Monday, October 20, 2025
spot_img
spot_img
Home Blog Page 374

Jan. 6 Capitol Invasion Secretly Planned In Advance

Far from being something unforeseeable that got out of hand, the Jan. 6, 2021 invasion of the United States Capitol was planned in advance as part of the three-pronged strategy to overturn the 2020 election. That was the main thrust of the seventh hearing of the Jan. 6 Committee on July 12. Moreover, Committee Vice-Chair Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) emphasized, it was Donald Trump himself, not crazy outside advisers, who was responsible for what unfolded.

“[Former] President Trump is a 76-year-old man. He is not an impressionable child,” Cheney said. “Just like everyone else in our country, he is responsible for his own actions and his own choices.”

In fact, Trump himself set things in motion on Dec. 19, with a tweet summoning his supporters to Washington D.C. on Jan. 6, promising it “Will be wild!” after a marathon six-hour meeting that left him dissatisfied with the options his outside advisers advanced. Rather than follow their advice, he hit on his own three-pronged plan.

That meeting, described as “unhinged,” involved White House attorneys and outside advisers screaming at each other, according to taped testimony. Trump’s sympathies lay with the outsiders encouraging him to keep fighting — he appeared to appoint one of them, Sidney Powell, as a “special prosecutor,” but never followed through with paperwork. Nor did he pursue their proposed plan to seize voting machines from multiple states, which his White House Counsel Pat Cipollone condemned as “a terrible idea for the country,” adding, “There’s no legal authority to do that.”

But their reckless spirit spilled over into Trump’s plan for what committee member Jaime Raskin described as “three rings of interwoven attack” focused on subverting the election on Jan. 6.

The inside ring, Raskin said, focused on “getting Mike Pence to abandon his oath of office … to reject electoral votes,” the middle ring, “members of domestic violent extremist groups created an alliance both online and in-person to coordinate a massive effort to storm, invade, and occupy the Capitol,” and the outer ring, consisted of the “large and angry crowd,” that “with the proper incitement by political leaders and the proper instigation from the extremists … could be led to storm the Capitol, confront the vice president and Congress, and try to overturn the 2020 election results.”

While there isn’t evidence that Trump coordinated directly with the extremist groups, he didn’t need to for his plan to succeed. It was sufficient simply to summon them, which they responded by dramatically shifting their behavior to align with him, as supported by taped testimony. “The former president, for seemingly the first time, was speaking directly to extremist organizations and giving them directives,” a Twitter employee recalled. “We had not seen that sort of direct communication before.” The Proud Boys and Oath Keepers had not worked together before, but now they and other groups began coordinating — as earlier evidence, highlighted by Raskin, had already established.

Prior to that tweet, extremists “were prepared to fight,” but “it was vague,” the employee said. Afterwards, “It became clear not only were these individuals ready and willing, but the leader of their cause was asking them to join him in this cause and in fighting for this cause in D.C. on Jan. 6.”

What was necessary, however, was the element of surprise: keeping the crowd in the dark until the last moment, along with law enforcement and security officials. And there’s plenty of evidence of this.

One of two live witnesses, Stephen Ayres, a former Trump supporter convicted for his involvement, only came to attend the rally and “didn’t actually plan to go down there” to the Capitol, until Trump riled up the crowd. After the speech, “I’m angry,” he said. “So were most of the people there.” And “I think everybody thought he was going to be coming down” to march with them.

Trump’s intention to storm the Capitol was known to the rally organizers in advance.

In the previous hearing, Cassidy Hutchinson said that her boss, Trump’s chief of staff, Mark Meadows, had warned her on Jan. 2 that things might get “real, real bad” on Jan. 6. In this hearing, committee member Stephanie Murphy revealed a pattern of specific communications about what was in store.

After a phone call with Meadows, rally organizer Katrina Pierson sent an email to her fellow organizers, saying, “POTUS expectations are to have something intimate at the Ellipse, and call on everyone to march to the Capitol.”

Murphy also shared a Jan. 4 text message from a rally organizer to Mike Lindell, the MyPillow CEO: “This stays between us. We’re having a second stage at the Supreme Court again, after the Ellipse. POTUS is going to have us march there/the Capitol. It cannot get out about the second stage, because people will try and set up another and sabotage it. It can also not get out about the march, because I will be in trouble with the National Park Service and all the agencies. But POTUS is going to just call for it, quote, unexpectedly.”

The extremists knew what was coming as well — as did anyone following them on social media. And not a few days in advance.

“When people are shooting each other tomorrow, I will try and rest in the knowledge that we tried,” the anonymous Twitter employee said in a Slack message on Jan. 5.

“For months I had been begging and anticipating and attempting to raise the reality that if nothing — if we made no intervention into what I saw occurring, people were going to die,” they said. “And on Jan. 5, I realized no intervention was coming.”

The eighth Jan. 6 Committee hearing is scheduled for July 21, in primetime, and will focus on the insurrection itself. But the evidence laid out in the July 12 hearing makes it unmistakable who is ultimately responsible for all the carnage of that day.

From Gettysburg to Insurrection

What some Americans seem to have forgotten

On Feb. 10, 2007, Senator Barack Obama announced his candidacy for the presidency of the United States in Springfield, Illinois. He did it at the old state Capitol building, where Abraham Lincoln delivered his “House Divided” speech. The symbolism in the staging of the announcement was intentional. For this is the same place, where Lincoln spoke after signing the legal document emancipating the enslaved while holding together this nation’s broken union — Obama’s announcement positioned him as the heritor of Lincoln’s legacy.

On one side of this political equation, it’s reasonable to believe a person of color could be elected president in this day and age. In what we would call naivete now, he thought he could be the bridge that united America in overcoming racial prejudice the conclusion of the “long arc of justice” and the herald of a “post racial America.” Essentially, Lincoln and Obama were supposed to be historical bookends. This all sounded good but the analogy turned out to be anything but. In retrospect, the historic connection between Lincoln and Obama is stronger and more alike than anyone knew at the time President Obama was inaugurated.

This history of the American Civil War started weeks before President Lincoln’s first inauguration. It wasn’t so much that this Republican won as it was the hostilities between North and South that had been simmering for many years over slavery, buttressed by the debate over “states’ rights.” The Civil War was the most violent expression of these core Southern values based on individual property rights — human bondage included.

Lincoln didn’t come into office to explicitly end slavery. In fact, he said many things that would lead us to believe keeping the union together was more important than emancipating Black people. However, it was his election that precipitated the war. Two bloody years later, President Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation on Jan. 1, 1863 to help quickly end the war. Later that year, he delivered his famous speech on the Gettysburg battlefield, which started, “Fourscore and seven years ago, our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” It’s notable that he didn’t say “all white men.” However, that speech was attempting to unify a deeply divided nation on a battlefield where 46,000 to 51,000 soldiers from both armies were casualties in the three-day battle — the most costly in all of U.S. history.

He ended that speech with this vision for the future, “that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.” He would not live to see this happen and in the intervening years between Gettysburg and the surrender at Appomattox, Reconstruction and the Obama presidency this country has struggled with the true meaning of who “the people” actually include.

Racism in America has had a long and enduring legacy that is at the very core of our nation’s consciousness and conflicts — something that post-Civil War immigrants hardly understand. It is why Black civil rights have taken center stage ever since.

It is a well known fact that on the very night of Barack Obama’s inauguration, Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell gathered the Republican leaders of Congress to plan to oppose and obstruct this new president and his Democratic party. It did not start off as a plan for the insurrection on the Capitol 12 years later, but it surely led to it by hostile partisanship; all the while Obama attempted to reach across the divide on healthcare, drastic Wall Street and banking reform and ending the unpopular war in Iraq.

The rise of Birtherism, questioning Obama’s birth certificate status to be president, was only a part of the racism lodged against him, supported by none other than Donald J. Trump, a celebrity, reality TV brand who was a well known con artist and racist in New York. That Trump would later replace him as No. 45 shocked both the nation and world. It did, however, set the stage for what was to come with the revival of old racial grievances that the majority of Americans thought were dead and buried history, like the Civil War soldiers at Gettysburg. How can America be racist if we elected a Black man as president?

Trump’s election, in response was like a conjuring up of all the ghosts of America’s past, playing to some of the most base prejudices latent in the collective unconscious, fed by Fox News fear mongering and amplified by social media disinformation. America returned to the age-old conflict of emancipation or subjugation of Black Americans and adding other non-white people. And like many times before, this tyranny was wrapped in the flag and carrying the Christian cross.

That the Confederate battle flag, the symbol of the failed Lost Cause of 1860 is flown next to the Trump flags and banners is as self-evident as any branding Trump places on his properties. He and his militia followers are intent on fomenting a second civil war and came damn close to actually pulling it off on Jan. 6, 2021. However, this time, unlike with the aftermath of the Civil War, when Jefferson Davis who led the Confederacy was not prosecuted, the Union has to convict Trump and his co-conspirators and make sure they never, ever hold power again. It’s unfinished business.

“It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work, which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us — that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion.”

—A. Lincoln, 16th president at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, 1863

San Pedro Music Festival Returns

Festival Highlights a Soulful Tribute to Stevie Wonder

The San Pedro Music Festival always honors musicians, Windy Barnes Farrell noted, because they are the key to the state of people’s consciousness.

“Musicians make people feel happy,” she said. “They make people embrace a sad moment or whatever we’re feeling, there’s music that can accompany that feeling. That’s a huge job that we have as musicians, to have that kind of responsibility to bring peace and happiness to the world. We were without it for a while and bad as it was, hopefully it caused people to really think about it. What would the world be like if we just did not have music? It would be bad, right?”

It’s been three years since the last San Pedro Music Festival. Dealt with the pandemic and subsequent shutdown, the event returns July 31 at the Warner Grand Theatre, with a focus to give back to the community.

Windy Barnes Farrell, the woman at its helm, spoke to Random Lengths News about her plans for the festival, including a couple surprises.

Windy has three goals for the music festival, which is now a nonprofit, the first being connecting to people’s consciousness.

The second goal is to bring the community together. Windy said because this community is so diverse, she wants the music to reflect this demographic.

“So we have something that everyone can enjoy,” said Windy. “It’s an eclectic fest because of that. I’m very particular about saying it’s a music fest, which does not mean it’s just jazz. It’s just music, and good music at that.”

However, Windy’s main goal is to help families that have been impacted by gun and gang violence — and their loss, in particular — with funeral costs, food and grief counseling.

The lineup features Windy Barnes and Stevie Wonder’s backing band, Wonderlove, rendering songs by Stevie Wonder, which Windy was a part of, Resurrection Road, The Habits, Wild Bunch, Sunny Daye, Andre Washington, Heru Yahli, band-leader and conga player Victor Orlando and Fun-Ja-La — playing funk, jazz and Latin, Josie Aiello, and trumpeter Tatiana Tate.

The repertoire of these artists range from alternative pop, country, genre-bending bands that blend pop, R&B, hip-hop to funk, jazz and latin big band. This grouping of San Pedro solo artists, bands and singer-songwriters, provide “soul music for the soul.” Some have appeared alongside Jennifer Lopez, Kanye West and Faith Evans and have performed with the Inspirational Voices of Free! under the direction of Windy Barnes Farrell — an international performing artist who has toured extensively with Stevie Wonder, Julio Iglesias and Michael Bolton.

Hosting the event is actress and comedian Roz Ryan, who has worked for productions in film, television and Broadway for more than 40 years. Ryan’s first role on Broadway was in Ain’t Misbehavin’, a Fats Waller-influenced musical revue that debuted in 1978.

SPMF is also introducing something new, showing videos of artists who Windy would have loved to have present. She said either she couldn’t afford them or they passed away. These include Celia Cruz, Pavarotti and James Brown doing a duet together, Prince, Misty Copeland and artist Miguel, who is from San Pedro, and an all-female Mariachi band.

“We’re trying to spotlight San Pedro talent because there’s a lot of gems here that people aren’t aware of,” Windy said. “People don’t have to go all over the place to find talent. You can find talent right here.”

Another very special part of the festival will be the “Artist Memoriam,” for artists who died between 2020 to 2022. Windy said these videos will be life-sized, with beautiful music behind it featuring the five most iconic artists who have passed away and who have impacted, especially, the African American community: Prince, James Brown, Whitney Houston, Michael Jackson and Aretha Franklin.

“It starts with them,” Windy said. “No matter what year they [died] they just left a hole that was too much.”

Windy Barnes Farrell in the inside of the Warner Grand Theatre. Photo by Arturo Garcia Ayala

Nonprofit and the Heal

My Family program

Windy has long had a passion for families impacted by gun violence. She was reared in Chicago’s Southside in the neighborhood of Englewood — also known today as Chicago’s murder capital. Windy’s life was touched by street violence directly and indirectly in her youth by her two older brothers who led double lives as gang leaders out in the streets on the one hand, and meek and obedient sons at home on the other. The line separating the two lives fell apart when the police repeatedly raided the family home in search of weapons and ammunition. Windy said she had at times hid these weapons for her brothers.

“By the time I was about 13, I had lost about six close friends to gun violence,” Windy said. “As a kid it’s overwhelming to learn that your friend is dead. And then [it happens to] another and another.”

She said when she thinks back, she believes she had buried those thoughts associated with gangs.

“You hear the word gang, you know what a gun is and what murder is way too early. That still bothers me to this day.”

Windy founded Windy City Entertainment Incorporated with the intention of financing youth programs in Chicago — designed to instill a sense of identity and purpose, including trips to Africa to counter the violence and the killing taking place in her hometown. Her thoughts soon turned to the question of what resources and relationships could she pull together to address the issue and see a direct impact?

The answer caused her to turn her attention to where she lives now and collaborating with leaders working on the issue in her own neighborhood: Justice for Murdered Children and Parents of Murdered Children.

“I know that once I [get] involved, there’s no turning back,” she said. “It’s a heavy thing to do and I’m very sensitive. When I see things, it’s overwhelming sometimes. I’ve been preparing for this family [I’m] going to meet.”

Justice For Murdered Children acts as advocates in court for murdered children. The organization speaks to office holders to change policy and to acquire monetary awards for the victim’s families. The organization connects Windy’s nonprofit with families of homicide victims to further help them in areas around grief counseling and more. Parents of Murdered Children Inc. offers ongoing emotional support, education, awareness and advocacy to all survivors of homicide victims. It does not give money. Through collaboration with Windy’s nonprofit, this is where her “Heal My Family” program comes in to provide financial assistance.

Additionally, Windy just received two proclamations; one from Sen. Stephen Bradford for Windy City Entertainment and one from Supervisor Janice Hahn for Windy’s participation in the Juneteenth celebration at the Korean Bell, which she noted was the first time the Korean Bell had rung for Juneteenth. She said being a part of that initial program was epic, from having her nonprofit recognized and being associated with that Juneteenth celebration.

“Music touches people,” Windy said. “This is just what I want to do so much for this community. It’s a special gift from Supervisor Hahn and myself. There will be something for the kids to see. It’s for all ages. There are so many layers to this. I’m really excited about the whole thing.”

The event also includes vendors, music sales, tee shirts commemorating the second annual festival and possible live stream of parts of the festival. The San Pedro Legends Car Club will present their cars in front of the theater so people can take pictures while they’re not on the purple — not red — carpet. There will be a food truck or two during intermission so people can meet and mingle and stretch out, as it’s a five-hour event.

San Pedro Music Festival will have a VIP reception from 3 to 4 p.m. for a $50 entry fee, which includes entertainment with a singer and pianist, food and signature wines (Windy’s own label), a silent auction featuring works unseen by anybody from Windy’s granddaughter Jaylynn. VIPs have balcony seating, perfect for stretching out and the whole event will be set up for social distancing.

Masks are strongly encouraged and bring your vaccination cards.

San Pedro Music Festival

Time: 4 to 9 p.m., July 31

Cost: Free

Details: sanpedromusicfestival.com

Venue: Warner Grand Theater, 478 W. 6th St., San Pedro

‘Someone Else’s Ocean’ — Ports Should Serve the Public, New Report Argues

The world’s ocean shipping lines, primarily concentrated into just three shipping alliances, generated about $190 billion in profits last year, mainly due to dramatically higher prices. But many others involved in global trade — businesses as well as workers, consumers, and communities — haven’t fared so well during the pandemic. Shipping costs have helped fuel inflation, congestion delays have severely damaged some businesses, workers have suffered high rates of COVID-19, and continued pollution exacerbated COVID-19’s health impacts.

A new report from the Economic Roundtable, “Someone Else’s Ocean,” looks beyond the extreme jolt of the pandemic, to the long-term neglect of the broad public interest that’s facilitated those disparities, specifically focused on the San Pedro Bay ports. “The ports are public property, and legally their obligation is to provide benefits for residents of California,” the report’s co-author Daniel Flaming told Random Lengths News. “And our central findings in the report are that the ports have become instruments of foreign shippers and foreign manufacturers who don’t have a stake in the port communities or the American labor force. ”Random Lengths News interviewed Flaming at length (the full interview is available online). He discussed issues like the imbalance of imports and exports, the importance of longshore jobs in the local economy, and the ripple effect costs of automation. If continued, and 50% of longshore work was eliminated, “that would be a loss of about $402 million a year in wages, and then it would destroy another roughly 2,500 non-port jobs,” he warned. “And if 75% of jobs were eliminated, that would be about 11 million hours of dockwork that would disappear, and about $628 million in wages. And that will eliminate the over 3,800 jobs that are supported by dockworkers’ household spending. So it can be very destructive for port communities.”

Most importantly, Flaming provided a summary of the report’s recommendations:

One of the things they could do would be to enact an impact fee. For any kind of new development there’s an impact fee — to pay for parks, pay for schools, pay for roads, pay for housing. And so there should be an impact fee on any automation for the cost of unemployed workers. And as we were just saying, we recommend the state should enact a tax on automated terminals meant to generate public revenue comparable to revenue from the jobs it destroyed. And we recommend that the ports eliminate all of the discounts for exporting empty containers, and have a surcharge to offset the under-utilization of California’s export capacity, and that the ports should also provide discounts for containers that export California’s goods. And that the jobs that the port provides, including the truck drivers who have really difficult jobs, should be paid a livable wage, the prevailing wage.

We also recommended that the union, the ILWU, should become more active in reviewing and providing public comment on terminal leases and we also recommend that the port should not pursue any more automation plans unless it’s demonstrated that there will be a net benefit for workers. And finally, we recommend that the port become proactive in reaching out to California export industries, listening to how they can be helpful in supporting them in exporting their products.

In conclusion, Random Lengths highlighted one more problem: the ports’ lack of any built-in institutionalized relationships with countervailing forces to offset the day-to-day influence of shippers. The Port Community Advisory Committee did provide a rudimentary model, but what’s needed, we suggested is something “with a lot broader range of shareholders, representing not just the local community but the whole region — LA County as a whole as well as the Inland Empire — and to some extent the whole state.”

“I think that’s a superb recommendation,” Flaming said. “I think you’re absolutely spot on.”

New Bills Could Increase Funding for Harbor Area Waters

On July 11, the Northwest San Pedro Neighborhood Council voted 12-0 with one abstention from John DiMeglio to support two pending state bills, both of which would increase the territory of the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy (RMC) to include the Dominguez Channel in Carson, and several other watersheds, including those in council district 15.

The two bills are Senate bill 1122, introduced by Sen. Ben Allen, and Assembly bill 2897, introduced by Assemblyman Patrick O’Donnell. Both bills are essentially the same and would add the coastal watersheds of Manhattan Beach to the Palos Verdes Peninsula, and Santa Catalina Island to the conservancy’s territory. This is in addition to the Dominguez Channel, which was the site of a foul odor in 2021, caused by chemical contamination from a warehouse fire. These bills would increase the resources and funding available to these areas.

“Even within our northwest San Pedro area we will greatly benefit,” said Gwen Henry, chair of the Northwest San Pedro Neighborhood Council’s Sustainability Committee, when she presented the motion to the board. “It’s a tremendous amount of funding. It will continue the river that has gone from the mountain, all the way through the Los Angeles River area.”

The board’s motion also said that this could revive the Port of Los Angeles, Wilmington Waterfront Park and the West Harbor LA Waterfront, and provide more educational opportunities to schools.

“Whereas, by including CD15 and the historic coastal wetlands within the Conservancy’s jurisdiction, the State is ensuring that their unique open space and wildlife habitat resources will be preserved and enhanced for present and future generations,” the motion says.

The neighborhood council’s vote came a couple weeks after the Los Angeles City Council voted on a similar motion, voting 12-0 on June 29 to support the bills, with Mayor Eric Garcetti supporting them on July 5.

The Coastal San Pedro Neighborhood Council voted 11-0 with one abstention on June 21 to support one of the bills, SB 1122. Board member Lashanda Roz Roberts abstained.

Richard Havenick, chair of the Coastal San Pedro Neighborhood Council’s Environment and Sustainability Committee, said that his neighborhood council had previously supported the other bill, Assembly bill 2897, in May 2020. However, he said that bill had died in committee, so his council was supporting the Senate bill instead.

“The Senate bill, if approved, will release state funding to ensure restoration and preservation of open space for recreational and educational uses that will enhance our area within CD15 and extending to Catalina Island,” Havenick said.

Henry said that she is surprised that it took the Assembly bill four years to get to this point.

“I guess Patrick [O’Donnell] just didn’t have the clout,” Henry said. “Ben Allen took it up.”

Henry wants her council to really push for the adoption of the bills.

“It’s just one part of changing the entire port area, which used to be so polluted,” Henry said. “You can have industry, and clean industry, next to re-naturalized areas. And it doesn’t have to be what it’s been, which is just terrible, health-wise.”

Henry said that the conservancy expanding its territory would benefit many Harbor Area bay cities. This includes areas near Gaffey in San Pedro.

Wilmington and Harbor City could greatly benefit from watershed restoration, Henry said. Banning’s Landing in Wilmington has mudflats that could be used as open space.

Henry said that watersheds begin in the mountains, then go to valleys, and continue into the ocean.

“The most important part of any watershed, the one that’s the richest and the most biodiverse, usually, is along the shoreline,” Henry said.

Henry said that portions of Torrance, Carson, Inglewood and Madrona Marsh all used to be wetlands.

“The state has funded a lot of the upper river watersheds,” Henry said.

She pointed out that Mayor Garcetti awarded $28 million to the Los Angeles River earlier this year.

“I believe that he gave that money because, of course, 2028 Olympics are coming,” Henry said. “Los Angeles has to look like the city of the future.”

She said there are a lot of things that must be done in LA to have it lead the way for the rest of the country, in terms of alternate energy and restoring waterways.

“It actually is an extreme benefit to have funds to try to restore the waterways,” Henry said.

She said that LA is one of the top 30 cities in the world with the most biodiversity.

“Within the City of Los Angeles, we have everything from mountains to desert, to oceans, wetlands,” Henry said. “And the count of species is pretty tremendous.”

She said that breaking down cement channels and re-naturalizing them creates open space, letting greenery grow, and restores ecosystems.

“It filters the water of toxins and nutrients,” Henry said. “It creates places for creatures to grow.”

Henry said there is a population of steelhead trout that is stuck in the Los Angeles River and cannot migrate. However, if the conservancy were to take over and repair inlets, such as at the Dominguez Channel, the trout might begin migrating again.

“This is like one of the hidden secrets of something that could be done, ecologically, that would be just unbelievable,” Henry said.

Moral Panic Over Fake News

By Nolan Higdon

In July 2022, David Keppler, writing for the Associated Press, warned that as “trust wanes, conspiracy theories rise,” and people in the U.S. are increasingly “rejecting what they hear from scientists, journalists or public officials.” After years of complicating and exacerbating the threats posed by disinformation through failed policies of censorship, the federal government seems to be coming to the realization that education is the best hope for mitigating the influence of disinformation on a democracy. As Keppler’s article was being published, The Digital Citizenship and Media Literacy Act & The Veterans Online Information and Cybersecurity Empowerment Act were introduced by members of the U.S. Congress to provide federal aid to media literacy education in the U.S.

Keppler’s article typified the moral panic over fake news, or disinformation, which began during the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election and was magnified during Donald Trump’s presidency and the COVID-19 global pandemic. In response to these fears, the federal government and private industry have collaborated to determine what is truth for the public. Through public denouncements, hearings, and the threat of regulation and or trust-busting, federal lawmakers have repeatedly pressured Big Tech to remove or censor content from their platforms that they deem false.

Meanwhile, companies such as Facebook and Newsguard, have capitalized on the moral panic, collaborating with people from the military-intelligence community to create problematic fact checking tools that purportedly determine fact from fiction for citizens. Big-tech has been found to not only remove false content from their platforms, but accurate content as well. For example, in October 2020, Facebook and Twitter famously removed a New York Post story from its platform about Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden, even though the story was not false, it was unverified. The removal later proved to be unwarranted as it authenticated by other media outlets including The Daily Mail and The Washington Post.

For its part, the federal government created a Disinformation Governance Board (DGB) in 2022 that was headed by at first Nina Jankowicz who resigned in the face of public pressure, and then by former head of the Department of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff. Despite reassurances from the corporate media that only conservatives were spreading false information about the board, pundits on both the left and the right panned it as reminiscent of The Ministry of Truth from George Orwell’s classic dystopian novel 1984. The DGB, which the New York Times claimed would “monitor national security threats caused by the spread of dangerous disinformation,” was discontinued after objections across the political spectrum became difficult to ignore.

Strategies that seek to censor content or define truth by decree are anti-democratic and do nothing to prepare citizens to determine the veracity of messaging contents. They do, however, complicate and worsen the spread of false information while simultaneously empowering known fake news producers: governments, industry, political parties, and establishment media outlets.

This has long been known by education scholars who have argued that critical news literacy education was the best antidote to disinformation. In July 2022, two congressional bills aimed to do just that were proposed: The Digital Citizenship and Media Literacy Act & The Veterans Online Information and Cybersecurity Empowerment Act. Collectively, they would provide $40 million to federal agencies to fund education programs to improve media literacy for American students from kindergarten through high school and for military veterans.

For decades, media literacy practitioners, scholars, and policy makers have worked tirelessly to make citizens aware of the existence and importance of media literacy education. Their goal was to do what countless other nations have done over the last forty years: add media literacy education to the curriculum in the U.S. The post-2016 moral panic over fake news advanced those efforts making Americans aware of the necessity of media literacy education.

The Digital Citizenship and Media Literacy Act & The Veterans Online Information and Cybersecurity Empowerment Act are promising steps toward funding media literacy education in U.S. schools. However, advocates need to be cautious that the bills do not become yet another opportunity for government and private industry to control information under the auspices of fighting fake news and promoting truth. Educators must ensure that they are offering students a critical news literacy not a corporate news literacy. Corporate-driven media—such as Facebook, Google, andNickelodeon—discourages critical thinking while enhancing brand awareness and socializing students to adopt corporate ideologies.

Click here to read the whole story at Project Censored.

 

 

EXCERPT— Inheritance: An Autobiography of Whiteness

By Andy Brack

“If South Carolina-born author Baynard Woods had his way, you would only read his name these days with a line through it like this: Baynard Woods.

But newspaper style is to be clear in writing, not to obfuscate, which is what a strikethrough does. Woods, however, uses the device in his new book to make a clear point – by striking through his name, he’s acknowledging the racial ills attached to his family from the past that he can’t escape while highlighting how it’s important for us all to move beyond race.”

https://charlestoncitypaper.com/brack-new-book-is-uncomfortable-but-important-read/

In 2010, the author saw in the Tea Party the stirrings of the fascist white power movement that would sweep Trump to office in 2016. But he was not ready to see how it implicated himself.

By Baynard Woods

When I attended the first Tea Party rally, on Tax Day, 2010, I was struck by how the low-grade horror of the obvious was transforming into the potential for real political terror. Of course, this was what whiteness looked like.

I met my friend Liam at Freedom Plaza early that bright spring afternoon. Liam was a big, tough, blue-collar dude I played country music with. He was a D.C. cop until he got shot. Then he worked on the railroad until two cars coupling crushed half his right hand. Then he became a union organizer, and he was a perfect fit for the job—the loud-talking, confrontational type of organizer who might just slam you up against a wall to make a point. He was the perfect guy to go to the Tea Party with.

When we got there, we found thousands of people wearing tricorne hats and other colonial-era garb along with signs reading “Don’t Tread on Me,” “Obama is a traitor” or “My freedom is a big fucking deal.” Pretty much everyone was white and over forty-five. I thought of Dad. He wasn’t the type to attend rallies — his political actions were largely confined to cursing at the television or the radio — but he shared the sentiments of these Tea Partiers. How much of their anger was the anger he’d expressed when I talked to him about school desegregation? This generation of white men had entered a world where they had to compete with Black people for jobs that had previously been reserved for them. And now, for the first time, there was a post boomer president, and he was Black. And to them that was unbearable.

I started talking with a white guy named John, who had long wavy hair coming out of a white baseball cap. He had on shorts and a loosely buttoned shirt showing off his gold chains.

“I’m ready for the next revolution,” he said. “I firmly believe that the guy in the White House is a Muslim. He hates America, I think he hates whitey. He’s a self-loathing piece of shit.”

“What do you think the post revolution world would look like?” I asked.

“It would look like me,” he said.

After a while, I needed to escape the constant barrage of aggressive whiteness that was almost bowling me over, so Liam and I went to a bar. Then we went to another one, where we ate oysters for a couple of hours. As it got dark, he left and I went down to the main event, where thousands of people crowded the mall and I wandered off through the apocalyptically Caucasian crowd into the heart of what looked to me like white doom.

I spotted one odd sign. “Defend Obama: Outlaw White Supremacy,” it said. Then I noticed that people were standing around it, holding other signs with arrows and the word “Infiltrator!” written across them.

I decided I needed to go see what was happening and snaked through the crowd until I reached the sign, which was being held aloft by two young people, a white woman and a Black man. Around them, a crowd of angry old white people were yelling and jeering.

“Hey, what’s going on?” I asked, walking up with my tape recorder out.

The couple with the sign said nothing. They just looked straight ahead and did not react.

“We’re blocking them off,” a Tea Partier told me.

“Is there a reason for that?” I asked.

“Because that’s offensive and no one should see it.”

“What is offensive about it?” I asked.

“ ‘Outlaw white supremacy’?” the woman sneered. “These Kool-Aid drinkers think all the Tea Partiers are racist.”

“If the Tea Party movement isn’t white supremacist, why block the sign off?” I asked, doing my best to appear as a neutral journalist. “Wouldn’t the Tea Party also want to outlaw white supremacy?”

“They don’t belong here,” the woman said.

She would not give her name.

A blond woman stepped toward me, aggressively.

“I can’t find a white supremacist, can you? Let’s go find one,” she said, and grabbed my arm, digging her fingers in.

“Hold on, hold on. Let go of me, please,” I said, my voice rising to an embarrassingly high pitch.

“Come on, let’s go,” she said, gripping my arm harder and pulling as people jostled around us. I jerked my arm away from her grasp.

“Let’s go find a white supremacist,” she said again, reaching for me once more as the crowd that had been focused on the sign now turned all its attention to me.

“Hold on,” I said.

“Let’s go find one. Do you know one? Do you know one?” she asked, grasping again at my arm.

“Do you have to know a crack smoker to outlaw crack?” I asked.

“Do you smoke it?” she asked.

Then she paused and sniffed, pointing at my face.

“Have you been drinking?”

I stepped back, trying to get away from her grabbing hands.

“You’ve been drinking,” she announced, delighted, her swelling southern accent almost a slur, moving across the word drinking like a truck over an oil slick. “You’ve been drinking. How much did you have before you came down here?”

People chanted, “USA, USA” in the background.

“You been drinking, haven’t you buddy?” she said.

The crowd around us loved that. It confirmed all their stereotypes about the liberal media. More people started yelling at me.

“Did you beat your wife before you came here today?” one guy bellowed.

Others started waving their “Infiltrator!” signs at me like tomahawks. I held up my arm to keep one from hitting me in the head.

I had swiftly lost control of this situation.

“Let me show you a picture of my grandchild,” the blond woman said as she dug into her purse. “Let me show you a picture of my grandchild.”

I knew what was coming. I hated every second of this confrontation.

“Look!” She pulled out a picture.

“He is cute,” I said.

“He’s Black!” she cried. “Isn’t he cute? He’s Black. Isn’t that great? My grandson is Black!”

“And that means what?” I asked.

“That means I’m not a white supremacist,” she said.

“He’s been drinking,” someone else yelled.

“I didn’t say you were one—but if you aren’t, why worry about this sign?” I asked.

“We’re not white supremacists,” the blond woman said. “Obama is a Black supremacist. That’s what we’re against. To be against Black supremacy isn’t white supremacy.”

“He’s been drinking,” a man yelled again.

More white people in tricornes and American flag T-shirts had gathered around. I didn’t even know what the couple’s sign really meant. It was hard to imagine what outlawing white supremacy would look like in a country where, with the exception of the first Black president, the political and law enforcement establishment was overwhelmingly white. But I applauded their sign and the courage it took to hold it.

“Well, thanks a lot for your time,” I said, easing back, hoping no one would push me down from behind. I felt as if I was in danger and I needed to get out.

“Going to smoke some crack?” the blond woman asked.

“He needs another drink,” a man said.

I did need another drink after I managed to extract myself from the rally. But more than that, I needed to get my ass home.

On the Metro ride back to Greenbelt that night, I stared at my reflection in the darkened window, exhausted, my buzz already a hangover. And as I thought about the Tea Party and its white anger, it was as if I saw Dad’s face superimposed over mine. All of this rage came from insecurity. Whiteness is the fear both of being seen and of not being seen. Whiteness demands to dictate its own terms—and everyone else’s terms too. For white people, politically, “don’t tread on me” also means “I can tread on you.” Whiteness sees any Black gain as white loss.

This anger wasn’t confined to the Tea Party event, it felt intimately familiar. It was the same anger and sense of aggrieved loss that had suffused Columbia, S.C. when I was growing up and the shared feeling in my community that the Civil War and the world had turned out wrong. It was the anger that suffused people I loved.

It was the anger I had, far too often, felt in myself. I started to sense that whiteness would be one of the most pressing political problems of the coming era. But it implicated me. And so I forgot. But the furies would find me soon enough.

Special Hearing: Deputy Gangs in the L.A. County Sheriff’s Department

The Civilian Oversight Commission is hosting a special hearing on deputy gangs in the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department. The public is encouraged to attend. Community input is vital to the ongoing analysis of the department’s policies, practices and procedures.

View the Agenda.

On July 25, there are three ways to tune in:

  1. In Person: RSVP and join us at Loyola Marymount University, Albert H. Girardi Advocacy Center, 919 Albany Street, Los Angeles, CA 90015
  2. Watch: Register for Webex (event password: COC123) or follow the Facebook Livestream.
  3. Listen: Call 213-306-3065 and enter access code: 2594 957 3398 and numeric meeting password: 262123

Submit written comments for the official meeting record by completing this form. Submissions will be accepted until July 25 at 5:00 p.m.

Time: 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. July 25

Cost: Free

Details: 213-253-5678; cocnotify@coc.lacounty.gov

Venue: Loyola Marymount University, Downtown Law Campus, Albert H. Girardi Advocacy Center, Robinson Courtroom, 919 Albany Street, Los Angeles.

Los Angeles Murder Suspect Added to FBI’s Ten Most Wanted Fugitives List

Suspect is accused of killing a man in front of barbershop

Omar Alexander Cardenas, wanted for his alleged involvement in the murder of a man and unlawful flight to avoid prosecution, has been added to theTen Most Wanted Fugitives list. The FBI is offering a reward of up to $100,000 for information leading directly to his arrest.

On August 15, 2019, Cardenas allegedly fired several rounds from a semi-automatic handgun in the direction of a barbershop, striking an adult male standing outside in the head, causing his death. The incident took place at Hair Icon Barber Shop, which is located in a small shopping center in the Sylmar neighborhood of Los Angeles, California. Law enforcement officials believe the victim may not have known Cardenas.

“At the scene of the crime, Mr. Cardenas is believed to have fired approximately six shots into a public space,” said Special Agent Michael Alker who is investigating the case for the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office. “He is not only a risk to the public, but he may also have information related to other violent crimes.”

Read more at: https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/omar-cardenas-added-to-ten-most-wanted-fugitives-list-072022

BA.5 Fuels Increase in COVID Metrics; Residents in High Poverty Areas Hospitalized At Faster Rate

The highly infectious BA.5 subvariant is fueling the rapid spread of COVID-19, leading to increases in Los Angeles County cases, hospitalizations and deaths, with residents in areas of high poverty being hospitalized at a higher rate.

In LA County, the Omicron variant continues to account for 100% of the county’s sequenced specimens, with BA.5 dominating, representing 48% of all sequenced specimens.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or CDC estimates that, across the country, as of the week ending July 9, the BA.5 subvariants of Omicron accounted for nearly 70% of specimens, a considerable increase from the 40% just two weeks prior. In both the national data and LA County data, BA.5 continues to outcompete the BA.2 subvariant and its sublineages and is increasing at a faster rate than the BA.4 subvariant.

Further, the number of daily new cases continues to rise. Over the last seven days, the average number of daily new cases reported was 6,742, a 24% increase from two weeks ago when the average number of daily new cases reported was 5,425. Additionally, the test positivity rate has now increased to 16.5%.

The number of people severely ill and needing to be hospitalized is also increasing. Over the last seven days, the average number of COVID-19-positive patients per day in LA County hospitals was 1,243, a 52% increase from two weeks ago when the 7-day average number of COVID-positive patients per day was 820. The hospital admission rate has also increased over the last two weeks. On July 13, the weekly hospital admission rate was 10.5 residents per 100,000 people, a 50% increase from two weeks prior when the rate was seven residents per 100,000 people on June 29. Of those hospitalized, on average, 42% are hospitalized with COVID-related illness.

Deaths, which typically lag hospitalizations by several weeks are also increasing, with an average of 14 deaths reported per day this past week, compared to an average of eight deaths two weeks ago.

Public Health continues to note the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 among some communities, including those communities with high rates of poverty.

As of July 8, hospitalization rates in the lowest income communities were 71% higher than in the highest income areas, with 20 residents per 100,000 in the lowest income communities hospitalized compared to just 12 residents per 100,000 in the highest income areas. Additionally, compared to one month ago, hospitalization rates in the lowest income areas increased 24%, while there was only a 7% increase in hospitalization rates in the highest income areas.