Sunday, September 28, 2025
spot_img
spot_img
Home Blog Page 124

Why Your Rents Are So Damn High

 

Justice Department Sues RealPage Over AI-Powered Scheme to Hike Rents

By Emma Rault, community reporter

The Department of Justice and eight states, including California, are suing software company RealPage, alleging that their AI rent-setting software has inflated rents across the country. Earlier this year, Random Lengths was the first to report on the use of RealPage’s algorithm by corporate landlords in Los Angeles.

RealPage collects private information that landlords don’t usually share with their competitors, such as lease expiry dates, vacancy rates and rents being paid by current tenants. Its algorithm then uses this pooled information to tell landlords how much to charge.

In March, President Joe Biden said in his State of the Union Address, “For millions of renters, we’re cracking down on big landlords who break antitrust laws by price-fixing and driving up rents.” That same month, the Department of Justice launched a criminal investigation into RealPage and some of its corporate customers.

Price-fixing is when several players from the same industry get together and figure out what to charge. Technology is changing what this looks like: it’s not a group of landlords getting together “in a smoke-filled room” anymore, as Washington, D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb told NPR.

However, regulators are coming to the conclusion that price fixing by algorithm is still price fixing.

Critics say the algorithm artificially pushes rents up beyond market rate — and because it is used by major players with real-estate portfolios worth billions of dollars, it has had a major impact on the rental market, hurting millions of Americans who are struggling to keep their heads above water. The New York Times reports that annual rent growth nationwide peaked in 2022 at nearly 16%. A recent UCLA survey found that 4 in 10 renters in LA County worry about becoming homeless.

Several corporations named in class-action lawsuits previously filed against RealPage also manage apartment buildings all over Los Angeles.

Corporate giant Greystar, for example, manages more than 500 units in San Pedro alone. Leasing managers for three of Greystar’s four San Pedro buildings confirmed to Random Lengths that RealPage’s AI software was being used to set rents.

At a campaign event in North Carolina earlier this month, Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee, mentioned algorithmic price-fixing in her remarks on the affordability crisis. “It’s anticompetitive, and it drives up costs. I will fight for a law that cracks down on these practices,” she said.

 

Sidebar

RealPage’s AI Pricing Blamed for Rent Inflation in LA Multifamily Housing

The Los Angeles Submarket corresponds to the Census Bureau’s Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim MSA and includes Los Angeles and Orange counties. There are approximately 522,937 multifamily rental units within the Los Angeles Regional Submarket.

Within the Los Angeles Submarket, the following Defendants own or operate multifamily units priced with RealPage RMS: AIR, AMC, Avenue5, Bell, Bozzuto, Brookfield, Camden, CONAM, Equity, Essex, FPI Management, Greystar, Pinnacle, Related, Sares Regis, Simpson, Trammell Crow, UDR, Windsor, and Winn.

The widespread adoption of Defendant RealPage’s RMS has caused rent to increase explosively in recent years, with Los Angeles renters paying 41% more today than they paid in 2016.

Through its suite of business products, including RealPage’s RMS, RealPage collects and shares pricing and occupancy information for a high concentration of multifamily residential apartment units within the Los Angeles Submarket, as self-reported by RealPage on its website: https://www.realpage.com/explore/main/ca/los-angeles-long-beach-glendale.

Property owners and managers who use revenue management software account for

approximately 79% of all multifamily rental units in the Los Angeles Submarket. Given that RealPage’s RMS accounts for over two-thirds of revenue management software used in U.S. the multifamily rental housing industry by both owners and managers, the Owners, Managing Defendants, and Owner-Operators, along with their co-conspirators who use RealPage’s RMS, account for over 52% of the multifamily rental market in the Los Angeles Submarket.

Below is a partial list of apartment complexes organized by residential management companies named as defendants in class-action lawsuits for price-fixing through artificial intelligence:

Apartment Management Consultants
The Renaissance at City Center (Carson)
Union South Bay (Carson)
Elevate Long Beach (Long Beach)
Volta On Pine (Long Beach)

Avenue5 Residential, LLC (“Avenue5”)
Marine View (San Pedro)

Camden Property Trust (“Camden”)
Camden Harbor View (Long Beach)

Equity Residential (“Equity”)
Hathaway Apartments (Long Beach)
Bay Hill Apartments (Long Beach)

Essex Property Trust, Inc. (“Essex”)
Pathways at Bixby Village (Long Beach)
Marbrisa (Long Beach)

FPI Management, Inc. (“FPI Management”)
Banning Villa Apartments (Wilmington)

Greystar
Suncrest at Ponte Vista (San Pedro)
San Pedro Bank Lofts (San Pedro)
Harborview (San Pedro)
Avana Rancho Palos Verdes Apartments (RPV)

Sares Regis Group Commercial, Inc. (“Sares Regis”)
The Linden (Long Beach)
The Pacific (Long Beach)
The Alamitos (Long Beach)

WinnCompanies LLC and WinnResidential Manager Corp. (collectively “Winn”)
Beachwood Apartments (Long Beach)
Park Pacific Towers (Long Beach)
The Don Hotel (Wilmington)
Vista Lee Rosa (Harbor City)
Tierra Vista Communities at Los Angeles AFB (San Pedro – housing on base)

Missing the Mark

 

LAPD Faces Scrutiny After Failing to Follow Military Equipment Transparency Law

By Rosie Knight, Columnist

In an extensive audit that was published by the City Controller this week, Kenneth Mejia’s officedressed down the Los Angeles Police Dept. over their failure to comply with segments of Assembly Bill 481. Random Lengths News has already reported on the Port Police and their attempts to comply with the transparency bill. AB 481 requires law enforcement agencies to “develop a military equipment use policy which includes a description of each type of military equipment in their possession. Submit this use policy to their governing body for approval, and obtain approval from the governing body within 180 days. Submit within one year of the approval of the policy, and then annually thereafter, a military equipment report which details the LEA’s military equipment inventory, usage, and costs for the prior year.”

The Assembly Bill was passed in 2021, in part because of large payouts due to the misuse of military equipment against civilians, which the audit highlights with three grim examples.

  • $3.75 million: Awarded by a jury to a young man who was shot twice by military projectiles during a protest
  • $1.5 million: City settlement with a man who suffered testicular trauma when LAPD shot him in the groin with a 40-millimeter launcher reportedly causing one of his testicles to explode and require immediate surgery
  • $1.25 million: City settlement with a Marine Corps service member who suffered a traumatic brain injury and brain bleeding when LAPD shot him in the head with a beanbag shotgun during a protest.

As we previously reported in our article, “How Safe is the “Less Lethal” Ammunition Touted by the LA Port Police and Beyond?”, these less-than-lethal weapons are deeply dangerous and damaging to the point where Amnesty International investigated them in a 2023 report. In “The Global Abuse Of Kinetic Impact Projectiles” the organization highlighted the danger and impact of Kinetic Impact Projectiles during the period of the Black Lives Matter protests across America in 2021. “Physicians for Human Rights found that police forces had shot at least 115 people in the head and neck with KIPs across the country in the first two months of protests after the killing of George Floyd, at least 30 of whom had suffered permanent eye damage.”

Despite that history, the City Controller’s audit found that the LAPD failed to meet multiple action items from the assembly bill. The audit also noted the department’s failure to provide an easy way for the public to find the reporting on military weapons online, one of the key purposes of the bill. Another glaring failure the audit highlighted was the LAPD’s failure to submit annual military equipment reports for each type of military equipment approved within a year of approval.

While the audit found that the LAPD at least partially met most goals, the big takeaway was the need for more transparency. The audit found that the LAPD failed to correctly list the amounts of military weapons they had and used vague language to avoid reporting how much military weaponry they wanted funding for.

The audit also compared LAPD’s implementation of certain transparency requirements with other cities including San Diego, San Jose, San Francisco, Fresno, Sacramento, Long Beach and Oakland. LAPD trailed behind these other cities with 0/7 requirements met compared to 7/7 in Oakland, 5/7 in Long Beach, and another 7/7 in Sacramento.

The extensive 60-page audit is just the latest from Mejia, who since being elected in 2022 has extensively audited city spending on police helicopters, fraud, waste, abuse and more. Upcoming audits include Affordable Housing and Karen Bass’ controversial Inside Safe program.

In conclusion, the City Controller said, “AB 481 was passed to increase public awareness about the funding, acquisition, and use of military equipment by law enforcement agencies. As the LAPD develops future reports, the department must ensure that it complies with all aspects of the law, that the information in the report is reliable and provides additional levels of transparency. This, in addition to improving the methods by which the public interacts with the LAPD on military equipment issues, will help to build trust between the LAPD and members of the public, and allow for meaningful community engagement.”

In part of a response letter printed in the AB 481 audit, the LAPD said that they “in general agree with the facts listed in your audit, however, we respectfully disagree with your interpretation of the facts and whether the department met the requirements of AB 481.”

 

Mayor Secures Federal Support For Community Partners To Assist Newly Arrived L.A. Migrant Families

0

 

LOS ANGELES — The Department of Homeland Security or DHS in August announced that Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass secured federal support for the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights or CHIRLA, Clínica Romero, and the Central American Resource Center to assist immigrant families who recently arrived in Los Angeles in need of supportive services.

“The Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, Clínica Romero, and the Central American Resource Center have been on the frontlines providing assistance to new immigrant arrivals in our city,” said Mayor Karen Bass. “I want to thank Secretary Mayorkas and the Department of Homeland Security for their partnership and for providing these organizations in the L.A. region with support to provide life-saving assistance.”

Mayor Bass appealed directly to Department of Homeland Security secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, acting deputy secretary at the Department of Homeland Security Kristie Canegallo, FEMA administrator Deanne Criswell and other White House officials to secure this support for local community organizations.

Details: For more information on the Shelter and Services Program, click here.

 

Carson Opens First Tesla Supercharger Station at Carson Event Center

 

CARSON —September 10, 2024 – The City of Carson Sept. 10 announced the opening of a new Tesla Supercharger Station at the Carson Event Center.

The station includes 20 V4 superchargers and will serve both Tesla and non-Tesla Electric Vehicles or EV. The cost to charge can fluctuate based on the time of day, but it will be commensurate with the cost of other supercharger stations throughout the region.

“Carson’s supercharger station is emblematic of our City Council’s commitment to innovative technologies that address both environmental concerns while supporting our economy by attracting visitors and supporting our local businesses,” said Carson’s Mayor Lula Davis-Holmes.

The new supercharger station, located at the Carson Event Center, is positioned near one of the most heavily trafficked freeway corridors in the state, offering easy access to drivers.

Details: For more information, please contact the Innovation, Sustainability, and Performance Management Department at 310-952-1700 ext 1312.

Grand Annex Presents The David Robert Pollock Variety Hour

“Expect the Absolutely Unexpected”

Modern folk singer-songwriter David Robert Pollock (formerly known as DCR Pollock) returns to the Grand Annex Music Hall, Sept. 14, to premiere The David Robert Pollock Variety Hour, featuring guest appearances by talent from across the LA music scene.

This show brings to life his short indie film The David Robert Pollock Show: Fame Is Poison And Your Heroes Are Cowards. The film takes place on a ’70s television set, reminiscent of classic variety hours like The Dean Martin Show, but with a thrilling, dark comedy twist.

Pollock, who was raised in San Pedro, was contacted by the Grand Annex about a year ago, just as he was in the process of changing his project and his former moniker.

“I had nothing lined up and I said ‘give me a date and, leading up to the show, I’ll let you know what I’m doing.’” said Pollock.

The Grand Annex was on board with Pollock, who it’s familiar with from his past performances at the venue. As the months passed, the venue contacted Pollock about his upcoming date. He had released a filmed variety show so he asked the theater, “what if we do it live?”

“That’s how this came about,” Pollock said. “I’m just going to be hosting, playing a couple songs myself, but mostly just getting everyone a little rowdy.”

The David Robert Pollock Show: Fame Is Poison And Your Heroes Are Cowards

Pollock’s short film was written during COVID-19. The artist had signed with a label where he put out a record at the start of the pandemic. Then, they kept him in limbo. He followed with a second record but the label told him they wanted to wait for the first record to get some more traction; meanwhile, they weren’t going to release anything.

“So I was like, well, I want to occupy my time with something,” he said. “I always liked The Carol Burnett Show and The Dean Martin Show, so it’s my way of mak[ing] the worst possible version of that because I don’t have a background of that kind of stage presence or entertainment. I said, well, why hide that? Why not just lean into the fact that I suck at it.”

In one of the film’s vignettes, Pollock wears a smoking jacket as he sits in a 1970s style den, “painting.” Someone’s hand places a cigarette between his lips then lights it. After Pollock’s smooth and friendly welcome to his audience, the same hand removes both the cigarette from Pollock’s lips, then the painting, as two arms turn it toward the camera so the audience may gaze upon a likeness of … the Mario Brothers. I’ll let you discover the rest.

“I always thought it was so funny that those shows always cut away to the host doing something. [like] painting and it was clearly a painting they didn’t do,” Pollock said. “I thought, if I had the capability of painting, what would I [make]? And what would bother people the most? So we had about six different paintings that we came up with. That one had the most visceral reactions.”

The film consists of different vignettes, most of them silly and surprising. When asked if Pollock had any message to his madness he basically answered no, but continued.

“I don’t think anything exists in a vacuum,” Pollock said, “There’s always a context that goes into everyone writing something. There’s always a political climate. Everyone has a class background or a class environment they’re surrounded by, who you sympathize with, who you don’t sympathize with. I hope it’s clear who I sympathize with and who I don’t sympathize with in the show.”

Ultimately, there wasn’t supposed to be a message, other than the fact that Pollock has a visceral reaction to entertainment in general.

“Overall, I wanted [to show] how I [feel] about entertainment … in that show, which I think it’s all meaningless in a sense. But that’s only in the context of looking back on it. Most of it was just me and a couple of buddies setting up a camera. If it’s propaganda, it’s really bad propaganda.”

Since Pollock cannot do what he did in the film at his live show, it’s going to be a little more tame.

“Obviously, we’re not going to be pulling guns and blood splattering all over the space,” Pollock said. “Mostly because you can’t get it out of the carpet. It’ll be more structured just because we have to for time sake. We can’t just go into an editing room, live, and have it make sense.”

I’ll admit, the film was hard to understand but as Pollock discussed, that effort wasn’t necessary. However, I gleaned that it seemed to be talking about the state of the world. Pollock expanded on that.

“I think we’re in such a time that any attempt to make entertainment seem relatable to human beings is a failed project,’ he said. “Anytime you watch interviewees, or these talk shows, there’s something so dystopian about them. Everything’s a shitshow and it’s a bunch of schmucks trying to sell you on that slot. And [there’s] a clear disconnect going on the whole time. There’s something about that contradiction that I love. It’s like, you’re not buying it, but you’re still locked into how pathetic it is. The entire thing is just embracing how absolutely useless another variety show is.”

Pollock and team considered having a theme for this show, but because of its many moving parts, people and not much rehearsal time, the theme is, it’s a music based South Bay variety show. Most of the performers are singer/songwriters.

“We have Grace Olivia DJing,” Pollock said. “She’s a staple around San Pedro. She’s always playing at Dockside. But she makes hilarious DJ sets, there’s clips of the most dystopian Mark Zuckerberg quotes. So we’re having her jump on to really set the tone.”

Pollock said it will be a pretty absurdist night — fun, loose, a unique experience.

“The idea comes from the old snake oil salesman shows. So we’ll be honking items the whole night, trying to pawn them off to people and sell them. We’ll be selling some nonsense drinks throughout the night sponsored by some dystopian companies. It’ll be a pretty hectic night, but it’ll be fun. We’re going to do our best to contain it to the stage as much as we can, [so as] not to put anyone in harm’s way.”

Marketing and leading up to shows is stupid to Pollock. However, he said this show is special because it’s localized.

“I get it,” Pollock said. “I’m all about keeping a local community having a place to come to. I like that Grand Annex has that, but there’s something so funny about me trying to make what’s clearly an insignificant thing seem significant to people.

“Come expecting the absolutely unexpected,” he said. “As long as you don’t try to understand it, you’re going to have a good time. I’ll be the schmuck they want me to be … the late-stage capitalist host that everyone is expecting from a variety hour. I’ll make fun of it. I lean into that character and try to give discount codes for the revolution.”

Pollock has a lot of appreciation for San Pedro’s local theater.

“Grand Annex supports what I do,” he said. “Every time I go there, I’m always bringing the most nonsense, [asking] can we just like to do it this way and they’re always accommodating. I appreciate that.”

Coming up, Pollock has a record coming out next year, under David Robert Pollock.

“It’s a very country record,” he said. “I said to hell with it. I’m going to make the shit I listen to.”

David Robert Pollock and Special Guests from the LA Music Scene

Time: 7 p.m. doors open, 8 p.m. show, Sept. 14

Cost: $22.95 and up

Details: www.grandvision.org/event/the-david-robert-pollock-variety-hour

Venue: The Grand Annex Music Hall, 434 W. 6th St., San Pedro

Rep. Barragán Announces $25 Million Grant for Pacific Avenue Protected Bike Lanes Project

 

LONG BEACH — Rep. Nanette Barragán (CA-44) Sept. 10 announced the City of Long Beach has been awarded a $25 million grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation to enhance Pacific Avenue with new protected bike lanes, pedestrian crossings, and other safety improvements.

Rep. Barragán urged U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg to fund this project through the Department’s Safe Streets and Roads All or SS4A grant program earlier this year in a letter to the secretary. This program was established through the Infrastructure Law to advance community-led projects that reduce traffic collisions and improve the safety of all road users.

This federal investment will add two miles of protected bike lanes, eight pedestrian crossings, new transit stops, and other upgrades to Pacific Avenue, between Pacific Coast Highway and Wardlow Road.

Additionally, the City of Carson was awarded a $967,480 federal Infrastructure Law grant to update their comprehensive local road safety plan.

Harris vs. Trump―A Battle Between Reality and Conspiracy in a Failing Democracy

As Kamala Harris and Donald Trump squared off for their debate on Sept 10, one overriding fact was apparent: America’s democratic institutions are failing, and Donald Trump is a symptom of that failure, as well as the malevolent driver of it.

In Brazil, their ex-president, Jair Bolsonaro, has been exiled from politics for his attempted coup. He cannot run for office until 2030. That is how functioning democracies protect themselves. But ours is not a functioning democracy. It’s a malfunctioning one, teetering on the edge of collapse. And so it was up to Harris to out-perform the reality TV star. And that’s exactly what she did.

Trump’s expertise is performing onscreen, without any concern about the relationship to reality, and so he spouts increasingly deranged and dangerous conspiracy theories, which the media, up to now, has largely chosen to normalize. But Harris, the expert prosecutor, repeatedly related her performance to reality, while also warning that “in this debate tonight, you’re going to hear from the same old, tired playbook, a bunch of lies, grievances and name-calling,” which is exactly what Trump proceeded to do.

“So, I was raised as a middle-class kid,” Harris began. “And I am actually the only person on this stage who has a plan that is about lifting up the middle class and working people of America.” She went on to highlight her $6,000 child tax credit and $50,000 tax deduction for small business start-ups, in contrast to Trump’s “tax cut for billionaires and big corporations, which will result in $5 trillion to America’s deficit,” plus his “plan that I call the Trump sales tax, which would be a 20% tax on everyday goods that you rely on to get through the month.”

That was a reference to Trump’s tariff plan. Trump falsely claims that tariffs are paid by foreign countries and companies, rather than consumers who buy the goods. It’s one of several big lies that are cornerstones of his campaign, at least four of which came in for a good degree of demolition during the debate.

Above all, Trump persists in the claim of his unique ability to save America from the horribleness that would otherwise engulf it. But, Harris reminded us, this depends on massively forgetting what actually happened when he last had his chance:

“Donald Trump left us the worst unemployment since the Great Depression. Donald Trump left us the worst public health epidemic in a century. Donald Trump left us the worst attack on our democracy since the Civil War. And what we have done is clean up Donald Trump’s mess.”

This isn’t just Harris’s point of view we should note. The latest assessment of presidential greatness by political scientists placed Trump solidly dead last, while Biden was rated No. 14.

Three other big lies Trump told in the debate were that immigrants cause massive crime, that everyone wanted Roe v. Wade overturned, and that he wasn’t responsible for the January 6th attack on the Capitol.

Trump fumed about immigration repeatedly, dragging it into his answers or non-answers to multiple different questions throughout the debate. “Do you know that crime in Venezuela and crime in countries all over the world is way down? You know why?” Trump asked, rhetorically, “Because they’ve taken their criminals off the street and they’ve given them to her to put into our country…. Crime here is up and through the roof.”

In fact, Venezeula’s crime rate has been falling since 2017. Its homicide rate fell most dramatically while Trump was in office, from 89 homicides per 100,000 in 2017 to 45.6 in 2020. It dipped slightly in the next two years, before another significant drop down to 26.8. In short, it dropped more than twice as much while Trump was in office than when Biden was.

Meanwhile, here in America, crime rates are falling significantly from the Trump era. Violent crime declined 6% from 2022 to 2023, according to the FBI, while murders declined 13%. Declines continued the first three months of this year: 15% for violent crimes, and 26% for murders. Murder murder rates peaked in 2020, increasing nearly 30% in a single year when Trump was President, due to the Covid-19 pandemic. So the reality of falling crime rates is the exact opposite of the hysterical portrait Trump paints.

When ABC moderator David Muir pointed this out, Trump said the FBI “were defrauding statements. They didn’t include the worst cities.”

“Well, I think this is so rich,” Harris said, “coming from someone who has been prosecuted for national security crimes, economic crimes, election interference, has been found liable for sexual assault and his next big court appearance is in November at his own criminal sentencing.”

But Trump’s wildest immigrant crime claim was promoting the latest rightwing social media lie: “In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs. The people that came in. They’re eating the cats.” Historically, lies like this have precipitated anti-immigrant violence, even mass murders. And Muir once again stepped into fact-check. “You bring up Springfield, Ohio. And ABC News did reach out to the city manager there. He told us there have been no credible reports of specific claims of pets being harmed, injured, or abused by individuals within the immigrant community.”

Trump shot back, “Well, I’ve seen people on television,” and Muir responded, “I’m not taking this from television. I’m taking it from the city manager,” meaning what’s been documented, not just someone mouthing off for whatever reason.

While the media has grown ludicrously lax in fact-checking Trump since he left office, a surge of recent criticism seems to have had some effect here, which was all to the good.

But Trump’s big lie about overturning Roe v. Wade was something else. It was wildly unpopular—polls showed 60 to 70% of people opposed — but Trump claimed the exact opposite, “What I did is something for 52 years they’ve been trying to get Roe v. Wade into the states,” he said. “Every legal scholar, every Democrat, every Republican, liberal, conservative, they all wanted this issue to be brought back to the states where the people could vote. And that’s what happened.”

“Well, as I said, you’re going to hear a bunch of lies,” Harris responded. “And that’s not actually a surprising fact. Let’s understand how we got here. Donald Trump hand-selected three members of the United States Supreme Court with the intention that they would undo the protections of Roe v. Wade. And they did exactly as he intended. And now in over 20 states, there are Trump abortion bans which make it criminal for a doctor or nurse to provide health care. In one state it provides prison for life. Trump’s abortion bans make no exception even for rape and incest, which I understand what that means. A survivor of a crime, a violation of their body, does not have the right to make a decision about what happens to their body next. That is immoral.”

Finally, when the moderators asked about January 6th and his threat to the peaceful transfer of power, Trump pretended to have no responsibility, because of one phrase he chose to highlight: “Peacefully and patriotically, I said during my speech. Not later on. Peacefully and patriotically,” glossing over the main thrust of his speech, urging his followers to “fight like hell, or you’re not going to have a country anymore.”

He then quickly changed the subject back to immigration again—“What about all the people that are pouring into our country and killing people?”—using one big lie to cover up another. He then added further lies, blaming Nancy Pelosi for the lack of troops protecting Congress. “I wasn’t responsible for security,” he lied. “Nancy Pelosi was responsible. She didn’t do her job.”

When Harris finally got a chance to respond, she was crystal clear— both on what happened then and what it means now and for our future:

I was at the Capitol on January 6th. I was the Vice President-Elect. I was also an acting senator. I was there. And on that day, the president of the United States incited a violent mob to attack our nation’s Capitol, to desecrate our nation’s Capitol. On that day, 140 law enforcement officers were injured. And some died. And understand, the former president has been indicted and impeached for exactly that reason. But this is not an isolated situation. Let’s remember Charlottesville, where there was a mob of people carrying tiki torches, spewing antisemitic hate, and what did the president then at the time say? There were fine people on each side. Let’s remember that when it came to the Proud Boys, a militia, the president said, the former president said, “Stand back and stand by.” So for everyone watching who remembers what January 6th was, I say we don’t have to go back. Let’s not go back. We’re not going back. It’s time to turn the page. And if that was a bridge too far for you, well, there is a place in our campaign for you. To stand for the country. To stand for our democracy. To stand for the rule of law. And to end the chaos. And to end the approach that is about attacking the foundations of our democracy ’cause you don’t like the outcome. And be clear on that point. Donald Trump the candidate has said in this election there will be a bloodbath if this — and the outcome of this election is not to his liking. Let’s turn the page on this. Let’s not go back. Let’s chart a course for the future and not go backward to the past.

That, in its essence, is what this election is all about. Not about this or that policy, but about whether we’ll continue to be a democracy so that we can debate policies in the future. That’s not something Harris can do by herself, not even by winning the election. But she did make the choice of direction crystal clear. It’s now up to all of us to follow it.

60 Years After Lyndon Johnson’s “Daisy Ad,” the Silence on Nuclear War Is Dangerous

 

One evening in early September 1964, a frightening commercial jolted 50 million Americans who were part way through watching “Monday Night at the Movies” on NBC. The ad began with an adorable three-year-old girl counting petals as she pulled them from a daisy. Then came a man’s somber voiceover, counting down from ten to zero. Then an ominous roar and a mushroom cloud from a nuclear bomb explosion.

The one-minute TV spot reached its climax with audio from President Lyndon Johnson, concluding that “we must love each other, or we must die.” The ad did not mention his opponent in the upcoming election, Sen. Barry Goldwater, but it didn’t need to. By then, his cavalier attitude toward nuclear weapons was well established.

Goldwater’s bestseller The Conscience of a Conservative, published at the start of the decade, was unnervingly open to the idea of launching a nuclear war, while the book exuded disdain for leaders who “would rather crawl on knees to Moscow than die under an Atom bomb.” Closing in on the Republican nomination for president, the Arizona senator suggested that “low-yield” nuclear bombs could be useful to defoliate forests in Vietnam.

His own words gave plenty of fodder to others seeking the GOP nomination. Pennsylvania Gov. William Scranton called Goldwater “a trigger-happy dreamer” and said that he “too often casually prescribed nuclear war as a solution to a troubled world.” New York Gov. Nelson Rockefeller unloaded with a rhetorical question: “How can there be sanity when he wants to give area commanders the authority to make decisions on the use of nuclear weapons?”

So, the stage was set for the “daisy ad,” which packed an emotional wallop — and provoked a fierce backlash. Critics cried foul, deploring an attempt to use the specter of nuclear annihilation for political gain. Having accomplished the goal of putting the Goldwater camp on the defensive, the commercial never aired again as a paid ad. But national newscasts showed it while reporting on the controversy.

Today, a campaign ad akin to the daisy spot is hard to imagine from the Democratic or Republican nominee to be commander in chief, who seem content to bypass the subject of nuclear-war dangers. Yet those dangers are actually much higher now than they were 60 years ago. In 1964, the Doomsday Clock maintained by experts at the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists was set at 12 minutes to apocalyptic midnight. The ominous hands are now just 90 seconds away.

Yet, in their convention speeches this summer, both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris were silent on the need to engage in genuine diplomacy for nuclear arms control, let alone take steps toward disarmament.

Trump offered standard warnings about Russian and Chinese arsenals and Iran’s nuclear program, and boasted of his rapport with North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un. Left unmentioned was Trump’s presidential statement in 2017 that if North Korea made “any more threats to the United States,” that country “will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen.” Nor did he refer to his highly irresponsible tweet that Kim should be informed “I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works!”

When Harris delivered her acceptance speech, it did not include the words “atomic” or “nuclear” at all.

Now in high gear, the 2024 presidential campaign is completely lacking in the kind of wisdom about nuclear weapons and relations between the nuclear superpowers that Lyndon Johnson and, eventually, Ronald Reagan attained during their presidencies.

Johnson privately acknowledged that the daisy commercial scared voters about Goldwater, which “we goddamned set out to do.” But the president was engaged in more than an electoral tactic. At the same time that he methodically deceived the American people while escalating the horrific war on Vietnam, Johnson pursued efforts to defuse the nuclear time bomb.

“We have made further progress in an effort to improve our understanding of each other’s thinking on a number of questions,” Johnson said at the conclusion of his extensive summit meeting with Soviet Premier Alexei Kosygin in Glassboro, New Jersey, on June 25, 1967. But fifty-seven years later, there is scant evidence that the current or next president of the United States is genuinely interested in improving such understanding between leaders of the biggest nuclear states.

Two decades after the summit that defrosted the cold war and gave rise to what was dubbed “the spirit of Glassboro,” President Reagan stood next to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev and said: “We decided to talk to each other instead of about each other.” But such an attitude would be heresy in the 2024 presidential campaign.

“These are the stakes,” Johnson said in the daisy ad as a mushroom cloud rose on screen, “to make a world in which all God’s children can live, or to go into the dark.”

Those are still the stakes. But you wouldn’t know it now from either of the candidates vying to be the next president of the United States.

______________________

Norman Solomon is the national director of RootsAction.org and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. His latest book, War Made Invisible: How America Hides the Human Toll of Its Military Machine, was published in paperback this month with a new afterword about the Gaza war.

Undebatable: What Harris and Trump Could Not Say About Israel and Gaza

 

Kamala Harris won the debate. People being bombed in Gaza did not.

The banner headline across the top of the New York Times home page — “Harris Puts Trump on Defensive in Fierce Debate” — was accurate enough. But despite the good news for people understandably eager for Trump to be defeated, the Harris debate performance was a moral and political tragedy.

In Gaza “now an estimated 40,000 Palestinians are dead,” an ABC News moderator said. “Nearly 100 hostages remain. . . . President Biden has not been able to break through the stalemate. How would you do it?”

Vice President Harris replied with her standard wording: “Israel has a right to defend itself. We would. And how it does so matters. Because it is also true far too many innocent Palestinians have been killed. Children, mothers. What we know is that this war must end. It must when, end immediately, and the way it will end is we need a ceasefire deal and we need the hostages out.”

“End immediately”? Anyone who isn’t in fantasyland knows that the only way to soon end the slaughter of Palestinian civilians would be for the U.S. government — the overwhelmingly biggest supplier of Israel’s armaments — to stop sending weapons to Israel.

Meanwhile, a pivot to advocating for a cutoff of weapons to Israel would help Harris win the presidency. After the debate, the Institute for Middle East Understanding pointed out that the need to halt the weapons is not only moral and legal — it’s also smart politics. Polls are clear that most Americans want to stop arming Israel. In swing states, polling has found that a large number of voters say they’d be more likely to cast a ballot for Harris if she would support a halt.

What Kamala Harris and Donald Trump said about Israel and Gaza in their debate was predictable. Even more certain was what they absolutely would not say — with silences speaking loudest of all. “Great is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth,” Aldous Huxley wrote, describing “the greatest triumphs of propaganda.”

By coincidence, the debate happened on the same date as publication of a new afterword about the Gaza war in the paperback edition of my book War Made Invisible. To fill in for the debate’s abysmal silences, here are a few quotes from the afterword about the ongoing carnage:

  • “After the atrocities that Hamas committed on Oct. 7, the U.S. government quickly stepped up military aid to Israel as it implemented atrocities on a much larger scale. In truth, as time went on, the entire Israeli war in Gaza amounted to one gigantic atrocity with uncountable aspects.”
  • As with the steady massacres with bombs and bullets in Gaza since early October, “the Israeli-U.S. alliance treated the increasing onset of starvation, dehydration, and fatal disease as a public-relations problem.”
  • “In the war zone, eyewitness reporting and photojournalism were severely hindered if not thwarted by the Israeli military, which has a long record of killing journalists.”
  • “Although the credibility of Israel’s government tumbled as the Gaza war dragged on, the brawny arms of the Israel lobby — and the overall atmospheric pressure of media and politics — pushed legislators to approve new military aid. . . . Official pronouncements — and the policies they tried to justify — were deeply anchored in the unspoken premise that some lives really matter and some really don’t.”
  • The United States persisted in “violating not only the U.S. Conventional Arms Transfer Policy but also numerous other legal requirements including the Foreign Assistance Act, the Arms Export Control Act, the U.S. War Crimes Act, the Leahy Law, the Genocide Convention Implementation Act, and several treaties. For U.S. power politics, the inconvenient precepts in those measures were as insignificant and invisible as the Palestinian people being slaughtered.”
  • “What was sinister about proclaiming ‘Israel’s 9/11’ was what happened after America’s 9/11. Wearing the cloak of victim, the United States proceeded to use the horrible tragedy that occurred inside its borders as an open-ended reason to kill in the name of retaliation, self- protection, and, of course, the ‘war on terror.’ It was a playbook that the Israeli government adapted and implemented with vengeance.”
  • Israel’s war on 2.2 million people in Gaza has been “a supercharged escalation of what Israel had been doing for 75 years, treating human beings as suitable for removal and even destruction.” As Israel’s war on Gaza has persisted, “the explanations often echoed the post-9/11 rationales for the ‘war on terror’ from the U.S. government: authorizing future crimes against humanity as necessary in the light of certain prior events.”

That and so much more — left unsaid from the debate stage, dodged in U.S. mass media and evaded from the podiums of power in Washington — indict not only the Israeli government but also the U.S. government as an accomplice to mass murder that has escalated into genocide.

Silence is a blanket that smothers genuine democratic discourse and the outcries of moral voices. Making those voices inaudible is a key goal for the functioning of the warfare state.

______________________

Norman Solomon is the national director of RootsAction.org and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. His latest book, War Made Invisible: How America Hides the Human Toll of Its Military Machine, was published in paperback this month with a new afterword about the Gaza war.

Supervisors Unanimously Support EPA Proposal to Add Exide Site to Federal Superfund Site

 

LOS ANGELES — The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Sept. 10 approved a motion by Supervisors Hilda L. Solis and Janice Hahn to express its support for a proposal by the United States Environmental Protection Agency or EPA to add the former Exide battery recycling plant and surrounding communities into the national priorities list as a Superfund site in Spring of 2025. The former battery recycling plant contaminated soil in homes across Southeast Los Angeles, East Los Angeles, and Boyle Heights over a period of decades. Many continue to deal with lead contamination and inadequate cleanup.

Hahn, who represents the communities of Southeast Los Angeles impacted by the contamination, released the following statement:

“The families impacted by the Exide disaster have faced one indignity after another. Home should be our safest place, but instead their homes were marred by toxic contamination. And to add insult to injury, there are serious concerns about the pace, efficacy and scale of the state’s cleanup efforts.

“Securing the Superfund designation will mean that the federal government grasps what we’ve already known: that this problem is urgent and that these communities deserve better. It is not just about cleaning up contamination; it’s about restoring dignity for these communities.”

With the unanimous support of the Supervisors, the Board will send a letter to the EPA reaffirming the county’s support for this important step in finishing the cleanup with the breadth of resources available for Superfund sites. The Exide site proposal is currently in the standard 60-day public comment period required of all proposed additions to the National Priorities List. The EPA must respond to any comments received before the site can be added.