Tuesday, October 21, 2025
spot_img
spot_img
Home Blog Page 373

Gov. Newsom Calls for Bold Actions To Accelerate Toward Climate Goals

SACRAMENTO Gov. Gavin Newsom July 22, pushed California to move faster to reach its climate goals, setting ambitious new targets for renewable energy, clean buildings, carbon removal, and clean fuels in the transportation sector. The Governor’s accelerated climate plan reinforces California’s leadership in addressing climate change, and will move the state faster toward carbon neutrality.

In a letter to the Chair of the California Air Resources Board (CARB), Governor Newsom called for the state to ensure that the 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan provides a path to achieve both the 2030 climate goal and state carbon neutrality no later than 2045, requesting that the final plan incorporate new efforts to advance offshore wind, clean fuels, climate-friendly homes, carbon removal and addressing methane leaks.

Last month, Governor Newsom signed a state budget that will make it easier to bring clean energy projects online, speeding up the environmental review process of new clean energy projects, and helping the state move away from electricity generated from fossil fuels.

The Governor also announced that he will work with the Legislature to enshrine carbon neutrality into state law, increase the state’s ambition towards our 2030 climate goals and accelerate California’s clean energy targets, while supporting carbon sequestration from our natural and working lands and advancing safe and equitable engineered carbon removal. He will also work to finalize the state’s historic investments under the $53.9 billion climate commitment, with a focus on equity and community resilience, while expanding opportunities for climate innovation and manufacturing here in California.

The new targets and requested actions outlined in the letter include:

  • Offshore Wind: Establishing a California Energy Commission planning goal of at least 20GW of offshore wind in 2045.
  • Clean and Healthy Buildings: Creating a goal of 3 million climate-ready and climate-friendly homes by 2030 and 7 million by 2035, supplemented by 6 million heat pumps by 2030, and directing 50% of investments to low-income and disadvantaged communities.
  • Moving Away from Fossil Fuels: Directing state agencies to plan for an energy transition to meet our long-term energy goals that avoids the need for new natural gas plants, while ensuring reliability. Establishing a 20 percent clean fuels target for the aviation sector. The Governor also requested that CARB evaluate a more stringent Low Carbon Fuel Standard and accelerate refinery transitions to clean fuels production.
  • Methane: Forming a task force to identify and address methane leaks from oil infrastructure near communities, recognizing the threats these leaks can pose to community health and safety.
  • Carbon Removal: Setting a 20 MMT carbon removal target for 2030 and 100 MMT carbon removal target for 2045, emphasizing the role of natural and working lands and the need for safe and equitable engineered carbon removal.
  • Increasing Climate Ambition: Partnering with the Legislature to make carbon neutrality state law and accelerate progress toward California’s 2030 target; bring new ambition to the state’s clean energy goals; develop policy to support sequestration from natural and working lands while incorporating industrial carbon capture in carbon neutrality efforts; and finalize investments under the state’s $53.9 billion Climate Commitment.

The California Air Resources Board will meet in the fall to consider adopting a final draft of the 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan.

Governor Newsom today also announced the launch of a new climate dashboard highlighting state climate action and progress toward key targets. CalEPA will continue to expand the dashboard to help Californians understand the actions the state is taking to adapt to a changing climate, and track progress in areas such as zero-emission vehicle sales, clean energy job creation and consumer savings from energy efficiency standards.

 

 

LA County Sees High COVID-19 Community Level, Common-Sense Steps Slow the Spread

LA County remains in the CDC designated High Community Level the week of July 25, with the rate of new COVID hospital admissions increasing to 11.4 admissions per 100,000 people. The 7-day case rate also increased the week of July 18, by 30%; at 481 cases per 100,000 people, this is higher than the case rate in February during the Omicron winter surge.

While some of those infected experience only mild illness, many do not, and this is seen in the doubling of emergency department visits for COVID over the last two months. This is also seen in staffing shortages at worksites, including at healthcare facilities. Outbreaks at workplaces are disruptive and expensive since there is cost associated with covering shifts and preventing further spread. Households with infected members also suffer disruptions: including lost wages, difficulties isolating, and needing help caring for children.

High community transmission also leads to preventable, avoidable deaths, primarily among those most vulnerable. Nearly 4,500 people have already died from COVID this year. By slowing down transmission, the community has a chance at preventing some people from dying in the upcoming months.

It is also clear that many individuals infected with COVID have experienced long COVID, and with big increases in cases, there are likely to be more people reporting illness symptoms weeks after initial infection. The most common symptoms reported for Long COVID are fatigue and exercise intolerance, however breathing problems, brain fog, prolonged loss of taste and smell, and even sudden hair loss have occurred for some. The symptoms vary and may last or reappear over time.

High transmission has been fueled by increased circulation of BA.5, a sub-variant that is associated with high rates or reinfections. Given the results from a recent large study among veterans that identified increased risks to health created by repeat infections, slowing spread is likely to also help lower the risk of reinfections.

If you are up-to-date on vaccines that offers the best chance of not experiencing the worst outcomes. Vaccines and boosters continue to significantly reduce the risk of severe disease and death from COVID, should residents become infected. If residents have underlying health conditions or are an older adult, they should be prepared to seek treatment right away if they become sick with COVID. There are free, lifesaving-medications available to treat residents should they become infected and sick.

At home, and in the community, there are several steps residents can take to lower risk, including getting tested if sick or recently exposed, and isolating away from others if they tested positive. When out and about, don’t wait for a masking requirement before masking indoors. If planning to attend a private event, residents should test themselves before going and stay home if they test positive. When hosting an event, it makes sense when transmission is this high to ask others to test before attending. Outside remains safer than inside for parties and events. If gatherings do move indoors, increasing ventilation and masking indoors when not actively eating or drinking is sensible, especially if anyone with vulnerable health is attending.

At workplaces, maximizing ventilation is primary as it reduces the amount of virus in the air, should an infected person be present. Workplaces must provide medical grade masks and/or respirators and may choose to require indoor masking. Workplaces that are experiencing outbreaks have additional reporting, masking, testing, and return to work required measures.

 

Let’s Acknowledge Why This November’s Elections Look So Bleak for Democrats: Joe Biden

By Jeff Cohen

Mainstream political pundits gain wealth and clout by speculating about elections – who’s up, who’s down, who’s raising the most campaign cash (but almost never from whom, of course). Now, they’re looking ahead to the congressional midterm elections three months away.

The liberal and centrist pundits at CNN, MSNBC, PBS, NPR, New York Times, Washington Post seem to agree on two obvious truths about the Nov. 8 elections.

  1. Republicans are very likely to win big – taking over the U.S. House, and probably the Senate.
  2. Republicans in Congress have never been as extreme as they are now – out-of-touch philosophically with most voters.

It’s not hard to see the contradiction in those two “truths”: If Republicans are so out of touch with voters, why will they be winning big among those same voters?

Something must be flawed in this scenario. If genuine progressives were more prominent among the pundit elite, they might point out the flaw by identifying the huge albatross around Democrats’ neck: Joe Biden.

If voters’ attention this November were focused not on Biden, but on Republican extremism, Democrats would likely win big. In recent months, the unpopular Republican ideology has been on full display — even to voters only half-paying attention — including GOP efforts:

  • to end reproductive freedom nationwide.
  • to block gun-safety legislation.
  • to deny global warming (even as our country is literally burning up).
  • to refuse criticism of President Trump’s attack on democracy and a peaceful transfer of power.

Admittedly, voters are also focused on other issues, according to polls, primarily the economy and inflation – which is a global problem and not really Biden’s fault (though he has failed to effectively challenge corporate profiteering and price-gouging, or even rising pharmaceutical prices).

In hopes of avoiding a disaster for Democrats this November, some progressives are joining the #DontRunJoe campaign that I helped initiate with RootsAction.org. Our hope is that Biden will announce – very soon – that he won’t be the 2024 Democratic standard bearer, which could shift voters’ focus in the upcoming elections to party vs. party, Ds vs. Rs. This argument was made last month in a guest Newsweek column by a former U.S. ambassador appointed by Obama, “President Biden: I’m Begging You – Don’t Run in 2024. Our Country Needs You to Stand Down.”

The regular pundits who dominate liberal corporate media (I include PBS and NPR) know full well that Biden is a weak president, that he’s a “gaffe-machine,” that he’s proven to be incapable of using the presidential bully pulpit to get legislation through even his own party. They worry about his age. But they’ve been tied to him and have protected him since early 2016, when he emerged as the only candidate capable of stopping Bernie Sanders’ rise. These pundits approve of Biden ideologically: he’s a go-slow, “moderate” incrementalist like they are.

If sanity is to come to the political process before a disaster occurs in November, it won’t come from Democratic leaders or pundits.

It will have to be progressives and activist Democrats urging Joe Biden to announce he won’t run again – while acknowledging that we’re grateful for his defeat of Trump in 2020 (and we worked hard in swing states for that to happen). Progressives also need to keep demanding more executive orders from Biden in the coming months that materially improve peoples’ lives, beginning with student debt cancellation.

Such actions could point to a brighter future for progressives and Democrats who understand that the party in power in Washington has to deliver for working people. And soon. It would especially energize “Democrats under 30”; a recent poll found that 94 percent of them want a Democratic presidential nominee other than Biden in 2024.

In the fast-approaching November elections, Republicans have various advantages thanks to their gerrymandering and voter suppression tactics, and the historical pattern in midterms that favors the party not in the White House — as well as an undemocratic Senate that grants excessive power to low-population conservative states.

A change of direction is needed quickly from Democrats. Bumbling onward with Biden might appeal to short-sighted liberal pundits who are afraid of serious progressive change. But it’s a recipe for disaster that could one day make Jan. 6, 2021 look like a garden party.


Jeff Cohen is co-founder of RootsAction.org, a retired journalism professor at Ithaca College, and author of “Cable News Confidential: My Misadventures in Corporate Media.” In 1986, he founded the media watch group FAIR.

Former LBPD Officer Sentenced to Prison for Distributing Child Pornography While on Duty

A former Long Beach Police officer was sentenced July 25, to 70 months in federal prison for distributing sexually explicit images of children, including when he was on duty.

Anthony Brown, 57, formerly of Lakewood and who now resides in Island, Kentucky, was sentenced by United States District Judge Virginia A. Phillips, who also ordered him to pay a fine of $15,000 and to be placed on lifetime supervised release once he is released from prison.

Brown pleaded guilty on March 21 to one count of distribution of child pornography.

From October 2019 through May 2020, Brown used MeWe, an internet-based messaging application, to engage in graphic sex chats with other users in which he posed as his wife and discussed encouraging fictitious minor female relatives to participate in group sex acts. While logged on and while he was on duty as a Long Beach Police Department officer, Brown distributed images of teenage and prepubescent girls engaged in sexually explicit conduct.

On May 27, 2020, a Long Beach Police detective called Brown and told him that an account associated with his phone number had been used to upload child pornography.

Brown was a Long Beach Police officer for 27 years. He left the force in 2021 after his arrest on state charges of possession and distribution of child pornography. The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office dismissed those charges in light of the federal case.

Suspect At Large After Shooting in Peck Park Leaves Two Dead and Six Injured

By Raphael Richardson and Fabiola Esqueda, Community News Reporters

At least eight people have been injured in a shooting in San Pedro on Sunday Afternoon.

Two of the victims, both male have died after being transported to the hospital with gunshot wounds, authorities announced during a press conference. As of Sunday night, one other victim remains in critical condition.The eight victims range in ages from 23 to 54.

Reports of a shooting in Peck Park occurred before 4 p.m., in the 500 block of N. Western Avenue, Los Angeles Fire Department spokesman Brian Humphrey said. At that time, a car show and a baseball game with hundreds of people in attendance was taking place.

A family member of one-shot victim told Random Lengths News it was a gang-related shooting. LAPD have yet to announce a motive.

Multiple firearms were found at the location and recovered by police as evidence, said officials.

No arrests have been made. LAPD has issued a citywide tactical alert due to the suspect being at large.

This is a breaking news story and new information will be provided as it comes in.

Meat Seasoned Right with Casa M Spice

0

What’s the Rub for Spicing Up Your BBQ?

By Seth Meyer, Contributor

Summer is upon us and what better way to enjoy the outdoors than to grab a beverage and throw some proteins on the barbie. But before you invite the neighbors and light up the grill, you have to prepare the meat. No one likes bland tri-tip or flavorless, un-crispy chicken skin so that’s why we learn how to season meat. Now, you can go to the store and buy salt, pepper, garlic powder, paprika, cayenne, etc. … Or you can grab a premade meat rub and be on your way. There’s no way to know who makes the best seasoning for meat because there are so many to choose from, like good ole Lawry’s seasoned salt to the most complex science experiment of spices. Casa M Spices, based out of Dallas, Texas, took a restaurant favorite of theirs and mixed in other spices to make a plethora of meat rubs whether you’re making a whole hog or a jerked chicken.

Casa M Spice is the brainchild of two men named Manny and Mike Hernandez. Amateur chef Mike has a passion for mixing spices to form new flavors. When he and Manny found the right chili, they knew they had something good that they could roll with, and developed their first seasoning. This original seasoning is called Chain Reaction, paying homage to Mike’s PhD in chemical physics, and every seasoning thereafter seems to be a variation of the chain reaction recipe with additional spices added. I tried the mini ranch set with seasonings for chicken, beef and pork.

What better way to try out some meat rubs than to break out the smoker and take it low and slow? I am currently smoking meats on the Traeger Tailgater 20. This smaller size Traeger has never given me an issue so don’t let anyone tell you size matters. Until it does matter at least (I’m looking at you, Thanksgiving turkey). It’s a perfectly-sized and affordable pellet grill, though. I decided on three common cuts of meat: the tri-tip, the pork loin and a whole chicken.

The Mini Ranch Set. Photo by Seth Meyer

I liberally coated the three pieces of meat in the respective seasonings and set the smoker to 225℉ for the tri-tip and pork, and 375℉ for the chicken. Different smokers might work better at different temperatures or you may like to smoke your tri-tips at 175℉ or 250℉; perfectly okay because it’s all preference. I wish I knew the magic formula for how long to cook every cut of meat but alas, I have found every cut of meat and every cooking method yields different times so I always play it safe and have a temperature probe in all my proteins until I reach a medium-rare (125℉) on the tri-tips and fully cooked pork (145℉) and chicken (165℉).

Let’s start with the tri-tip. A company from Texas led me to predict a high amount of pepper in the seasonings. I was right about the beef seasonings but was surprised when I wasn’t also greeted with a large amount of salt. I felt there needed to be a little more salt in a seasoning like this because salt does more than just provide flavor. It is a natural tenderizer and enhancer to meats due to the nature of animal cells that will lose water in an environment that is more saline. This tenderizes the meat and allows salt to penetrate the meat, enhancing the flavor. Chef Michael mentions in a video that the lack of salt allows for the rest of the flavors to be brought out more and I can see this, and I tasted this, but I felt it could have used just a tad bit more salt. Aside from the salt, a proper Texas pepper rub was what I got with the addition of some flavor profiles in the form of the chili that was different and welcomed. But if pepper is not your thing, like it’s typically not for me, then you may want to steer clear of the beef seasoning as pepper was the most prominent spice when eating the tri-tip. Granted it did not taste bad, personally, this was my least favorite of the three.

The pork rub was the most neutral spice out of the three but having read the description of the spice beforehand, I knew what flavor I was expecting. The product page on the Casa Spice website points out ginger as being a prominent flavor in this rub. Without knowing that before, I’m not sure it would be something I would recognize. Having known it, it was just faint enough to reach the pallet later in my bite. It provided good flavor to the pork, giving it a sweet and spicy flavor that was an addition to the chili, but a similar note as the above with the lack of salt left me wanting something a tad bit more.

My favorite overall was the chicken rub. This is a meat rub I intend to use in the future. In the same fashion as the pork, this rub has a forward flavor — brown sugar. I was expecting it to play a big part of the flavor and I was right, and I wasn’t disappointed. The sugar gave a sweetness that at first quickly transitioned to a spicy chili-forward flavor. Not only does sugar bring out good flavor in chicken but the chili did as well, and this took both flavors and balanced them, enhancing the chicken. It was the winner at dinner with everyone who tried it.

Overall, these seasonings did what they are supposed to do. My three cuts of meat were not bland, and they had a good crust of seasoning. I typically make my own rubs where I know exactly what is in them and can choose my own quantities, but sometimes I am running low on my homemade meat rub and these provide a good amount of flavor without being simply seasoned salt. One thing to note is that I only smoked my meat with these seasonings. I think these might be even better seasonings for smaller cuts of meat cooked on a skillet or grilled. I believe these meat seasonings will be perfect for this style because you won’t lose any flavor from smoke and you don’t need as much salt to penetrate the meat. If this is something you do often, I would recommend trying the Casa M Spice meat rubs on your next cut of meat. If you’re not eager for a trip halfway across the country, you can grab Casa M Spice from their website. These rubs are on the pricier side compared to other rubs on the market, at $16.99, when you purchase the stainless steel shaker option. I have to admit, I do like the shaker but if you are content with a plastic shaker like other spice companies come in then the price is very comparable to the others at $11.99.

My Recycled Life — My Mother Turned Me Into a Stamp Collector

“Every stamp, no matter how insignificant it may appear, is of some value and should be saved.” That’s a quote from one of my mother’s stamp albums, which holds pages of stamps from the 19th century to the 1980s. Contrast this with the response I’ve got from several local dealers and clubs, who’ve collectively told me stamps from the late 20th and early 21st centuries have no worth beyond face value. They’ve advised me to just use them for postage.

My childhood memories include how my mother took care of her stamp collection, buying every new issue, tearing and soaking any odd or foreign stamps off envelopes and carefully using little gummed paper stamp hinges to attach the stamps to the album pages.

That ended, though, somewhere in her years of getting a master’s degree and a full-time job and divorcing my father, and she only indulged her collecting habit half-way after that. She kept saving sheets of stamps, and buying guides and albums from direct-mail marketers, but she never again took up organizing and preserving her collection. Her stamp albums, along with hundreds of loose stamps, got stashed in a little Danish-modern entryway table that contains a cabinet measuring about 16 inches cubed. By the time she died, hundreds more loose stamps were all over the house, in jars, boxes, drawers and simply piled on any available surface.

So my mother’s stamp collection is now mine, and there’s at least one upside — I haven’t had to purchase any new stamps for months. I’ve recently noticed, though, many of the stamps from the 1970s and 1980s could be put into the albums, so maybe I should do that.

I’ve thinned some of the collection by donating a few envelopes full of stamps to the ARIE Foundation, a veterans’ group that encourages stamp collecting. If you have any stamps or stamp-collecting paraphernalia you’d like to donate, their address is: P.O. Box 64, Old Bethpage, NY 11804. Their website is www.ariefoundation.com.

Some local stamp clubs have offered to evaluate my collection and suggest a proper disposition, but the collection is too disorganized to show anybody yet. I don’t know how many hours, days, months or years I’d need to put the collection in order, and by that time, I’d be calling myself a stamp collector, too.

Reagan’s Racism Once Saved Lives, Now It’s Killing Children

1

By Thom Hartmann

On May 2, 1967, the destinies of Huey Newton, Bobby Seale, and Ronald Reagan collided. The day saved untold thousands of lives.

At the time, California was an open-carry state with few gun restrictions. Gov. Reagan was on the steps of the state Capitol to meet and share lunch with a group of visiting 8th graders when Newton, Seale, and nearly 30 other Black Panthers pulled up out front in a small caravan of cars.

Armed with everything from pistols to 12-gauge shotguns, they climbed the half-dozen steps to the area around the front doors of the building. Bobby pulled out a prepared statement, and read to the students and people in front of the capitol:

“Black people have begged, prayed, petitioned, demonstrated, and everything else to get the racist power structure of America to right the wrongs which have historically been perpetuated against Black people. The time has come for Black people to arm themselves against this terror before it is too late.”

They then walked into the building to confront the state’s police and legislators, fully loaded guns and rifles in their hands.

Reagan was aghast, and the nearly all-white California legislature panicked.

“There’s no reason why on the street today a citizen should be carrying loaded weapons,” Reagan said later that afternoon.

Within a few weeks Don Mulford (Oakland-R), with bipartisan support, introduced into the California Assembly a law (AB-1591) to ban people in California from carrying loaded weapons in public.

It was enthusiastically signed into law by Gov. Reagan on July 28, fewer than three months after Seale’s proclamation at the Capitol.

Over the following years, California built on that initial gun control law. After a 1989 school shooting in Stockton, when a young white man wielding a semi-automatic weapon murdered five children and a teacher while injuring over 30 others, California passed a ban on assault weapons that stands to this day.

The state went on to ban private gun sales, closing the notorious “gun show loophole” that pours weapons into other states. California requires all gun dealers to be registered and licensed by the state, mandates backgrounds checks, and even outlawed the manufacture and sale of cheap “Saturday Night Special” handguns in the state.

When California put their version of “Red Flag” laws into place — laws forbidding people flagged at risk for committing gun crimes or mass murders from purchasing guns — the state followed up (it’s one of the few in the country with an agency that studies gun violence) and found them to be nearly 100% effective because of how difficult the state makes obtaining a weapon.

While in Texas a violent criminal on the federal no-fly terrorist watch list is welcome to buy a dozen assault weapons from the back of a car and go shoot up a school, in California you can’t buy a gun if you’ve been convicted of any violent crime whatsoever, even a misdemeanor like a bar fight.

As a result, according to New York Times correspondent Shawn Hubler, by 2019 (the last year for which we have statistics) California’s gun deaths were around 7 per 100,000 people, one of the lowest in the country.

“So there was a huge differential by 2019,” Hubler told Sabrina Tavernise on the Times’ podcast The Daily. “The chances of dying from gun violence in California were about 70% lower than they were in the rest of the country.”

California still has more gun deaths than any state in the nation except Texas, as the National Rifle Association will quickly point out, but what they won’t highlight is that California, with 40 million people (about the same as Florida and New York combined), has the largest population of any state in America. It’s bigger than 198 of the world’s 235 nations.

But compare California’s 7 per 100,000 gun deaths to states with virtually no gun control like Mississippi (28.6), Louisiana (26.3), Wyoming (25.9), Missouri (23.9) or Alabama (23.6).

If you live in Texas, floating around the national average at 14.2 gun deaths per 100,000, you’re far more likely to die from a bullet than in states with strong gun control laws like Hawaii (3.4), Massachusetts (3.7), New Jersey (5), Rhode Island (5.1), New York (5.3) or Connecticut (6).

When your gun-nut brother-in-law starts babbling about gun deaths in Chicago (Illinois, with reasonable gun control laws, is 14.1 gun deaths per 100,000 people), you may want to point out that nearly 60% of guns seized in Chicago came from out-of-state, with most coming from next-door Indiana (17.3 gun deaths per 100,000) where gun stores dot the Indiana side of the Indiana-Illinois border.

National gun control would put a quick end to that.

In the 1932 New State Ice v. Liebmann decision, Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis famously called the states “laboratories of democracy”:

“It is one of the happy incidents of the federal system that a single courageous State may,” he wrote, “if its citizens choose, serve as a laboratory; and try novel social and economic experiments without risk to the rest of the country.”

He could have been speaking of California, Hawaii, or Connecticut. Gun control works, and we have the proof right here in the United States.

Ironically, while it was Reagan’s racism that first produced significant gun control in America’s largest state, it’s racist white supremacy in America that is today the single largest force fighting against gun control.

With very few exceptions, the entire Second Amendment movement is made up of white people, many of them associated with white supremacy militias and politicians from former confederate states.

The NRA is greatly diminished, both in power and budget, but racism continues to drive the gun control debate, this time in the opposite direction from the days Reagan was governor of California.

Today we see a knee-jerk fear of non-white people in the ongoing explosion of gun purchases in rural and suburban white communities across the country. When America elected our first Black president in 2008, gun stores across America were so overwhelmed by white people buying guns that it was referred to as a “frenzy” and “the great gun and ammunition shortage.”

Scratch the surface of the most fervent “gun rights” members of Congress and you’ll find unrepentant white supremacist Republican politicians who reflexively villainize the Black Lives Matter movement and hype the Antifa straw-man at every opportunity.

On the “gun control” side, now that the Panthers are mostly just a memory on the national stage, fear of armed Black people has been replaced by fear of white children being slaughtered in public schools.

And it’s providing us with a shocking glimpse into the minds of these Republican legislators: White freak-out about Black people having weapons back in the 1960s was a stronger motivator for them than today’s slaughter of innocent children of all races.

At least so far.

Thom Hartmann is a talk-show host and author of more than 25 books in print. His work is also crossposted with permission from Common Dreams.

Random Letters: 7-21-22

0

Letter of Thanks to Reps. Lowenthal and Barragán for Supporting Port AQ Bill

Dear Congresswoman Barragan and Congressman Lowenthal,

Clearly, the Port of LA has been ignoring and stalling the institution of genuine emission controls for far too many years! The judge just ruled on our second lawsuit against them (this time joined by the Attorney General’s office, CARB and the AQMD —see links) on the China Shipping EIR. The judge ruled in our favor describing the port’s behavior with some very harsh words. However, just as the Port violated our original 2003 Settlement Agreement … there is little confidence that they will perform any differently or really change their behavior on any new EIRs going forward. There is little belief that there will be any real adherence to their legal promises either. Frankly, with these reports taking literal “years” to complete … who will be the watchdogs going forward? It seems to be common policy to simply “out wait” the activists in order to continue unabated. Our weary team is growing older by the day … and just who will fill our shoes in the future? There is a strong Port “will” to find loopholes that allow them to circumvent these emission controls and continue to operate without any obstacles. If there is no one to dispute their deficient and untruthful findings there will be no significant environmental gains to ever be realized.

Please note that during the pandemic, and during the very worst port congestion we have ever witnessed, the Port of Los Angeles unplugged some of its air quality monitors. Some stations now only monitor a few pollutants compared to earlier. New monitors are not due until the City of Los Angeles procurement process is over, which is at earliest in late summer. So monitors will not be installed until at least the fall. Meanwhile, the Port has stated that when it installs new monitors at all four stations, two of the stations will not be measuring “ultrafine particles,”” which the Port measured from 2012-2019. At that time, monitors at two stations broke down … and the Port has never replaced them! Ultrafine particles are the “most deadly” particulates to human life! The “ultra fine” particulates are said to be registering much higher now in the San Pedro community. Exactly what is going on at the Port of Los Angeles?

As noted in this other article in Splash (see link) ….. the impending rail and truck strikes are expected to, yet again, deliver us MORE ship and rail backlog headaches … not to mention MORE “pollution!”

Meanwhile, the port’s intent is to take the “struthious” approach as to measuring just how lethal those pollution levels will be. It is extremely appropriate to describe the port’s policy with the old adage, “ignorance is bliss!” As the victims of these debacles we cannot stand by while this “public”agency continues to bury the truth of their harm. This must stop!

The environmental Professors at USC, Andrea Hricko and Ed Avol, wanted to also express to you their thanks for your bill. Both have been engaged in trying to reduce port emissions for many years and continue in this fight.

We also wish to remind you again of the horrific vulnerability of the 25 million gallons of highly explosive butane gas at Rancho LPG sitting on the doorsteps of our homes and schools. Another “gift” brought to us by the Port of Los Angeles. The current use of port owned “public trust land” to accommodate this (private) company (that has zero connection to tenancy at the Port) while posing such an extraordinarily high risk to population is completely unjustified. The port is facilitating the practice of “privatizing a company’s profits” while “socializing” its associated grave risks on the backs of the innocent public. Again, another situation where the continued absence of any risk analysis continues to hide the potential of severe harm to the surrounding residents, our schools, and the local communities. Again, the result of an ingrained port policy that embraces the reckless notion “ignorance is bliss.” How is this being rationalized by other government officials? Where is the justice? The magnitude of disaster from this facility and/or its operations will extend for miles. It offers every potential to decimate both ports of LA and Long Beach.

Thank you for your efforts on behalf of your constituents. Please continue to fight for our health and our safety. It is obvious just how badly we need both your attention, and your actions, to protect us.

Janet Schaaf-Gunter, San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United, INC. Communications Administrator

Strike Authorized a Week Before the All-Star Game

0

The union representing concession workers at the ballpark UNITE HERE Local 11 has authorized a strike.

For decades, 24 billionaires, the owners of 30 Major League Baseball teams, have complained about labor costs — particularly the players’ salaries and pensions, but also the stadium workers who park cars, sell hot dogs, beer, peanuts and T-shirts; clean the stadiums, show fans to their seats and provide security.

Mark Walter, the founder and CEO of Guggenheim Partners, an investment company valued at $310 billion in assets, has a personal net worth of $3.7 billion. In 2012, Walter and his partners purchased the Los Angeles Dodgers for $2.15 billion in cash — a record cash amount for any sports franchise. The team is now valued at $4.1 billion, according toForbesmagazine.

Meanwhile, Sabrina Macias, a concession worker at Dodger Stadium for 18 years who earns $23 an hour, is wondering if she can work enough hours to keep the health insurance that covers her daughter’s dialysis treatments.

“Right now,” Macias said, “I don’t know how I’m going to put together enough hours from working at various venues to make sure I qualify for health insurance.”

Macias and 1,500 of her fellow Dodger Stadium employees — including food servers, bartenders, suite attendants, cooks and dishwashers — have voted to strike on the eve of the Major League Baseball All-Star game at the stadium on July 19. While the labor battle is focused on Los Angeles, the outcome of the negotiations will ripple throughout the country.

Like their counterparts at the other 29 Major League ballparks, most of the concession workers at Dodger Stadium are not employed directly by the team but instead by a subcontractor.