not be consumed by humans. The quarantine area extends from the Oregon border to the Mexican border, including all bays, inlets, and harbors in Los Angeles County. The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health continues to work with CDPH and collect shellfish for testing.

This quarantine is to protect and preserve public health under the California Health and Safety Code Section 131056. During the quarantine season, mussels may concentrate naturally occurring toxins that are highly poisonous to humans including paralytic shellfish poison or PSP and domoic acid biotoxins in bivalve shellfish (mussels, clams, oysters, and scallops). Cooking does not destroy the toxins.

This advisory does not apply to commercial shellfish from approved sources.

State law prohibits the sale or offering for sale for human consumption of any bivalve (two-shelled) shellfish, except by a State-certified commercial shellfish harvester or dealer. Shellfish sold by certified harvesters or dealers are subject to frequent mandatory testing and are not subject to this quarantine.

Mussels may be used or sold for use as bait when displayed and sold in containers labeled in boldfaced type letters at least one-half inch in height as follows: MUSSELS FOR BAIT ONLY, UNFIT FOR HUMAN FOOD.

Symptoms

Early symptoms of paralytic shellfish poison or PSP include tingling of the lips and tongue, which may begin within minutes to a few hours after eating toxic shellfish. These symptoms are typically followed by a loss of balance, lack of muscular coordination, slurred speech, and difficulty swallowing. In severe poisonings, complete muscular paralysis and death from asphyxiation can occur.

Clams and Scallops

People consuming clams or scallops are warned to remove and discard the digestive organs or viscera and any other dark parts. Only the white meat of clams and scallops should be prepared for human consumption. Also, bivalve shellfish should not be collected for food from any area subject to sewage or chemical contamination.

If you or a family member experiences gastrointestinal or neurological symptoms after eating mussels taken for human consumption by recreational sport harvesters from California’s ocean shore, please submit a Foodborne Illness Report and seek medical care.

Details: For additional information call the Shellfish Hotline at 1-800-553-4133 or online at the CDPH Marine Biotoxin Quarantines and Health Advisories.

Rep. Barragán Leads Congressional Charge Against Trump-Era Semiconductor Tariff Plan

 

Washington, D.C. — Rep.Nanette Barragán (CA-44) May 7 led a group of her Democratic colleagues on the House communications and technology subcommittee in calling on President Donald Trump and commerce secretary Howard Lutnick to abandon proposals to impose sweeping tariffs on the semiconductor industry.

The letter, signed by House communications and technology subcommittee ranking member Doris Matsui and subcommittee members Greg Landsman and Jennifer McClellan, warns that the proposed tariffs would increase costs for consumers, disrupt American manufacturing, undermine U.S. competition, and strain relationships with key international allies—all without achieving the stated goal of boosting domestic production.

“These tariffs will increase the cost of essential technologies like smartphones, laptops, and broadband equipment, and will act as a direct tax on American consumers,” wrote the group of Democratic lawmakers. “The result: reduced productivity, limited access to essential tools, and slower economic growth.”

“Rather than resorting to punitive trade measures that risk backfiring economically and geopolitically, the United States should double down on policies that support domestic semiconductor production and strengthen our long-term competitiveness,” they continued. “We urge you to abandon these ill-conceived tariff plans and instead work with Congress, industry leaders, and international allies to bolster American innovation, secure our supply chains, and build a technology economy that serves American workers and consumers.”

 Find the full text of the letter below.

President Trump and Secretary Lutnick:

We have serious concerns with your reported plans to impose sector-specific tariffs on semiconductor products, including chips, telecommunications equipment, and consumer electronics. These tariffs would raise prices for consumers, disrupt American manufacturing, and damage our nation’s global competitiveness—all while failing to meaningfully strengthen national security or domestic production.

These tariffs will increase the cost of essential technologies like smartphones, laptops, and broadband equipment, and will act as a direct tax on American consumers. The result: reduced productivity, limited access to essential tools, and slower economic growth.

The United States currently lacks the capacity to rapidly relocate large-scale technology manufacturing to our country. Structural challenges—including a shortage of workers trained in high-tech manufacturing and underdeveloped semiconductor infrastructure—make such a transition unrealistic in the short term. Tariffs will not solve these issues and could instead deepen them by inflating costs, discouraging investment, and weakening the long-term position of the United States technology industry.

The ongoing uncertainty surrounding this tariff plan has already disrupted financial markets and injected instability into critical sectors of our economy. The technology industry depends on predictable, long-term policy—not abrupt changes that create confusion for investors, suppliers, and businesses.

These tariffs could also provoke diplomatic fallout with some of our most trusted allies. Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, and Malaysia are potential targets for these tariffs. These are all vital partners in our technology supply chains and unnecessary tariffs could jeopardize the resilience of our supply chains and the strategic alliances that have long supported American leadership in innovation.

Additionally, a disruption to American technology imports from allied nations could undermine the Federal Communication Commission’s efforts to implement the Secure and Trusted Networks Reimbursement (“Rip and Replace”) Program. Rip and Replace, which has received strong bipartisan, bicameral support in Congress, strengthens our national security by supporting providers who are working to replace insecure network equipment from Chinese vendors like Huawei and ZTE, while simultaneously maintaining network connectivity for consumers across the country. By disrupting global supply chains and raising the overall cost of replacing network infrastructure, the proposed tariffs could needlessly strain the Rip and Replace program’s budget and delay program implementation.

The consequences of supply chain disruptions would also be particularly acute in the race to deploy 5G infrastructure and to lead in artificial intelligence. Access to cutting-edge components is essential to maintaining leadership in 5G, as well as in AI development. Disrupting access to these components would not only slow American progress but would also give China an unnecessary—and avoidable—strategic advantage.

We are especially alarmed by reports that these tariffs will be enacted under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, a provision designed to protect national security. This seems incompatible with the imposition of tariffs that damage alliances and delay technological innovation – that would in fact compromise our national security. As the Department of Defense made clear in its 2022 report Securing Defense-Critical Supply Chains, disruptions to allied supply lines—particularly in microelectronics—pose a direct threat to military readiness.

Rather than resorting to punitive trade measures that risk backfiring economically and geopolitically, the United States should double down on policies that support domestic semiconductor production and strengthen our long-term competitiveness. Congress passed the CHIPS and Science Act precisely for this purpose—to revitalize American semiconductor manufacturing, create high-quality union jobs, and reduce our dependence on foreign supply chains, especially those vulnerable to authoritarian influence or geopolitical instability.

We urge you to abandon these ill-conceived tariff plans and instead work with Congress, industry leaders, and international allies to bolster American innovation, secure our supply chains, and build a technology economy that serves American workers and consumers.

RPV Land Movement Shares Key Community Updates – May 7

May 6, 2025 City Council Meeting Discussion Recap

At the May 6 city council meeting, city geologist Mike Phipps gave an update on movement in the landslide area. According to the latest data from April, overall, the land movement continues to decelerate or maintain a steady state in areas that are still moving. Phipps believes this is largely due to significantly below-average rainfall through April, positive effects from winterization measures implemented in the fall, and ongoing dewatering efforts by the city, the Abalone Cove Landslide Abatement District or ACLAD and Klondike Canyon Landslide Abatement District or KCLAD.

Using a $1.6 million loan from the city, ACLAD has installed: five deep dewatering wells that are removing approximately 158,000 gallons of water per day and two monitoring wells (the wells are not operating 24/7). ACLAD anticipates activating three more dewatering wells in the coming weeks. These wells are targeting the fastest moving parts of the landslide area — in the Altamira and Abalone Cove Landslides — which are moving at a rate of about 4 inches per week. For comparison, at this time last year, the landslide was moving roughly twice as fast and was rapidly accelerating.

The city’s effective deep dewatering wells at the toe of the Portuguese Bend Landslide have removed 215 million gallons of groundwater at a current rate of about 0.85 million gallons per day. The council allocated another $500,000 toward re-drilling several wells that have sheared or are anticipated to by June 30, 2025.

The council also directed city staff to revise the scope of work on a proposed hydrology and hydraulics study that would identify the source of water, ground and subsurface, contributing to land movement, including water originating outside city limits and from upper watersheds. An updated contract for the revised study will be considered by the council at a future meeting.

Finally, the council renewed for 60 days the local emergencies in the landslide area and the temporary prohibition of motorcycles, bicycles and other one- or two-wheeled devices along a two-mile stretch of Palos Verdes Drive South.

 

Update on Disaster Recovery Appeals

In March, the city formally appealed the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s or FEMA decision to deny $37.9 million in disaster recovery funding requested by the city for costs incurred responding to the landslide emergency due to the winter storms in late January and early February 2024. Earlier this week, the city was notified that the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services or Cal OES will not support the city’s appeal. This is due to Cal OES’ position that while the winter storms may have greatly accelerated land movement, what it considers to be pre-existing conditions in the landslide make the city ineligible for reimbursement under the 2024 federal disaster declaration. FEMA District 9 administrator Robert Fenton has 90 days to consider the city’s appeal, Cal OES’ recommendation, and to render a decision. His decision is then appealable to FEMA’s headquarters in Washington, D.C. Cal OES is also not supporting appeals submitted by ACLAD and KCLAD for their denials of disaster recovery assistance respectively.

One-time “reality TV” star shows real talent in one-woman play

I don’t know who the fuck Bekah Martinez is. Google says “Former TV personality” — The Bachelor, 2018. I can’t tell you how many fucks I couldn’t give. It’s a sign of the apocalypse that this got her 850,000 Instagram followers. It’s a sign of the apocalypse that seven years later there are 850,000 people who want pics of her non-Bachelor hubby and kids popping up on their phones. These are end times.

But never mind. Making her stage debut (as an adult, anyway) at the Garage Theatre in Brian James Polak’s The Call List, Martinez manages all by her lonesome to hold our attention for nearly 90 minutes, despite the fact that the entirety of the action is her side of a series of phone calls.

Samantha (Martinez) works for an attorney hired by a guy named Craig to notify a dozen or so acquaintances in the event of his (Craig’s) demise — which just happened: Craig offed himself with a bullet to the heart. Alone in a small legal office with a yoga mat, vape, and the boss’s neck massager, Samantha is tasked with said notification before leaving for a weekend with her sister and mother, while her father is in the hospital after his most recent suicide attempt.

And so, phone calls. Lots. Some of Craig’s friends/exes/people who barely knew / don’t remember him she reaches, some she can’t. She keeps forgetting to leave a callback number. As she slowly acquires pieces of the puzzle, she becomes intrigued. Who were you, Craig? Why did you die? In the midst of this, Mom won’t stop bugging her, and Dad isn’t picking up.

Polak’s got an idea here, but he hasn’t done enough unpacking of either Craig or Samantha. The few details we get about Craig — he painted, he was married once upon a time, he went to the same coffeehouse every day and was pals with a priest — are not quite clues to a mystery that ultimately we don’t care about solving. “I guess you never really know someone,” Samantha eventually says more or less verbatim, as if we should be satisfied in Polak’s writing there’s no there there. (And not for nothing, but don’t we go to the theatre precisely to know the characters we encounter?)

If we get a better sense of Samantha, it’s mostly due to the idiosyncratic energy Martinez brings to the table rather than anything Polak serves up. Yes, she likes to draw and feels she’s nowhere in life, having tried her hand at a variety of jobs that left her numb. But aside from a couple of generic nods toward family dynamics (Dad’s the only one who understands her, while claws come out on the distaff side), that’s pretty much it. The synchronicity of Craig’s suicide and Dad’s attempt doesn’t even seem to register with her — though it’s unclear whether that’s more on Polak or Martinez and director Diana Kaufman.

But Kaufman has done nice work channeling Martinez’s energy, including some thoughtful blocking that helps keep the play from dying a static death. And although a particular pet peeve of mine is the one-sided phone conversation where the speaker we hear is clearly not leaving enough time for the person on the other end of the line to say what’s supposedly being said, Martinez probably strikes the right balance between realism and obvious falsity, leaning toward the former without creating too much dead air.

What doesn’t work are the music cues. A few ominous metallic overtones à la David Lynch make no kind of sense. And aside from one snatch of song that earns a chuckle, the rest of several ten-second snippets serve no apparent purpose. It’s as if Kaufman suffered a needless crisis of confidence vis-à-vis holding our attention, when that is one thing the production definitely has going for it.

Even if The Call List may not fulfill its potential as a character study or compelling work of art, it does the job as an actor showcase — a success made manifest thanks to a “Former TV personality” who actually has discernible talent. Don’t be surprised if both this showcase and the showcased have a future in theatre.*

The Call List at the Garage Theatre
Times: Thursday–Saturday 8 p.m.
The show runs through May 24.
Cost: $23–$28 (Thursdays 2-for-1); closing night w/afterparty: $40
Details: thegaragetheatre.org
Venue: The Garage Theatre, 251 E. 7th St., Long Beach

(*The Call List isn’t being touted as a world premiere, but apparently this is the first time it’s been performed, so you do the math.)

 

Kroger and Albertsons are Feeding Wall Street While Starving Stores

Read the new Economic Roundtable report

Across the country, grocery store workers are sounding the alarm: stores are dangerously understaffed, wages have fallen behind, and corporate profits are soaring at the expense of workers and customers alike.

Kroger and Albertsons have boosted their stock prices 77% more than the overall stock market, feeding Wall Street with short-term gains while their workers are left behind, and communities suffer.

If these trends continue, groceries may become harder to find and harder to afford.

A new report from the Economic Roundtable, “Bullies at the Table,” documents the devastating impact of chronic understaffing at Kroger and Albertsons stores.

READ THE REPORT FROM THE ECONOMIC ROUNDTABLE

Based on surveys from grocery workers in Colorado, Southern California, and Washington, and a financial analysis of the companies, here are some key findings:

More than nine out of ten grocery store workers in the three states studied say that there is price gouging at their stores.

Customers put groceries back on the shelf because they cannot afford to buy them and are eating less balanced and healthy food than they used to.

More than four-fifths of workers are unable to pay basic living costs.

More than two-thirds do not have secure housing.

Weekly earnings for U.S. grocery workers in real dollars dropped 15% from 2003 to 2024.

From 2018 to 2022, Kroger and Albertsons took $15.8 billion in cash out of their businesses and sent it to shareholders while neglecting maintenance of their stores.

A $5.50 per hour raise for nonsupervisory grocery workers would stimulate almost twice as much new value in the economy.

“This fight affects all of us — workers, families, and communities.” said UFCW 770. “We need fair contracts, living wages, and enough staff to safely and effectively serve our neighborhoods.

Grocery workers are determined to fix these issues at the bargaining table, but if the company will not show any interest to improve, we will continue to escalate our actions in coordination with our customers.”

Labor Caucus Members Demand Answers on DOGE Access to NLRB Information

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Last week, Labor Caucus Co-Chairs Reps. Mark Pocan (WI-02), Donald Norcross (NJ-01), Steven Horsford (NV-04) and Debbie Dingell (MI-06) on April 28 led over 50 House Democrats in demanding answers from the National Labor Relations Board or NLRB management regarding a recent whistleblower report detailing Department of Government Efficiency or DOGE officials accessing sensitive NLRB information.

“We are writing regarding the recent whistleblower report filed by a [NLRB] employee that makes several serious allegations of [DOGE] officials accessing sensitive NLRB information” wrote the lawmakers to NLRB General Counsel William Cowen. “This account alleges that not only were DOGE officials granted access to this sensitive information, but also that DOGE officials extracted a high volume of information, intentionally removed any details about the information that was extracted, and left workers’ data exposed in the process.”

“These revelations from the whistleblower report are highly concerning for a number of reasons,” continued the lawmakers. “If true, these revelations describe a reckless approach to the handling of sensitive personal information of workers, which could leave these workers exposed to retaliation for engaging in legally protected union activity. Additionally, given DOGE’s desire to access sensitive information at other federal agencies with a focus on payment information, it is unclear why DOGE would be interested in NLRB data that has nothing to do with federal payments. Furthermore, Elon Musk, whom Donald Trump has repeatedly said is “in charge” of DOGE, has a number of cases before the Board and is also pursuing several lawsuits to challenge the constitutionality of the Board itself.”

“Accordingly, it is critical that you work to address these complaints as soon as possible, especially after it was reported that DOGE officials were again recently present at the NLRB headquarters.” concluded the lawmakers.

The Members of Congress also requested responses to a series of oversight questions regarding DOGE’s access to sensitive NLRB data by no later than May 5.

A full copy of the letter can be found here. The letter was signed by over 50 House Democrats.

Rep. Barragán Fights Back: Joins Petition to Stop GOP Attacks on Medicaid and Food Assistance

WASHINGTON, DC – On May 6, Rep. Nanette Barragán (CA-44) signed a discharge petition to force consideration of a special rule to prevent the largest cuts to Medicaid and food assistance in American history — just so Donald Trump and Republicans can pay for massive tax giveaways to their billionaire donors. The petition is led by Rep. Brendan F. Boyle (PA-02), ranking member of the House budget committee. The petition is now open for signature by any Member of the House who is committed to protecting access to Medicaid and SNAP for millions of Americans.

Under House rules, once a discharge petition receives 218 signatures, it triggers a vote on the House Floor. Ranking member Boyle’s petition would trigger a special rule that includes the text of his Hands Off Medicaid and SNAP Act — amending the Congressional Budget Act to protect Medicaid and SNAP from any reduction in coverage or benefits in the reconciliation process.

“This is the chance for House Republicans to do the right thing and prove that they do indeed work for the American people,” said Rep. Barragán. “Donald Trump and House Republicans’ budget would cut healthcare and food assistance for the hardworking families who struggle more than ever to put food on the table and secure the care that they deserve. House Democrats will fight and take every possible path of action to prevent this budget from passing, because we believe that working- and middle-class families having access to essential benefits is far more important than funding tax breaks for Republicans’ billionaire donors.”

“The Republican budget includes the largest cuts to Medicaid and SNAP in our nation’s history—cuts that would jeopardize health care and food assistance for millions of Americans,” said budget committee ranking member Boyle. “This discharge petition is an opportunity for every Member of Congress to show where they stand. We intend to gather 218 signatures from both parties, and I sincerely hope my colleagues across the aisle will join us. If they truly believe in protecting these essential benefits, this is their chance to prove it.”

The Hands Off Medicaid and SNAP Act is led in the House by Representatives Brendan F. Boyle (PA-02), ranking member of the house budget committee; Frank Pallone, Jr. (NJ-06), ranking member of the energy and commerce committee; Angie Craig (MN-02), ranking member of the agriculture committee; Greg Casar (TX-35), chair of the Congressional progressive caucus; Brad Schneider (IL-10), chair of the New Democrat Coalition; and Lou Correa (CA-46), Blue Dog Coalition co-chair for policy and legislative strategy.

Details: More information about the Hands Off Medicaid and SNAP Act is available here.

Hepatitis A Outbreak Declared in Los Angeles County

The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health has declared a community-wide outbreak of hepatitis A following a sustained increase in clinical cases and elevated virus levels detected in local wastewater. Public Health confirmed 165 hepatitis A cases in LA County in 2024, which is three times the number of cases reported in 2023. Although unhoused individuals are at higher risk for contracting hepatitis A infection because they often have limited access to handwashing and toileting facilities, of the 29 hepatitis A cases confirmed to date in 2025, most have been among people without travel or housing risk factors. This increase in hepatitis A infections among people without risk factors has corresponded with recent increases in hepatitis A wastewater concentrations. While the risk to the general public remains low, community-wide protection actions are needed to ensure that transmission of hepatitis A is reduced.

Vaccination and good hygiene are the best ways to prevent hepatitis A.

“The ongoing increase in hepatitis A cases signals that quick action is needed to protect public health,” said Muntu Davis, MD, MPH, Los Angeles County Health Officer. “The hepatitis A vaccine is safe, effective, and offers long-term protection. Getting vaccinated is simple, and it’s one of the most important things you can do for your own health and the health of our entire community. It is also important for residents to wash their hands with soap and water regularly and especially before eating and preparing food and after using the bathroom.”

Public Health continues to monitor for and immediately investigate suspect hepatitis A cases and is working closely with healthcare providers to request that they remain vigilant for hepatitis A. Public Health is also working with organizations that serve people experiencing homelessness to educate the community about the increase in hepatitis A, encourage people to get vaccinated, and recommend those with symptoms of hepatitis A to seek medical care.

The hepatitis A vaccine is typically a two dose vaccine series that is safe, highly effective in preventing infection, and has been routinely given to children for over a decade. Residents are urged to check if they have been vaccinated for hepatitis A by contacting their medical provider. To protect community health, Public Health strongly encourages vaccination for:

  • Any LA County resident who did not previously receive a hepatitis A vaccination and is seeking protection
  • People experiencing homelessness
  • People who use drugs (including non-injection)

Full protection requires two doses of hepatitis A vaccine administered at least 6 months apart. Additionally, previously unvaccinated people can receive hepatitis A vaccine soon after exposure to protect against developing the infection.

In addition to vaccination, Public Health recommends residents follow good hygiene practices including washing their hands with soap and water before eating and preparing food and after using the bathroom.

For questions or to find a nearby clinic or doctor, call the Public Health InfoLine at 1-833-540-0473, open every day from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m.

Details: ph.lacounty.gov/HepA.