Saturday, October 11, 2025
spot_img
spot_img
Home Blog Page 416

Thanks to Community, the Garage Theatre Emerges from Its COVID Cocoon

0

The Garage Theatre team was psyched for 2020. It was a milestone year, the big TWO-OH, a time to celebrate two decades of doing everything from slapstick and melodrama to Shakespeare and the world premiere staging of a Tom Stoppard play — and always doing it their way.

Five performances into the first show of the season, the C-word brought the festivities to a sudden halt. And after a few months of uncertainty, one thing was sure: 2020 was a bust.

“We were like everyone in the world: we thought, ‘It might be a week, might be two weeks,’” recalls Garage Theatre co-founder Eric Hamme. “Then, ‘It might be a month, might be two months.’ And then it just kept going, and in the summer it became clear it just wasn’t coming back.”

Keen to hold on to the 1,200 sq. ft. space at 7th St./Long Beach Blvd. the Garage Theatre has occupied since 2005, they kept up with their rent. (Hamme has nothing but good things to report about their landlords.) But although they’ve done alright financially over the years for a black-box theatre company, they lacked the money in reserves to weather the sort of storm that COVID-19 turned out to be.

“[The financial reality] wasn’t great,” Hamme says. “Always at the beginning of the season we put a lot of our resources into getting the season up and running. We had a little bit of money in the bank, but we really depend on that first show to get us through the rest of the year. […] We got a rather sizeable donation from a family friend that kind of carried us through the summer and fall, so we knew we were okay for a little while while we were sort of feeling out what was happening and figuring everything out. But come the winter of 2020 we knew things were bleak for us, to say the least.”

Because the Garage Theatre is a nonprofit, all-volunteer organization — no employees, no payroll — none of the small percentage of COVID-related financial assistance they were technically eligible for came through. So they were left to their own devices.

“In 20 years, we’ve never been in debt. […] We’ve never taken a loan; we don’t even have a credit card. We’ve always just operated with what we have,” Hamme says. “So the idea of getting in the hole or into debt with anybody has never been something we’ve been comfortable with. So with that [above-mentioned] donation we received, we continued to pay the full rent every month. It wasn’t until November or December when that wasn’t a reality anymore. And we had a lot of discussions [along the lines of], ‘Well, is this the end of the road? Has it run its course?’ But we decided to give it one last effort and do a fundraiser.”

The Garage’s ”Yes We Can” fundraiser (as in: YES WE CAN survive this fucking pandemic) launched on December 18, 2020. With no illusions about the financial demographics of their audience, the Garage team did not have huge expectations.

“Let’s be honest: [although] our audience is incredible — I think we have the best audience in Long Beach, and they’re very supportive — we don’t have the wealthiest audience,” Hamme says. “Which is fine. But in general asking for money has always been an uncomfortable thing for us. […] So we thought $5,000 [was enough] to get us a few months into 2021. But then we decided, ‘Look, if we’re going to ask for anything, let’s go big.’ And the response was absolutely incredible.”

Incredible as in: despite a target of $10,000, donations to “Yes We Can” ended up totaling about $25,000, which enabled the Garage to pay their entire 2021 rent in one lump sum.

“It was really nice to have that security, [to realize] that we weren’t going to lose our space and were going to get through this and figure it out as we go,” Hamme says. “We didn’t have the financial pressure that a lot of companies and organizations and people felt last year.”

Although COVID continues to make things, er, interesting, the Garage plans to resume operations on March 11 with the world premiere of Private Lives of Imaginary Friends by local playwright Ryan McClary (whose Entropy General in 2011 remains one of the best things I’ve seen in Long Beach).

“Ryan wrote this play that really captured, in a very sweet and nice way, what a lot of us have gone through [during the pandemic],” Hamme says. “It’s about loneliness, about isolation, about getting back in touch with yourself and realizing who you are and where you belong in the world.”

Despite the difficulties of the last two years, Hamme feels the struggle has helped him get a clearer view of who the Garage Theatre is how they fit in the world.“I always had visions of us growing and being bigger than what we are,” he admits. “[…] When we got [Tom Stoppard’s] Darkside, to get the world premiere of a Stoppard play and have his agent come out from England to see it and give us his stamp of approval, I thought that might have put us on the map a little, so to speak. But the truth is, as great as it was and as much as I loved it, that didn’t happen. For example, we couldn’t get the L.A. Times out [to see it]. And when it was done, we just moved on to the next show like [it had been] any other show. And on a personal level — and I’m just speaking personally — in a way it kind of took the wind out of my sails a little bit. I was kind of like, ‘I don’t know what else we could do. […] I don’t know how to take this thing to the next level.’ So we kind of took a mini-break in 2019, and I was actually really excited about our 20th anniversary season. But then having the pandemic hit and our having to completely close down was kind of a blessing in disguise. I think it was needed for everyone to step away and take a break. And over the last year-and-a-half, not only did I start to miss it, but seeing the support we got from that fundraiser made me realize that [the Garage] means something and it is important. And it doesn’t really matter what the fuck it is. It doesn’t matter how big it is, how successful it is — what it is is important, and it means something to people. […] What the response showed me that I didn’t know is that the Garage is perfect the way it is. […] I no longer feel any pressure to make it something that it’s not. I accept it as it is — and love it as it is.”

For more information on what it is and details on what they’re calling “Year XX Two Ish,” visit thegaragetheatre.org.

New Law Will Make it Easier for Restaurants to Serve Alcohol

On Feb. 9, the Los Angeles City Council voted 13-0 to adopt the Restaurant Beverage Program Ordinance, which will make it easier for sit-down restaurants to acquire permits to serve alcohol.

According to a document from the city planning website, the new process will take weeks instead of months, and reduce the cost from about $13,000 to about $4,000.

However, there are a lot of restrictions — it only applies to restaurants, and there are more than 50 restrictions that must be met. For example, the restaurant can only be open from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m., there can be no live entertainment, and the only music allowed is ambient background music.

“The restaurant industry in Los Angeles is one of the most important drivers of our economy,” said Councilman Paul Krekorian, who represents the 2nd District. “It’s one of the most important providers of employment to the people of Los Angeles and it’s a central component of tourism and bringing outside money into Los Angeles.”

Krekorian said that the restaurant industry has fallen on hard times, particularly because of the pandemic. However, he also pointed out that the ordinance had been in the works for years. It has been in development since 2017, according to the city clerk’s website.

“We’ve been working on a way to try to shorten the time that restaurants need to get open … and provide a full range of services to their customers, while still protecting surrounding neighborhoods,” Krekorian said.

Krekorian said that under the ordinance, restaurant owners agree to a set of conditions that are already stronger than the ones typically required. These include security standards, such as security cameras, a complaint log and the removal of graffiti and litter. In addition, participating restaurants must take part in an inspection program.

Jorge Castillo, advocacy director for Alcohol Justice, said that the Los Angeles Drug and Alcohol Policy Alliance objected to this ordinance for many reasons, which were spelled out in a letter. The ordinance will no longer require public input when going through the alcohol permit process, and there will no longer be any California Environmental Quality Act review, public hearing or appeals.

“Public health data show LA is already dramatically over-concentrated with alcohol businesses, 300% over what’s recommended in many areas,” said Sarah Blanch, co-chair of the LA Drug and Alcohol Policy Alliance. “The county spends $10 billion annually managing alcohol-related problems, and this new measure will make it much worse with no controls.”

Castillo said the alliance requested plenty of changes to make the ordinance safer, but most were ignored. One was to make sure that 20 seats were required in order for a business to count as a sit-down restaurant — but this was lowered to 10. Another was to not allow happy hours at the restaurants that used the ordinance, as this encourages customers to drink more heavily.

The alliance also requested a program that would help local community members open restaurants in their communities, as well as ensure a percentage of restaurants open in communities be founded by residents. This was also ignored by the city council.

In addition, the alliance asked for stricter accountability for businesses that broke rules. Under the current system, a restaurant needs three citations in two years to lose its permit. The alliance asked for just three citations in one year, or if a felony was committed on the premises, the permit should be removed immediately.

Castillo said that Krekorian pushed for restaurants to be allowed to have 45% of their sales be from alcohol, which is what the final ordinance states.

“Forty-five percent is really high,” Castillo said. “If half of your sales are alcohol and you’re a restaurant, that’s problematic. Then you’re selling too much, and it’s not really a restaurant at that point. … It’s like a bar that’s selling food.”

The alliance pushed for 30% instead, which Castillo said was more reasonable — but he acknowledged that enforcing this would be difficult, no matter what the percentage was.

“A lot of these conditions are not enforceable,” Castillo said. “And they’re not going to enforce them. So the best thing to do is not even have [the ordinance].”

Councilwoman Nithya Raman, who represents the 4th District, said that Los Angeles is one of the most difficult cities in the country to open a restaurant.

“Our current process of permitting the sale of alcohol at restaurants … stacks the deck against small, independent restaurants,” Raman said. “Because you have to have so much capital and so many connections in order to go through the incredibly lengthy process; and the incredibly expensive process; and a process which demands a huge amount of political wrangling to get a conditional use permit.”

Krekorian said there have been several compromises to the ordinance, including making the ordinance an opt-in program.

“Members who want to participate in this will need to submit a resolution to be able to opt-in to the program,” Krekorian said. “That also provides us with an opportunity to ensure that if particular neighborhoods are not interested in this program, they will not participate.”

While a full menu is required, this does not prevent customers from picking up or ordering alcohol, even if they aren’t buying any food. This is because of Senate Bill 389, which was passed by the state in October 2021. This was a point of contention among some public commenters, including Charles Porter, of the United Coalition East Prevention Project.

“We’re still concerned about a process to fast-track alcohol sales in a time of rampant alcohol substance abuse,” Porter said. “SB 389, which was recently passed by the state, allows all restaurants to sell a bottle and can to go, without food, for the next five years. That completely changes the spirit and scope of this program, which was originally envisioned as allowing alcohol sales in sit-down family restaurants.”

The San Pedro Chamber of Commerce did not respond in time to comment on this story.

Random Letters: 2-17-22

0

Re: Profiteering Foreign Shipping Companies Versus U.S. Workers

Frank Ponce De Leon’s editorial on profiteering by the foreign shipping companies is smack on the mark correct. They have used the pandemic as cover to increase shipping prices by 1,000% and more. This can not possibly be justified. Are ship crews paid 10 times more? Longshoremen? Ship builders? Certainly not.

Cost of shipping a container from China to the USA, up from $2,000 to $25,000. Why? Can someone answer if the cost from the USA to China is also $25,000? Or it is unchanged?

By shipping empty containers from USA to overseas because they make more money faster than shipping USA goods in those containers they have manufactured a VERY profitable crisis.

And how much of the very same thing is being done in our USA supply chain by greedy shippers and sellers? The Biden administration needs to look into the profiteering and use Anti-Trust laws to clean this mess up.

John Mattson,San Pedro


It Never Ceases to Amaze Me

Near the end of the Super Bowl a conservative sitting at our table asked,

“So many people call in sick to work the day after the Super Bowl. Why don’t they just make it a national holiday?”

I had to laugh. Conservatives are lukewarm to Presidents Day. They are downright hostile to the MLK Holiday. And they spasm uncontrollably at the mere mention of making federal election days a holiday (search Paul Weyerich’s quotes on voting “I don’t want everybody to vote,”). [He’s an American conservative political activist and commentator]

Yet they can come up with something that could be called “National Hangover Day.” Straight out of Ripley’s Believe It or Not.

Steve Varalyay, Torrance

….

Steve,

I think we should trade them one hangover day for one election day holiday.

James Preston Allen,Publisher


Beating the Drums of War

Here we go again.

With talk of war in Ukraine rising to a fever pitch, U.S. media outlets are once again beating the drums.

We’re told that we’re facing a new Hitler. That this is a “new axis of evil” and a “Cold War 2.0.” That if we don’t “forcefully confront” Putin, it’s “appeasement.”

I’ve covered nearly every major U.S. military action since the 1990s, and it’s always the same.

The talking heads on cable news are almost drooling over the prospect of a ratings-boosting war. Retired Pentagon officials on the payroll of the defense industry are presented as “experts,” often with no disclosure of their financial conflicts of interest.

And once the shooting starts, mainstream pundits will drop any remaining pretense of journalistic integrity and begin openly cheerleading for “the troops,” like sports announcers rooting for the home team.

Meanwhile, the U.S. is the world’s largest arms dealer and it spends more on “defense” than China, Russia, India, the U.K., Germany, France, Japan, South Korea, and Australia combined.

As co-founder of The Intercept, I guarantee that we will never surrender to the jingoistic media stampede. Our tenacious team of investigative journalists will interrogate every official claim, challenge the Pentagon’s spin, and never defer to the conventional wisdom of a foreign policy establishment that has been disastrously wrong over and over and over again.

Jeremy Scahill, The Intercept, Washington, D.C.

Justice Breyer to Retire

0

By Jacob Pickering

After 27 years of praiseworthy public service on the U.S. Supreme Court, Justice Stephen Breyer has announced his retirement from the court, which will reportedly take effect this summer after the Supreme Court’s current term ends.

California-born Stephen Breyer’s surprise retirement has sent conservative politicians in Washington, D.C. into a terrified tailspin in their knowledge that the possibility of the Republican Party winning a majority in the U.S. Senate in November has now just come to an end. Too bad for them.

Due to the historical pattern of the incumbent U.S. president’s party losing congressional seats in the first mid-term election after that president takes office, combined with the numerous announced retirements of incumbent Democratic U.S. House members, recent redistricting, and extreme congressional gerrymandering by blatantly racist Republican state politicians, it’s probably unlikely at this point that the Democratic Party will be able to maintain their narrow majority in the U.S. House of Representatives after November’s general election.

However, all of the time and public tax dollars wasted by racist GOP politicians in Republican-controlled red states (whose blatantly discriminatory and illegally gerrymandered congressional political maps are being torn up by one court after another) will not have any appreciable impact whatsoever on the outcome of U.S. Senate races in 2022, because statewide U.S. Senate elections can’t be gerrymandered since all voters in any state get to vote for or against their state’s U.S. Senate candidates.

What will impact the 2022 U.S. Senate elections is the fact that the current 6-3 partisan Republican majority on the U.S. Supreme Court is likely to overturn Roe v. Wade prior to this November, which will spell certain political doom for anti-choice Republican U.S. Senate candidates across the country, not just in swing states or in Democratic-controlled blue states.

Even red state Republican candidates have much to fear this year from what is sure to become a historically large voter turnout in November by women furiously focused on protecting their right to choose from misogynistic male GOP jurists and from right-wing religious extremist Republican politicians who are personally obsessed with controlling, regulating, and restricting female sexuality at the point of a gun.

The Republican Party is going to have some explaining to do to its criminal corporate donors and to its fascist foreign sugar daddies (like Russian kleptocrat Vladimir Putin and Saudi Arabian despot Mohammed bin Salman) when 2023 dawns on at least several red states inaugurating Democrats as their new governors, etc.

In fact, Justice Breyer’s retirement along with the likely overturning of Roe v. Wade by the current U.S. Supreme Court prior to November will probably result in multiple red states becoming swing states just in time for this year’s general election, not to mention those flipping to blue states in time for the 2024 presidential election (like Texas and Ohio for instance), which will hand a second four-year term in the White House to President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris.

Maintaining their current slim majority in the U.S. House of Representatives is likely to be a heavy lift for the Democratic Party this year. However, don’t be shocked if the redirection of American voters’ attention towards the U.S. Supreme Court come election time will make fools out of those in the corporate media who have already mindlessly handed victory to the GOP in 2022, without a single vote having been cast yet! “Conventional Wisdom” isn’t wisdom after all, y’all. It’s simply groupthink.

Jacob Pickering is a long time Arcata, California columnist who has been published in news outlets across the United States.

Labor Notes: Mexican GM Workers Vote for New Union

0

Mexican GM Workers Vote for New Union

Auto workers at a General Motors plant in central Mexico delivered a landslide victory to an independent union in a vote held the first two days of February. It’s a major breakthrough for workers and labor activists seeking to break the vice grip of the employer-friendly unions in the Congress of Mexican Labor (CTM), that have long dominated Mexico’s labor movement.

Turnout among the plant’s 6,300 eligible voters was 88%. The independent union SINTTIA (the National Auto Workers Union) picked up 4,192 votes — 78% of the vote. SINTTIA, which grew out of the successful campaign which ousted the previous corrupt union last year, promised to raise wages and fight for workers on the shop floor.

“Today I believe we as workers are more united than ever,” said Alejandra Morales, SINTTIA’s principal officer, who has worked at the plant for 11 years. “Not only in Silao, but in all of Mexico.”

CTM affiliates, tied to the long-ruling PRI, have long been criticized for signing employer-friendly “protection contracts,” which lock in low wages and prevent workers from organizing genuine unions.

SINTTIA’s victory is a shot in the arm for the independent union movement in Mexico; the vote was closely followed domestically and internationally.

“What we hope is that [workers at] new companies see that they can beat the CTM,” said Juan Armando Fajardo Rivera, the union’s press secretary, who has worked at the plant for 13 years. “The CTM isn’t invincible. If you want a union, you can achieve it with the new reform.”

Video interview with new union leaders. https://therealnews.com/mexican-auto-workers-just-made-history-by-taking-back-their-union


International Support

Support for the effort to vote in a genuine union at GM Silao poured in from unions and labor activists across the globe. Unionists from Brazil, Canada, and the U.S. joined an international delegation to support the vote.

“It’s important to recognize the commitment of workers from other countries,” said Morales, “because it’s important that the whole working class, not just from here but globally, be in constant communication for the betterment of everyone.”

Once the results are certified by Mexican labor authorities, SINTTIA will enter negotiations with GM. This week, GM reported a record $10 billion in profits last year.

Workers at the Silao plant make the lucrative Chevy Silverado and GMC Sierra pickups, but earn less than $25 for a 12-hour shift. Foremost on their minds is a wage increase. “What workers would like most is to have a decent salary that is enough for their day-to-day [needs],” said Morales.

Video interview with new union leaders. https://therealnews.com/mexican-auto-workers-just-made-history-by-taking-back-their-union


Memphis Starbucks Workers Fired for Unionizing Efforts

Recently fired Starbucks workers are speaking out after they were fired by the coffee chain for organizing a union drive at a Memphis store. The workers say they refuse to be silenced and are calling on Starbucks employees around the country to unionize more locations.

After a Starbucks in Buffalo, New York became the first unionized Starbucks store in the U.S. a wave of workers at 67-plus stores began to join the #UnionsForAll movement fighting for safer working conditions, higher wages, fair schedules and more.

Starbucks is raking in record-profits while employees are reporting hours getting cut and retaliation for their union organizing. They’re pulling out the same tactics that many other employers have tried.


Amazon Workers in Alabama Try Again for Union

Amazon workers at the Bessemer, Alabama, warehouse are voting to unionize for the second time in a mail-in election that began 2.4. The new vote comes after the National Labor Relations Board found Amazon unlawfully interfered with the first election last year.

In a related development, Amazon was able to dodge over $5 billion in federal income taxes in 2021. Amazon reported record revenue of $35 billion last year but benefited from a federal income tax rate of just 6%, thanks to corporate tax breaks voted in by Democrats and Republicans, at the expense of working people.

Wrong Way Joe

Buscaino calls for outlawing sidewalk bike repairs and other ill-conceived notions

Once again LA City Councilman Joe Buscaino wants another ordinance outlawing homelessness on the streets of Los Angeles. This is nothing new. Last time it was the anti-camping ordinance; the time before that, it was homeless “sweeps;” and before all of the hand-wringing over homelessness, he was responsible for the eviction of some 170 souls from Ken Malloy Park in Harbor City. Then he was shocked when these unhoused individuals began conspicuously camping in the public domain. Between then and now, Buscaino has disregarded the neighborhood councils’ advice, never seeking their support. Instead, he went on a gentrification spree using non-union labor and building less than mandatory affordable units.

Joe was a Johnny Come-Lately to the Bridge Home concept. And he only fell in line with the tiny homes solution when Mayor Eric Garcetti adopted the policy once the name was changed to “pallet homes” and placed at a distance far from his hometown of San Pedro. That there has been any movement policy-wise on more effective and quicker solutions addressing homelessness is due to Judge David O. Carter’s holding homeless hearings in council chambers at city hall. I have said it before and I’ll repeat it here for the hard of hearing, if ordinances could solve the homeless crisis, it would have been solved a long time ago!

Somehow, Buckets Buscaino, as he is known in the district, has convinced a majority of his city council colleagues to pass his latest political theater act over to his mayoral opponent, City Attorney Mike Feuer, to write up this bright idea in such a way that it’s not unconstitutional. The four dissenters, Mike Bonin, Nithya Raman, Marqueece Harris-Dawson and Curren Price, pointed out this needless act of grandstanding. Raman rightly pointed out that blocking any public right-of-way is already illegal as is bike theft, which is what Buckets seems bent on preventing. For all the effort, the proposed law would specifically target one class of people, expend scarce police resources better used elsewhere, while clogging already packed court dockets with quick catch-and-release misdemeanor cases. Does anyone see the problem with this scenario?

This manipulation of public policy toward political ends is reminiscent of Buscaino showing up on the Venice Boardwalk last summer and pointing out homelessness in Bonin’s district while announcing his mayoral campaign. It only serves him and doesn’t address the larger problem.

A better solution would be to set up bike repair shops at all of the shelters run by Lime Bike and others already littering our sidewalks with sanctioned Gen Z mobilizations. Here’s an opportunity to help the able-bodied and the willing to acquire a skillset and a means to help themselves get off the streets. Of course, a solution such as this is only viable if you are a believer in redemption. Something Buscaino clearly is not.

As a former Los Angeles Police Department officer, his knee jerk response to nearly every situation is enforcement first, ask questions later.

However, I do understand the frustration of many Angelenos. After a decade of promises and millions spent on promises, it seems like the solutions to the homeless crisis are as elusive as curing poverty in California itself. Are they not one and the same? What is needed are compassion and practicality, both of which seem to be missing in Buscaino’s approach.

First you have to meet the homeless crisis head-on with the facts — not fantasy. Homeless people are where they are for a multitude of reasons but the common denominator is that they are all just desperately poor. It is unsafe and unsanitary for them to live on the streets. So let’s confront this as a public health crisis rather than as a crime scene. Provide them with safe, secure and sanitary campsites out of the public right-of-way. Provide services in a centralized area away from neighborhoods and sort out the mentally ill from the drug addicted; and the disabled vets from the just down-on-their-luck people, and get them the help they need. Permanent housing, or institutional care can come later. Some may be saved from the scourge of poverty or addiction, some may not. But I cannot believe that this city with all its wealth can’t do better and take care of what amounts to less than one half of 1% of its residents.

This is not the civil society to which I belong, nor is it the one I know exists across this city. Think of the many hundreds of nonprofit organizations who, in their own ways, are a part of solving this humanitarian crisis. Buscaino’s anti-homeless measures are both counter to our culture and the current politics of this city. He may get some to follow him down this path of reckless disregard as he promotes his new “law and order” agenda, but it just mustn’t be the policy that ever gets him elected mayor!

Erasure or Remembrance? — Japanese Internment 80 Years Later

Feb. 19 marks the 80th anniversary of when Terminal Island’s residents became the first Japanese Americans on the West Coast to be forcibly removed from their homes. They were forced to evacuate their homes within 48 hours and had to leave almost all of their possessions behind due to President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s signing Executive Order 9066.

Los Angeles has always been a place that forever asks, “What does the past have to do with me?”

And with every new redevelopment project our history and our heritage is razed, bulldozed, remade, covered up and or otherwise obliterated from memory. Los Angeles has gotten particularly good at it, since institutions lose institutional memory the way a man with a hole in his pocket loses money.

The Port of Los Angeles was considering a plan to demolish the old StarKist Cannery this past December. San Pedro residents with ties that go back generations with the cannery made their voices heard and demanded the building be preserved and repurposed.

The project would involve demolition of the main building (Plant No. 4) and the northern and southern portions of the East Plant and a water-side dock. The 16.5-acre parcel sits on Terminal Island amid a heavily industrialized area.

The port’s environmental study determined that the site did not qualify for historic status based standards for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources and the Los Angeles Historic-Cultural Monument.

This move sparked concern for the remaining buildings of Japan Town on Terminal Island. Central San Pedro Neighborhood Council member, Gina Lumbruno, had taken an interest in the building over the past year and researched the backgrounds of many of the pre World War II properties still standing on Terminal Island.

“The port deemed Japan Town’s only buildings remaining are on Tuna Street from addresses 700 through 744,” Gina explained. “The Port’s master plan called for knocking these buildings down. It’s so ridiculous. The LA Conservancy came and fought for these buildings. So the port had them deemed historical.”

Gina says there is still one building that remains in peril.

“You have to go on that Japan Town’s website and you can plug in the addresses,” Gina explained. “It’s so sad because it’ll tell you which addresses were demolished and what ones are extant, which means they’re still standing.”

Gina explained that the port has provided the council a historical inventory report that included the addresses 700, 702 and 712 on Tuna Street. But it did not include 744 Tuna Street. The Nakamura Company store was located at 712 Tuna Street while the Tokyo Aloha Restaurant was located at 744 Tuna Street.

Gina noted that the port is supposed to put out an inventory report of the historical buildings every two years.

Gina learned that the building at 748 Tuna Street was built by Vincent Thomas, the assemblyman from San Pedro for which the bridge is named. It was a market. Then Harbor Light restaurant and market took over.

“I think maybe about 10 years ago, a Korean couple started a restaurant there at 748 and they got their lease taken away two years ago.”

Gina didn’t know the reason it was taken away, but believed the port likely made it difficult for the couple to keep the lease because they had other uses for the property in mind.

“To me that might be a sneaky underhanded way of getting them out of there,” Gina explained.

“That was the only thing open [for food]. Truckers used to have coffee and food there. That was the only place on the island to get anything.”

A. Nakamura Company at 712 Tuna Street, a store that was founded by a Japanese fisherman. Photo courtesy of Derek Nakamura

Legacy, History and the Present

Derek Nakamura said he was always aware that his grandfather’s store was still standing on Terminal Island. He just didn’t know the port was looking to tear down what remained.

Until recently, he’d bring his family to visit Tuna Street to look at the Star-Kist cannery and what’s left of the Japanese village that once thrived there, known as Fish Harbor.

Fish Harbor was entirely man-made. Construction, according to Naomi Hirahara and Geraldine Knatz, authors of Terminal Island: Lost Communities of Los Angeles Harbor, began in 1915. Based on plans drawn by engineer E.P. Goodrich, Fish Harbor was built to help separate the shipping and fishing industries in the fast-expanding Los Angeles Harbor.

The crews of fishermen were primarily Japanese born (Issei) or American citizens whose parents were Japanese nationals (Nisei). Beginning in the early 1900s, Japanese fishermen were actively recruited by big canneries on the West Coast because of their skill at catching sardines and the increasingly popular albacore tuna.

It is thought that there were some Japanese fishermen in the Los Angeles Harbor by the start of the 20th century. There was definitely a Japanese encampment at Timm’s Point in San Pedro by 1912. With the creation of Fish Harbor, canneries, particularly Van Camp, recruited and hired hundreds of Japanese workers, many of whom hailed from the seaside state of Wakayama in Japan.

Fishing Village on Terminal Island.

The canneries soon built more than 300 houses for workers and their families behind the harbor. A thriving community of around 2,000 to 3,000 souls was born.

“There was a whole village, with dwellings akin to barracks where the workers lived before the war,” Derek said.

Derek’s great grandfather, a fisherman, founded A. Nakamura Company at 712 Tuna Street. When fishing season ended, he worked in the store with his daughter (Derek’s grandmother, Aiko).

Derek’s father’s generation didn’t talk much about their experience in the internment camps. Derek would go to Terminal Island and visit the memorial and the old store more than his dad and uncle did.

But once the memorial at Terminal Island was erected, Derek regularly took his father to visit. Derek’s uncle was a member of the Terminal Islanders, a landscaping company, widely known for creating Japanese gardens that were popular in the 1970s.

The Nakamuras lived in San Pedro before they were forced to dispose of all possessions they couldn’t take with them on a bus or a train. Their final destination was the internment camp called Manzanar. The Manzanar War Relocation Center was one of ten camps where the U.S. government incarcerated Japanese immigrants ineligible for citizenship and Japanese American citizens during World War II.

Manzanar is off the 395 Freeway, in Inyo County on the east side of the Sierra Nevada and southeast of Yosemite National Park. Derek’s father was born there. Derek had to retrieve his father’s birth certificate when he passed away last year.

One of his few relatives willing to talk to Derek about that period of the family’s history was an aunt, who explained that the men particularly didn’t like talking about that experience. “She would tell me the men wouldn’t talk about it really because they felt ashamed and because they love the U.S.,” Derek explained.

“In Japan, you weren’t considered Japanese if you were not born in Japan,” Derek said. “In the United States you weren’t considered American even though you were born here.”

They were more willing to talk about their exploits in World War II as members of the 442nd Infantry Regiment, the most highly decorated unit of its size, that fought in the European theater of the war.

Derek still has the flyers that were put on the doors announcing the evacuation. Families were only allowed to carry bedding and linen (no mattresses), toiletries, extra clothing for family members and essential personal effects.

“You got to take one bag or whatever belonging to you. Then you [and your family] had to get on the bus, and then a train,” Derek said.

As dark as those moments were, Derek relayed moments of human kindness and grace that he learned from family who lived through the experience. In one case, Derek noted that some soldiers guarding the camps allowed detainees to go fishing at night at the lake in the back of Manzanar.

“We were very lucky since we had more than one grocery store,” Derek explained. “We had another grocery store that was on First Street, but before that, my grandmother Aiko was friends with a lot of Caucasians and they saved a lot of stuff for us. And after the war, they gave it all back.”

“It’s very rare. The same thing happened over here in San Gabriel, there’s a San Gabriel nursery that’s Japanese-owned. They signed over the deed to a Caucasian family and when they came back from the internment camps, the Japanese family didn’t have the money to get it back. The Caucasian family transferred the nursery back to the Japanese family without charge. There were a lot of good people. There were a lot of bad. There was a mixture.”

“I guess it’s under preservation to some extent,” Derek said, referring to the old grocery at 744 Tuna Street. “But the port still wants to take down all that stuff.”

Derek connected with Gina after she made a post that included a picture of Derek’s great grandfather on the San Pedro Facebook page about Terminal Island.

“I said, ‘That’s my great grandfather’s shop!’ From then on we started talking.”

That’s when Derek learned Gina was trying to get what’s left of the buildings on Tuna Street preserved. Gina invited Derek to speak at a neighborhood council meeting last year and he’s been kept in the loop ever since.

“There was a little restaurant, a dry goods store, and something else and that’s all that’s left,” Derek explained. “Gina is proposing a mural.”

Derek likes the idea, but hopes something more can be done — like a museum.

“Since they have the statues there with the mural and their names there telling the story of the Japanese fishing village there, I was thinking we could turn it into a small museum.”

Derek imagined the possibilities for a moment: “If we could have a docent tour through all those buildings and have all the artifacts and information about Terminal Island, you know, people could learn more about it and understand … The first step is just keeping it.”

But monied interests don’t want us to keep it. They prefer that our memory becomes washed out and erased. It makes it that much easier to restrict our imaginations and limit our claims to all belongs to us as citizens.

Hahn and GCP Begin Demo of Vacant Courthouse

SAN PEDRO — Supervisor Janice Hahn and Genton Cockum Partners on Feb. 9, announced the demolition of the San Pedro Courthouse, which will pave the way for a new mixed-use community, comprising market-rate and affordable housing, joint-use open space, and expansive ground floor retail space. Demolition is expected to take up to 50 days with construction anticipated to begin in the third quarter of 2022. The San Pedro Courthouse operated from 1969 to 2013 and was among the many county courthouses across the state closed because of budget constraints and the opening of the Duekmejian regional courthouse in Long Beach.

The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors entered into an exclusive agreement with Genton Cockrum Partners for the redevelopment project in 2018. Following years of planning, Genton Cockrum Partners tapped MVE + Partners to design the eight-story building, which will include 300 apartment units spanning studio, one-, two- and three-bedrooms, as well as approximately 20,000 square feet of ground floor retail occupied primarily by a food hall with areas for communal seating, entertainment and community activities.

As part of its plan, Genton Cockrum Partners revealed that more than 20% of the units — 60 in total — will be offered at rents considered affordable to households earning no more than 80% of the Los Angeles area median income. In addition, the developers will use entirely union labor for construction of the project, working with the Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council.

The courthouse property on 6th and Centre streets is owned by the County of Los Angeles and Supervisor Janice Hahn has led the charge for its redevelopment, which is labor-financed and labor built. The courthouse has been vacant since 2013 when the state consolidated many local courts into regional ones.

“Today, we said our last goodbyes to the old courthouse,” said Supervisor Janice Hahn. “Regardless of what your memories are with this building, it served our community well for as long as it could. Today we are officially closing the door on that chapter of this property and opening the door to the next. This project is an ideal one for downtown San Pedro. We are building apartments that people can afford, bringing more people to downtown and building a space everyone can enjoy. And yet this project doesn’t address the accessibility to justice that the closing of the courthouse created. As one noted jurist commented, ‘Denial of access to justice is denial of justice.’”

Genton Cockrum Partners has been dedicated to delivering a project that aligns with the authenticity of San Pedro. Working with the San Pedro Neighborhood Council, Chamber of Commerce and Business Improvement District, Genton Cockrum Partners revised initial design plans to incorporate street level commercial design and public open space elements intended to be more consistent with nearby historic buildings and contribute to the vitality of downtown San Pedro. The result is a building that celebrates old architecture while incorporating modern elements.

“This demolition marks years of collaboration and dedication to bringing thoughtful housing and activated public spaces to downtown San Pedro,” said William (“Bill”) Cockrum, senior managing partner and president of the development firm. “We are grateful for the tremendous support we’ve received from Supervisor Hahn, Councilmember Buscaino and other local officials, as well as the community and construction trades. We look forward to officially beginning excavation and construction later this year.”

Ted Chandler, senior managing director of the AFL-CIO Housing Investment Trust said, “We look forward to working with Genton Cockrum Partners and the County of Los Angeles, and appreciate their commitment to building mixed-income housing, and building it with 100% union labor.” Located at 505 S. Centre St., the property is among downtown San Pedro shops and restaurants and is within two blocks of the LA Waterfront.

— RLn Staff Report

 

Carson Quietly Undergoes Redistricting

Come March, Carson’s City Council will take a vote on redistricting the current controversial district map — the once-a-decade process has drawn criticism from Carson residents for fueling deeper polarization at an already politically divided city council.

The city only moved to district voting in 2020 after being hit with a lawsuit for adopting at-large elections. The Southwest Voting Rights Group sued on the basis that Carson violated guarantees of a constitutional election. The lawsuit, which was expected, cost the city over $500,000.

“For the past several years, the outcome of the elections in Carson were pretty much decided by a very specific group of residents in the city,” said Dr. Sharma Henderson, president of Carson Accountability and Transparency. “That’s what made our city a textbook case for the Southwest Voting Rights. And why it was very easy for them to force our hand at making us a district city.”

When the city council adopted the district map, community leaders and political candidates immediately criticized the new district lines as benefiting the council members. The accusations of gerrymandering, and intentionally skewing district lines for political advantages, plagued the council with claims of disenfranchising voters.

“They’re [city council] concerned about protecting their own interests,’’ said Dr. Henderson. “Because remember, as those lines shift, that determines whether or not they stay in the district that they’re in, that determines who gets to run against them. That determines whether or not they end up having to run against each other.”

Carson’s former city councilwoman and a plaintiff in the lawsuit, Vera Robles DeWitt, said the election process with the current map makes it difficult for members of the community to run for a political position. In November, she ran for city clerk, an elected position, but came short behind then California state legislator Myla Rahman.

“It is very difficult to win an election in Carson,” Robles DeWitt said during her campaign run in November. “You either have to know the right people or have loads and loads of money.”

The Fair and Inclusive Redistricting for Municipalities and Political Subdivisions (FAIR MAPS) Act requires cities to involve residents in the redistricting process by “holding public hearings and/or workshops and doing public outreach, including to non-English-speaking communities.”

Carson’s Assistant City Manager John Raymond, the leader behind hosting the workshops and delivering the information to the council said the city is trying to be as “public and transparent as possible.”

“All of these workshops that we’re doing, it would be one thing to say, ‘well we’re just going to put the notice up on the website and hope people show up, right?’” he explained. “And we do that, and we put it on social media channels and things like that, sort of blast it out.” Raymond goes on to say the city has hired a walkman to pass flyers to residents near the neighborhoods where the next workshop will be held. This process ended after all scheduled workshop meetings became virtual.

But Dr. Henderson said the city of Carson should do more than what the law requires and urges residents to pay more attention to redistricting.

“They’re going through the motions as legally required, and that’s it,” she said. “They’re doing the bare minimum, and they’re doing it very quietly. It’s an opportunity for engagement that I feel has been intentionally overlooked. And that saddens me because the lack of engagement from the residents allows for that to happen. And so the net result of it will be that we’re going to get a map that’s going to be favorable to the people who are serving in council. And we’re going to have to live with that map. And by the time people actually either realize that the boundaries of the map have changed, if at all, the process will be done and over with.”

The city, tasked with hiring a demographer, chose Andrew Westfall to draft a variety of maps to present during workshops and council meetings. As of early February he has drafted and presented six district maps. Members of the public are able to present their own maps. The maps are a representation of the various demographics of the city. Who is represented and by which council member is influenced by how the map is outlined.

Councilwoman Arleen Rojas expressed that the turnout of the workshops is disappointing. “I’ve been to the meetings and there are not that many people who show up,” she said during a council meeting. “And it’s staff. We really need to promote it and get the community to come out. We need to hear from them.”

At the council meeting, Mayor Lula Davis-Holmes suggested council members host their own redistricting information meetings for their districts — a process that will require further evaluation from the city manager.

But residents are still skeptical about the unanimity in the final decision and question if the council members should be the ones making the final call. Raymond says the council members don’t have to pick a new map if they don’t want to.

“Under the law, they can actually adopt the current app,” Raymond said. “The map that was adopted two years ago meets the demographic tests and meets a balancing test, so they don’t have to change the map. If they didn’t want to change it, they wouldn’t have to. But we’re required to go through this process and create new maps and try to improve things.”

When the redistricting process is finalized in March, the next opportunity to redraw the lines won’t come for another decade. Dr. Henderson wants to make every resident aware of this.

“It’s their opportunity to make sure that a person is in office, who lives in their community, who understands the issues and the circumstances that are specific to the neighborhoods that are represented by their district. And that’s the whole point behind having districts,” Dr. Henderson said. “They need to consume as much information as possible. They need to educate themselves. They need to ask questions. They need to be as engaged in the process as possible. And they need to let their voice be heard.”

Mayor Lula Davis-Holmes, council members Cedric L. Hicks Sr. and Jawane Hilton did not respond for comment.

19th Premiere of LAHIFF: Remaining Relevant Amidst a Pandemic

0

Golden Age Hollywood films have always been L.A. Harbor International Film Festival’s niche, highlighting great films going back to the 1940s and 50s to a new generation of audiences who otherwise would never have been exposed to films like the 1941 film The Maltise Falcon or the 1951 film, Journey to the Center of the Earth.

The festival’s founder, Stephanie Mardesich, doubles down on ensuring younger audiences are exposed to such filmmaking via the festival’s Read the Book, See the Movie programming to which the festival donates the books from which the films were adapted to local students.

This year’s program features the 1961 film West Side Story, which was itself an adaptation of the 1951 Broadway musical. LAHIFF screens the film as a tribute to George Chakiris on the 60th anniversary of his receiving the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor and co-star Russ Tamblyn. It also honors Chakiris’ recently released his memoir, My West Side Story.

The book follows the entirety of Chakiris’ life — before, during and after the film that ultimately earned him an Oscar and a prosperous career. In the book, Chakiris recounts the rich history behind the West Side Story film.

The festival’s decision to include West Side Story in this year’s line is timely given the release of Steven Spielberg’s Oscar-nominated version of the film.

On March 3, LAHIFF kicks-off presenting “Read the Book, See the Movie” or RBSM. The program features the classic novel Treasure Island by Robert Louis Stevenson along with the Walt Disney Studios 1950 film. Mardesich noted the most meaningful aspect of this year’s festival and something “very rare” is LAHIFF is screening two 35mm. prints — Treasure Island and The Sound of Music. Juxtaposed with the live program will be a real time webinar set up for the free education outreach program. Nearly 18,000 free books have been distributed to students and community members since 2004. This year books were again provided by “publishing angel” sponsor Penguin Random House.

On the night of the Hollywood Nostalgia Tribute (March 5), The Sound Of Music — presented in 35mm — will be co-presented by San Pedro International Film Festival and LAHIFF. The audience is invited to sing along and come dressed as their favorite characters.

DocSunday, the closing day of the festival (March 6), is devoted to non-fiction films by NewFilmmakers LA Short Documentary Project at 1 p.m.

Followed by film, Eddy’s Story at 2:30 p.m., inspiring account of 100 year old “toy genius” inventor Eddy Goldfarb. The film was produced and directed by Goldfarb’s daughter, Academy Award-nominated filmmaker Lyn Goldfarb.

Closing Program F is the world premiere of composite film of oral history project Stories Of Los Angeles Harbor Area: For Yesterday, Today & Tomorrow, The Movie – Volumes II & III produced by Mardesich and Jack Baric, who also directs. There will be a Q&A with filmmakers after the screenings.

The LAHIFF offers stimulating and entertaining programming that inspires audiences and respects the integrity of the silver screen. As Mardesich contends “the film festival is a way to offer a collective experience augmenting the cultural landscape of and promoting all San Pedro and surrounding areas have to offer residents, visitors, and tourists.”

Though the festival is forging ahead with in person programing, Mardesich provided links to view the films via internet and/or home entertainment centers. With the slated closure of the Warner Grand Theatre in June for renovation, this year’s festival screening in the 90-year-old theater is particularly meaningful.

List of films and links to view:

March 3 Prog. A RBSM: 10:30 a.m. “real time webinar” Treasure Island https://bit.ly/RTBSTM2022

Zoom access: 869 4231 1869, no password

Link to view: https://tinyurl.com/mrywv4tw

March 4 Prog. B: Opening night West Side Story

March 5 Prog. C: The Sound Of Music

DocSunday March 6 Prog. D: New Filmmakers LA Short Documentary Project (no fee) March 3 to 6 only: www.NFMLA.org/LAHIFF2022

March 6 Prog. E: Eddy’s Story (no fee) March 3 to 6 only: https://vimeo.com/453116634

March 6 Prog. F: Stories Of Los Angeles Harbor Area: For Yesterday, Today & Tomorrow (SOLAHA) The Movie – Volumes II & III www.storieslaharborarea.com

Details

Get tickets at the box office during the day of the program — one hour prior to the program. Veterans and those currently serving in the military complimentary admission; subject to availability —first come, first seated.

From March 6, view on website: https://www.laharborfilmfest.com/

Time: Various

Cost: General admission $10; seniors, students and affiliations $8 — cash only

Details: www.laharborfilmfest.com

Venue: Warner Grand Theater, 478 W. 6th St., San Pedro