Saturday, October 18, 2025
spot_img
spot_img
Home Blog Page 567

Wisconsin Eats its Young Scott Walker’s Revenge

0

By Greg Palast for Truthout adapted from Palast’s newly released book How Trump Stole 2020

Donald Trump’s 2016 Wisconsin win was a shock to the Democratic Party — but then, the Democratic Party is always shocked — because Wisconsin was supposed to be a safe state for Hillary Clinton.

Democrats had crushed it seven elections in a row, helped by the massive vote from the famously progressive, activist University of Wisconsin student population.

But then, on Election Day 2016, a giant hunk of the student vote simply… vanished. And the Milwaukee Black vote also seemed to just… disappear.

And so, Trump took Wisconsin by 22,000 votes out of 3 million cast.

And, if Wisconsin’s voter vanishing operation isn’t rooted out, 2020 will be déjà vu all over again. If Trump swipes this swing state again, he’s as good as inaugurated.

Where did they go, the voters who mysteriously didn’t show up? I flew to Wisconsin just before the COVID lockdown to hunt down the students and voters of color who, mysteriously, did not show up.

The first thing that caught my attention: While the rest of the nation had massive voter turnout in 2016, in parts of this down-to-the-wire state, voting fell off a cliff. Which parts? In Black-majority Milwaukee, turnout plummeted from 66 percent to 56 percent of the voting-age population. That’s strange.

And Wisconsin’s student vote evaporated. Nationwide, only two states recorded a drop in student voting. Wisconsin’s drop was breathtaking: In-precinct voting by students declined by a third, from 67 percent to 49 percent.

They didn’t need to drag the local lakes to find the missing students and Black voters. They were disappeared in plain sight by the Republican legislature under laws crafted by Wisconsin’s radical-right governor, Scott Walker.

One new law required a government photo ID to vote. But the photo ID issued by the state to its 182,000 University of Wisconsin students did not qualify them for voting nor for registration.

How brilliant is that? Gun permits could be used to vote; but not student ID. Carry a weapon, good. Carry a book, forget it.

A Wisconsin driver’s license would do. But not everyone has a license. Who doesn’t drive? People who don’t have cars — students in Madison, low-income renters who take the bus in Milwaukee, i.e. voters of color. And the color is Democratic Blue.

What was particularly devastating was that the law was ordered into effect by a court only two weeks before the 2016 election. Even those who knew of the change had little time to correct their lack of paperwork, even if they could.

2020 Mail-In Meltdown

But this is about 2020. Despite all the trickery, Walker was tossed out on his keister in 2018. New Democratic Gov. Tony Evers — encouraged by his Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes — has tried to make it easier for Wisconsinites to vote without dropping dead from the virus.

The GOP won’t have it. Republicans went to court to successfully overturn Governor Evers’s order waiving the requirement that absentee ballots include a witness signature.

Elections Commissioner Ann Jacobs pointed out to me that the university could simply issue ID that allows students to vote … but, she noted, just before he lost reelection, Republican Governor Walker appointed the university regents — GOP hacks who wouldn’t dream of minting tens of thousands of Democratic voters.

But students will have to get more than a new ID. Wisconsin is alone in the U.S. in requiring that a student voter can’t register without including proof of enrollment in good standing. Like, huh? Fall behind in tuition, flunk algebra… lose your vote?

As Common Cause warns,

The standard student ID at only four of the University of Wisconsin’s 13 four-year schools and at eight of the state’s 23 private colleges can be used as a voter photo ID.

Note: if you use a school-issued ID for voting, you must also present (or display electronically) at the polls a separate proof of enrollment document, such as an enrollment verification form, class schedule or tuition bill.

And the student will have to include photocopies of their paper chase in their absentee ballot.

Assuming they get one. The U.S. watched in horror as Wisconsin voters were forced to vote in person on April 7 at the height of a virus spike — when the Republicans overturned the governor’s order to delay the vote. But why didn’t voters simply vote by mail?

They tried. First, you can’t mail in a ballot if you don’t get one. About 1 in 10 ballots requested nationwide are never received by the voter – or received too late. That’s national. Students and renters who move in their neighborhoods, within their dorms, don’t have an easy time getting their mail-in ballots; over 100,000 could not get a ballot because, unbeknownst to the voter, they had been purged from the voter rolls, a purge that centered, once again, on Milwaukee and Madison.

We spoke with voters (mostly African Americans) in line, and voter after voter said they did not receive their mail-in ballot. Milwaukee was forced to reduce the number of voting stations from 180 to five because they simply couldn’t find enough poll workers, mostly retirees, who would risk their lives to hand out ballots. Add the withholding of mail-in ballots to the closure of polls and you’ve got electoral meltdown.

61,274 Voters Shafted

University of Wisconsin professors Michael DeCrescenzo and Kenneth Mayer wanted to find out about the mysterious massive drop in 2016 turnout. They conducted an extraordinary survey, contacting thousands of non-voters directly. They asked each registrant why they did not, or could not, vote.

They discovered that 28,000 citizens in just two cities, Milwaukee and Madison, were blocked by the ID requirement. (This 28,000 excludes the majority of voters without proper ID who did not vote for other reasons, such as long lines — or who just didn’t give a damn about voting.)

Some folks did in fact have the ID required, but the law is so complex and little-explained that thousands thought they did not have acceptable ID. One in 11 Black voters did not have the right ID, but more than twice that many thought they didn’t, so they did not show up at the polls.

Take a look at this chart from the University of Wisconsin study. The ID law was three times as likely to block African Americans as whites.

The Black vote in Wisconsin statewide fell by a mind-blowing 24.5 percent between 2012 and 2016 when the ID law hit. The loss of Black and student votes due to the ID law cost at minimum 61,274 votes, almost three times Trump’s plurality. And that estimate of the loss is low. I’ve left out the Latinx voters who are growing near to the size of the Black population. Any way you calculate it, the show-me-your-papers ID tactic won Wisconsin, not the voters.

And that’s how Trump has already stolen 2020. But, if we raise hell and raise the warning, we can steal it back. And we can try something new for the U.S. — letting the voters choose the president.

This article is adapted from Palast’s newly released book How Trump Stole 2020 (illustrated by Ted Rall). Get it and find out how to steal it back.

Rebuild Long Beach Relief Fund, $1.2 Million Available In Additional Grants To Businesses

LONG BEACH — On the evening of May 31st, numerous small businesses were vandalized and damaged across Long Beach. While the city provided numerous emergency grants and loans to small business owners, Mayor Garcia asked the City Council to create a new Rebuild Long Beach Relief Fund and make $1.2 million available in additional grants to businesses.

Application forms and program materials are available for this program to qualified businesses by clicking here.

Administered by the Economic Development Department, the Small Business Restart Grant Program (SBR Grant) has been made available as part of the Rebuild Long Beach Relief Fund. Applicants may be eligible for up to $10,000 in SBR Grant funding. 

SBR Grant funds may be used for the following purposes:

Replacing lost inventory

Making repairs to the exterior or interior of a business

Replacing lost equipment

Repairing damaged equipment

Paying business interruption insurance deductibles

Working capital to continue operations

The SBR Grant Program is available on a first-come, first-served basis. After completing the Business Damage Assessment Form, business operators will be contacted to receive instructions on how to apply. 

Details: Long Beach Business Hotline, 562-570-4BIZ (4249) from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., weekdays. In-person application assistance is available outdoors at the City Hall Plaza (411 W. Ocean Blvd.) from 8 a.m. to noon on Tuesdays and from noon to 4 p.m. on Thursdays through Sept. 29, 2020.

The 2020 Assessment Roll By Los Angeles County Assessor

LOS ANGELES — Los Angeles County Assessor Jeff Prang announced Aug. 4, his office has laid the groundwork for the property taxes that pay for L.A. County vital public services: The Assessment Roll.

The Roll for 2020 has been closed and it reflects solid growth for Long Beach and the rest of the County. However, the Roll is pre-COVID, which will be explained.

First, this comprehensive tally values more than 2.5 million real estate parcels in Los Angeles County and results in the very tax dollars that goes to pay for vital public services, such as healthcare, police, fire, schools, and even librarians, to name just a few. Prang is constitutionally mandated to close the role by the end of the Fiscal Year on June 30.

The 2020 Assessment Roll has a total net value of $1.7 trillion, indicating the 10th year of consecutive growth. That value places $17 billion in the hands of the county to be used for those public services just mentioned. This year the Roll has an added dynamic, however, the COVID-19 pandemic.

Locally, Long Beach for 2020 came in at $63.4 billion for taxable values, which is a 5.4% increase over last year’s numbers. That includes 79,831 single-family homes, 17,396 apartment complexes, 9,563 commercial-industrial parcels for a grand total of 106,790 taxable properties.

Growth is steady in Long Beach. That $63.4 billion translates into about $630 million for vital public services such as public safety, healthcare and public education for Long Beach.

However, these figures are pre-COVID. 

To explain: assessments are based on the value of property as of the lien date of January 1, 2020, which was a couple of months prior to the outbreak of COVID-19. Next year’s lien date of Jan. 1, 2021, will tell a different story.

The pandemic has devastated the economy to levels only seen during the Great Depression. The reduction in sales tax revenue, housing market slow down and high unemployment is going to most likely have an adverse effect on the economy.

Some basics: The Roll, as it is known, contains the assessed value of all real estate and business personal property in the County’s 88 cities along with the unincorporated areas. It also breaks down the number of single-family residential homes, apartments and commercial-industrial parcels.

This year’s Roll comprises 2.58 million real estate parcels as well as business assessments countywide. That includes 1,882,121 single-family homes, 250,089 apartment complexes, 247,562 commercial and industrial properties and more than 205,000 business property assessments.

The 2020 Roll also grew by $95.9 billion (or 5.97%) over 2019. In addition to the values of the county’s 2.38 million real estate parcels, this total amount reflects $87.91 billion in business personal property, which includes boats, machinery, equipment and aircraft.

Since the Roll is the inventory for all taxable property in the county, it can provide some insight into the health of the real estate market. Although there was a slowdown in sales, there was continued growth in property values. The Roll is also driven in large measure by real property sales, which added $49.6 billion to the Roll as compared with 2019; the CPI adjustment mandated by Prop. 13, adding an additional $30.8 billion; and new construction added $13.4 Billion.

Why the Left Must Reject and Elect Biden at the Same Time

In the next three months, a dozen states will determine whether Donald Trump wins
another four years as president. Those swing states should be central to the work of
progressives who are determined to prevent that outcome.
With so much at stake, we can’t afford the luxury of devoting time and energy to endless
arguments about whether progressives should vote for Joe Biden if they live in
California or New York, or Alabama or Alaska, or other states where the electoral votes
are sure to all go to Biden or Trump.
What will matter are the swing states, generally understood this time around to include
Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas
and Wisconsin. (Also in play are “swing districts” in two states where the statewide
winning candidate doesn’t automatically get all of the state’s electoral votes: Maine’s
second congressional district and Nebraska’s second congressional district.)
There’s no point — or honesty — in pretending that Biden is a decent guy whose public
service has overflowed with compassion. Whether provided by the New York Times
days ago or The Nation last year, the grim evidence of Biden’s callous political career is
profuse.
During the primary campaign, the organization where I’m national director,
RootsAction.org, supported Bernie Sanders and widely distributed documentation of
Biden’s decades-long record of serving corporate greed, racial injustice and the military-
industrial complex. I’ve denounced Biden’s political record in one article after
another after another after another after another after another after another.
But the choice ahead, Trump or Biden, is painfully real. Magical thinking has its literary
value, but in politics it’s delusional and dangerous to evade the realities of binary
choices when they arise. All too often, discussion of voting can fall into a kind of self-
absorption that focuses on a voter’s emotions about voting rather than on the impacts of
election results on other people.
“It doesn’t matter whether you like Biden or not, that’s your personal feelings, irrelevant,
nobody cares about that,” Noam Chomsky said in a just-released video. “What they

care about is what happens to the world. We have to get rid of Trump, keep pressure on
Biden, just as Sanders and associates have been doing.”
Chomsky added: “Politics is activism, not taking five minutes to push a button. Look
what’s happening in the streets of the country. One of the greatest social movements
that has ever developed, led by Black Lives Matter. Take Sunrise Movement, managed
to put the Green New Deal on the legislative agenda. This generation is going to decide
whether organized human society can survive. And the crucial part of this decision is to
get rid of the major barrier to survival, which happens to be in the White House. Get rid
of Trump, then we have opportunities.”
My colleague Jeff Cohen, who co-founded RootsAction, told Common Dreams that the
“Vote Trump Out” initiative that RootsAction launched with the Chomsky video is “a two-
step campaign: First, vote Trump out. Then challenge Biden from day one. . . It’s easier
to persuade ‘swing voters on the left’ who live in swing states to vote for Biden despite
their hesitancy if they know we’re serious about step two.”
Like it or not, the imperative of defeating Trump is directly in front of us. To make a
progressive future possible, beating Trump is absolutely necessary while very far from
sufficient. To organize against a government headed by Trump is to push against a
thick stone wall. To organize against a government headed by Biden holds out the real
potential of progressive breakthroughs.


 
Norman Solomon is co-founder and national director of RootsAction.org. He is a Bernie
Sanders delegate from California to the 2020 Democratic National Convention.
Solomon is the author of a dozen books including “War Made Easy: How Presidents
and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.”

Los Angeles County Will Not Consider School Re-opening Waivers, Per State Guidance

The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health will adhere to new guidance from the California Department of Public Health, which recommends that Counties with case rates at or above 200 cases per 100,000 residents do not extend waivers for the reopening of classroom instruction for students in grades TK- 6.

Los Angeles County’s case rate currently is 355 per 100,000 and the county will not be considering waiver applications, at this point in time.

To many families, this is a disappointing announcement, but it’s based on the existing science and data that is guiding all of the county’s decision-making. Ensuring the health and safety of our children, school teachers and staff and all of their families is a priority.

This decision will be reconsidered once the case rate falls to the levels recommended by the State. 

The Department of Public Health will continue to work with all partners across the county to implement the infection control strategies we know effectively reduce community transmission and case rates so that schools can re-open for in-person instruction as soon as the data and science reveal that it is safe to do so.

While all schools, public and private, across the County are closed for in-person instruction of students, teachers, staff and administrators are allowed to return to school buildings provided adults adhere to existing protocols that require physical distancing and infection control measures, including wearing face coverings.

Keeping Courthouses Clear of COVID-19

LOS ANGELES — Seeking to keep Los Angeles County courthouses clear of COVID-19, the Board of Supervisors called for stronger health and safety measures to reduce the risk of exposure to the virus. 

When the courts reopened on July 6th after weeks of closure prompted by COVID-19, the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, began implementing a range of health and safety measures recommended by the LA County Public Defender and endorsed by the LA County Board of Supervisors. Additional measures may be necessary, however, given the recent surge in infections.

In their motion, Supervisors Ridley-Thomas and Kuehl noted that the LA County Sheriff’s Department (LASD) notified the Public Defender that many of its attorneys may have been exposed to COVID-19 by clients who tested positive for COVID-19 while in jail. In addition, many clients come to Court from jail without being tested beforehand.

On June 26th, the Department of Public Health recommended that LASD stop transporting clients with pending test results. However, given recent changes around testing, opportunities to -identify positive asymptomatic in-custody clients prior to transportation to Court has declined. Also complicating matters is inconsistent compliance with the Presiding Judge’s July 6th order requiring social distancing and the wearing of masks in courthouses.

Supervisor Ridley-Thomas and Kuehl’s motion instructed the County CEO, in collaboration with the Public Defender, Sheriff, and the Directors of DPH, the Correctional Health Services (CHS) within the Department of Health Services (DHS), the Internal Services Department (ISD), and the Alternate Public Defender (APD), to report back to the Board in 14 days with recommendations on:

A pre-screening process, including temperature checks and symptom and exposure questions, for entering courthouses;

Hourly patrols to ensure compliance with masking and social distancing protocols;

Public health inspections of lockup spaces in every courthouse

Whether and when incarcerated individuals should be tested before a court appearance;

The feasibility of rapid testing for incarcerated individuals;

The feasibility of testing jurors;

Expanding video conferencing technology to allow incarcerated individuals access to attorneys, clinicians, and the courts; and

Recommending protocols for responding when there is a known positive COVID-19 test from any individual who has been in a courthouse, including how to issue notifications and whether to impose a quarantine.

LA County to Support Litigation Efforts to Protect DACA Dreamers

In response to the Department of Homeland Security’s recently released memorandum attacking the DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) program, the Board of Supervisors has unanimously approved a motion authored by Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas to join in litigation, or to file an amicus brief supporting California’s lawsuit, challenging the federal government’s actions to rescind DACA. As a way to help protect the thousands of undocumented families that are without legal protection, the Attorney General, Xavier Becerra, seeks to urge other attorney generals to send letters encouraging the President to maintain the DACA initiative. This motion will direct LA County to support these efforts.

Established by President Obama in 2012, DACA allows more than 700,000 immigrants to live and work in the United States legally even if they are undocumented. The program enables non-U.S. citizens who came to the U.S. as children and who meet several key guidelines, to remain in the country for two years. Recipients of the program are eligible for work authorization and other benefits and are shielded from possible deportation. Youth impacted by DACA are often referred to as “Dreamers.”

Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision, the Trump Administration has indicated that it will once again attempt to revoke the initiative. In the memorandum issued on July 28, 2020, calls for a rejection of all initial requests for DACA program recipients and all pending and future applications for advance parole absent exceptional circumstances, and to shorten DACA program renewals to one-year periods. 

On June 15, 2012, the Obama Administration initiated the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, providing temporary forbearance of removal and work authorization eligibility for undocumented immigrants who entered the United States (U.S.) as children. Since its inception, the DACA program has protected nearly 800,000 individuals, including tens of thousands of immigrants in Los Angeles County (County), from deportation. Donald Trump first attempted to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program in September 2017, a move that would have stripped its beneficiaries of work permits and subjected them to deportation. Recognizing the countless contributions that DACA program recipients have made to their communities, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that the Trump Administration’s attempted rescission of the DACA program was unlawful.

Long Beach Unveils Proposed 2021 Budget and Racial Equity and Reconciliation Initiative – Initial Report

City of Long Beach Releases Racial Equity and Reconciliation Initiative – Initial Report

LONG BEACH —The City of Long Beach Aug. 3, released the Racial Equity and Reconciliation Initiative – Initial Report to Mayor Robert Garcia and City Council. The report details actions to address anti-Black racism, advance racial equity, and reconcile with the vision that race should not determine social and economic outcomes for those who live or work in Long Beach.

The initial report represents the fourth step in the Framework for Reconciliation following acknowledging, listening and convening with stakeholders to shape policy and ideas.

The city encourages community members to stay engaged by submitting their comments on this agenda item in advance of the Aug. 11 City Council meeting

Time: The sign up form will close at 12 p.m. Aug. 11

Details: longbeach.gov/cityclerk.

City of Long Beach Unveils Proposed 2021 Budget

LONG BEACH —The City of Long Beach Aug. 4, unveiled its Proposed Fiscal Year 2021 or FY 21 Budget. To resolve a projected FY 21 $30 million General Fund shortfall, the proposed budget is balanced and relies on a multi-faceted strategy of assistance from city employees, new or reallocated revenues, strategic investments, efficiency improvements, and service reductions.

City residents are invited to attend online community budget meetings throughout August. The meetings will be accessible by computer or by phone. Community members may also provide input by completing the Budget Priority Survey available in English, Spanish, Khmer and Tagalog at, www.proposed-budget-survey .

Time: 7 to 8:30 p.m

Details: community-budget-meetings-schedule

COVID-19 EDD Assistance Information

0

Many Californians have suffered a loss of work and are struggling to stay afloat due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Much of the state is going through a hard time, but there are resources to help. If you need assistance in navigating what is available, please contact Assemblymember Miguel Santiago’s [53rd District] office at, 213-620-4646 and the staff can talk you through the options most appropriate for you.

Unemployment Assistance

As part of the Federal CARES Act, the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) initiative serves to support unemployed Californians.

You may qualify if you are:

A business owner;

An independent contractor;

An individual with limited work history; or

Out of business or seeing services reduced as a direct result of the pandemic

Visit the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance page on the EDD website for more information.

If you have become unemployed or partially unemployed, you may file an Unemployment Insurance (UI) claim. Visit the EDD website to apply.

Independent contractors can use PUA. However, you may also apply for unemployment insurance if you were previously misclassified by your employer.

Details: covid19.ca.gov or call 833-544-2374.

Let Your Voice Be Heard

During this unprecedented time, public comment during board meetings has transitioned from in-person to call-in, which has substantially increased public access and input. Frequently, the opinions voiced during public comment are disproportionately on one side of an issue. Now more than ever, you are encouraged to participate in these opportunities for public comment. Please take the time to call into these public hearings to share your views with the elected officials who are setting policies that affect us all. 

To address the Board call: 844-767-5651 Participant Code: 9676434

Time: 9:30 a.m. Tuesdays

Details: http://bos.lacounty.gov