Monday, October 6, 2025
spot_img
spot_img
Home Blog Page 21

County Backs Bill to Recognize Landslides as Local Emergencies

LOS ANGELES — The County Board of Supervisors Aug. 5 voted to support state legislation that would add landslides to the list of disasters that qualify as local emergencies under California law.

The move comes in response to the ongoing, unprecedented land movement in Rancho Palos Verdes, which has destroyed homes, displaced families, and left the city struggling to access critical resources for response and recovery.

“There is no question about it – the land movement that has devastated neighborhoods in Rancho Palos Verdes and displaced families absolutely is a local emergency, and state law should recognize it as such,” said Supervisor Hahn. “Right now, cities impacted by landslides are forced to respond to these crises with one hand tied behind their back. That has to change.”

Rancho Palos Verdes has suffered severe and irreversible damage from widespread land movement. But because landslides are not currently included in the California Emergency Services Act, the city faced challenges unlocking essential recovery resources for affected residents.

Under existing law, disasters recognized as local emergencies include wildfires, floods, storms, droughts, earthquakes, and other specified events — but not landslides. AB 986, authored by Assemblymember Al Muratsuchi, would add landslides and conditions exacerbated by climate change to this list.

Details: Read the full motion here: https://file.lacounty.gov/SDSInter/bos/supdocs/205861.pdf

 

Randi Weingarten’s AI Betrayal

A new program funded by Big Tech is a Trojan horse, allowing it to infiltrate public education and lock in long-term influence.

https://tinyurl.com/2m5htf66

On July 8, theAmerican Federation of Teachers, the second-largest teachers’ union in the United States, announced it would launch a $23 million artificial intelligence training initiative for educators — funded by OpenAI, Microsoft and Anthropic — dubbed the National Academy for AI Instruction. The New York–based effort will offer workshops this fall to show teachers how to use AI tools for tasks like “generating lesson plans.”

Framed as innovative and empowering, this partnership is anything but. In truth, it’s a corporate public relations stunt — and a betrayal of the foundational principles of organized labor.

The academy’s backers don’t even hide the true motive. Venture capitalistRoy Bahat, who first proposed the idea,postedthat if we can figure out how to train teachers to use AI, “maybe we can figure it out for other occupations.” Translation: Teachers are guinea pigs in Big Tech’s broader project to reengineer labor, one profession at a time.

That AFT is not only complicit butcelebratingthis shift is shameful. Unions exist to protect workers from corporate exploitation, not to usher in the tools of their replacement. They emerged from workers recognizing that their strength lies in numbers. Employers — backed by immense wealth and power — could only be forced to improve wages, benefits and conditions when faced with collective resistance: strikes, boycotts and solidarity. People literally died fighting for the right to organize.

But since the1970s, labor has been under siege. Both political parties helped dismantle union power. Democrats, especially under Bill Clinton’s“Third Way”politics, sold out labor for corporate donors — cutting regulations, taxes and social programs, and weakening protections, while dressing it up with socially liberal talking points. The result? A generation of workers trained to focus on identity politics while ignoring the structural power of corporations.

This shift hit education hard. Public schools and universities became increasingly reliant oncorporate dollarsand increasing tuition costs to pay for the reduction in tax funds received by the institution. In the process, education’s civic mission — producing thoughtful, engaged citizens — was gutted. Instead, schools were refashioned as job-training pipelines. Students became customers. Faculty became disposable.Adjunctificationexploded as full-time, tenure-track positions were replaced by lower-paid and often part-time roles (known as adjuncts), forcing faculty to teach two to three times a full-time load across multiple campuses just to make a living — and possibly earn benefits. Meanwhile, higher education experiencedadministrative bloat, meaning a dramatic increase in the ratio of managers to faculty that saw members of the professional managerial class — people who rarely if ever step foot in a classroom or produce scholarship — tell scholars and teachers how to do their jobs.

This managerial class promoted ideological compliance under the guise of “meritocracy” and “diversity.” You could critique race, gender or sexuality — but challenge corporate power or neoliberal logic and you were branded out of touch, problematic or worse. Higher education became a safe space for Clintonian technocrats:progressive on culture, pro-corporate on economics. And, tragically, many of these people now run unions.

Anyone who understands labor history should see this AFT-Big Tech alliance for what it is: a Trojan horse. AI companies aren’t trying to “help teachers.” They’re trying to infiltrate public education, lock in long-term influence and normalize surveillance capitalism for the next generation.

Big Tech has already reshaped the economy by undermining workers’ rights and security. Companies like Uber and TaskRabbit rely on business models that erode job stability, shift risk onto individuals and avoid regulation. Despite promises that technology would create a better and more prosperous future, many who rely on platforms like Airbnb and Lyft are far from wealthy. Instead, they often have to let strangers into their homes or cars just to make ends meet — juggling multiple gigs in a way that contrasts sharply with earlier, unionized generations who could support a household on a single income. Artificial intelligence represents the next phase of this ongoing project to extract more from workers while giving them less in return.

Technologists such asPeter ThielandCurtis Yarvin, both of whom are close to the Trump administration, have been openly hostile to the idea of humans living in a democracy. They want rule by “experts” — preferably machines. AI, as currently deployed,isn’t intelligent; it’spredictive,biasedandextractive. It gathers data, replicates prejudice and makes decisions based on past patterns — not human judgment orethics. Even as research shows AIharmscognition,lacks privacy,exceedshumans in manipulating users in online discourse and performs mosttasks poorly, it’s already being used to decidebenefits,calculate tariffs,sentencingandhealth care.

Big Tech’s push into education isn’t about learning. It’s about market capture.Schoolsoffer a captive, young audience — ready to be mined for data, shaped into obedient users and sold to advertisers. TheseAI companiesdon’t want to “teach students about AI.” They want todefineAI for them — framing it as inevitable, neutral and beneficial. They certainly won’t highlight its limitations, dangers or environmental toll.

They won’t teach that AI reflects the biases of its creators. They won’t teach that “AI” today is little more than a marketing label for probabilistic autocomplete systems. They won’t highlight examples likexAI’s Grok promoting Hitler rhetoric, or how AI routinely fails basiclogical reasoning. And they won’t teach students how algorithmic systems entrench inequality or whysurveillance-based modelsare fundamentally at odds with democratic education.

As shocking as AFT’s sellout is, it’s not the first time AFT President Randi Weingarten, who spent aboutthree yearsas a full-time teacher, collectively, in her career, has cozied up to corporate power. Under her leadership, AFT has backedNewsGuard, a military-industrial-adjacent “news literacy” tool, and co-hosted an AI conference between AFT and Microsoft that turned out to be a Big Tech trade show. I was there. It wasn’t education —it was marketing.

This latest deal couldn’t have happened without her. AsBahat told Time magazine,“The critical thing here is that it was led by a worker organization. Randi and the AFT really drove this process.”

Let’s be clear: Any union that signs off on corporate control of the classroom isn’t defending education — it’s selling it off. It’s not just shortsighted. It’s reckless. It undermines labor. It undermines public education. And it hands over power to some of the most anti-worker, anti-democratic corporations in existence. If the AFT stays on this path, it won’t just become irrelevant — it will forfeit the right to call itself a labor union. We can’t build a just society by aligning with the very forces hollowing it out.

LASD Homicide Bureau Responding to a Shooting Death Investigation, 2800 blk of E. Del Amo Blvd., Carson

0

 

CARSON—Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Homicide Investigators are responding to assist Carson Station with a shooting death investigation. The incident was reported Aug. 5, about 3:32 p.m., on E. Del Amo Boulevard, in the city of Carson.

The victim was pronounced deceased at the scene.

There is no additional information available at this time.

Anyone with information about this incident is encouraged to contact the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department’s Homicide Bureau at 323-890-5500, or anonymously at 800-222-8477; http://lacrimestoppers.org

Adopt, Don’t Shop: Clear the Shelters Month Is Here

 

LOS ANGELES — ALA Animal Services, NBC and Telemundo have partnered for their annual Clear The Shelters campaign to promote pet adoptions in the community. Since Clear the Shelters launched in 2015, more than 1.2 million pets have found loving homes. With more than 1,800 animals in the six city shelters, LA Animal Services is offering special adoption for dogs, puppies, cats and kittens, to go to stable forever homes, now through Aug. 31.

August 6 to 15: Adoption fees sponsored by Petco Love

  • Dogs and puppies: $20, not including $20 dog license fee for LA City residents
  • Cats and kittens: Adoption fees waived

August 16, 17: Adoption fees sponsored by Pet Care Foundation

  • Dogs and puppies 40lbs and over: $51, not including $20 dog license fee for LA City residents
  • Kittens: $25
  • Cats: $12.50

Dogs 40lbs and under and puppies: $20, not including $20 dog license fee for LA City residents (sponsored by Petco Love)

August 18 to 31: Adoption fees sponsored by Petco Love

  • Dogs and puppies: $20, not including $20 dog license fee for LA City residents
  • Cats and kittens: Adoption fees waived

Pets adopted from any of the six LA Animal Services join their new families already spayed or neutered, vaccinated and microchipped. Adopters also receive a Petco flyer with discounts to help make their pet adoption a success, and a VCA Healthy Start Certificate, which provides up to $250 of follow up veterinary care within the first 14 days of adoption.

Details: See the animals available to adopt or foster here: LAAnimalServices.com/pets.

 

LA Briefs: Researchers Awarded Port Pollution Study Grant as LAFD Strengthens HAZMAT Response

$3.5 Million Grant Will Fund Cutting-Edge Port Pollution Monitoring

LOS ANGELES—UC Riverside researchers have been awarded a $3.5 million grant by the Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment for a cutting-edge approach to monitoring pollution from ocean going vessels in and around the Port of Los Angeles. Researchers at the Center for Environmental Research and Technology (CE-CERT) will measure emissions of up to 100 vessels using drones and on-board instruments, according to the grant announcement, and “will work in close partnership with communities to investigate the impact of Ocean Going Vessels (OGVs) on near shore air pollution.”

“This research will help close critical knowledge gaps and give frontline communities and regulatory agencies the information they need to advocate for public health and make policy decisions relating to the impacts of port activities,” said Dr. David Cocker, lead researcher at CE-CERT.

 

LAFD HAZ MAT Report Update

LOS ANGELES—Last week, the Los Angeles city council approved a report based on a motion councilmember Tim McOsker introduced on the LA Fire Department’s readiness of its Hazardous Materials (HAZ MAT) teams citywide.

This action follows a motion McOsker introduced last year after an explosion in Wilmington injured nine LAFD firefighters, including two critically, and highlighted the urgent need to assess preparedness for high-risk incidents. With this motion, city council will explore ways to support LAFD in meeting their specialized needs, including ensuring sufficient HAZ MAT resources in this district. During the personnel committee, the city council also instructed the LAFD to include a proposed HAZ MAT apparatus staffing plan in future budget requests.

“It’s crucial that we invest in personnel, equipment, and infrastructure to protect our communities from hazardous threats,” said McOsker in his newsletter.

 

Amplify Your Voice: Virtual Forum on LA County Law Enforcement & ICE – Register Now

0

The Los Angeles County Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission is bringing together experts in civilian oversight, law enforcement professionals, and community partners on Aug. 7, to discuss local law enforcement operations associated with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement or ICE across the county. The public will be able to provide comments and/or ask questions.

This forum is intended to provide the community with a greater awareness of local law enforcement policies as well as information about ways they can safely and lawfully protest against immigration enforcement practices with which they may disagree.

Join virtually

Register in advance to participate in the meeting.

Time: 5:30 to 7:30 p.m., Aug.7

Details: Register, https://tinyurl.com/Law-enforcement-and-immgration

 

Watch the livestream: https://www.youtube.com/@LACountyCOC

From Boom to Bottleneck: Is California’s Economic Edge At Risk?

  • California remains the largest state economy in the nation
  • Economic growth is increasingly uneven
  • Public sector hiring is outpacing private job creation
  • Population growth turned positive in 2024

LOS ANGELES—California continues to play a powerhouse role in the U.S. economy, contributing more than 14% of the nation’s GDP, according to a new outlook from Beacon Economics.

However, recent data also reveals sharply growing challenges across labor markets, housing, and state finances, signaling a complex path ahead for the state. Although the election is more than a year away, California’s next governor will need to look beyond short-term fixes to patch long-term imbalances.

“California’s economy is being lifted on one side by a booming tech industry fueled by the many major companies based here, and on the other by strong public sector hiring,” said Niree Kodaverdian, research manager at Beacon Economics and the outlook’s author. “But that growth is increasingly held back by limited housing supply, slow population growth, budget pressures, and policy-driven barriers that tech gains and public hiring can’t prop up forever.”

 

From the latest outlook

  • Growth amid job losses: Economic growth in California is being driven by tech-led productivity gains amid job losses in traditional sectors.
  • Innovation at the helm: Key industries such as manufacturing and agriculture are shedding jobs even as their output increases, signaling that productivity—rather than employment—is doing much of the economic heavy lifting.
  • Public vs. private sector job creation: Public employment has significantly outpaced private hiring in recent quarters, a dynamic that raises questions about fiscal sustainability—particularly in the face of budget tightening.
  • Unemployment up; teen unemployment surges: At 5.4%, California’s unemployment rate is one of the highest in the nation and significantly higher than the national average of 4.1%. Teen unemployment has ballooned by 9.2 percentage points since 2022.
  • ICE crackdown could threaten population rebound: California’s population growth finally turned positive in 2024 but federal immigration crackdowns could reverse those gains. Immigrants represent 27.3% of the state’s population, making federal policy all the more critical.
  • Housing supply bottleneck: Housing demand is rising in California as household sizes shrink and new construction remains well below pre-pandemic levels. CEQA reforms, passed in June, could accelerate urban infill housing development.

New DPSS Effort Expands Access to Critical-Support for Angelenos in Need

 

In an effort to promote its core programs and connect residents with the support they
need during times of hardship, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Social
Services (DPSS) will launch August Essential Services Month—a focused digital
outreach campaign to reach residents who may not be aware of the department’s
programs or how to apply for them.


As one of 58 county social services agencies in California, DPSS provides essential
assistance to eligible L.A. County residents, including help with food, healthcare, cash
aid, employment support, and in-home care for elderly, blind, or disabled individuals.
DPSS will use its digital platforms—including the weekly Essential DPSS resource
newsletter, social media accounts, and hundreds of poster ads donated by LA Metro, to
highlight services and show residents how to apply.


Outreach materials will be available in multiple languages to serve the County’s diverse
communities and will include direct links to dedicated websites and video guides with
step-by-step instructions on how to apply for benefits. The department will also share
critical information about local job fairs and other free community resources to help
improve the quality of life for L.A. County residents.

DPSS encourages all L.A. County residents to share this information to ensure that
those most in need are informed, supported, and empowered.

Details: To stay informed with the month-long campaign, visit dpss.lacounty.gov

Economic Terror and the TURBOCHUGGF*CK In Texas

 

By Danbert Nobacon

https://www.projectcensored.org/economic-terror-turbochuggfck-in-texas

I don’t know what word in the English language—I can’t find one—that applies to people who are willing to sacrifice the literal existence of organized human life … so they can put a few more dollars into highly overstuffed pockets. The word ‘evil’ doesn’t begin to approach it.

— Noam Chomsky

Unlike other historical periods of extreme wealth inequality, the added fact that our planet’s life support systems are currently being pushedtoward a breaking pointadds a new level of horror to current governance by the elites. As Chomsky implies, we need new words to describe our daily and worsening situation.

The short answer to Chomsky’s question is that these people, mostly oligarchs, arecorporateeconomic terrorists,answering to no one as they are executing the suicide hijacking of the natural systems that pilot the planet Earth, in their quest to rule a now-burning planet of their own making. Operating mostly by stealth to keep fossil fuel king, their cumulative crimes over the last five decades amount to a mostly slow-motion, everyday reign of terror over the whole planet, punctuated by theturbocharged,greenhousegas-fueled,climatechaos of extreme weather events.

Exposing theEntrapocracy

Extreme weather terror, orturbochuggf*cksin the vernacular, is most recently evident in July 2025, in the human catastrophes caused by floods in Texas, New Mexico, and North Carolina, as well as in the heatwaves across Europe and around many other parts of the world that do not merit media coverage in the US. Increasing in number and intensity each year, such disasters are the sharp end of global warming, which is pushing the planet’s life support systems towards the brink of collapse. Crucial, but absent in most of the reporting of these disasters and climate change in general is the role of the corporate-powered climate denial lobby in prolonging the shelf life of fossil fuels for decades beyond their sell-by date.

The most profitable business in the history of the world has leveraged its vast wherewithal to assume political, judicial, and cultural control of those human systems necessary to prolong its own primacy, by completely normalizing this insanity. In the face of now long standing near total agreement amongst climate scientists that as a global community we simply need to stop using fossil fuels, the fossil fuel industry seized control of the invisible handto throttle dissent, whilst slamming down its invisible foot harder on the accelerator of increasing fossil fuel production, driving the planet ever closer towards the climate precipice.

Whilst mostly sticking to the shadows of theirdark moneyuniverse, these corporate economic terrorists do have names and they should be made to answer for their eco-cidal crimes.Best in Showcorporate economic terrorist is Charles Koch, who pioneered in practice the now much-copied template for bending the US political system away from genuine democracy and towards authoritarianism, and, in his case, in favor of the bottom line of his personal economic agenda.

Koch stands head and shoulders above his peers, as a key organizer in terms of coordinating billionaire “solidarity,” not least enabling allegedly competing brands within the fossil fuel industry to work in unison, if not direct collusion, to use any means necessary to prop up the fossil fuel oligopoly’s monopoly on how the planet is powered. Acting like a protection racket, thisentrapocracyensures that the general public’s subsistence needs are largely dependent on an infrastructure specifically designed for the exclusive use of fossil fuels’ key products, keeping we, the global citizenry, largely entrapped, often against our better judgement, but nonetheless hooked.

“Climate Homicide”

The fatal “side effects” of unregulated capitalism are long known. Back in 1845, Friedrich Engels formulated the concept of“social murder,”defining it as an unnatural death that results from social, political or economic oppression, “whereby the class which at present holds social and political control … places hundreds ofproletariansin such a position that they inevitably meet a too early and an unnatural death,” precisely because of the unregulated dominating activities of the ruling class. Engels’s point wasn’t rhetorical. In 2022, a US worker was killed at workevery ninety-six minutes, on average, according to records kept by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Jason Hickelidentifiesa second era of horror unleashed on the Global South by corporate power mongers in the Global North as “colonialism 2.0.” Hickel calls the catastrophic harm to billions of people in poorer nations from the “excess emissions of a few rich nations” a “crime against humanity” and stresses that “we should have the clarity to call it that.”

A joint study by the Harvard School of Public Health and three British universities in 2021 found that1 in 5 global deaths,or around 8.7 million people per year, can be attributed to fine particulate fossil fuel pollution. These deaths are on top of those directly resulting from turbochuggf*ck weather events.

In a 2024 journal article,publishedin theHarvard Environmental Law ReviewandcoveredbyCommon Dreams, David Arkush and Donald Braman describe the man-made climate crisis as not only “globally catastrophic” (as the fossil fuel industry has known for years) but also “climate homicide.” They point out that the oil majors have been “technically sophisticated enough to know that they could hide the harms they were generating from lay observers for decades, allowing them to earn trillions of dollars while researchers, activists, and regulators struggled to overcome the sophisticated disinformation and political influence campaigns these profits supported.”

Further, Arkush and Braman contend that, “The case for [climate] homicide prosecutions is increasingly compelling. A steady growth in the information about what [Fossil Fuel Companies] knew and what they did with that knowledge is revealing a story of antisocial conduct generating lethal harm so extensive it may soon become unparalleled in human history.”

Charles Koch inherited a fortune and then multiplied it many times over. Initially, in 1969, as a rookie CEO, he secured control of the Pine Bend refinery in Minnesota and refined the tariff-free, dirtiest of“garbage crudes”from the Canadian tar sands, to become the Koch cash cow for decades to come. Lee FangdescribedKoch Industries as a “pollution-based empire,” engaged in what George Monbiot and Peter Hutchisoncalledthe modern expression of capitalism’s essential DNA—colonial looting— which has made Koch the twenty-second richest man in the world today.

Toxic Business Activism

As if mirroring their extremely profitable and ever-expanding ventures of turning the world’s most toxic raw materials into sellable products, Charles Koch and his brother David pioneered an equally toxic form of business activism, which continues to push the planet to the brink of habitability and the US political system into authoritarianism.

In a 1974 speech organized by the Institute for Human Studies, Charles Koch praised the infamous Powell Memo, which urged business activism, but noted that itdid not go far enough. Recommending a radical corporate libertarian vision for the country, where government only exists to oversee the police and the military in their duties to protect the private property rights of the elites, Koch envisioned a world where any taxes on elites amounted to theft, where the progressive reforms of the twentieth century would be rolled back, and where all regulations against corporate activity would be abolished. We can call this Koch’sProject 1974, and, some fifty years later, many of Koch’swishes are being fulfilledby the second Trump administration in the form of Project 2025, which, of course, Koch himself partly funded.

The political machine he built to this end became known as the Kochtopus, for its multi-tentacled, democracy distorting and unprecedented seizure of US politics. Call thisKoch math, i.e., billionaires weaponizing what, for them, is chump change (the millions of dollars available from their tax evasion schemes) to secure billions of dollars in return in the form of further tax cuts, corporate perks, and government deregulation. Koch initiated donor summits in 2003, harnessing the undisciplined billionaire instinct of throwing money at causes and weaponizing its collective power in the form of what Theda Skocpol and her colleagues called a“donor consortia,”thus multiplying times over what good, old-fashioned, dirty oil money could buy in terms of actual political influence.

Couching the defense of fossil fuel in the broader realm of the conservative tent of rabid market fundamentalism, the Kochtopus became a toxic ideological engineering pipeline, pedaling thiscapitrickalist free malarketryfrom ideas generated by paid-for-professors and taught infunded university programsacross the country; refined into policy proposals in conservative think-tanks and deployed in the real world in“scripts” handed to paid-for-politicians;all of which were distilled and seeded as invasive species of dominant narratives in the corporate owned media. The Kochtopus’s reach was further and uniquely magnified by the addition of astroturf boots on the ground, facilitated by paid-for-organizers, often graduates from the above network, with budgets leftists and progressives could only dream of.

Promoting Climate Denial

We now know that Big Fossil Fuels’ own scientists predicted, with remarkable accuracy, turbochuggf*cks and climate breakdown as a result of global warming all the way back in the 1970s. Koch was certainly privy to this insider knowledge at the time. By 1988, NASA scientist James Hansen hadtestified before Congress, putting the world on notice that global warming was real and was happening.

In response, Koch’s own Cato Institute hosted the world’s first climate denial conference in 1991, the details of which remained buried until Christopher Leonard revealed it in his 2019 book,Kochland. Fifteen years ahead of the Tea Party, Koch’s own free market thought police, the fake populistCitizens for a Sound Economy,led the efforts to defeat the Clinton-Gore administration’s attempts to tax carbon. And the Kochtopus joined the industry-wide pushes to derail the Kyoto Protocol and to prevent Al Gore from becoming President in 2000.

Theda Skocpol and Alexander Hertel-Fernandezdocumenthow, by the mid-2010s,the Koch effectoperated

on the scale of a national U.S. political party … but despite its massive size, the Koch network is a leveraging operation—not a separate third party—because it is intertwined with (although not subordinated to) the institutional GOP … the Koch network operates as a force field to the right of the Republican Party, exerting a strong gravitational pull on many GOP candidates and officeholders. The overall effect is to re-set the range of issues and policy alternatives to which candidates and officeholders are responsive.

In 2004, after Citizens for a Sound Economy underwent a rebranding, it emerged as Americans for Prosperity. During the Obama administration, the much expanded group bullied politicians, with the threat of primary challenges from the right, into taking a “climate pledge” that effectively flipped almost the entire Republican Party into the party of climate denial. By 2014, “only eight out of 278 Republicansin Congress were willing to acknowledge that man-made climate change was a reality.”

If all this were not enough, Koch’s key cognizant pre-meditated climate crime is the massive expansion of Koch Industries into frack-f**cking the planet. ItsCorpus Christirefinery in Texas, which had focused on light oil refining, was ideally positioned to capitalize on the fracked oil boom of the early 2010s. Despite the well-established and public climate science that recommended remaining fossil fuel reserves stay in the ground, Koch doubled down on fracking, confirming his intentions to stay the course. Around this same time, Koch began trying towhitewash his own imageusing the smallest of his small change, as the Kochtopus used its massive wherewithal to continue to bully the GOP and the country towards the authoritarianism that would be essential to defending his businesses in the 2020s.

TheOtherDEI: Domestic Election Interference

Americans for Prosperity gloated over the recent passage of Trump’s Big Abomination of an Abysmal Bill, praising how it “unleashes American Energy”by reducing regulations and increasing tax breaks for the fossil fuel industry, oblivious as ever to the economic terror guaranteed by this implementation of thisProject 1974“economic freedom über alles.”

Koch has weaponized the template for theotherDEI,domestic election interference, by billionaires. As Bill McKibben noted in 2016, the Koch Brothers may be “themost important unelected figuresin American political history.” The strategies of political manipulation they pioneered have not only been adopted by conservative forces from The Federalist Society to AIPAC, but they also enabled the corporate coup d’état on full display at the 2024 Trump inauguration. The Koch brothers might have scoffed at Elon Musk wielding a chainsaw, but their concerted assault on the democratic process helped lay the groundwork for DOGE.

In late 2024, Connor Gibson and Robert J. Brulle, joined what is now a chorus of journalists and researchers who haveexposed the Koch brothersas leaders of climate denialism, if not the scam’s leading perpetrators; yet when I play the songs from myKochtopus’s Gardenrecording at shows and ask who has heard of the Koch brothers, very few people raise their hands.

Unable to let go, Charles Koch remains CEO of Koch Inc. Now aged 89, he’s likely to escape in death any punishment for his life of economic terrorism. In 2023, as anhors d’oeuvrefor his undeclared plans for life after death, he bequeathed, tax-free, a record-breaking$5 billionto sustain the Kochtopus after his passing. For those inheriting the burning planet that is the Kochtopus’s Garden, documenting his crimes and stopping their daily recurrence is up to us—by dissent, by court cases, and by dismantling the corrupt, oligarchic political system Koch did so much to create.


Danbert Nobacon, Chumbawamba alumni, lives in Twisp, WA. His most recent CD isKochtopus’s Garden—Now That’s What I Call Capitalism—The Musical.He hostsThe Mystery Motelradio show, playing music and talking about current events with his pals. He is writing a book with the working title,Kochtopus’s Garden—The Origin Story of the American Oligarchy and Its Idiot Plan to Rule a Burning Planet.

Fighting Fed’s Pays Off – California Recovers Billions in Federal Funding

 

SACRAMENTO — Acting as the first and last line of defense against the Trump Administration’s incessant barrage of illegal executive orders, baseless actions, and widespread dismantling of our country’s rule of law, California has protected more than $168 billion in federal funding coming into the state through numerous court efforts.

In coordination with Attorney General Rob Bonta, California has filed 37 lawsuits, leading or co-leading 23 of them, and separately filed more than 40 amicus briefs in support of other litigation against the Trump Administration in just six months. In the 19 cases where California has sought and a district court has ruled on early relief, the state has succeeded in 17 of them with 13 orders blocking President Trump’s illegal actions currently in effect.

These actions have ensured that an estimated $168 billion continued to flow to the state through a single early lawsuit challenging the President’s illegal and sweeping freeze of federal funding. California’s continued court actions have also protected an estimated $11.1 billion in federal grant funding from successive targeted efforts by the Trump Administration to defend California’s values. California has also secured concessions and reversals outside of court, including the Department of Education’s recent decision to restore funding it had illegally frozen just days after California filed a lawsuit.

A return on investment

In late 2024, Gov. Newsom convened a special session to set aside state money to pay for legal costs to combat then President-elect Trump’s administration. With support from the Legislature, the state dedicated $25 million for the California Department of Justice or CA DOJ and other state agencies to challenge and defend against illegal actions by the Trump Administration and another $25 million to support legal aid for vulnerable Californians in civil proceedings.

Through litigation brought on by the CA DOJ, the state has rejected the successive targeted efforts by the Trump Administration to terminate, impound, or condition specific funding for education, healthcare, transportation, and more; defended constitutional rights like birthright citizenship and the right to vote; and stopped the dismantling of federal agencies like U.S. Health and Human Services and AmeriCorps, among other relief to the states.

  • 1/3 of the state’s budget: After the office of management and budget issued a directive that purported to freeze nearly $3 trillion in federal funding, California led a multistate coalition in filing a lawsuit challenging the directive. The CA DOJ secured an immediate temporary restraining order and subsequent preliminary injunction, preserving roughly $168 billion in federal funding for California, representing about one-third of the State’s budget. These are tax dollars coming back into California, which contributes to the federal budget as a net-donor state.
  • Transportation funding: California receives approximately $7 billion in grant funding from the U.S. Department of Transportation or DOT each year to support and maintain the roads, highways, railways, airways, and bridges that connect our communities and carry our residents to their workplaces and their homes. In June, the CA DOJ secured a court order blocking the DOT from imposing unlawful immigration enforcement conditions on this grant funding.
  • Education funding: The CA DOJ protected $939 million for California schools last week when the U.S. Department of Education reversed its decision to withhold vital education funding just weeks before the school year was set to start in the face of a multistate lawsuit. This funding supports key programs for after school and summer learning, teacher preparation, and to support students learning English.
  • Public health funding: The state also protected approximately $11 billion in critical public health funding nationwide, including roughly $972 million for California, through litigation challenging and subsequent court orders blocking the abrupt termination of federal funding for grants that provide essential support for a wide range of urgent public health needs, including identifying, tracking, and addressing infectious diseases; ensuring access to immunizations; and modernizing critical public health infrastructure.
  • Electric vehicle infrastructure funding: After the Trump Administration sought to withhold billions of dollars in funding approved by bipartisan majorities in Congress for electric vehicle charging infrastructure, California filed a lawsuit and secured a court order restoring more than $300 million in funding previously awarded to California.