Monday, September 29, 2025
spot_img
spot_img
Home Blog Page 140

Long Beach Moves to Raise the Wages of Airport and Convention Center Workers

0

 

By Daniel Rivera, Reporter

On July 16, Long Beach City Council voted to recommend the city manager raise the wages of its airport and convention center workers. This was after community members from several unions and organizations gathered at City Hall to give public comment and advocate for their inclusion under Measure RW, which raised the wages of hospitality workers at large hotels.

“Our raises must be included in the preparation for the Olympics, because workers cannot prioritize the success of such an event when their basic needs aren’t met,” Lupe Ferrero, an airport cook, said during public comment.

The union said workers are being overworked, noting that some are working in multiple kitchens while barely being able to make ends meet. Several speakers referred to hour-long commutes from Los Angeles spreading them increasingly thin.

“The cost of housing can take up about 80% of our income, leaving little for our basic needs,” Diamond Bar, a prep cook, said during the public comment.

During the meeting, Mayor Rex Richardson said that Measure RW provides “Olympic wages,” about it being one of the highest in the state for hotel workers, and in preparation for the Summer Olympics.

“Previously, there was a discussion when this wage was set with Measure N about the status of the airport and convention center, those questions are still not resolved here,” Rex Richardson said during the meeting.

Measure N, like Measure RW, was a wage increase for hospitality workers back in 2013, setting their wages at about $13 an hour.

Originally, the workers at the airport would be included under the new measure. They were left out due to alleged last-minute changes by the city attorney, who did not feel comfortable including them based on the language of the measure.

“They weren’t included originally because they didn’t need to be, it was done originally for hotel workers,” City Attorney Dawn McIntosh said in a phone call. She went on to explain that when the union requested the inclusion of Airport and Convention Center workers, the measure was already too far along and those changes couldn’t be properly assessed.

When Measure N was passed, any future changes would need to be done through a vote which led to Measure RW. RW changed the process so that the city can now change the salaries based on recommendations from the City Council. And barring any legal challenges like existing contracts, the wage raise is likely to proceed.

The recommendation to raise the wages of airport and convention center workers was sponsored by Councilwoman Suely Saro, and co-sponsored by Mary Zendajas and Joni Ricks-Oddie.

“Request the city attorney to prepare an ordinance to amend the Long Beach airport and convention ordinance, to authorize a market wage adjustment,” Saro said during the meeting. She went on to emphasize her constituents’ commitment to labor with the passing of Measure RW and other similar legislation.

While the city council endorsed the move, Councilwoman Kristina Duggan pushed for a more measured approach and stated that they should let it be negotiated between the union and the workplaces.

“I think the parties can negotiate at a much closer level, I don’t want to make staff the mediators of the parties that this proposal will impact,” Duggan said. She brought up that this approach may not work for all businesses in the airport due to the various business models that all extract different levels of revenue and the price limits imposed on them by the city, which limit flexibility.

Earlier in the year they had already secured a contract with their workplace, but they want to be included in the existing measure because they believe that’s the standard and would result in a faster and higher wage increase.

The original wage increase would put them at a little over $21 an hour but with their inclusion into Measure RW, it would put them at around $23 an hour.

Measure RW would also put the wages of hospitality workers to around $28 by the end of the decade, it would help them keep up with the rising cost of living. This development comes on the back of several contracts obtained by the Unite Here Local 11.

Prosecutor Vs Convict: Presidential Race Reframed

 

She prosecuted sex predators. He is one. She shut down for-profit colleges that swindled Americans. He was the for-profit college, literally. He’s owned by the big banks. She’s the attorney general who beat the biggest banks in America and forced them to pay homeowners $18 billion. He’s tearing us apart. She’ll bring us together.” —Kamala Harris 2019/20 Primary Campaign Video

The first party to retire its 80-year-old candidate is going to be the one who wins this election,” — Nikkie Haley, January 23, 2024.

Everything changed on July 21 when President Joe Biden dropped his re-election bid and endorsed Vice-President Kamala Harris to take his place. The move set the stage for Harris’s long career as a prosecutor to refocus the debate on its true foundations: preserving democracy and the rule of law from an attempted authoritarian take-over. In response, three-plus weeks of Democrats in disarray disappeared in a flash as a tsunami of endorsements, money, and new volunteers flooded in.

All her imaginary challengers—including all Democratic governors—quickly endorsed Harris. And while rightwing tech billionaires have pledged hundreds of millions to support Trump in the coming months, the Harris campaign and allies surpassed their pledges within 24 hours. She reclaimed the fundraising momentum that Trump has enjoyed since his May 31 conviction on 34 counts of election-interference-related business fraud. Before the announcement, only a few hundred volunteers were signing up every day. After it, over 28,000 signed up in 24 hours.

Speaking before campaign workers the next day, Harris made things perfectly clear. Before she was vice president or US Senator, Harris noted, she was California attorney general, and before that “I was a courtroom prosecutor. In those roles, I took on perpetrators of all kinds. Predators who abused women. Fraudsters who ripped off consumers. Cheaters who broke the rules for their own gain. So hear me when I say I know Donald Trump’s type.”

Regardless of media focus, preserving democracy has always been a voter concern—second only to abortion in Swing Left’s nationwide feedback from canvassing in swing states and districts, according to Executive Director Yasmin Radjy, and Harris has been a powerful, laser-focused advocate on both issues.

“What we’re finding at Swing Left is that voters and volunteers alike are actually incredibly driven by concerns for our democracy,” Radjy told Random Lengths. “They are worried about the perception of having a president [like] Donald Trump who is a criminal with little respect for the law or our democracy. As a former prosecutor who has upheld the law to hold sex offenders and the wealthy to account, Vice President Harris is well-positioned to make Donald Trump’s lawlessness front and center in the campaign.”

Prior to this, a fog of other issues have clouded media coverage, topped by the media’s obsession with Biden’s age, and supposed incapacity, and their willingness to amplify Republican blame-shifting for problems decades in the making which Trump managed to make dramatically worse. With Biden out of the race, Harris is also better able to set the record straight.

“Joe Biden’s Legacy of accomplishment over the past three years is unmatched in modern history,” Harris said. “In one term he has already….yes you may clap…in one term he has already surpassed the legacy of most presidents who have served two terms in office.”

The record investments in energy transition, infrastructure, and rebuilding American manufacturing have not only been under-covered by the media, but they’ve disproportionately gone to red states and districts where Republicans who voted against them have shamelessly claimed credit while continuing to demonize Biden. The fact that America’s economic recovery after Covid is leading the world has been utterly ignored. But all that seems about to change.

The prospect of facing Harris in a debate so frightened Trump that within hours a GOP source told Politico he’s unlikely to debate her, using the dog-ate-my-homework excuse that he’ll call her an “illegitimate candidate,” a ludicrous claim reflecting both his fear and his authoritarian assumption that he is the sole arbiter of right and wrong, legal and illegal, truth and lies.

In his acceptance speech, for example, Trump claimed “If you took the ten worst presidents in the United States, think of it, the ten worst, added them up, they will not have done the damage that Biden has done…. The damage he’s done to this country is unthinkable.”

In reality, the 2024 edition of the Presidential Greatness Project Expert Survey ranked Trump dead last, with Biden in 14th place, two slots ahead of Ronald Reagan. Trump’s raw score of 10.92 was so bad that Richard Nixon and Herbert Hoover, the two most disgraced GOP presidents of the 20th century, both scored three times as high. Trump was seen as “by far the most polarizing of the ranked presidents,” according to a summary of the survey.

But Trump’s threat to democracy and the rule of law overshadows all else. In that same acceptance speech, Trump repeated the 2020 stolen election lie multiple times, even warning, “The election result, we’re never gonna let that happen again.”
The contrast with Harris could not be more stark, as Madiba Dennie, author of “The Originalism Trap: How Extremists Stole the Constitution and How We the People Can Take It Back,” told Random Lengths.

Democrats and Republicans are offering voters wildly different visions for the country’s future, and many of those differences are laid bare by Kamala Harris’s candidacy,” Dennie said. “Harris is a former prosecutor who has spent her career enforcing laws, while Trump is a convicted felon who has spent his life breaking them. She prosecuted sexual offenders; he’s a legally-adjudicated rapist. She represents women and people of color gaining political power; Trump’s Supreme Court justices have been stripping that power away,” she summed up. “Her candidacy gives voters a choice between a legal system that serves everyone or only serves to enable men like Trump.”

While the Harris announcement has dramatically altered the prospects, there are still more than 100 days before election day, and thousands of other races at the state and federal level in red, blue, and purple states and districts, including initiatives to protect abortion rights and other vital issues. In his Weekend Reading newsletter, Democratic strategist/analyst Michael Podhorzer, co-founder of multiple key progressive organizations, presented this big-picture view:

For the last three cycles, the success of the anti-MAGA majority has depended on historically high turnout and lopsided opposition from young voters and voters of color – the demographics Biden had lost the most ground within polls. However, these voters were never really “for” Biden or Democrats generally; in fact, they are much more likely to think the country is on the wrong track and lack confidence in American institutions and political leaders. But since 2018, they have been motivated to turn out by loss aversion – fearing (correctly) that they could lose their freedoms if MAGA wins.

That sense of loss aversion was significantly less in blue states in the 2022 election—most notably California and New York, each of which saw more than five Biden-won districts go Republican—enough to give Republicans a razor-thin House majority. Reversing that here in California is the entire goal of the California Grassroots Alliance.

While Harris offers the possibility of adding new hope to the mix, loss aversion remains a key starting point. The six targeted districts in California have a broader mix of concerns among lower-information, disaffected, and unregistered voters the Alliance is reaching out to, within a framework of “Our freedoms, our families, our futures,” as Alliance leader Patti Crane explained to Random Lengths. “That sounds generic, but it’s not,” she said. “There’s very specific things under freedom. There’s very specific things under families are very specific things under futures, like you have crumbling the economy.”

There are different local issues in each district—the Central Valley is different from the Inland Empire or Orange County, so “We don’t have a single thing” that predominates,” Crane said. “What we have seen is threats to democracy have risen from … below the top ten, right up there into the top five. I have had that confirmed by people, regardless of the district that that is starting to penetrate.”

She regrets that the Supreme Court decision giving king-like immunity to the President didn’t get more attention, “because it’s such a perfect illustration of what a corrupt court looks like and how you can no longer trust the basics because the MAGA justices were just doing the partisan bidding for one party.”

As a long-time Senator, responsible for approving judges and justices, Biden has been quite reluctant to challenge the court full-throatedly, though that’s begun to change just in the last week. But Harris’s very different experience, fighting legal battles in the trenches raises the possibility that this will become a major campaign focus, particularly given the Court’s role in overturning Roe, and subsequent efforts to limit medical abortions and even threats to birth control.

In short, the shape of the election at every level is in a state of flux. But there’s significant momentum toward a clarifying choice between a democracy that preserves the rights and opportunities of all Americans versus a MAGA, Handmaid’s Tale-style pseudo-democracy where only a minority of self-proclaimed “real Americans” gets to have their way on every aspect of life.

In her first campaign rally, in Milwaukee, Harris gave a preview of the campaign to come.

“Donald Trump wants to take our country backwards. He and his extreme project 2025 agenda will weaken the middle class,” Harris said. “Can you believe they put that thing in writing? …. When you read it you will see Donald Trump intends to cut Social Security and Medicare. He intends to give tax breaks to billionaires and big corporations and make working families foot the bill….. They intend to end the Affordable Care Act and take us back then to a time when insurance companies had the power to deny people with preexisting conditions. Remember what that was like? Children with asthma. Women who survived breast cancer. Grandparents with diabetes. America has tried these failed economic policies before, but we are not going back,” she said.. “We are not going back.”

And the crowd began chanting “We’re not going back!”

“I’ll tell you why we’re not going back,” Harris said, after several rounds of chanting. “Because ours is a fight for the future. And it is a fight for freedom.”

Breaking Barriers, Changing Narratives

Capt. Shannon White Bridging Communities and Law Enforcement in Changing Times

Editor’s note: Capt. Shannon White’s rank is Captain I. She is second in command to Capt. Brent McGuyre, whose rank is Captain III.

Capt. Shannon White, first class, is cognizant of the importance of recognizing history and accepting it, knowing that it’s real, and then talking about what we want going forward because, as she says, “it’s easy to sit in the cheap seats and talk about how bad everything is.

Last month the Harbor Division police captain discussed her life and career in the Los Angeles Police Department. The San Pedro-born, second-generation police officer was assigned to her hometown in September 2023. She is the first African American woman to serve as captain at the Harbor Division.

White takes her cue from her LAPD police captain father, the late Paul Enox, who was born in the 1940s and joined the department in the 1970s ― a generation of African Americans who despite having negative experiences with Los Angeles police chose to fix the department from within and offer a different perspective of what it means to be Black in Los Angeles.

Referring to non-Black officers or officers not necessarily from Los Angeles, she said it can be hard for people who are asked to drive past 1,000 houses not in crisis, where everybody is doing the right thing, to the call of that one house that is in crisis.

“It alters your mindset a little bit because all you’re seeing is how everybody has problems,” White said. “Yeah, everybody needs the police. They wouldn’t be safe without me,” White explained about the mindset of officers on a beat. “I think it’s important for people to have touch points that show there’s a lot of normalcy in the Black community. It’s not all violence and crime. It’s people there that get up every day, and go to work, and live honorable lives, and try to make a living and want the best for their kids.”

Capt. White’s elevation is a big deal to any in the African American community who’ve long advocated for the hiring of more Black police officers in the Harbor Division.

Joe Gatlin is a long-time civic leader who served on the LAPD Harbor Division’s Community Police Advisory Board for the past year.

“That’s a big deal. Especially with the Port of LA wanting to do more work with the continent of Africa, and that means more imports coming in from the continent,” Gatlin said. “And with that happening, we’ll all be pushing to make sure that more Blacks work in the union as these arguments get bigger because of these imports.”

“I’ve been pushing for a long time to get more Blacks from LA and everywhere into jobs on the waterfront; and the things I run into all the time is that some of the Blacks who work long hours at the port wonder how they’re going to be perceived once they get here … driving in at 2 or 3 in the morning going back home, are they going to get profiled, and how are they going to get treated and that type of thing,” Gatlin explained. “That’s the reason I even joined the advisory board at the LAPD Harbor division.”

Gatlin said he was pleased with the progress the Harbor Division is making.

Pastor Adam Stevenson of Warren Chapel CME Church expressed similar sentiments, praising Capt. White’s elevation as being “essential for the transformation and growth of our communities.”

“Her presence brings a needed perspective to law enforcement and inspires future generations to pursue leadership roles,” Stevenson said. “True progress is achieved when our leadership reflects the diversity of our society.”

To be fair, the diversity reflected in the Los Angeles Harbor Area is directly reflected in LAPD’s Harbor Division in both rank and file ― a reality orchestrated by the concerted efforts of the department since the 1992 rebellion. Indeed, Capt. White is not even the first African American to serve in that position. That title belongs to Deputy Chief Gerald Woodyard, the current commanding officer of operations in the West Bureau. He served as captain of the Harbor Division from 2013 to 2017.

Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Passion
White calls her work a passion project with the department.

“I love the City of Los Angeles. I love the LAPD,” the 42-year-old captain said. “I jokingly tell people that if you are not part of the LAPD or the NYPD, then you must be working a security job.”

The captain values the lived experience of a community.

“No one side is completely right and no one side is completely wrong,” White said. “I don’t deny the lived experience of people. I never do when they’re telling me that they felt some sort of way about their interaction with the police. That is to be believed. But I also understand the complications.”

The captain posed a hypothetical: Imagine four officers receiving a crime alert, and they have to stop vehicles that relate to this crime alert because there’s violence going on in the area. How should she address that?

“Part of it is just building up trust over time,” she said. “I think what’s challenging for any personnel in the department today, is that we’re in that transitional period.”

White believes the LAPD is more transparent and more accountable than it has ever been before. But the officers have to remember that just because it feels like so much time has passed does not mean residents see those days as being in the distant past.

Changing the Narrative
“We talk about Operation Hammer in ’84,” referring to the large-scale attempt to crack down on gang violence by the LAPD’s CRASH unit in 1987.

Operation Hammer can be traced back to the 1984 Olympic Games under Chief Daryl Gates when the LAPD expanded gang sweeps for the duration of the Olympics. The sweeps were implemented citywide, particularly in South Central and East Los Angeles. After the games concluded, city leaders revived old anti-syndicalism laws to maintain the security apparatus instigated by the Olympic games. Those involved in the mass arrests of Black and Hispanic youth made little distinction between gang members or teens seen in the same vicinity as gang members.

“Those people are still living in their multi-generational homes,” White said. “So they’re able to tell their kids and their grandkids about what they experienced.”

She said we have to get real distance from those events ― real distance means doing the right thing repeatedly.

“That’s the tough dynamic,” White said, “because I think our officers that come in and go, ‘I wasn’t even alive in ’84,’ right?”

“I come taking reports from people and go filling out their paperwork and going on like, ‘Oh! There’s a two in front of the year you were born.’ So they weren’t even alive, but they have to carry that departmental reputation of the things that [officers] before them did.”

White noted that ultimately, it’s the job of new generations of police officers to help shift the narrative a little bit at a time.

The police captain would know after serving with the LAPD during the Occupy Movement in 2010 and the Black Lives Matter movement a decade later. It is in moments such as these, in which public sentiment and political headwinds swirl with intense public scrutiny, that police departments have the most challenging struggles.

White believes the media play co-equal parts in those struggles.

“The media is paid to create a narrative that can go 24 hours a day and psychology shows that we have more of an emotional trigger to negative news than positive,” White said. “That’s the way your brain works. A lot of media outlets really traffic in division, making us feel like it’s you versus me.”

To combat this in her own mental space, she said over time she spent less time falling down certain media rabbit holes of television and radio news and began reading [as many books] as she could.

“I can’t encourage officers enough,” White said. “I tell them to turn off the TV and stop listening to the radio on the way to work. It’ll make you think everybody hates you.”

Citing Loyola Marymount University’s 2023 Police And Community Relations Survey, she noted that while officers think they are hated, nearly 70% of residents were neutral towards or very positive about the police.

“When you look at the Occupy Movement through Black Lives Matter, at its foundation, policing is about protecting people,” White said. “There are times when we have to recognize that people are being responsive to some things outside of the city. That’s what happens as we now have a global media.”

White noted that no longer does anyone ask if it happened in LA or not. It can happen in another country and it will come here.

“Our job is to recognize that and to be adaptable to the fact that people are being expressive of things that they don’t like and they’re trying to move the needle, and our job is to protect their constitutional rights and balance that with public safety,” White said. “I can’t stress enough for people that our role as an apolitical police force is that we leave it at the door when we put on the uniform.”

The 42-year-old mother of two noted that some would assume she agrees with Black Lives Matter, who have called for the abolishing of the police. The social justice movement believes that justice is impossible as long as American policing is based on the late 19th century Black Codes.

“I think some of the largest movements are things where people would go, ‘Oh, well, of course, you agree, it’s Black Lives Matter’, but I’ve been at protests where there’s fundamentally nothing that they’re talking about that I agree with,” White said. “It actually speaks counter to everything I hold dear in my personal life.”

For the captain, however, what’s important is, “Are they [protesting] in a way that it’s a protected act? If they are … perfect. It’s my job to make sure that that’s being facilitated.”

“That goes back to [my point about] critical thought of how, we as officers, can separate ourselves a little bit and go, ‘It’s your rights ahead of my feelings,’” White said.

White implicitly understands the limits of a police department’s commitment to constitutional policing. She noted that while the department values highly educated personnel who can think critically, the department is not filled with 10,000 independent thinkers. A police department is a paramilitary organization, and the actions of rank-and-file police officers are driven by who’s at the top and the political will of the city.

“When you look at the difference between the actions of police officers in different eras, a lot of that relates to who the chiefs are, their relationship with the mayor and city council, and the overall conversation that’s going on,” White said.

The City of Los Angeles is fortunate in that there is some commitment to constitutional policing. But at this moment, where radical factions of Congress and partisan Supreme Court justices are actively attacking the U.S. Constitution ― even to the extent they are willing to attack police officers and police institutions to facilitate the attacks, one has to wonder about the future of constitutional policing.

From Capt. White’s perspective, the job remains the same: remain apolitical and adapt as much as the law and the way that it’s applied changes.

“While there is an increasing amount of political noise that can make it seem as though the walls are coming in, our day-to-day direction ― as dictated by local, state, and federal laws have been relatively stable,” Capt. White explained. “Where others feel called to act out violently, even to the point of attacking officers, we stand ready to take appropriate action to ensure our partners and our community members go home safely.”

Life After Mother — Tragic and Fateful Day

 

I knew a tragic and fateful day was happening as soon as I opened the door to my mother’s house five years ago. I called out a greeting, no response. The house was abnormally quiet, despite the sound of running water about to overflow the kitchen sink. I turned off the water, checked the rooms, found nobody — except the door to the front bathroom was closed. I knocked, spoke, no response. I opened the unlocked door.

My mother was unconscious on the floor, wrapped in a blue comforter, wearing nothing but a top and bra. I tried to use my cell phone, couldn’t, it was either dead or too slow to respond. I grabbed my mother’s cordless phone, couldn’t get it to work either. It was like I was in some dead zone.

Some roofers were working next door. I hurried over and shouted to them that my mother had collapsed, could I please borrow one of their phones? One guy handed his down, and I went back to my mother’s side and finally was able to contact 911.

The dispatcher appeared to be following a protocol designed more for drug overdoses than senior health emergencies. “Is she breathing?” Yes.

“I need you to turn her on her side.”

“Why?”

“In case she vomits and stops breathing. I need you to turn her on her side.”

My mother weighed more than 200 pounds and was squeezed into a cramped corner of the bathroom. I tried to explain I couldn’t budge her, she might be injured, and I might injure her further, “She’s breathing, and this isn’t drug-related. If she stops breathing, I’ll be able to tell. Did you send an ambulance yet?”

I continued to argue with the dispatcher about the turn-her-on-her-side business, until the first responders arrived and put my mother, still wrapped in the blue comforter, in the ambulance, while she became semi-conscious and complained, “Leave me alone!”

My mother was taken to the nearest hospital, UCI Medical Center in Orange, where they stuck needles and tubes in her, and then she was transferred to her HMO’s Anaheim hospital. Three days later she was transferred to a memory-care facility — only after being heavily sedated.

“She’s being very hostile and combative,” reported one facility staffer, coordinating the transfer.

I think no one understood how close to death my mother was. She developed puffy ankles about a month later, was admitted to her HMO’s Irvine hospital, and died.

Her end of life was so needlessly complicated. At the hospital in Anaheim, a doctor asked me to estimate how long my mother had been unconscious. I said, “Just a few minutes,” but before I could explain about the running faucet, he started lecturing, her brain scan indicated she’d been out for some time. After I managed to tell him about the faucet, we came to an agreement that perhaps she’d been passed out for various lengths of time for quite some time.

What if I hadn’t walked in when I did? I didn’t have a key, so what if the front door had been locked? What if the sink had overflowed and flooded the house? What if those roofers hadn’t been next door so I could borrow a phone? I’d only persuaded my mother to sign a power of attorney a short time before, and that was how I got her into the memory care center — all because she was too stubborn to admit living alone was unsafe.

 

Barragán, Markey Introduce Bill to Hold Big Oil Accountable for Collusion with OPEC

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Rep. Nanette Barragán (CA-44) and Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) July 24 introduced the Big Oil Collusion Accountability Act, legislation that would hold fossil fuel companies accountable for colluding with OPEC to raise prices. If a company is found by the Federal Trade Commission to have colluded with OPEC, the company would no longer be eligible for new oil and gas leases on federal lands and waters. To the extent allowable by law, the Department of Interior would also be required to cancel the company’s existing oil and gas leases, and would not renew or extend any leases once their terms expire.

In May of this year, the Federal Trade Commission or FTC accused Pioneer Natural Resources CEO Scott Sheffield of exchanging hundreds of messages with OPEC officials to artificially inflate oil prices. Recently, the media reported the FTC is investigating the executives of several big oil companies for signs of collusion with OPEC, including Hess Corp, Occidental, and Diamondback Energy.

“As we work to urgently transition our country off fossil fuels and invest in clean energy alternatives, American consumers should not pay unfair prices at the pump to pad the fossil fuel industry’s pocketbook,” said Rep. Barragán. “We need a strong deterrent to ensure fossil fuel companies cannot price fix. I’m proud to introduce this bill with Senator Markey to ensure we hold oil companies accountable for illegal price-fixing schemes that hurt American’s wallets.”

The following members of Congress have cosponsored the bill: Raul Grijalva, Rashida Tlaib, Andre Carson, Eleanor Holmes Norton, Dina Titus, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Kevin Mullin, Barbara Lee, Ilhan Omar, Bonnie Watson Coleman, and Jared Huffman.

The following organizations have endorsed the bill: League of Conservation Voters, Oil Change International, Sierra Club, Center for Biological Diversity, Food & Water Watch

Details: The text of the bill is available here.

County Supervisors Approve Creation of Independent Ethics Commission and Ethics Reform

 

LOS ANGELES — The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors July 23 approved a motion introduced by Supervisor Kathryn Barger and co-authored by Chair Lindsey P. Horvath that directs the creation of an independent ethics commission and ethics reform measures to improve transparency and create greater oversight in county government.

The motion gives the county’s legal team 30 days to report back on a plan to create an independent ethics commission, an office of ethics compliance with an ethics compliance officer, and an enhanced cooling off period for former county officials to lobby the county.

“Our Board has engaged in a lot of discussion about reforming Los Angeles County governance, including strengthening ethical checks and balances,” said Supervisor Kathryn Barger. “We don’t need to wait until November to enact ethics reforms. This is an opportunity to walk-the-talk by committing ourselves and our resources to further cultivating a culture of integrity and responsibility now.”

“Creating, funding, and empowering an Independent Ethics Commission for Los Angeles County is necessary and the right thing to do,” said Chair Lindsey P. Horvath. “Through this motion – and with input from community voices – we will lay the groundwork for the Commission, while working towards putting to voters a charter amendment to ensure the Commission cannot be undone without a vote of the people.”

The motion calls for increased independent oversight and authority over ethical conduct, county contracts, lobbying, financial disclosures, conflicts of interest, and campaign finance laws, among other things. It also supports the implementation of data portals to make lobbying information and campaign contributions easily accessible to the public.

Great Casting Makes for a Great “Hedwig and the Angry Inch”

Although Hedwig and the Angry Inch originated in the mid/late ‘90s as a (not-really-)one-(wo)man cabaret-within-a-cabaret, for most of us its primary valence is John Cameron Mitchell’s brilliant 2001 film adaptation, which fleshes out the story, themes, and even music in ways impossible to achieve onstage. The film is, quite simply, more.

But in theory the play is (still) good enough to stand on its own. Whether theory becomes fact, though, rests centrally on casting the title role.

According to director Eric Hamme, he’s had Hedwig and the Angry Inch on his Garage Theatre bucket list for over six years, largely because he felt there was a great Hedwig in JT Stipp just waiting to come out.

Well, he’s out now. But it’s not just Stipp that makes this Hedwig sing.

The metafictional conceit that frames Hedwig has our titular chanteuse on a nationwide tour shadowing rockstar Tommy Gnosis, who just made headlines here in Long Beach for drunkenly ramming a short bus while a mystery woman was orally anointing his little bishop. We read about this in the papers, of course — otherwise, why would we be slumming at this divey…where are we: “The Garbage Theatre, is it? Garbage?” — and we want the deets on this obscure figure who claims she sired Gnosis and penned his biggest hits.

So Hedwig regales us with tales of her origins (long story short: gay, young East Berliner falls in love with an American GI in the mid/late ‘80s and suffers a botched sex-change operation — leaving him/her with “a one-inch mound of flesh / Where my penis used to be and my vagina never was” — so they can marry and relocate to rural Kansas, where hubby abandons her/him just before the fall of the Wall), told in part by her musical stylings and interspersed with bits of Gnosis’s sold-out concert at Long Beach Arena every time she throws open the back alley door. But there’s a piece missing, and we are fortunate enough to be here to witness what happens when it’s finally found.

The demands of playing Hedwig are great. Despite all of Stephen Trask’s wonderful music (more on that anon), a huge chunk of Hedwig is not only pure monolog but one heavily punctuated by silence. The slightest nuances of delivery often determine whether we laugh with/at Hedwig when we’re supposed to. We also need to resonate emotionally (I find Hedwig more touching than funny) with both story and song — all without sacrificing the pure sense of play that permeates the entire show.

Stipp delivers all of this. And although he’s fab playing what’s on the page, since I was already acquainted with the magnificence of the material, it’s probably his face — how he shows us the Hedwig behind those heavily painted eyes — that made the deepest impression on me. Clearly, Stipp and Hamme have done the work.

But Hedwig is not a solo act. Off to the side is backup singer and devoted factotum Yitzhak, whom Hedwig married on one condition: on pain of deportation, donning a wig is streng verboten. Hedwig’s wicked little town just ain’t big enough for two femmes. Alyssa Felix Garcia creates a solid Yitzhak, particularly vocally, where she’s got to soar high enough so we get why Hedwig feels the need to clip their wings.

Smart as it is, Hedwig would be a drag (ha) if the songs weren’t so fine. Trask’s music, which draws as heavily on Sex Pistols and David Bowie as Mitchell’s book draws on Pink Floyd’s The Wall — all more as homage than derivation — is shot through with bona fide angst (“Tear Me Down”, “Angry Inch”) and affecting melodies (I can’t sing along to “Wig in a Box” or “Wicked Little Town” without tearing up). Although none of it is especially complicated, it’s finely constructed, and in a small theater a band could easily muck it up, if for no other reason than failing to get the sound right. This iteration of the Angry Inch rarely suffers any such problems. Only “The Origin of Love”, a pivotal early number based on Plato/Aristophanes’ mythological account of sexuality, doesn’t quite come off.

For those who like a side of meta with their meta, staging Hedwig in downtown Long Beach is next-level. The queerness of our little Iowa by the Sea is fab enough, but if you know your geographical LBCs there’s the frisson of understanding that if you tore the roof off Long Beach Arena you really might hear Tommy Gnosis rocking his own side of epiphany every time Hedwig opens the Garage Theatre’s (set-fabricated) back door.

Hedwig and the Angry Inch is a fantastic piece of work. Clever. Profound. Compelling. Sing-alongeriffic. Fun. You’re cooking with gas when you do this show. But gas fires happen, right? And, wait, how do you put one of those out? Water? Baking soda? A fire extinguisher? Which type? Before you know it, your house is a smoldering ruin.

I don’t know what happens when you don’t have a great Hedwig to make this great work flesh, because I’ve seen only the film — and now, the Garage Theatre’s staging.

Hedwig and the Angry Inch at the Garage Theatre
Times: Thursday–Saturday 8:00 p.m.
The show runs through August 3
Cost: $30 (Thursdays 2-for-1); closing night w/afterparty: $35
Details: thegaragetheatre.org
Venue: The Garage Theatre, 251 E. 7th St., Long Beach

McOsker’s Clean 15 Celebrates One Year and 26,503 Tons Removed

 

LOS ANGELES — Councilmember Tim McOsker’s Clean 15 Program celebrated its one year anniversary July 17 and announces that since its inception the program has picked up, removed, and discarded 26,503 tons, or 53 million pounds, of trash, debris and overgrown vegetation on streets, alleys and other public spaces throughout the Council District.

The Clean 15 program was allotted $1 Million in funding in the prior 2023-24 fiscal year budget and initiated July 17, 2023. The team, made up of two Council District 15 staffers, has been supported by the city of Los Angeles’ Bureau of Sanitation and local community organizations, including LA Conservation Corps/Clean and Green, Gang Alternatives Program, Coalition for Responsible Community Development and SBCC Clean Wilmington.

“For the past year, the Clean 15 Team has been out in our 5 communities, beautifying our beloved One-Five,” said Councilmember Tim McOsker. “Among the most basic services that we all want in each of our neighborhoods are clean public spaces. That’s a necessity for pride and appreciation for the areas where we live, work and play. With every clean up, our team is working not only to beautify but to strengthen our communities.”

Recently, the program expanded to include two dedicated support teams, in partnership with the Coalition for Responsible Community Development, one to focus on the northern communities of Watts and Harbor Gateway, and the second to cover our Harbor communities of Harbor City, Wilmington, and San Pedro. They have also added power-washing in their capabilities.

The Clean 15 Program travels throughout the 15th Council District on a schedule, addressing dumping issues in each of the five communities, Monday to Friday, with one team operating on Saturdays.

Al Murray Shoes To Close After 101 Years

Business owners’ experience is a case of capitalism but a story of humanism.

In March of 2023, J.C. Ryu, owner of Al Murray Shoes, celebrated the centennial of the shoe store’s important existence in San Pedro. Recently, the spry octogenarian reached out to inform Random Lengths News that the store off Western Avenue, which originally thrived in Downtown San Pedro on 6th Street for six decades, will close permanently this autumn.

The store’s lease will expire at the end of September. The landlord normally contacts J.C. about six months ahead of time to continue the lease. But not this time. J.C. thought it was a signal that maybe it’s time to say goodbye, or the landlord had other plans. He recalled having hope that after the pandemic, business would improve. But with no big turn around, J.C. began to think maybe this is a trend given the unfriendly environment for small businesses. He cited how many are closing.

Recent years were challenging. J.C.’s work became more of a “community service” in the last four years, he said; he didn’t lose money, but there wasn’t much profit. Yet, he loves his work and his clients, who “give him strength.” The last time J.C. spoke to Random Lengths he explained he’s like a shoe agent, not just a salesman.

IMG 1169
A spry J.C. Ryu,, owner of Al Murray Shoes and “shoe agent” in San Pedro, will retire in a little more than two months, when the store permanently closes. Photo by Arturo Garcia-Ayala.

 

“This kind of business requires nurturing to stay afloat,” said J.C. “I think if all those customers just came once more per year, it could be a better situation. But I don’t blame anyone. Even if I’m gone, hopefully, people think about this subject: if you want to make it a rich … resourceful town, rather than a town full of empty businesses, it’s not a new idea, you have to pay attention to the local small businesses so they … carry on, and customers could have a choice. I’m afraid someday they will have no choice.”

San Pedro’s shoe agent has connected to this community. He’s provided a unique, specialized service. That’s what small businesses do. But he fears a dubious future.

“My value is a little bit outdated, but I know there’s a plenty of people who need service like mine, even though I’m leaving. I think there’s a frustration because they know it’s not going to happen again. I might be like a dinosaur, a dying breed. One time [small businesses were] a major backbone of the retail business, not only the shoe business, but overall.” he said.

Retail Boss, a publication for retail professionals, in June noted numerous major retail chains, (including 11 Walmarts) closed in 2024 due to: convenience/rise of online shopping; competition and market share loss; missteps and failure to pivot; COVID-19; remote work and urban exodus; high rent. Given this, it’s curious if consumers actually desire customer service. J.C. suspects younger generations don’t know what they’re missing. They’re not used to service, relationships and friendships with merchants — or “what full service means and what they can get from that.”

For example, J.C. informed his clients about his retirement too. He reached across his desk, for two red journals and a blue binder, full of handwritten clients’ names, “close to 1,000,” as he explained he tried to call as many of them as possible. His clients were surprised, many were sad. Some even said, “You can’t do that to me.”

One client unexpectedly asked him what she could do for him; what was the problem? He said the rent is out of reach and he feels like he’s working for his landlord now. The woman returned to tell J.C., if he wanted to keep going with the business, she would support his rent so he could carry on. But this was after J.C. had already discussed with his family and announced his retirement. He said he was shocked.

More clients visited him, thanking him personally for taking care of their family for generations. San Pedro’s “shoe agent” has a lot of love in this community; that this could happen to him, J.C. said, was like a fairy tale.

“It made me feel like my business did not fail, even though I am closing,” J.C. said. “I knew we had a relationship but I didn’t know there was that much love, care and concern for each other. I think we shared each other through the years. It’s just an unusual relationship.”

J.C. and his clients or, “friends actually,” shared lifetime stories. It’s the nature of this business, he said. His plan was after retirement to still come in a few times a week to see and take care of his long-term clients who need his “care and attention.” J.C. doesn’t leave his day at work after closing time. He thinks of what he did for his customers, what he could do better. It’s almost a 24/7 job. After 42 years his children told him now was the time to retire. He isn’t sure if he’s ready but his first plan is to rest.

Customers have asked him if they can still call him and chat, ask his advice about shoes and more. He’s fine with that and it sounds like he looks forward to that connection.

He described this situation as probably a case of capitalism but it could be a story of humanism.

“We share each other,” J.C. said. “I don’t mind carry[ing] on the rest of my life [with these] memories,” he said. “It’s a funny thing. I’m not a psychologist [but] when they sit in my chair, they start to talk. I’m never bored.”

J.C. communicates with podiatrists often about what they need for their patients and what they suggest for patients’ foot care. Al Murray Shoes has specialized in

“functional, yet fashionable shoes,” as J.C. says. Throughout his career, J.C. has dealt with podiatrists, trainers, therapists and medical doctors because of the many challenges people have daily.

He wants to tell people, shoes are a very important part of your body.

“It’s not like clothing,” said J.C. “Clothing can look ugly but at least it doesn’t hurt you. A wrong fitting could damage not only a foot [but] ankles, knees, pelvis and lower back … Sometimes the neck too … Do not hesitate to spend some more money for quality shoes rather than cheap shoes. Try to find someone who has experience and knowledge and cares about your foot. And change your shoes at the right time. Don’t wait until shoes wear out.”

The shoe agent said they’re a supporting device for your whole body — “not only a fashion item; it’s a function item.”

“We are living things,” he said. “People think … ‘I’ve been the same size for 20 years.’ That is very wrong judgment because your body does not stay the same [as] 20 years ago. It’s ideal to check every time you get a new pair of shoes, but unfortunately … places don’t have that kind of service.”

J.C. said if you have a heart or kidney issue your foot swells up and down. If you have diabetes you have a circulation issue. Your shoes should fit to accommodate. If you have arthritis, you cannot stand any kind of pressure, so your fitting has to be different. Also the manufacturer, model or your last size or width could vary. And inserts or orthotics can be changeable too, it depends on your need. He explained, for a customer to have the right thing, all of this must be combined together.

“It starts with science but ends with art,” J.C. said

Everything Must Go

Until the last moment, J.C. wishes to serve, he said. Everything will be on sale 20%-50% off. If folks need furniture, fixtures or store equipment, that will be for sale until he closes the doors. He has to let go of everything in the store.

“I want to see all my previous customers before I close the door, to hug them, say thank you and goodbye to everybody so we could have a proper goodbye,” J.C. said. “Do you remember Douglas MacArthur the General and WWII hero? He said old soldiers never die, just fade away. So, Al Murray’s memory never dies and my loyal customers never die in my mind. Hopefully, I’ll leave good memories. I love everybody who came through my door. I remember all those feet and toes. Sometimes I remember their feet better than their faces.”

J.C. contacted his landlord who knows he’s leaving; now, they said they want him to stay. He said it’s too late. J.C. was glad to solve these puzzles because he knows that’s the job he can do that not everybody can — it’s a point of pride that he can do what somebody else doesn’t want to.

“I don’t mind do[ing this],” he said. “I’m glad to actually. I feel like I’m useful. I have a meaning I’m useful … here, [its] probably why [I’m] here still.

Details: Al Murray Shoes, 938 N Western Ave. San Pedro. Telephone: 310-832-8321

The Democratic Party’s Culture of Loyalty

How an Ethos of Compliance Made the Biden Debacle Possible

Published in TomDispatch July 23

https://tomdispatch.com/the-democratic-partys-culture-of-loyalty/

The Biden campaign drove the Democratic Party into a ditch and speculation is rampant about grim prospects for the election. But little scrutiny has gone into examining how such a dire situation developed in the first place.

Joe Biden was on a collision course with reality long before his abysmal debate performance led to his withdrawal from the race. “Several current and former officials and others who encountered him behind closed doors noticed that he increasingly appeared confused or listless, or would lose the thread of conversations,” the New York Times reported five days after the debate. Some had noticed the glaring problem months earlier but kept quiet.

A culture of dubious loyalty festered far beyond the Biden White House. It encompassed Democratic leaders at the Capitol and across the country, as well as countless allied organizations and individuals. The routine was to pretend that Biden’s obvious cognitive deficits didn’t exist or didn’t really matter.

Because his mental impairment was so apparent to debate viewers, some notable Democratic dissenters in Congress stepped up to oppose his renomination. But for weeks, relatively few colleagues followed the lead of Texas Representative Lloyd Doggett, who broke the congressional ice by calling for Biden to “make the painful and difficult decision to withdraw.”

Heads in the Sand

Acuity came from Julián Castro, former secretary of Housing and Urban Development in the Obama administration, who kept up a barrage of cogent tweets. One message referred to Biden’s “unique political liability” and warned: “It’s not going to get any better — and has a high risk of scrambling the race again, sealing Dems fate. Burying our heads in the sand won’t assuage voters’ concerns, which have been painfully obvious for years.”

A literal heads-in-the-sand photo was at the top of a full-page print ad that the Don’t Run Joe team at RootsAction.org (where I’m national director) placed in The Hill a year and a half ago. Headlined “An Open Letter to Democrats in the House and Senate,” it said: “Many of your colleagues, and maybe you, are expressing public enthusiasm for another Biden presidential campaign in on-the-record quotes to journalists — while privately voicing trepidation. This widespread gap ill serves the party or the nation… There are ample indications that having Joe Biden at the top of ballots across the country in autumn 2024 would bring enormous political vulnerabilities for the ticket and for down-ballot races. No amount of spin can change key realities.”

But the spin never stopped and, in fact, went into high gear this summer with Biden trying to make his candidacy a fait accompli. Meanwhile, the culture of loyalty kept a grip on the delegates who’ll be heading to Chicago in mid-August for the Democratic National Convention. As the second week of July began, CNN reported that “a host of party leaders and rank-and-file members selected to formally nominate Biden said they were loath to consider any other option.” A delegate from Florida put it this way: “There is no plan B. The president is the nominee. And that’s where I and everyone that I’ve been talking to stands — until and unless he says otherwise.”

The lure of going along to get along with high-ranking officials is part of the Democratic Party’s dominant political culture. I saw such dynamics up close, countless times, during my 10 years as a member of the California Democratic Party’s state central committee, and as a delegate to three Democratic National Conventions. I viewed such conformist attitudes with alarm at meetings of the Democratic National Committee (DNC).

Democratic Rubber-Stamping

Larry Cohen, former president of the Communications Workers of America, has been on the DNC since 2005. “Currently the national Democratic Party exists in name only, and is largely the White House and a nominating procedure for the president,” he told me. “The internal life is in the 57 state and territorial parties, and important reform efforts are visible in many of them.” Cohen added: “It’s the ‘rules and not just the rulers,’ and the Democratic Party compares poorly to centrist parties in other democracies, especially with the domination of corporate and billionaire money in our nominating process at every level of government.”

Pia Gallegos, co-founder and former chair of the Adelante Progressive Caucus of the New Mexico Democratic Party, summed it up this way: “The culture of the Democratic Party at the national level is top-down in the sense that it appoints the members of its committees rather than opens committee membership to elections among the DNC delegates — and then expects its delegates to rubber-stamp approval of those appointments.”

Gallegos, who chairs the board of RootsAction, is on the steering committee of the nationwide State Democratic Party Progressives Network, an independent group that formed last year. “Democratic parties at the state level also have policies or traditions to appoint local committee members or national committee representatives, consequentially pushing out their more progressive or reformist members from positions of power,” she said. In short, “the Democratic Party leadership appears to be more concerned with maintaining their control of the party than with promoting democracy within the party.”

When it comes to their decision-making, some state parties have headed in more democratic directions — or the opposite. I’ve seen firsthand that the nation’s largest one, the California Democratic Party, has steadily become more autocratic for over a decade.

Overall, big donors and entrenched power are propelling the Democratic Party.

After Judith Whitmer became an active DNC member as chair of the Nevada Democratic Party, she got a close look at the committee’s inner workings. “Today’s Democratic Party is run by consultants and operatives who tightly control every aspect of the DNC,” she texted me. “The big-tent party that champions ‘democracy’ is actually a small circle of insiders who hold all the power by maintaining the status quo. Dissenting opinions are not welcome. Progressives are ostracized, and the everyday voter no longer has a voice.”

In early 2021, a progressive insurgent campaign enabled Whitmer to be elected chair of Nevada’s Democratic Party. Powerful Democrats in the state, outmaneuvered by that grassroots organizing, quickly transferred $450,000 from the Nevada party’s coffers to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and set up a parallel state organization. Two years later, the erstwhile party establishment retaliated by crushing Whitmer’s reelection bid.

In a Word: Undemocratic

Subduing progressive power is a key goal of dominant party leaders as they gauge when and where to strike. While nominally supporting the two-term progressive congressman Jamaal Bowman for reelection in his New York district last month, powerful party elders nonetheless winked and nodded as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee poured some $15 million into backing a corporate pro-war Democrat against him.

“The Democratic Party is, in one word, simply undemocratic,” Joseph Geevarghese, executive director of the national activist group Our Revolution, told me. “The illusion of ‘party unity’ fostered by Biden and Bernie [Sanders] four years ago is gone. In fact, the donor class feels emboldened to wage war openly with progressives, especially after defeating Jamaal Bowman.”

I saw the illusion of party unity playing out at sessions of the Unity Reform Commission that the DNC convened in 2017. The calculus was that the strength of Bernie Sanders forces, then at high ebb, had to be reckoned with. The commission had a slight but decisive majority of members aligned with Hillary Clinton, while the rest of the seats went to allies of Sanders. While the commission did adopt some modest reforms, the majority balked at substantive DNC rules changes that would have provided financial transparency or prevented serious conflicts of interest.

Overseeing the blockage of those changes was Jennifer O’Malley Dillon, the commission chair, who later worked for three years as deputy chief of staff in Joe Biden’s White House. She went on to become the Biden campaign chair.

“The Democratic Party now functions through foundation-funded advocacy organizations, and without the kind of self-funded mass membership groups that had a genuine voice with real power when the labor and civil rights movements were strong,” journalist David Dayen wrote in early July for the American Prospect. “If you read the polls, the interests of the public and the donor class are actually aligned in favor of Biden’s withdrawal. But given who’s making that case, it sure doesn’t feel that way, nor does it feel particularly small-d democratic. That makes it easy for Biden to fall back on the will of ‘the people’ who voted in Democratic Potemkin primaries, because outside of that, the people are voiceless.”

Money in Charge

Alan Minsky, executive director of Progressive Democrats of America, had this to say when I asked him to describe the party’s political culture: “While the Democratic Party is a complex organization with a lot of dimensions, I think the role of money — and, more specifically, the never-ending need to raise more money — has become its central organizing principle. This, of course, skews the priorities of the party in a conservative direction. Democrats who can raise money comparable to the levels raised by the GOP are seen as indispensable to the party, and grow in power and influence… In turn, these powerful money-raising Democrats have little use for anyone inside the party who is perceived as jeopardizing the flow of money — such as left-progressives and other advocates for the poor and working class.”

Minsky added:

“As these dynamics became central to the party over the past few decades, the rich and powerful grew in influence, and the general political culture reflected the priorities of the professional class rather than the working class, a sharp contrast to the mid-20th century, which was the height of the party’s power and influence.

“However, since the GOP only turns ever more to the right, progressives and working-class advocates continue to stake a claim in the Democratic Party. Paradoxically, since these non-wealthy groups represent the majority of the population, they also provide the best opportunity for the party to regain its majority status. However, from the point of view of the party’s dominant faction, and their legions of highly compensated consultants, this is an unacceptable outcome as it would shut down the gravy train.”

The Democratic National Committee building on South Capitol Street in Washington is a monument to the funding prowess of multibillionaire Haim Saban, who became the chair of the capital campaign in late 2001 to raise $32 million for the new headquarters. He quickly donated $7 million to the DNC, believed to be the largest political donation ever made until then.

Haim Saban has long been close to Bill and Hillary Clinton. By 2016, Mother Jones reported, Saban and his wife Cheryl — in addition to hosting “lucrative fundraisers” — had given “upward of $27 million to assorted Clinton causes and campaigns.”

Saban and Joe Biden also bonded. When Saban had an appointment at the White House last September, “the visit was supposed to last an hour, as part of lunch, but in practice he spent three hours with the president and his people,” the Israeli newspaper Yediot Ahronoth reported.

Reasons to reaffirm warm relations with the likes of Haim Saban were obvious. Presumably, the president remembered that a single virtual fundraiser the Sabans put together for the Biden-Harris campaign in September 2020 brought in $4.5 million. In February 2024, with the Gaza slaughter in its 135th day, the Sabans hosted a reelection fundraiser for the president at their home in Los Angeles. The price of a ticket ranged from $3,300 to $250,000. An ardent Zionist, Saban has repeatedly said: “I’m a one-issue guy, and my issue is Israel.”

This summer, while Biden fought to retain his spot as nominee, fervent support from the Congressional Black Caucus seemed pivotal. The CBC has changed markedly since the 1970s and 1980s, when its leadership came from visionary representatives like Shirley Chisholm, John Conyers, and Ron Dellums. Then, the caucus was antiwar and wary of corporate power. Now, it’s overwhelmingly pro-war and in willing captivity to corporate America.

With President Biden in distinct denial about his unfitness to run again, the role of the Congressional Progressive Caucus was accommodating. Its chair, Pramila Jayapal, endorsed him for 2024 gratuitously early — in November 2022 — declaring herself “a convert.” Since then, some high-profile progressives went out of their way to back Biden in his determination to run for reelection.

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who endorsed Biden a year ago, went in front of journalists 10 days after his debate disaster to make a vehement pitch for him as the nominee. In a similar mode, Senator Bernie Sanders was notably outspoken for Biden to stay on as the party’s standard-bearer, even implausibly claiming on national television that, with a proper message, “he’s going to win, and win big.”

When some of the best progressive members of Congress fall under the spell of such contorted loyalty, it’s an indication that deference to the leadership of the Democratic Party has come at much too high a price.