Wednesday, October 8, 2025
spot_img
spot_img
Home Blog Page 508

Californians Can Track Their Stimulus Checks with “Get My Payment” Tool on IRS.gov

WASHINGTON, D.C. — With 80 percent of California adults set to receive Economic Impact Payments of up to $1,400 per person through the recently-signed American Rescue Plan and money beginning to be directly deposited into bank accounts this week, Congresswoman Nanette Diaz Barragán is highlighting a new “Get My Payment” tool from IRS.gov where Californians can check the status of their payments.

In most cases, these payments are automatic and no action is necessary to receive them.

How to Check the Status of your Payment: Californians can go online and check the status of their payment using the “Get My Payment” tool at: https://www.irs.gov/coronavirus/get-my-payment.

What to Expect: Some Californians have already received their payments, and more could start seeing payments show up in their bank accounts as soon as this week if their 2019 or 2020 taxes have been processed by the IRS or they used the “non-filer portal” for previous payments and provided their bank account information to the IRS. Recipients of other federal government benefits, like Social Security, Supplemental Security Income, Railroad Retirement Board, or Veterans Affairs benefits, should expect to receive a payment automatically as well. For Californians awaiting a paper check or debit card, some checks have been mailed already, but most will find their paper checks or debit cards in the mail over the next several weeks.

How Many Californians Will Get Payments: According to the White House, more than 22 million adults and 9 million children in California are eligible to receive payments of up to $1,400 per person through the American Rescue Plan. That means 80 percent of all California adults and 81 percent of all California children in the state are set to receive payments.

Who is Eligible for Payments: The American Rescue Plan includes Economic Impact Payments of up to $1,400 per person. Individuals earning up to $75,000 annually, heads of household earning up to $112,500 annually, and couples earning up to $150,000 annually will receive the full $1,400 per person, for themselves and their dependents. After that, the checks begin to phase out, with payments stopping at individuals earning $80,000 in annual income, heads of household earning $120,000 in annual income and married couples earning $160,000 in annual income.

Chaleff Report on LAPD: Critical of Response But Doesn’t Go Far Enough

The just-released Chaleff report on the Los Angeles Police Department’s actions during the protests following the George Floyd murder in May 2020 find lack of training and preparedness as the culprit for LAPD’s failures –failures that date back to the Democratic Convention demonstration in 2000. 

Some progressives see this as a cover-up for LAPD historical harassment, violence and arrests. It has been ongoing for decades. Carol Sobel, a prominent civil liberties attorney known for suing the city on behalf of the homeless, is also representing people arrested  and allegedly abused by the police during the George Floyd protests last May. Sobel said that the report “underscores the claims we made in our lawsuits.  

“It’s really inexplicable that it happens over and over,” Sobel said. “We’ve gone through this show many times. When does it change?”

The Los Angeles City Council assigned a task force composed of former police department commanders and led by a former president of the LA Police Commission and retired LAPD commander, Gerald Chaleff. Activists have questioned why an independent report on the LAPD was prepared by veteran LAPD officers?” 

More than 4,000 demonstrators were arrested and hundreds injured by police projectiles during the summer protests. Multiple interviews in the media reflect individuals who were badly wounded after being shot with 40 mm hard foam/rubber projectiles at close range without them representing any threat to officers. One was shot in the head while standing with his arms in the air after backing away from advancing officers.

When the arrestees were finally released, they were dropped off far from where they were arrested in late hours past the city curfew.

Melina Abdullah, cofounder of Black Lives Matter-LA said the report, “addressed some of the wrongs,  but did not critique the notion that LAPD should be putting down righteous protests in the first place.”

The report acknowledges “mistakes that appeared to repeat problems that surfaced in past protests; citing Democratic National Committee convention in 2000, MacArthur Park 2007 attack on immigrants’ rights protesters, the Occupy LA 2011 encampment, protests sparked by the killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri (2014), and one could add several other demonstrations. The report acknowledges that the city paid out over $3 million in lawsuit settlements for false arrest problems.

The National Lawyers Guild is spearheading a class action lawsuit against the city for its arrests and constitutional rights violations during the protests against killings by cops. Also, the National Lawyers Guild’s membership passed a resolution supporting police abolition following its #Law4thePeople Convention last fall, acknowledging that the institution of policing is incompatible with the Guild’s mission to use law in defense of human rights and ecosystems over property interests. 

The report’s review team reported finding deficiencies in the following areas that impacted the LAPD’s actions

during the protests, including : planning, command and control, public order policing, less lethal tools (such as rubber and foam projectiles), mass arrests, preparedness and training and wellness.

The report adds that LAPD used a great deal of munitions during the protests, totaling more than 9,700 rounds of ‘less lethal’ munitions. This included more than 3,500 “40” mm foam rounds and 6,200 “37” mm foam rounds.”

The police complained that they were understaffed and poorly equipped, yet they apparently had enough beanbags, rubber bullets, tear gas, batons, shields and gas masks, to carry out sustained attacks on the media representatives covering the protest as well as the demonstrators.

It further acknowledges that people were indeed illegally detained for “exceedingly long periods of time.” This further includes failure to release protesters for curfew violations, a misdemeanor that does allow for arrest, and “failure to provide access to bathroom facilities and water” while hundreds of protestors were detained.

The report further says that interviewees were surprised at the violence that occurred in the afternoon and evening hours at some protests and that they lacked intelligence. By that they mean they did not get accurate information from the teams of undercover cops, whom they call “shadow teams.” 

During the George Floyd Minneapolis protests activists accused undercover police officers engaging in vandalism and inciting violence during the protests last spring. Minneapolis police have denied the accusation. Right-wing agitators have been documented carrying out such tactics, the most infamous of which was dubbed the “Umbrella Man.”

The reports review team cited poor training, command and control and planning for the LAPD’s failures during the protest last spring. 

In response to the report, Mayor Eric Garcetti is quoted as saying he was “Looking forward to working with the police commission, the city Council, LAPD and community stakeholders in implementing improvements suggested in this report and the two reports coming shortly.

Furthermore, while the report affirms “a duty of the police is to protect free speech and First Amendment rights” the report says nothing of the violation of the protester’s civil liberties, nor the multiple physical assaults on members of the media even after identifying themselves. In fact, media representatives have said that they were consciously targeted.

Former LAPD officer and current city councilmember, Joe Buscaino, quoted in the Times with a different approach, saying “We need to be thoughtful about how we process this information and how we implement changes.”

Slapdash Writing, Production Plague “Pick of the Vine”

This last year has been a terrible time for theatre, particularly small companies and troupes. While most have gone completely dark, some have at least tried their hand at mounting plays online. The problematic reality is that theatre is a very different animal than film/video, requiring a separate skill set to do well.

Unfortunately, in translating its annual “Pick of the Vine” event (an evening of short plays that has opened every Little Fish season since the beginning of the millennium) to the internet, Little Fish Theatre hasn’t brought on board anyone with those skills. Even more problematic, however, is the quality of the plays they’ve chosen to include. 

The opener, Jack Karp’s Working from Hideout, may be the best of the bunch. Clark Kent (Charlie Bates) is giving Bruce Wayne (Doug Mattingly) a Zoom tutorial on how to fight cybercrime — because in the time of COVID-19 they’re supposed to be working remotely. Bruce protests that they’re essential workers; Clark points out that they’re also role models and need to set a good example by staying at home. It’s an amusing premise, with a couple of nice details (e.g., Bruce needs glasses to read what’s onscreen), but after five minutes the constant references to their comic-book universe wear thin.

Snickerdoodle concerns a young woman still living at home (Kimmy Shields) announcing to her parents (Cindy and Perry Shields) that she’s going to clown college. “Why are you doing this to us?” her father asks. “Are you trying to send your mother and me to an early grave so you can inherit our valuable collection of antique cardboard boxes?” All the jokes are that level. What else to say?

Purgatoromeo is about what happens after the action in Romeo & Juliet, with Romeo (Edward Hong) finding himself in a waiting room — yes, in Purgatory — for processing before he goes up or down. A bureaucratic snafu sees him reunited there with Juliet (Josephine Chang). But are they bound for the same place? The reunion is cute; that’s about it.

Elemental is the sole drama. A scientist (Mattingly) who has discovered a new element with the potential to revolutionize the energy industry takes a meeting with a head muckety-muck (Branda Lock) at a powerful corporation. She tries to strongarm him but is hoist by her own petard. Playwright Brandon Cahela is trying to make a point about greed, but he doesn’t make it well. The muddy audio doesn’t help.

In The Aloha Life, a retired couple (Belinda Howe and Don Scholssman) vacationing and considering settling down in Hawaii get a text alert of a missile attack (we aren’t given any context). What to do in what may be your final minutes of life? Take it easy, I guess. This certainly isn’t a drama, but it doesn’t try very hard to be a comedy, so….

The Job Interview from Hell has Vanity (Lock) and Gluttony (Lloyd Robertson II) trying to find a replacement for Sloth (Daniel Gallai), who just hasn’t been carrying his weight. Potential candidates include Affectation (Rogelio Douglas III), Annoying Cellphone Usage (Kimberly Patterson), Sarcasm (Dionne Neish), and Mansplaining (Allen Barstow). Some fun performances here — particularly Douglas and Neish — but playwrights Chris Irby & Sean Freeman confuse mansplaining with simple pedanticism, and they seem to think the sin sloth is the same thing as moving like a sloth. More problematic is when your play feels redundant even though it’s less than 15 minutes.

Contact is a good closer, if for no other reason than because it bookends “Pick of the Vine” with pandemic themes — plus, it lasts no longer than it should. A pair of strangers (Barstow and Roberson) brush arms as they pass on the sidewalk. Slathering their offended limbs with sanitizer (funny), they almost come to fisticuffs over not being given proper social distance. “I would totally kick your ass right now if I wasn’t afraid of catching COVID-19!” But after being in lockdown for so long, isn’t it nice to have a little human contact? I hear ya, bruh.

If you are in Little Fish Theatre’s target demographic taste-wise and like your comedy lite and silly — and to be fair, that’s not me — there is zero question you’ll like this better than I did. But there’s no getting around the fact that the scripts this year were chosen less selectively than any of the five or six “Pick of the Vine”s I’ve seen, and the overall production value is no better than your basic Zoom call. Yes, there are extenuating circumstances. But it is what it is.

Little Fish Theatre’s “Pick of the Vine” streams on-demand through March 31. Cost: $20

For more information, visit LittleFishTheatre.org.

We All Need Parks: Help Identify Regional And Rural Park And Recreation Needs

LOS ANGELES — The Los Angeles County Department of Parks and Recreation or LA County Parks is inviting the public to participate in a community engagement and outreach process to help inform planning and funding allocation to address regional and rural park and recreation needs. As a focused update to the 2016 Los Angeles Countywide Parks Needs Assessment, this effort is called the Regional and Rural Edition. Specifically, it will apply an equity lens to comprehensively identify, analyze, map, and document:

The need for regional facilities, including regional parks, beaches and lakes, trails, and natural areas and open spaces; and

The park needs of Rural communities which are primarily located in the Antelope Valley, Santa Clarita Valley, and Santa Monica Mountains.

With the support of the Regional Park and Open Space District, LA County Parks has initiated the Regional and Rural Edition in response to a motion by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors which called for the development of a needs assessment to address regional recreation, beaches, rural areas, and open space.  This is an appropriate time to evaluate regional and rural park and recreation needs, given that outdoor public spaces, such as beaches, local and regional parks, natural areas, and trails, have all become popular during the COVID-19 pandemic as people seek opportunities for recreation and respite.  

Designed to be extensive and inclusive, the community engagement and outreach process will be launched by LA County Parks in March 2021 in partnership with other County departments, community-based organizations, and other groups.  Due to COVID-19 restrictions on in-person meetings and group gatherings, the process will consist primarily of online methods of engagement and physically distanced activities, including the following: project website updates (https://lacountyparkneeds.org/); surveys/polls; social media, including photo competitions; phone calls; focus groups; workshops and webinars

LA County Parks has also convened a Technical Advisory Committee to help inform and guide the process of data collection and analysis, development of metrics, community engagement and outreach, and other key aspects of the project.  The committee includes representatives from a broad range of agencies and organizations with expertise in geographic information systems (GIS), beaches, parks, public health, regional planning, transportation, open space and conservation, and sustainability, including:

  • Cal Poly Pomona
  • LA County Department of Beaches and Harbors
  • LA County Department of Parks and Recreation
  • LA County Department of Public Health
  • LA County Department of Regional Planning
  • LA Metro
  • National Recreation and Park Association
  • Prevention Institute
  • Southern California Association of Governments
  • The Nature Conservancy
  • The Wilderness Society
  • UCLA Institute of the Environment and Sustainability

LA County Parks is the lead agency charged with updates and implementation of the Countywide Parks Needs Assessment.  The 2016 Parks Needs Assessment involved a 14-month process that included data collection and analysis, engagement with stakeholders and community members in cities and unincorporated areas. The 2016 Parks Needs Assessment directly informed the development of Measure A, a Countywide funding measure for parks approved by nearly 75% of LA County voters in November 2016 and generated more than $90 million annually.

Per direction from the Board of Supervisors and the Grants Administration Manual for Measure A, the results of the Regional and Rural Edition will be used to help inform project planning and the competitive grant process. It will also provide data and analyses to inform future park and recreation planning efforts by LA County Parks, cities, and other stakeholders.

Details: https://lacountyparkneeds.org/

Are News Media Intentionally Perpetuating a Two-Party System?

0

The game is rigged in favor of the two-party system. It’s rigged by the Constitution, which mandates that the president be chosen by simple majority in the Electoral College rather than by popular vote; and it’s rigged by the Democrats and Republicans, who (to quote Micah L. Sifry in The New Republic) “artificially lock themselves in power” by “instituting onerous petitioning requirements to hinder other upstarts” from getting on ballots, which are controlled by state legislatures — which are controlled by (surprise!) Democrats and Republicans.

For all that, it’s still possible to be part of the U.S. political process on the highest levels without belonging to one of the Big Two. But sometimes it seems like the news media don’t want you to know.

Consider the coverage of Jan. 5’s Georgia runoff elections, when Democrat challengers Jon Ossoff and Ralph Warnock bested Republican incumbents David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler, respectively. “Should Ossoff be certified the winner, Democrats would have 50 seats [in the Senate],” the Washington Post reported as the final results came in. “That gives Democrats the two victories they needed to secure a 50-50 tie in the Senate,” said the Los Angeles Times. “Democrats will hold 50 seats in the Senate,” proclaimed the New York Times. “With Warnock and Ossoff’s wins, the Senate is deadlocked with 50 Democrats and 50 Republicans,” stated Fox News. CNN generated a neat little half-blue, half-red “Democrats flip the Senate” graphic for the occasion: “50 DEMOCRATS, 50 REPUBLICANS.” Etc. Etc.

But it’s fake news. In reality, the Georgia results created a Senate composed of 50 Republicans, 48 Democrats, and two Independents: Bernie Sanders (VT) and Angus King (ME). Peruse the above articles — which represent the vast majority of print, online, and TV reportage — and you won’t find a single mention of Sanders or King or any sort of clarification such as we find parenthetically in a January 7 Bloomburg.com article: “(The Senate technically has 48 Democrats and two independents, Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Angus King of Maine, who reliably vote with them.)”

It may be captious to complain about the “technically” or the claim that Sanders and King “reliably vote with” Democrats (ProPublica documents that Sanders and King don’t even vote with each other 1 out of every 3 times; and FiveThirtyEight reports that King supported President Donald Trump’s positions more than twice as often as did Sanders). We know what they mean: in straight “party-line votes,” Sanders and King almost always line up with the Dems against the GOP. 

But reporting that there are 50 Democrats in the Senate is not the same thing — and “we know what they mean” doesn’t cover it, because this isn’t a matter of nuance or interpretation. As a matter of fact, there are 48 Democrats — not 50 because Sanders and King caucus with the Dems, not 51 because Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris presides over the Senate and is the tie breaking vote, but 48.

This widespread misreportage may be nothing more than journalistic laziness — inexcusable if you believe accurate reportage of fact matters, but not the same thing as calculated falsehood. But might corporate media have a vested interest in preserving the two-party system?

The obvious reason they might is money. With virtually no limits on campaign spending, American elections are a cash cow that the media managed to milk for more with every passing election cycle. According to Advertising Analytics, “Political ad spending has grown an average of 27% per year since 2012,” including about $8.5 billion in the 2020 election cycle alone, plus the Georgia runoffs, which accounted for an additional $600 million. Split that number, $9.1 billion, in half (it’s not quite that simple, with PACs, etc., but third parties account for almost no ad revenue, so you get the idea), and that means the Democrat and Republican Parties are each in the top five among all U.S. advertisers, despite the fact that their products — elections — are generally available only once every two years.

The reason they have so much money to spend is because together they hold a virtual monopoly — and just as importantly, a perceived monopoly — on the American political process. If everyone believes Democrat-or-Republican is the only game in town, then all political donations will go to them regardless of how many others are running for office. This keeps both parties rich enough to blanket media with ad buys across the country, including negative ads — a strategy that yields diminishing returns when you have multiple opponents rather than a single target. Perpetuating a political milieu where two and only two superpowers are engaged in a political arms race in which they have to keep spending to avoid annihilation is the ideal way to maximize media profit.

The best way to perpetuate the idea that Democrats and Republicans are the only viable options is to perpetuate the falsehood that there are no other options. Nationally televised presidential debates certainly perpetuate this idea, giving voice only to Democrats and Republicans. At first you might guess it’s a numbers thing. After all, we have to draw the line somewhere to limit the number of participants in a debate. But consider the first two 2020 Democratic Party presidential debates in June and July, where NBC and CNN each accommodated 20 candidates spread out over two nights. If a debate can accommodate 10 candidates on stage at a time, why not open them up to more parties — especially in a country where (according to a recent Gallup poll) half of voting-age Americans identify as independents and 62% say “[the two major] parties do such a poor job representing the American people that a third party is needed”?

As it stands, the bipartisan (read: Dems and Repubs only) Commission on Presidential Debates mandates a 15% nationwide polling threshold — an arbitrary number seemingly calculated to keep third parties from getting a foot in the door — for admittance into an “official” presidential debate. However, any network inclined to let the public know about other candidates could do so at either the primary or presidential level. In 2012, for example, Democracy Now!, a nonprofit news organization not beholden to advertising, held a debate for third-party candidates Jill Stein (Green Party), Virgil Goode (Constitution Party), and Rocky Anderson (Justice Party), providing them with a platform to answer the same questions Democratic incumbent Barack Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney fielded in the primetime telecast.

In other words, it’s simply a matter of will — just as it’s a matter of will to accurately report the number of Democrats and Republicans in the Senate. Back in November, USA Today demonstrated how simple it is to do so: “Republicans currently hold 53 seats, while Democrats have 45, plus two independents who caucus with them.”

When it’s so easy to accurately report the facts, we should wonder with chagrin every time so many in the media choose to do otherwise.

Transformational Change, Or Not?

The American Rescue Plan will cut child poverty in half for a year. Democrats want to make that cut permanent. To prevent that — and much more — Republicans are trying to destroy democracy

By Paul Rosenberg, Senior Editor

On March 11, President Joe Biden signed the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, the most consequential and most popular rescue package since the New Deal. Economists project it could double GDP growth this year, from around 3.5 to 7%. It passed narrowly with no Republican votes in Congress, but is so overwhelmingly popular — in the 70 to 80% range — that even a majority of Republican voters approve of it. 

The plan could be the harbinger of a new era —just like the New Deal was in the 1930s — in which Americans see government playing a crucial role in bettering their lives, thus restoring faith in our democracy. And, the House has already passed a string of bills to do just that, with more on the way. But if Republicans have their way — relying on the Senate filibuster and a wave of over 250 voter-suppression bills in 43 states — that faith could be strangled, rather than restored. We could be headed the way of India or Brazil.

“The sheer number of repressive voting bills that have been introduced just in the last few weeks are terrifying,” said Harbor Commissioner Diane Middleton, citing it as a response to the progressive agenda pushed by the Bernie Sanders campaign, which substantially informed the plan. 

Even before that, in early February, there were four times as many such bills as there were at the same time last year, according to the Brennan Center. Millions could be blocked from voting.

The worst that Republican Senators could say about the American Rescue Plan was that it represented a “liberal wish-list” — otherwise known as an agenda. As Washington Post blogger Greg Sargent remarked:

[T]he way representative democracy is supposed to work is that the voting public elects a party, that party enacts as much of its agenda as it can, and then voters judge the results. Only in a system where inaction is the norm is there something untoward about the party in power putting a wish list into legislation.

The problem for Republicans is that liberal policies are popular: Social Security, Medicare, environmental protection, minimum wage laws, the list goes on and on. A 1967 book,  The Political Beliefs of Americans first uncovered this pattern: while a plurality of Americans called themselves conservatives and preferred free market solutions to government action in the abstract, a two-thirds supermajority was “operationally liberal,” meaning that they supported specific government programs, like the ones just cited, to solve specific problems.

And that’s exactly what the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan does. It includes $1,400 direct checks for 85% of Americans, $300 per week in extended unemployment, up to $3,600 per child tax credit, $350 billion in aid for state and local governments (reaching every state and county), $130 billion for schools, $34 billion in health care subsidies, $28.6 billion aid for restaurants and $37.5 billion aid for other small business, $25 billion in rental assistance, $14 billion for vaccines, and $8 billion for food assistance.

The child tax credit is refundable — meaning it even goes to families who don’t owe income taxes, making it more of a European-style child allowance, which is far more effective in reducing child poverty — 90% more effective according to one study. Along with the $1,400 checks, the extended unemployment and expanded food assistance, it’s projected to cut child poverty in half — at least for this year. That’s comparable to the drop in senior citizen poverty when Medicare was enacted in 1965. The provision expires after a year, because it is specifically designed to respond to the pandemic. But there will be a strong push to make it permanent, especially once it’s had a chance to prove itself. And that’s what Republicans are really afraid of: Democrats reminding people what a functioning government can do to dramatically improve their lives — and making it permanent.

Putting Working People First

Biden honed in on this the next day in his Rose Garden speech, after discussing some of the key highlights in the bill.

“The bill does one more thing which I think is really important, it changes the paradigm,” Biden said. “For the first time in a long time, this bill puts working people in this nation first. It’s not hyperbole; it’s a fact. We’ve seen time and time again that trickle down does not work. … All it’s done is make those at the top richer in the past and everyone else fallen behind. This time, it’s time that we build an economy that grows from the bottom up and the middle out.”

If Biden sounds more like Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren than the Joe Biden of old, that’s because decades of trickle-down failure has finally taken its toll politically as well as economically. A decade ago, the establishment basically ignored Occupy Wall Street. But that’s now the distant past.

“You won’t find this in the mainstream media coverage,” political scientist Thea Riofrancos tweeted, “but it’s literally impossible to imagine this $1.9 trillion dollar relief package without the past year of organizing by Black Lives Matter, tenant orgs, DSA, Sunrise; essential workers going on strike; and the Bernie campaign.”

“Everything that Bernie espouses from taxing the billionaires and ending corporate welfare to universal health care, cancelling student debt, ending the school to prison pipeline, addressing climate change,  etc. has overwhelming voter support,” Middleton said. “That is what motivated people to go to the polls.  We want transformational change.  That is how Bernie has described the American Rescue Plan — the most transformational change in decades.

“And it must be stopped — if capital is to remain in total control. Thus — task # 1 — keep people from voting.”

Peter Warren, with Indivisible San Pedro, sees a three-sided blockage of democracy: repressing voting rights, the Senate’s filibuster, and rightwing court packing.

“The GQP — the Grand [QAnon] Party — is cooking bills to increase voter suppression and pack the House via partisan redistricting,” Warren said. “The GQP, with massive amounts of funding and the Federalist Society picking young judges — all ideologues and many unqualified — will support these fascist victories to entrench the white vote in GQP states and even purple states.

“To fight back, we must pass The For The People Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, which means overhauling or killing the filibuster. We are doing that work now.”

Middleton agreed.

“Anything that secures national and fair voting rights is necessary,” she said. “If that means millions marching à la Black Lives Matter mobilizations, it must be done. If that means abolishing the filibuster, it must be done. And these laws must be written to pass the possibility of reversal by the U.S. Supreme Court.”

It’s not just activist advocates saying this. America’s already declined on several measures of democratic robustness tracked internationally by the V Dem Institute — a process of erosion that voter suppression could significantly intensify. 

“Democrats have a very short window to protect and expand voting rights in this country,” Princeton historian Kevin Kruse said on Twitter. “Everything else depends on that effort.”

“We have so little time,” said Jason Stanley, author of How Fascism Works.

San Pedro NCs Petition to Use Vacant Port Property for Homeless

By Hunter Chase, Community News Reporter

Two neighborhood councils in San Pedro have asked the Port of Los Angeles to use two of its parking lots — about four acres, total — as a campsite for homeless people. The port says it is not interested, citing the lots’ proximity to contaminated land and their current uses in the construction of the West Harbor project and for overflow business parking.

Under a plan proposed by the Central San Pedro Neighborhood Council and the Coastal San Pedro Neighborhood Council in separate votes taken one month apart, lots E and F, located near 22nd St., would be used  as living space for homeless people for three or four years, while the West Harbor development project is being built.

On Jan. 19, Central San Pedro NC approved the plan, 7-3, with one abstention. The no votes came from Linda Alexander, Eugenia Bulanova and Matthew Quiocho. President Carrie Scoville abstained. On Feb. 16, Coastal San Pedro NC registered its approval, 9-0, although five members abstained — President Doug Epperhart and board members Isiah Cade, Erika Hernandez, Kavitha Muthuswamy and Shannon Ross.

Neighborhood activist James Campeau had reached out to the port about the idea in November 2020.

“I just had [it] in mind for all the people that are on the sidewalks in San Pedro and on Gulch Road, on the side of the hill, sliding down in the mud in the rain, to … have a safe, level place,” Campeau said.

Campeau said the lots have trees and shade and are fairly secluded.

“They’re not in the firing line of … people driving by and cursing them out,” Campeau said. “I think it would be a dignified place, you know, in the interim that they find something else.

However, at the March 4 meeting of the Board of Harbor Commissioners, Gene Seroka, executive director of the Port of Los Angeles, said the lots are close to a Superfund site, the GATX Annex Terminal, which is an area that needs long-term work to eliminate the contamination of hazardous material.

“When we began discussions with Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti and this Harbor Commission on what we could do to assist those folks who are experiencing homelessness, the last thing we wanted was to put any human being in danger of polluted sites, and that’s what this is,” Seroka said.

In addition, he said the lots are currently being used as a laydown area for the ongoing construction of the West Harbor project, meaning that construction materials are temporarily stored there. They are also intended to be used for overflow parking for nearby businesses.

Seroka said that the City of Los Angeles has already committed two nearby properties to help homeless people — one is the Bridge Home shelter in San Pedro, and the other is the Bridge Home shelter in Wilmington.

“Unfortunately, those two facilities are underutilized today,” Seroka said. “Let’s get folks who need housing into those facilities first, before we start talking about other difficult properties to convert, and time that these people don’t have.”

Campeau argued that there was no overflow parking currently, and if there were, Sampson Way was closer to West Harbor, and has adequate parking available. In addition, the lots are currently used as a park about 75 feet away from the GATX Annex Terminal, and the park has never been identified as an environmental hazardous zone.

“Mr. Seroka’s public safety concerns for not allowing the use of Lots E and F, despite their use by the general public for a number of years, doesn’t make sense,” Campeau said in an email to Seroka and the harbor commissioners.

Campeau said that use of the lots could help homeless people who could not pass background checks to get into permanent housing or bridge homes.

“I can’t find another area that is close enough that would work,” Campeau said. “The port is just, you know, throwing any cog in the wheel they can to not cooperate.”

Campeau said he would like to see the port contribute its fair share to helping homeless people.

“You can’t send them … way too far away, they have to be part of our community,” Campeau said.

Coastal board member Kavitha Muthuswamy argued that this shouldn’t just be an excuse to get homeless people out of public spaces, as they have a right to be there.

“If the true intent, as many people have stated, is to provide a place where people can be clean and you know, go to the bathroom and relieve themselves, then fine, leave that open,” Muthuswamy said. “But it doesn’t mean that we need to get them out of our sight in other places.”

The site could have wraparound services if it had city or county funding. But even if it didn’t, it would still have trash cans and portable toilets, both of which are inexpensive.

Central board member Linda Alexander said using the lots to help homeless people could lead to lost revenue for the port.

“I’m not opposed to this, I just wanted to point out that those lots are often used for … base camps, which would generate money for the port,” Alexander said. “I don’t know how much money they make, but … it may be their excuse to not do this.”

Coastal board member Shannon Ross said this property might be under the California Tidelands Trust act, which would prevent it from being used as a site for homeless people.

“I’m not sure that this property would be eligible for this type of … homeless facility,” Ross said. “I don’t think the port is going to do anything with that property for a very long time, as we know, we watched them tear down the Ports O’Call village and it’s just been sitting there.”

However, Calif. State Controller Betty Yee, who sits on the State Lands Commission, recently corresponded with this newspaper saying that “they were reviewing the Trust Doctrine in light of changing values.”

But Campeau wants to use the lots because they represent immediate solutions. While the city has built homeless shelters, they take time to develop.

“Meanwhile, every night, these people are on [the] sidewalk, out in the weather,” Campeau said. “Bridge Home is great, all these people that work to get permanent housing is great, but it doesn’t happen fast enough.”

Venice’s Loss is San Pedro’s Gain

By Arturo Garcia-Ayala, Columnist

A new mural combining the best elements from San Pedro’s local landmarks and characters from Alice in Wonderland is on the corner of O’Farrell and Oliver streets behind Sister Cities Plaza. It was painted by renowned graffiti artist and muralist, Jules Muck.

Jules recently moved to San Pedro from Venice Beach to seek more artistic opportunities.

 “How can I be a part of the community?” she asked herself. “Honestly, [Venice Beach is] running out of space …. The work space is limited. There aren’t enough walls for muralists.”

She contacted her friend, Jason Ostro, who owns the Gabba Gallery in Los Angeles’ Filipino Town. He put Jules in contact with Linda Grimes, the managing director of San Pedro Waterfront Arts District. Linda then arranged Jules’ introduction to Leslie Jones. Leslie was already undertaking a cleanup effort with the San Pedro Caring Proactive Residence Volunteer Crew along Oliver Street behind Sister Cities Plaza, which also painted over the retaining wall turning it into a blank slate. 

Leslie, recognizing Jules’s talent and reputation, immediately commissioned her to paint the expansive mural dedicated to the local parks. It also takes inspiration from the adjacent mural on a privately-owned wall depicting the Mad Hatter painted five months prior by another artist named Ricky Hernandez. 

“San Pedro needs this, especially after the year it has had,” Leslie said.  

To prepare the wall, there was a coordinated effort between the volunteer group San Pedro CPR and District 15 City Councilman Joe Buscaino’s office to beautify the area obscured behind a major freeway exit. The clean-up effort was a volunteer effort spearheaded by local San Pedro resident, George Matthews. In the past, the retaining wall on the other side of Sister Cities Plaza was constantly vandalized by gang graffiti, the sidewalk was littered with bottles and food containers. Residents’ attempts to maintain the area were futile. 

The mural spans more than half of the neighborhood block. In one section, Jules has painted a stone footpath flanked by giant colorful mushrooms leading to the pond under the Averill Park bridge with the Point Fermin Lighthouse in the faded background. In another section, she has painted the Alice in Wonderland caterpillar relaxing on a leaf smoking a hookah under the windswept tree near Sunken City as the Cheshire Cat looks on grinning. A large Alice herself spanning several sections lays on the grass looking up at the sky, dreaming what could be. To her right, a swarm of monarch butterflies surround the Korean Bell of Friendship with a melting clock stretching off the pagoda roof as though someone tossed their large pizza on a whim.

“There is a difference between public art and making art in my studio because once it goes on [the wall] it belongs to everybody,” Jules said.

During the interview, Jules continued to answer questions while at the same time carefully controlling every spray with coordinated clarity. Random admirers who have heard of the new mural stopped by to express their appreciation — some even brought their families. 

Her Story

Jules has been a muralist for 30 years. She was born in Stoke-on-Trent, England to a Greek father and British mother. Her family immigrated to the United States, settling in New York City. Jules began her artistic work as “a little graffiti writer; — I was painting on a rooftop in the Bronx.” She was discovered by another renowned graffiti artist — Sandra Fabara, aka Lady Pink — and during the next several years Jules expanded her talents further as Lady Pink’s apprentice. She apprenticed under her for several years before moving to Venice Beach in 2008. 

In 2015, while visiting her father on the island of Lesvos in Greece, Jules personally witnessed the Syrian refugee crisis. While there at the harbor city of Mytilene, which was a major port of entry, Jules painted a mural of a woman draped in the Greek flag with only her eyes showing as a sympathetic gesture to the incoming refugees. 

The Alice in Wonderland mural on Oliver Street was an achievement of coordination among the many concerned citizen groups.

“There is more to come,” Leslie said, implying this is only the beginning of more art projects in San Pedro. 

You can follow Jules Muck on her website www.julesmuck.com or through her social media under the Instagram handle @muckrock.

Healthcare Worker and Skilled Nursing Home Cases Significantly Decline as Vaccinations Increase

The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health or Public Health has confirmed 75 new deaths and 897 new cases of COVID-19. To date, Public Health identified 1,211,733 positive cases of COVID-19 across all areas of L.A. County and a total of 22,580 deaths. Public Health has tragically confirmed one of the reported COVID-19 deaths is a young person, under the age of 18. Details about underlying health conditions is unknown for this person. This brings the total number of deaths among children from COVID-19 to 2.  

The seven-day average number of daily cases by episode date has decreased to 524 new cases per day as of March 9; the lowest since April 2.

There are 857 people with COVID-19 hospitalized and 28% of these people are in the ICU. Average daily hospitalizations are now under 1,000, at pre-surge early-November levels.

Testing results are available for more than 5,972,000 individuals with 19% of people testing positive.  Today’s daily test positivity rate is 1.9%.

The 7-day average number of daily deaths as of March 9, is 24. On Feb. 9, the average number of daily deaths was 118.

Of the 75 new deaths reported today, 27 people that passed away were over the age of 80, 29 people who died were between the ages of 65 and 79, 12 people who died were between the ages of 50 and 64, four people who died were between the ages of 30 and 49, and one youth under the age of 18. Two deaths were reported by the City of Long Beach.

The first group of people to be vaccinated in L.A. County were those serving on the frontlines at the hospitals, in healthcare facilities, and in the homes of those requiring constant care. Since late December, when healthcare workers began to be vaccinated, we have seen their cases plummet.  During the last week of December, there were 1,730 new cases of COVID-19 among healthcare workers. In the past three weeks, there have been less than 100 new cases across the entire county each week, the smallest number of weekly cases seen among healthcare workers during the pandemic.  This is the lowest number of new cases of COVID-19 among healthcare workers since last March and, in part, reflects that the vast majority of our healthcare workers are vaccinated. 

Currently, 79% of skilled nursing home staff and 78% of residents received at least a first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine and 74% of all staff and 69% of residents received their second dose and are fully vaccinated. It’s important to note that there is high turnover rate among residents in these facilities, and this number only reflects rates among current residents, not the total number of residents who have been vaccinated. When the vaccine first was administered to residents at skilled nursing homes in L.A. County in late December, the average daily number of cases was over 200 a day and has dropped to 3 a day as of March 9.  This is excellent evidence that these vaccines are working.

To date, Public Health has confirmed a total of 55 cases of COVID-19 U.K. variant, two cases of the B.1.525 variant, which was also first identified in the U.K., 21 cases of the New York variant and 1 case of the P.2 variant from Brazil in Los Angeles County. There have been no cases identified of the South African variant. In addition, there have been 35 California variant B.1.427 cases identified and 276 of the California Variant B.1.429.  The B.1.427 and the B.1.429 are both, slightly different sequences of what is commonly called the California variant. Variants remain a concern, even as more and more people are vaccinated. As the county plans for additional re-openings, it is clear that if there is more transmission of the COVID-19, there is more risk of variants dominating.  It is important for each person to continue to do everything they can to reduce transmission, including masking and maintaining physical distance whenever you are outside of your home and around others.

As of March 16, 1,810 schools are providing on-campus services for high needs students. This includes over 99,000 students and over 36,000 staff. A total of 55 school districts and 466 individual private and charter schools are approved for in-person instruction of students in grades TK through 12. Public Health is surveying schools to assess which schools have already opened for in class instruction and are scheduling site visits as appropriate.

School staff have been eligible to be vaccinated since March 1. Many partners including school districts, schools, providers, unions, and health care providers worked together to coordinate closed pods for every single school district and additional vaccination sites for independent schools.  To date, 102,730 vaccine doses have been allocated to teachers and staff in K-12 public and independent schools through closed pods. Public Health also continues to set aside appointments at the large capacity county sites for teachers and school staff.  On March 21, there will be vaccinations available for teachers and staff of independent schools at all five county large vaccination sites.

Last week, the state hit its goal of vaccinating 2 million people who are living in communities across the state with the lowest scored on the Healthy Places Index (HPI). The state has set an additional goal of vaccinating 4 million people in these areas. L.A. County is vaccinating a larger percent of people in communities with fewer resources when compared to California overall. Last week, 32% of the people vaccinated in L.A. County, were people who live in communities with the lowest HPI score, compared to the state, where 19% of people vaccinated live in the communities with the lowest HPI score. 

Visit: www.VaccinateLACounty.com  (English) and www.VacunateLosAngeles.com  (Spanish) for more information on who is eligible, how to make an appointment if it is your turn, and what verifications you will need when you show up for your vaccine. Vaccinations are always free and open to eligible residents and workers regardless of immigration status.
Details: www.publichealth.lacounty.gov.

Dr. Godfrey Pernell

March 21, 1922- March 8, 2021

Dr. Godfrey Pernell, widely known for his political engagement and civic participation, died on March 8 at the age of 98. Born March 21, 1922, the oldest son of Russian immigrants, Dr. Pernell was the quintessential first-generation success story. Growing up in Chicago in a family of modest means, he had an active and inquisitive mind and developed a life-long thirst for knowledge. He was interested in everything, but his passion was science.

During World War II, he practiced dentistry as a navy lieutenant. After the war, he travelled to Southern California where he met his wife of 58 years, Beverly Furst. They built their home in Rolling Hills (a place they both loved), raised a family and were active in social and civic life. Dr. Pernell was a member of the Rolling Hills City Council and served multiple terms as mayor of the city.

A life-long progressive and supporter of labor unions, Dr. Pernell created the first pre-paid dental program in the country in 1954, providing affordable dental care to union workers. The company he founded, Dental Health Services, was headquartered in Long Beach. 

He had no tolerance for racial injustice. In the 1950s, he won the Urban League award for the example he set with his multiethnic dental office.

He was a model of how to live a full and active life. He never stopped learning and trying new things. He enjoyed traveling, SCUBA diving, rare fruit and cacti gardening. He was, among other things, an entrepreneur, a metal sculptor, restaurant owner and amateur geologist. He read two newspapers a day and kept his mind challenged with crossword puzzles.

After he retired in his nineties, he helped create a local preschool at the Pacific Unitarian Church. He enjoyed spending time at his second home in Palm Springs where he had a wide-circle of friends. He was a mentor to many and generous with those in need. He had a great sense of humor and asked everyone he met for their best joke in exchange for one of his. He would end a conversation with, “Do good stuff,” a motto he lived by.

Godfrey was preceded in death by his beloved wife, Beverly, his daughter Deanne and sister Charlotte. He is survived by his sons, Gary, Wayne, and Jeff Pernell, his daughters-in-law, Wilhemina, Shannon, Melissa, Jan and Stephanie, his sister Estelle, his brother Marvin, 11 grandchildren, and five great-grandchildren. Donations may be made to fridaysforfuture.org so others may have the opportunity to live as long and meaningful a life as Godfrey Pernell.

A virtual memorial service will be held Sunday, March 21 noon to 1 p.m. Live streaming from Pacific Unitarian Church, Palos Verdes. (Godfrey’s 99th birthday.) http://www.pacificunitarian.org