Friday, October 17, 2025
spot_img
spot_img
Home Blog Page 389

China Shipping Trial Starts June 24

Revised Mitigation Plan Challenged

“This case is the latest in a chain of litigation stretching back over two decades.” So begins the California Attorney General’s opening brief in the China Shipping lawsuit set for trial in San Diego on June 24. At issue is the adequacy — and lawfulness — of the port’s revised environmental mitigation measures approved in 2020 by the Board of Harbor Commissioners.

In the beginning — when the port tried to build the China Shipping terminal without any environmental impact report at all — local homeowners battled alone, but not any more. The Attorney General is arguing on behalf of The People of California, as well as the California Air Resources Board.

“The Port [of Los Angeles] has repeatedly failed to comply with CEQA [the California Environmental Quality Act] in approving projects at the China Shipping Container Terminal,” the brief goes on to say. “In so doing, the Port has chosen to expose communities of color and low-income communities to excess emissions of criteria and toxic air pollutants harmful to public health, despite the fact that feasible measures to mitigate those emissions were available and required. Not only is that choice unlawful, it is unconscionable as it unjustifiably increases the public health risk for Californians that are already overburdened by some of the highest levels of air pollution.”

The initial lawsuit was settled in 2003, modified in an amended stipulated judgment (ASJ), signed in 2004. But crucial mitigation measures in the EIR completed in 2008 were never implemented. “Although the Port knew, or should have known, about these failures as early as 2009, it did not disclose them to the public until 2015, after a Public Records Act request [from Random Lengths News] revealed the noncompliance,” the brief explains. A supplemental EIR meant to remedy that failure was opposed as illegally inadequate by all the plaintiffs in the current case — which includes the homeowners and their allies (known as “Community Petitioners”), represented by the Natural Resources Defense Council, along with the South Coast Air Quality Management District. This is only the third time ever the AQMD has joined such a lawsuit. The Attorney General’s involvement is even more exceptional.

The three filed separate lawsuits which were joined together, but they continue to make distinctly different — though related — arguments reflecting their different roles, while relying on a common foundation of facts.

The Community Petitioners brief argues that the SEIR “contravenes two fundamental purposes of CEQA: to inform the public and decision makers about the environmental effects of a proposed project, and to reduce those effects to the extent feasible.”

The Attorney General’s brief argues that the port violated CEQA in five ways: by “failing to enforce the 2008 mitigation measures,” by producing an invalid SEIR that “cannot cure the Port’s failure,” by failing to support changes to the 2008 mitigation measures “with substantial evidence,” by “failing to adopt all feasible mitigation measures,” and by “failing to ensure the SEIR mitigation measures are fully enforceable.”

Finally, AQMD is arguing for “a writ of mandate to protect the local community and the region’s air by compelling the Port’s compliance with CEQA.”

The port’s core line of defense is to normalize everything it has done (all the way back to 2001), claim it did nothing wrong, and shift the burden of proof: “The EIR is presumed adequate and challengers bear the burden to prove otherwise,” it states in its brief. Challengers “must establish, at every stage in the litigation, that ‘the determination or decision is not supported by substantial evidence.’”

To defend its failure to enforce compliance via lease terms, the port tries to shift blame to the plaintiffs and their attorneys: “[B]ecause NRDC did not include China Shipping in the original lawsuit or the ASJ, nor secured an order to set aside Permit 999, China Shipping was allowed to continue to operate the Terminal under Permit 999,” thus leaving the port powerless to enforce the measures — or so it claims.

However, the Attorney General’s brief notes that “In February 2015, counsel for the Port sent a letter to China Shipping, acknowledging its responsibility to enforce the measures, and warning that “[i]f these measures are not included [in China Shipping’s operating lease, the lease] remains legally insufficient and China Shipping’s operations could be subject to legal action,” which could affect the terminal’s operations.

“The Court should reject the Port’s attempt to blame its legal violations on the ‘complicated’ history of the China Shipping terminal,” NRDC wrote in a reply brief filed on May 24. “The reality is that those complications have been caused by the Port’s repeated refusal to comply with CEQA.”

Jan. 6 Accountability — A Republic, If You Can Keep It

It’s been said that a coup that goes unpunished is a dress rehearsal, which is why it’s so important for the truth about the Jan. 6 insurrection to come out, and those responsible to be held accountable — including Donald Trump. The pattern across the globe has been clear, but in America it’s been more complicated, with the American Civil War as the prime example.

Then, issues of individual and collective responsibility were not just shuffled aside, but eventually turned on their heads. When Jim Crow segregation reimposed a system of white supremacy run by the same landed aristocracy that controlled the slaveholding South, and took the nation to war.

After the war, Confederate President Jefferson Davis was arrested, but never stood trial. If he had, he most likely would have been prosecuted by Richard Henry Dana Jr. — author of Two Years Before The Mast — who won the most important Supreme Court case of the war, allowing for the blockade of Southern ports, without which the North almost certainly could not have won.

There were two lines of argument against trying Davis. One was that the nation needed to heal, an argument advanced by a trio of prominent unionists who joined in posting bail for Davis in May 1867. Dana made a very different argument, though with the same result. In an August 1868 letter to Attorney General W.M. Evarts, Dana warned of the danger of jury nullification. “We know that it only requires one dissentient juror to defeat the government and give Jefferson Davis and his favorers a triumph,” Dana wrote. “This possible result would be most humiliating to the Government and people of this country, and nonetheless so from the fact that it would be absurd.”

In the end, on Christmas day, 1868, President Andrew Johnson pardoned Davis, letting him off the hook. But the biggest failed lesson of the time wasn’t that. It was the birth of the big lie known as the “Lost Cause,” which absolved not just individuals like Davis, but the entire slave-owning class and the regional culture they dominated. The failure to combat the Lost Cause should be what bothers us most today — pointing to a much bigger task than simply holding Trump accountable.

Trump’s Bigger Big Lie

Trump’s stolen election big lie grew out of the broader lie that his entire presidency was based on, the lie that the system is specifically rigged against his base — white, Christian, conservatives — particularly men, who are innocent victims of malevolent outside forces, sinister elites and dangerous minorities. The Lost Cause was likewise designed to cast white Southerners as innocent victims of similar malevolent forces. While the details may differ, the main thrust was the same: denying reality, reversing the roles of victim and perpetrator, and claiming the moral high ground.

The Great Replacement Theory, cited by the Buffalo shooter, and mentioned by Tucker Carlson more than 400 times on his primetime Fox News show, echoes the same basic lie: that the white majority is being attacked by sinister globalist (i.e., Jewish) elites using foreign brown bodies to invade and overwhelm them. Steven Miller, the architect of Trump’s immigration policy, is a firm believer in the Great Replacement, as we’ve reported in the past.

Two other Trump-era big lies echo the same story. The QAnon conspiracy claims that Trump is fighting a global Satanic cabal of cannibalistic child sex traffickers, involving leaders of the Democratic Party, Hollywood elites and George Soros. It originally claimed Trump was secretly working with special counsel Robert Mueller to expose the conspiracy when Mueller was publicly investigating Trump. It was supposed to end in the mass arrests of thousands of Trump’s enemies.

The more recent panic over “critical race theory” — which has generated multiple state laws stifling the teaching of history, social studies and literature — arose in the wake of the police murder of George Floyd, and the historic wave of Black Lives Matter demonstrations it generated. Floyd’s murder vividly illustrated the absurdity of widely-held claims that white people are now more discriminated against than Black people, and it fueled a long-overdue discussion of systemic racism — institutions, practices and assumptions that have harmful racist impacts quite apart from any individual intent. The CRT panic stands the meaning of systemic racism on its head, falsely claiming it means that all white people are racist. Hence the false claim that CRT itself is racist and anti-American.

Beliefs in all these wild fantasies are interconnected by shared assumptions of who’s good, who’s evil and who’s to be trusted as a source of information.

Basics of The Lost Cause

In his book, The Myth of the Lost Cause, Edward Bonekemper identifies seven main tenets, the first four of which are sufficient to consider here. They are best considered in pairs:

1) Slavery was a benevolent, but dying institution by 1861, so there was no need to abolish it suddenly, especially by war.

2) States’ rights, not slavery, was the cause of secession, creation of the Confederacy and thus of the Civil War.

Bonekemper refutes these with mountains of facts, but just one simple fact is enough to demolish them both: The South had always opposed states’ rights when it came to fugitive slaves and when the 1793 Fugitive Slave Act was strengthened in 1850, he notes, “the fear of being kidnapped and sold into slavery led some fifteen to twenty thousand free Northern blacks to migrate to Canada between 1850 and 1860.” There’s no way to reconcile this mass migration with slavery being benevolent, or dying, or the South being committed to the principle of states’ rights.

In short, the “Lost Cause” is a farce. But there’s more, as the next pair of tenets fails just as quickly:

  1. The Confederacy had no chance of winning, but did the best it could with its limited resources.
  2. Indeed, it almost won, led by Robert E. Lee, one of the greatest generals in history.

Both claims are easily refuted. As Bonekemper notes, “All the Confederacy needed was a stalemate, which would confirm its existence as a separate country. The burden was on the North to defeat the Confederacy and compel the return of the eleven wayward states to the Union.” This basic reality was widely cited by Confederates as the war began, assuring themselves of ultimate success. Lee’s eagerness to invade the North, abandoning this obvious strategic advantage, is sufficient by itself to destroy his undeserved reputation. Celebrating Lee — and other Confederate generals — created a heroic narrative genre meant to silence all criticism.

The “Lost Cause” narrative was constructed in the 1870s and ’80s not simply to rewrite the South’s past to make it less painful, but to create a “usable past” that could justify and help organize what was going on there at the time — the violent, blood-soaked destruction of a fledgling multi-racial democracy — and guide the creation of a preferred future — the segregated South that perpetuated a social system materially similar to what existed under slavery.

Trump’s New Lost Cause

Like the old “Lost Cause,” Trump’s new Lost Cause is both about making a past loss less painful and creating a new politically controllable future. The same efforts that went into trying to steal the last election continue to try to steal the next, fueled by Trump’s stolen election lies. Thus, a recent New York Times story reported that “At least 357 sitting Republican legislators in [nine] closely contested battleground states have used the power of their office to discredit or try to overturn the results of the 2020 [election],” the backward-looking aspect of Trump’s Lost Cause. At the same time, it reports 52 laws passed that include restrictions on voting — the forward-looking aspect. Some include putting more power over elections in the hands of state legislatures.

Davis’ fate had little to do with the Lost Cause, as opposed to the field general, Lee. But Trump’s stolen election big lie puts him squarely in the middle of the new “Lost Cause.” “You’ve got to fight like hell, otherwise you won’t have a country anymore,” Trump said on Jan. 6. And that remains his rallying cry. The party base is with him. Numerous polls have found that about 7 in 10 Republican voters believe that Joe Biden wasn’t legitimately elected. But that’s only about 3 in 10 of all voters — not nearly enough to win competitive elections. So GOP politicians worried about that are trying to create some separation, even as Trump is trying to purge them from the party. But they largely embrace most, if not all of Trump’s broader lie, which severely imperils our democracy.

For example, the Washington Post recently wrote about the Republican Governors Association’s efforts to counter what one former governor called Trump’s “personal vendetta tour,” with the Georgia governor’s race as the premier battleground, where they spent about $5 million to defend Gov. Brian Kemp from a Trump-backed challenge by former senator David Perdue. Kemp has done a great deal to cripple democracy in Georgia, adding new election restrictions after the 2020 election. And that record has helped him stave off Trump’s attacks. But it strengthens Trump’s broader big lie, even as he holds back on the narrower one.

The Hearings Ahead

The Jan. 6 Committee is about to hold six public hearings, presenting its preliminary findings.

“The hearings will tell a story that will blow the roof off the House,” Rep. Jaime Raskin said in late April. “It is a story of the most heinous and dastardly political offense ever organized by a president, and his followers and his entourage in the history of the United States. No president has ever come close to doing what happened here.”

No president other than Jefferson Davis, that is. A flood of recent stories strongly suggests that a far more detailed, far-reaching effort to overthrow the election will be revealed, with strong connections between two months of political arm-twisting and three-plus hours of physical violence. Repeated comments from Republican Rep. Liz Cheney suggest that specific criminal acts by Donald Trump will be featured as well.

But there’s been little discussion of what accountability would look like. Other democracies have put former leaders on trial without seriously damaging their systems. Following their examples shouldn’t be that hard. But America’s history with the “Lost Cause” suggests otherwise. It’s not Trump alone who belongs on trial, it’s the whole breadth of his New Lost Cause mythology — the stolen election, the Great Replacement Theory, the “Critical Race Theory” panic, the QAnon conspiracy, all of it. And the Jan. 6 committee hearings will only address one facet of that mythology. There are no plans at all to take on the whole of it. But that’s what America desperately needs, if we’re to preserve a functioning democracy — or even just the chance for one.

Republicans have only won the popular vote for president one time since 1988. But they’ve controlled the presidency almost half the time, and appointed six Supreme Court justices to the Democrat’s three. They have little prospect of winning the popular vote anytime soon. But they don’t have to. All they have to do is come close enough to win the Electoral College vote — either at the polls, or by the kind of shenanigans that Trump tried in 2020. Like the old Lost Cause, Trump’s new Lost Cause can be used to justify and help organize the destruction of a fledgling multi-racial democracy. That’s what he tried to do in 2020. And without drastic action now, it’s what Republicans are positioning themselves for in 2024 as well.

On the last day of the Constitutional convention, according to the journal of James McHenry, “A lady asked Dr. [Benjamin] Franklin, Well Doctor what have we got a republic or a monarchy – A republic replied the Doctor if you can keep it.”

That is the question.

Who Killed Overtime Pay?

Photoessay by David Bacon
Series written by Marcus Baram
Published by Capital & Main, May 10-13, 2022
https://davidbaconrealitycheck.blogspot.com/2022/05/who-killed-overtime-pay-photoessay-by.html

After decades of decline in overtime pay, the Biden administration is considering action to sharply expand access in a time of high inflation. This is the first article of a four-part series examining the 40-year effort by big business and elected officials to deny Americans extra pay for extra work.

While in the White House, Barack Obama had ambitious plans to expand overtime pay to millions of American workers who didn’t receive it, seeking to revive the New Deal promise of a fair wage for a fair day’s work. He was partly inspired by a single mom working at a sandwich shop in Tucson, Arizona.

Elizabeth Paredes was 23 and raising a 3-year-old boy in 2015 when she concluded it was unfair that she didn’t get paid time and a half for the extra hours she put in as an assistant manager at Baggin’s Gourmet Sandwiches. She was working at least 50 hours a week at the deli chain, but still wasn’t earning a higher wage for those overtime hours, leaving her struggling to pay her rent, buy groceries and afford child care. Paredes went to her manager to complain, but she says he replied with the words: “That’ll never happen.”

She didn’t qualify for an overtime wage, a store supervisor explained, because she was a salaried employee and her $24,000 salary put her above the threshold to qualify for overtime pay. That didn’t seem fair, so she decided to contact a person with the power to change the situation for people like her. “Somebody’s got to say something or nothing is going to happen,” she says.

Elizabeth Paredes and son.

She penned a letter to President Obama that summer to ask the former community organizer to expand the number of Americans who qualify for overtime. “It’s not easy work and requires a lot of time away from my son,” Paredes wrote to Obama. “At times,” she added, “I find [it’s] not worth it.”

Decades earlier, most people in Paredes’ situation did earn overtime. In 1975, more than 60% of salaried workers qualified for time and half pay. (So did most hourly workers.) By 2016, that share had shrunk to less than 7%, according to the Economic Analysis and Research Network, before rebounding slightly in the years that followed.

Paredes didn’t think much about her missive to the president. But a few months later she received a certified letter from Obama in which he’d written that he was “struck by how hard you are working to build a bright future for your son. I want you to know that I hear you.”

Secretary of Labor Tom Perez later called to invite Paredes to a White House event, at which Obama announced a proposal in preparation for two years to expand overtime protections for workers like her.

She couldn’t make the trip due to her work schedule, but she was on the administration’s radar. In a weekly address on May 21, 2016, Obama kicked off his remarks by describing the letter from Paredes, and then announced plans to overhaul overtime rules that would make millions of additional workers eligible. “[Elizabeth] earns about $2,000 a month, and she routinely works some 50 hours a week, sometimes even more. But because of outdated overtime regulations, she doesn’t have to be paid a dime of overtime.”

Then, as now, the vast majority of people who work more than 40 hours are excluded from overtime for earning too much, but the income threshold for exclusion has long been notably low. In 2016, people earning more than $23,000 in salary — equivalent to about $11 an hour on a full-time schedule — were ineligible. That overtime pay eligibility threshold, which topped out at much less than the median salary in the country, hadn’t changed in over a decade. Nor had it kept pace with inflation since Gerald Ford was president, meaning that millions of workers saw their overtime eligibility slide away as their income increased, in some cases very moderately.

Obama proposed to more than double the maximum income limit to $47,000, which would have extended overtime protections to an additional 4.2 million workers. The change would, according to his administration, increase wages for such workers by $12 billion over the next decade.

“This is the single biggest step I can take through executive action to raise wages for the American people,” said Obama in his 2016 address. “It means that millions of hard-working Americans like Elizabeth will either get paid for working more than 40 hours, or they’ll get more time with their families. Either way, they win, the middle class wins, and America wins.”

Days after Obama’s speech, when Paredes walked into work, she recalls, she was mocked by her supervisors for being a “rock star” whose name was on the president’s lips.

But that didn’t translate into more income. Several months later, Paredes says she was transferred to another store and told to work the grill. She perceived the change as a step down from her previous job — and she never did earn any overtime. She didn’t even receive the annual pay raise she was accustomed to. “I got nothing more than snide remarks,” she says.

“That was the last straw and I quit.”

The chain’s management did not respond to multiple requests for comment by phone and email.

Paredes ended up moving to Pennsylvania where she works part time at her fiance’s family’s restaurant while also raising her son.

It turns out that the Obama administration’s overtime effort wouldn’t have helped Paredes even if she had stayed in her old job. Six months after the presidential speech — and before the plan was implemented — dozens of industry groups and states sued the administration to block the proposed changes. A federal judge concluded, based on the plaintiffs’ arguments, that it was a case of government overreach. Obama’s modernized vision of overtime was dead.

A barista at a cafe in Berkeley whips up a coffee drink in 2020. In the months after COVID-19 slammed California, most people stayed home and sheltered in place, but due to a pandemic-induced shortage of workers, Carlos often worked overtime in what authorities deemed an essential job. Photo: David Bacon

Trump’s Halfway Overtime Win

Things ultimately changed for some workers, but only after Obama had been replaced in the White House. The Trump administration was much less ambitious, implementing a split-the-difference overtime expansion that was more amenable to industry; it raised the overtime income threshold to $35,000 in 2019 and broadened overtime eligibility to an estimated 1.3 million additional workers. That was half of the increase that Obama attempted, but it left nearly 3 million additional workers who stood to benefit from Obama’s proposal out of luck. Most significantly, though, Trump’s overtime expansion passed legal muster.

Some economists noted that Trump’s overtime expansion wasn’t nearly large enough to make up for decades of lost wages. And it didn’t help the typical worker at all. The overtime threshold of $35,000 remains far below the typical salary for a full-time worker. In 2021, that was $51,480, slightly more than the upper limit that President Obama sought.

The Trump administration also neglected to automatically index the new overtime salary limit to inflation, meaning that in times of declining buying power for many, overtime eligibility has slipped away from more workers, sometimes as they received very small raises.

Meanwhile, many people have lost economic ground, in some cases a great deal, over the years due to rising prices. When adjusted for general inflation, the typical worker’s wage increased just 8.8% between 1979 and 2019, even as real housing prices jumped 50% and health care costs soared.

No Overtime Pay in Classrooms or on the Farm

There are other reasons that tens of millions of Americans who work more than 40 hours weekly don’t qualify for overtime. Some don’t receive it because they work in one of the numerous occupations — such as farm work and teaching — that have long been exempt due to industry lobbying and political compromise.

In 1938, the Roosevelt administration accepted the exclusion of farmworkers from overtime protections to win the votes for the Federal Labor Standards Act of Southern Democrats whose rural constituents relied largely on poorly paid Black labor. Eighty-four years later, that exclusion remains.

Most farmworkers won overtime rights in California in 2019, but those on H-2A visas, which allow migrants to come to the U.S. to work, have fewer practical labor rights because they can be fired and deported in retaliation for highlighting illegal conditions. Here, H-2A workers harvest melons for the Rancho Nuevo Harvesting Company in the San Joaquin Valley in 2021. Photo: David Bacon

Other workers miss out on overtime because they have minor management responsibilities. Even fast-food managers who work the grill and sweep bathrooms are exempt if at least half of their time is spent “managing” two or more employees.

If excluded workers did earn overtime, the additional money they made would be substantial. Nationwide, about 18 million people say they work more than 50 hours a week. This suggests that the vast majority of them are not receiving time and a half for at least 10 hours of work.

The Biden administration has promised to remedy this, at least for some workers, likely by sharply increasing the maximum income eligible for overtime pay and by more narrowly defining managerial duties that exclude many workers from overtime.

Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal, of Washington state, told Capital & Main that dozens of progressive lawmakers stressed the importance of raising the overtime income threshold to President Biden in meetings at the White House in late March. She declined to characterize the president’s response, but the Department of Labor is reportedly set to unveil a formal proposal on overtime in the coming months.

There’s little doubt that the administration’s effort will face opposition from much of the business lobby and some fiscally conservative lawmakers, who have already written to Labor Department Secretary Marty Walsh to argue that expanded overtime protections will weaken American businesses.

Overtime hours are common in many fast food establishments, especially after the pandemic triggered labor shortages of workers willing to accept such low-wage jobs. Here, a worker in Arcadia, California, in 2006, makes sure customers get their sides of fries. Photo: David Bacon

They have made similar arguments against increases in the minimum wage for generations. Advocates for overtime reform counter by highlighting the link between such wage issues and the widening gap between the rich and low income workers in the country. The Economic Policy Institute cites weakened labor standards, including “eroded overtime protections,” as a factor in the worsening wage inequality over the last four decades. While worker productivity has sharply increased during that time, most of the rewards have gone to executives and corporate shareholders, even as median wages stagnated.

The decline of overtime “parallels the entire history of the drop in median wage relative to productivity,” says Marilyn Watkins, a professor at the University of Washington School of Public Health.

Watkins, who has studied labor and employment issues, adds that “there was a cascading set of policies through the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s that just enabled in all sorts of ways the income and wealth gap to grow.”

When it comes to overtime, there are ever more categories of employees who are exempt from overtime pay, including computer programmers, insurance claims adjusters, news editors, most delivery workers and movie theater staff.

Sociologist Kimberly Bobo, the author of the book Wage Theft: Why Millions of Working Americans Are Not Getting Paid — And What We Can Do About It, provides a simple overarching explanation.

“Many of these job categories are only ‘exempt’ because employers groups have lobbied hard to have made them ‘exempt,’ rather than because there is some intrinsic reason why the workers shouldn’t be provided overtime pay,” she says.

The Overtime Maze

The list of exemptions and the rules around overtime qualification are so complicated that the Labor Department’s own officials have admitted during congressional hearings on the subject that they have trouble understanding them.

The overtime rules governing journalists are notably confusing. Reporters who write up stories by gathering facts on “routine community events” can qualify for overtime because they’re not considered “creative professionals.”

But if a journalist’s primary duty is to perform on-air, to conduct investigative interviews, “to analyze or interpret public events; to write editorial, opinion columns or other commentary; or to act as a narrator or commentator,” they don’t qualify for overtime.

Labor Department guidelines put it this way: “The less creativity and originality involved in their efforts, and the more control exercised by the employer, the less likely journalists are to be considered exempt.”

Some occupations that clearly involve long hours — such as teaching — have always been exempt. Annalisa Capotorto, 37, has been an instructor for 12 years but has always, like many of her colleagues, worked extra hours during school days and on weekends. She also uses her own money to buy supplies like books and crayons for her classroom when the school does not provide them.

Capotorto, who has a child, loves her profession, but she’s considering taking another job that pays more, because she’s tired of getting down to just $150 between paychecks.

“I have nothing in savings, I don’t have money if my car breaks down,” she says, adding that she and her husband can’t afford to have a second child because the day care costs are too high. “I just want to have a life where I am not worrying about paycheck to paycheck.”

Due to staff shortages, classroom aides — like this one sharing a math lesson at a Janesville, California, school in 2006 — often work long hours.

Photo: David Bacon

Often, workers are unaware that they’re entitled to overtime and thus fail to demand the pay they’re due. Sage Bird, a single mother in Santa Fe, worked as a health enrollment counselor at BeWellnm, the state’s health insurance exchange, from 2016 until 2019. She says that during the busy three months of the year when one can enroll in a health insurance plan for the next calendar year, she was paid overtime, but for the rest of the year she wasn’t, even though she was regularly working three to five extra hours per week.

Bird says she didn’t know she was supposed to receive overtime whenever she worked the extra hours. “I wish I had known,” she adds, “so I could’ve taken care of my grandma, who died while I was at that job.”

In response to a query from Capital & Main, BeWellnm says that Bird was never its employee during her time there but was employed by New Mexico Primary Care Association (NMPCA). Delia Eileen Goode, the CEO of NMPCA said, “I am not aware of any time that an employee was not paid for working overtime.”

Other employees may suspect they are entitled to overtime, but don’t raise the issue unless co-workers do for fear of angering bosses or losing their jobs.

It can be a vicious cycle in which a hard-earned labor right has withered, depriving tens of millions of workers of income even as many companies and institutions have thrived, partly thanks to money they’ve saved through overtime wages they don’t pay. Given that overtime has become increasingly rare over a period of two generations, many workers have no idea that it was until fairly recently a widespread and well-established labor right.

“People have been made docile because they have become generationally inured to being on the short end of the stick,” says Michael McGrorty, a former Labor Department investigator.

Paredes, the deli worker who wrote the letter to Obama, is convinced she deserved overtime pay for the work she put in. “Where’s the fairness?” she asks. “If you work so many hours, you deserve to get paid more for going above and beyond what is required. You’re working extra — and not getting extra pay.”

Frances Madeson contributed to this story.

Copyright 2022 Capital & Main.

This series on overtime was produced by Capital & Main in partnership with theMcGraw Center for Business Journalismat CUNY’sNewmark Graduate School of JournalismandType Investigations, with support from the Puffin Foundation.

Harbor Commission Approves $700,000 in Community Sponsorships

The Long Beach Board of Harbor Commissioners May 23, approved 179 sponsorships totaling $701,430 for a wide variety of community events and projects. The sponsorship program helps the Port of Long Beach engage with and inform local community members about port projects and initiatives.

For the spring 2022 sponsorship call, the Port received 28% more applications than in spring 2021. Of the applications, 43% were first-time applicants.

To satisfy the demand for community funding, the Harbor Commission approved a $222,150 increase to the $1 million sponsorship budget, bringing the new sponsorship budget total to $1,222,150 for the 2022 fiscal year.

Among the events and programs sponsored, to help spread awareness about the port’s operations and initiatives, are Long Beach Community Table’s Sunday Homebound Food Distribution Program, Compound Long Beach’s Art for All Series and Operation Jump Start’s 2022 Scholars Day Celebration.

The port accepts sponsorship applications twice a year, in March and September.

Details: https://tinyurl.com/yc2xh329

Positive Cases at K-12 Schools Continue to Rise

With cases and outbreaks remaining high and many opportunities over the Memorial Day Holiday to gather, staff, students, and their families are encouraged to layer in safety measures to prevent spreading COVID-19 at schools when they return.

The number of cases among students and staff has more than doubled in one month. For the week ending May 15, there were a total of 5,918 positive cases at schools across the county, of which 4,723 were among students and 1,195 among staff. A month prior, for the week ending April 17, there were 2,742 positive cases, of which 2,159 were among students and 583 among staff.

While transmission in the community remains high, it is important to layer in additional protective measures, especially when gathering for end-of-school year events, to keep school communities as safe as possible. Public Health urges everyone to wear a well-fitting mask when indoors, especially at any indoor school or sporting events. Those attending large celebratory school events should test before attending, and if positive for COVID, remain home away from others.

With vaccinations providing the best protection against illness and hospitalizations, parents are urged to make sure that they and their children are up-to-date on their vaccinations and boosters. Last week, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention approved a single booster dose for children ages five through 11 years of age, at least five months after completing a primary series.

For information, go to VaccinateLACounty.com or VacunateLosAngeles.com (Spanish) and go to the How to Get Vaccinated webpage, or call 833-540-0473 between 8 a.m. and 8:30 p.m. seven days a week.

Additionally, with Memorial Day and the start of the summer travel season the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now recommends that you get a COVID-19 test as close to the time of your departure as possible, regardless of your vaccination status. The test should be taken no more than three days before your departure.

The CDC also recommends that you test after travel if your trip involved situations with greater risk of exposure. Students and staff who traveled or gathered with many other people during the holiday break are encouraged to test themselves before heading back to school next Tuesday.

Details: www.publichealth.lacounty.gov

Assassination Plot Targeting Former President Exposes Ease of Obtaining Fake Police Badges & ID

LOS ANGELES Police impersonators are a very real and frightening scenario for the public, the police, and now former President George W. Bush. A Tuesday arrest and federal search warrant reveal an ISIS plot to kill former President George W. Bush. The plan centered around smuggling terrorists across the U.S. border with previously obtained police uniforms, false identification and immigration documents.

Shihab Ahmed Shihab Shihabplot, a U.S. asylum candidate, is alleged to have plotted the killing and revealed the plan to an FBI insider. Authorities said he asked another person who was a confidential source (“CS”) for the federal government if he knew how to “obtain replica or fraudulent police and/or FBI identifications and badges.” (Forbes – Thomas Brewster)

A law enforcement badge and ID provide authority for the holder. The suspect orchestrating the killing of the former President wanted these items because it would make his plot easier to carry out. Unfortunately, authentic-looking replica badges, ID patches and law enforcement gear are alarmingly easy to obtain. Both Amazon and eBay sell fake FBI and police badges, IDs, patches and equipment.

The Counterfeit Report received the fake made-to-order FBI & LAPD ID cards below from eBay sellers bearing the names and photos of now Vice President Kamala Harris and former U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch. Replica badges were selected from dozens of authentic-looking fakes purchased on eBay and Amazon to accompany the counterfeit identification cards. Each was sent the fake items, yet neither chose to act. Ironically, an aide to then California Attorney General Kamala Harris, Brandon Kiel, was arrested in 2015 for impersonating a police officer.

Are you talking to the real police? How would you know?

The Counterfeit Report found more than 11,515 fake law enforcement badges and IDs on eBay and Amazon. The website listings indicate that over 2,575 have been sold. Hundreds of email reports, press releases and warnings were sent to eBay and Amazon staffers, eBay’s then CEO Devin Wenig, eBay General Counsel Marie Oh Huber, eBay Global Intellectual Property Brand Manager Julien Dudouit, and then Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos. The press releases were viewed over 400 times by the companies, yet the e-commerce executives did not respond or take action to remove the counterfeit items.

The fake badges remain on these e-commerce sites. Amazon and eBay continue to be the “one-stop” shopping market for anyone worldwide to buy reproduction law enforcement badges and IDs. See the fake badges listed on eBay and Amazon here.

Public trust is destroyed when companies don’t align themselves with ethical behavior and diligence and put profit before protecting the public, children, national security, or in the most recent case, a former United States President. Despite the law, website policies, ethics and even common sense, the items remain.

*Editor’s Note: eBay and Amazon claim they have strict policies prohibiting counterfeits, fakes and replicas on their websites. The truth is that counterfeits and reproductions can be, and are, easily listed and sold.

Below is a small sampling of past law enforcement related press releases:

Press Release: Impersonating The Police Is Easy With eBay Counterfeit Badges & ID

Press Release: Nike, NBA, SanDisk & FBI All Victims Of Amazon & eBay Counterfeits

Press Release: eBay Won’t Stop Selling Counterfeit Law Enforcement Badges

Press Release: Amazon Still Selling Counterfeit Police Badges Despite Complaints

Press Release: Amazon Fake FBI and Secret Service Badges Endanger the Public

Press Release: eBay Fake Police Badges and ID Endanger the Public

Press Release: After Warnings, eBay Fake FBI, Police Badges and ID Remain

Press Release: eBay FBI and Police Badge Sales Endanger the Public

Website: https://www.TheCounterfeitReport.com

Military Personnel to Give Back To The Community During LA Fleet Week

LA Fleet Week, the annual multi-day celebration of the nation’s Sea Services, will take place over the Memorial Day weekend, May 27-30, in San Pedro at the Port of Los Angeles. Active-duty sailors and Marines visiting Los Angeles for LA Fleet Week will be giving back to the local community by volunteering their time at organizations throughout the Los Angeles area.

Find below, a list of the scheduled local community relations projects that Navy sailors and Marines will be participating in:

May 26, 2022

Sailors interacting with kids in an after-school program.

Time: 4:30 to 5:30 p.m.

Venue: YMCA, 301 S. Bandini Street, San Pedro

May 27, 2022

Sailors participating in an after-school program.
Time: 4:30 to 5:30 p.m.
Venue: YMCA, 301 S. Bandini Street, San Pedro

May 28, 2022

Placement of flags at the ceremony for Memorial Day
Time: 8:45 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
Venue: Green Hills Memorial Park, 27501 S Western Ave, Rancho Palos Verdes

May 30 — Memorial Day

Memorial Day Service: Sailors and Marines to attend Memorial Day service.

Time: 10 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
Venue: Green Hills Memorial Park, 27501 S. Western Ave., Rancho Palos Verdes

Memorial Day Ceremony: Sailors and Marines to attend Memorial Day Service

Time: 1 p.m.
Venue: Veterans Park, 309 Esplanade, Redondo Beach

For a full schedule of activities at LA Fleet Week 2022, visit www.lafleetweek.com.

White Supremacy in America: Mainstream Pathology

By John Gray, Los Angeles Harbor resident

White supremacy in America began when 20 Black Africans were unloaded at Virginia’s Jamestown in 1619. They were there as human chattel in perpetuity for the next 240 years.

Government sanctioned slavery ended in 1865 with the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation to free America’s slaves. But more to a point, did white supremacy end? Well… just ask Emmett Till’s family or Ahmaud Aubery’s family.

The Civil War and the ratification of the 13th and 14th Amendments should have put an end to white supremacy. But that’s not what happened. Following the Civil War, the push for reconciliation was so strong that the war’s victors willingly lost sight of the reason the war was fought in the first place and refused to punish supporters of the institution of slavery and sedition, and Supreme Court rulings such as Plessy v. Ferguson preserved white supremacy into a generational curse.

This latest mass killing, resulting in ten dead and hundreds more mourning in Buffalo, New York is a case of more Black bodies being sacrificed at the altar of white supremacy. Same story. Different black church. Where’s the outrage? There’s been a few heartfelt prayers sent out to the survivors. But it feels like this shooting will disappear from the news, as proms and high school graduation photographs fill our social media feeds.

We know Republican politicians won’t speak out against white supremacy, god-be-damned the party of law and order. Where are all the Democrats on this issue? Where is the voice of all those Christian fundamentalists who cherish life so much? What about the news media? All are invited to stop playing mumblety-peg around the radicalization of white youth.

Sorry to sound so pessimistic, but unless there is a well-orchestrated protest by all of America’s people against white supremacy, Black bodies will continue to be sacrificed at the altar of white supremacy.

America… We are at a crossroads. Will racism and white supremacy continue to be America’s all-consuming and unsolvable problem? Is genocide America’s only way out of its own manufactured peculiar institution.

John Gray, San Pedro

Adrian de la Peña: Before the Veil, After the Veil

0

The Aleph’s diameter was probably little more than an inch, but all space was there, actual and undiminished. Each thing […] was infinite things, since I distinctly saw it from every angle of the universe. – Jorge Luis Borges “The Aleph”

God is an infinite sphere, the center of which is everywhere, the circumference nowhere – Liber XXIV Philosophorum

Cornelius Projects will present Before the Veil, After the Veil: The Veil, an exhibition by Wilmington artist Adrian de la Peña. The exhibit features paintings, objects and video that represent the artist’s multi-faceted investigations, representations and manifestations of visions that bend toward the infinite. The exhibition runs from June 18 to Aug. 28, with an opening reception June 18.

The new paintings in this exhibition are a continuation of an ongoing evolving series of works incorporating multidirectional grids resulting in an omnidirectional plane. Each intersection of the grid is at its own center; an unconditional/happiness grid; a queered grid. Layered on top of these works are veils of transparent fabric with varying textures and tension adding to their optic dimension. De la Peña creates a physical analog of a veil of perception that hides, obscures, or changes what lies beneath it.

Included in the exhibit are works constructed from a narrative that was revealed to de la Peña while viewing an exhibition of netsuke at LACMA in the 1990s; the artist posits that the narrative was ‘downloaded’ from a supernatural or extraterrestrial consciousness. The results are paintings on transparent acrylic which the artist suggests are relics of creatures drawn from the narrative who await the reanimation that will occur as the story unfolds. Also included are paintings on canvas that represent beings that may be alternate versions of the artist himself, fractured visions of extrinsic entities, or the visible forms of spirits.

These multiple frames of reference also extend to Subatomic Gestalt, a series of videos de la Peña created while employed by a museum, where he felt he was ‘an artist performing as a janitor performing as an artist.’ Shooting video from the point of view of a dust mop, or spraying cleaning fluid on the impermeable barrier that hovers between the viewer and works of art, de la Peña examines ‘what things are made of’ from the viewpoint of someone who must maintain the bricks, mortar, and drywall of an institution.

Zooming from the quotidian to the cosmic and back again, de la Peña creates speculative fiction about daily life as seen from an oblique perspective.

The exhibition is viewable Saturdays and Sundays, 12 to 5 p.m. or by appointment, June 18 to Aug. 28.

Time: Opening reception 3 to 6 p.m. June 18
Cost: Free
Details: 310-266-9216; corneliusprojects.com
Venue: Cornelius Projects, 1417 S. Pacific Ave., Gabrielino-Tongva Territory, San Pedro

 

Rachel Alejandro Headlines Philippine Independence Day Celebration in Carson

An all-day festival in Carson featuring non-stop cultural and patriotic performances and entertainment for the entire family will mark the 124th anniversary of Philippine Independence Day.

The festival will take place on June 4, at Veterans Park. Entertainment begins at 10 a.m. featuring big names in Filipino pop music, homegrown talents, and cultural performers. Food and display booths will be lined up for the day’s activities.

Topping the list of this year’s guests is multi-award singer and actress, Rachel Alejandro. Rachel had several hit songs including Mr. Kupido, Paalam Na, Bulag Sa Katotohanan and Nakapagtatakato. Rachel has also enjoyed success as an actress, appearing in films and theater productions. In 2018, she starred in the Philippine-Australian jukebox musical All Out of Love: The Musical, which is based on the songs of Air Supply.

A parade of reigning beauty queens representing various regions from the Philippines will cap the celebration.

The City of Carson is home to the largest concentration of Filipinos outside of the Philippines. The celebration of Philippine Independence Day is a yearly festival that draws thousands of Filipinos and non-Filipinos of all ages from all over Southern California. It is a commemoration of the birth of the Philippine republic after over 400 years of Spanish rule. This is the premiere Filipino event in the United States.

Philippine Independence Day has been celebrated in the City of Carson since 1986, making it the largest and longest-running Filipino event in a city that has about 20% of our roughly 100k population being of Filipino descent. We’re excited that after two years of having to celebrate virtually due to the global COVID-19 pandemic, we’re once again able to have some sense of normalcy and celebrate together as a CommUNITY,” said president of the Philippine Independence Day Foundation, Fred Docdocil.

The annual celebration is a joint undertaking of the City of Carson and the Philippine Independence Day Foundation.

Time: 7:30 a.m. to 6 p.m., June 4
Cost: Free
Details: 310-830-9991
Venue: Veterans Park, 22400 Moneta Ave., Carson