Friday, October 3, 2025
spot_img
spot_img
Home Blog Page 848

Battling Inequity in the Wake of MLK

Martin Luther King, Jr., who was murdered when I was a week old, was my first hero. The simple righteousness of his struggle was apparent even to a child who still counted his age in single digits, at least if that child was not misprogrammed by bigotry. You can’t justly treat someone as lesser, I reasoned, just because she was born with darker skin.

What I was too young to understand—at least in the way King was presented to me at the time—was that King’s righteous fight went far deeper than matters of the skin.

It is a stroke of chronological good fortune that Martin Luther King, Jr. Day does not fall within Black History Month, because King’s cause, while reified as the call for Black equality, had far broader horizons. As a Black American living in the South during the height and heat of Jim Crow, it was natural for King to focus his fight against equality on the battle that hit him where he lived. But King did not advocate merely for Black equality: he preached against inequity, period, wherever it be found, in whatever guise.

That is why, despite the immense progress made regarding people with King’s pigmentation being treated the same as people with mine, King would be little more satisfied with society today, finding almost as much inequity 45 years after his death as he found during his too brief life.

Perhaps the most glaring inequity in early-21st-century American society is found in the plight of the poor. Not that this is something new. So obvious was this particular inequity that in the last years of his life King channeled some of his energy in this direction, hitting the issue head-on in his final book, 1967’s Where Do We Go From Here: Chaos or Community?

No doubt, then, that King would be distressed to find that, in the war against inequity, we are losing the battle against poverty, with the gap between the wealthy and the poor wider than ever.

Unlike issues related to skin color, when it comes to economics, in a free society—where inevitably you get some sort of free market—true equality is not the goal. True economic equality may not even be possible in any society larger and more complex than a kibbutz. But there is a world of difference between absolute economic parity and the existence of predatory corporations that break the law, swindle the general public, and get government assistance and tax loopholes to help them do it—with their CEOs pulling down eight-digit salaries in the process—while millions of Americans cannot properly feed and shelter themselves.

King would be horrified at this inequity, but not all that surprised. Words he wrote in 1967 demonstrate his plain understanding that the seeds for today’s bumper crop of economic inequity had already been sown and were bearing poisonous fruit:

The contemporary tendency in our society is to base our distribution on scarcity, which has vanished, and to compress our abundance into the overfed mouths of the middle and upper classes until they gag with superfluity. If democracy is to have breadth of meaning, it is necessary to adjust this inequity.

There are, of course, additional societal inequities, including the treatment of the millions of “undocumented” Mexican immigrants living among us. No doubt King would have fought for the eradication of inequity on this front, viewing its redress as no less an American responsibility for the fact that those directly subject to this particular inequity are not technically citizens of the United States.

The reason citizenship would have made no difference to King can be extrapolated from his religious faith. Like most Americans, King was a theist, and the Supreme Being of King’s conception no more observed the human-made distinctions between “Mexican citizen” and “American citizen” than He did between “Black person” and “White person.” All are God’s creatures, perhaps distinguished by the content their character, but certainly not by the color of their skin or on which side of a line they were born.

Nor, I am sure, by what particular secondary sexual characteristics individuals develop or what they do with them with other consenting adults. Apropos of this last category is an exchange I witnessed in 1991 during a protest rally against then-Governor Pete Wilson for his veto of AB101, a proposed California law that would have prevented institutional workplace discrimination against homosexuals. As I stood on the sidewalk, too timid to join the protest I so completely supported, I looked on as a group of Black men right in front of me jeered at the marchers. One of the marchers approached, trying to reason with the group. “We are the same,” the man said. “Our struggle is the same as yours was. Martin Luther King preached equality for all.” Over two decades later, I can recall not just the words but also the disdainful tone and intonation of the reply: “Martin Luther King didn’t use no K-Y Jelly.”

The Reverend King’s Bible read just like everyone else’s, condemning “a man [who] lies with a man as one lies with a woman” to death (Leviticus 20:13). But that same Bible clearly endorses slavery (see, for example, Leviticus 25:44), which is about as clear an inequity as can be had. Obviously King rejected such inequity, no doubt understanding the Bible as, however divinely inspired, the product of a particular time and place which, like all times and place, accommodated ignorance and inequities that were to be transcended by ever more enlightened thinking.

King’s chief contribution to enlightenment was his powerful testimony about and against inequity. Although the battleground against inequity may have shifted, the wider war continues to rage. And King’s crusade for the extirpation of inequity was, is, and always will be righteous, even holy. Inequity should be fought wherever where it is found, and this fight should not relent until all trace of such evil is wiped from the Earth.

Three years after King’s death, philosopher John Rawls published A Theory of Justice, wherein he developed the idea that the best vantage point from which we could design an equitable society would be a place where none of us who would go on to inhabit that society would have foreknowledge of the social position each of us would occupy. ” Among the essential features of this situation,” Rawls writes,

is that no one knows his place in society, his class position or social status, nor does anyone know his fortune in the distribution of natural assets and abilities, his intelligence, strength, and the like. I shall even assume that the parties do not know their conceptions of the good or their special psychological propensities. The principles of justice are chosen behind a veil of ignorance. This ensures that no one is advantaged or disadvantaged in the choice of principles by the outcome of natural chance or the contingency of social circumstances. Since all are similarly situated and no one is able to design principles to favor his particular condition, the principles of justice are the result of a fair agreement or bargain. For given the circumstances of the original position, the symmetry of everyone’s relation to each other, this initial situation is fair between individuals as moral persons, that is, as rational beings with their own ends and capable, I shall assume, of a sense of justice.

Clearly this is a thought experiment, as society is a process that each of us enters in medias res. But it is a thought experiment of which King would have wholly approved, distilling as it does an ingredient central to the realization of societal equity. And no doubt King would have encountered the phrase “the symmetry of everyone’s relation to each other” as a concise formulation of his own belief in each person’s inherent value, an inherency distributed equally to all persons, a divine apportionment that must be honored by a society that is fair and just.

Yesterday New York Governor Andrew Cuomo wrote that King “believed in the inherent and fundamental equality of all people—that every man, woman and child should be treated fairly no matter the color of their skin.” Certainly Gov. Cuomo is correct, but he would have done better to place the period after “fairly” instead of unnecessarily narrowing the scope of King’s mission. We all know King championed the cause of Black Americans; what many overlook is that this was merely the battle against inequity closest to home, a fight that was literally brought to him.

Martin Luther King, Jr. was a great warrior, and that which he dreamed of having fall under his sword ranged far beyond matters related to skin color. Inequity was his nemesis, in all its myriad forms. Let that fight be his legacy, and let us carry it forward. The King is dead. Love live the King.

(Photo of sculptor Lei Yixin’s Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial in Washington DC taken by the Nat’l Park Service)

Whether or Not Michael’s Pizzeria Is Best in U.S., Story Shows Media Outlets Not Checking Sources

While trying to think of a Christmas gift for my dad, I recalled hearing that Michael’s Pizzeria, located not far from my downtown Long Beach home, had been named the nation’s #1 pizzeria by Zagat Survey. Bingo! Downright pleased with myself, I hopped online to print out a confirmation of the #1 ranking that I could craft into a little DIY gift certificate for Dad—”This piece of paper entitles you to the best pizza in the country + beer” or something like that.

But I ran into a snag. While I had no trouble finding a host of articles seemingly confirming the Zagat ranking, I couldn’t find confirmation from Zagat itself. Moreover, since Michael’s Pizzeria was listed as scoring a 27 (out of 30) for food and two other pizzerias scored a 28, I was nonplussed. But with a modicum of research, I stumbled into a simple cautionary tale of how sometimes the news you read is generated from unverified press release.

The press release emanated from Michael’s itself. “Zagat Names Michael’s Pizzeria Best Pizzeria in U.S. and Los Angeles,” the headline proclaimed. The problem was, Zagat had done no such thing—though the confusion on Michael’s part may have been understandable.

“The list [of the best pizzerias in the country] was originally sorted alphabetically by state (where Michael’s was first on the list),” says Susan Cadrecha, a communications senior associate for Zagat. “This caused some initial confusion over a #1 ranking (which was not correct). We’ve since adjusted the list for it to be in alphabetical order according to property name.”

Any media outlet seeking to confirm Michael’s claim with Zagat would have received immediate clarification. That’s exactly what the Orange County Register did. “It’s not entirely clear where the bit of hyperbole came from,” staff writer Greg Mellen wrote as the questionable stories were popping up, quoting Zagat spokesperson as saying that, while “Michael’s is listed among the top pizza restaurants in America,” Zagat did not declare any pizzeria as the nation’s best.

Nonetheless, a plethora of local media outlets—including the Long Beach Post and LAist, as well as TV stations like KTLA 5, KCBS 2, and KABC 7—reported that Zagat had named Michael’s Pizzeria the country’s top pizzeria. Which means that none of them actually confirmed the supposed ranking with Zagat.

Why not? None of the abovementioned organizations provided Random Lengths News with an answer to that question, although three of did offer insight into what transpired:

• A spokesperson for LAist evinced surprise at hearing the claim was inaccurate and admitted that it “[l]ooks like we got that info from a local Patch site,” presumably a reference to Belmont Shore Patch, which published the press release in full (properly attributing it as such).
• A spokesperson for the Long Beach Post confirmed that the source of the story was the Michael’s press release and says Michael’s subsequently “apologized to various publications […] for the misunderstanding.” However, Michael’s categorically denies sending any such apology. “That’s not true at all,” says Carl Dene, a principal with the Michaels Restaurant Group. “[…] That is absolutely untrue. We never sent anything like that.” (The Post did not respond to RLn‘s follow-up query on this claim.)
• A spokesperson for KCBS says its story was based on Michael’s claim “that its Naples Island location was ranked best pizza joint in the U.S. in 2013” and provided a link to Zagat listing Michael’s as “one of several pizzerias on Zagat’s top-rated list.”

The confusion that started the chain can be traced to July 2013, when the Michaels Restaurant Group was informed that Zagat had awarded their Naples Island pizzeria a 28 for food, appearing to be the only pizzeria in the country to achieve such a score. However, although Zagat provided Michael’s with a plaque reflecting the 28, by late September—i.e., the time of the questionable news stories—the Zagat Website listed the pizzeria as scoring a 27.

That 27 remains in place today, with Antico Pizza Napoletana in Atlanta and Lovely Fifty Fifty in Portland, OR, scoring a 28. But that doesn’t mean Zagat is saying Michael’s isn’t the best pizzeria in the country. As writer Lesley Balla noted in an October Zagat article entitled “Michael’s Challenge All U.S. Pizza Makers to Cook-Off,” Zagat’s list of “the #1 pizzerias in 15 different cities […] doesn’t anoint any particular pizzeria as the front-runner.”

While Carl Dene concedes that there was a good deal of confusion regarding whether Michael’s was at one time ranked—even if not officially named—as the #1 pizza in the country, the organization is both proud of the high regard Zagat has for Michael’s Pizzeria and willing to take on all comers.

“Last fall, we were thrilled and honored that our original 2nd Street location received the highest rating for food of any pizzeria in the country by Zagat,” says founder Michael Dene in a statement provided to Random Lengths News. “Michael’s Pizzeria received a 28 for food, unheard-of for a pizzeria, which carried the distinction of being the highest in the country. The information that was provided to the media at the time was based on numerous conversations that we had with the team at Zagat and with their knowledge. Zagat.com listed Michael’s Pizzeria first in its list of ‘Top Pizza Joints’ in the country, and only after other pizzerias complained did they change the order to alphabetical. We still stand by our 2013 rating and challenge any pizzeria across the country to make a better pizza than here at Michael’s.”

Renovated Apartment Building Offers Low-Income Housing

0

 

LONG BEACH — On Jan. 16, Long Beach celebrated the grand re-opening of Belwood Arms, a two-story 34-unit complex that will provide affordable, quality housing for residents with low- and very- low incomes.

Together with The Long Beach Community Investment Company, formerly known as The Long Beach Housing Development Company, Hunt Capital Partners, LLC, Ashwood Townhomes, Inc. and Davila Properties LLC, the city is opened the doors to this improved housing development.

The building is located at 6301 Atlantic Ave., near Houghton Park and Jordan High School.

The restoration features an environmentally green building with freshly planted trees along the parkway of Atlantic Avenue; new architectural treatments and drought-resistant landscaping, new roofing and flooring, high-efficiency electrical and plumbing systems; and, renovated apartment interiors including updated appliances, finishes and lighting. Residents will have access to after-school programs, adult education services, job training and health programs at little or no cost.

Belwood Arms will help maintain rents affordable to households earning between 50 to 60 percent of area median income for a period of 55 years. The apartment complex includes 12 one-bedroom units with rents near $635 and 22 two-bedroom units with rents priced under $777.

The $9 million project was financed through a combination of Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credit equity provided by Hunt Capital Partners, LLC, federal tax-exempt bonds issued by California Communities and loans from California Bank & Trust and The Long Beach Housing Development Co./City of Long Beach.

Hollywood Shorts

0

By John Farrell, Curtain Call Writer

Hollywood Shorts is an evening of brief, energetic comic delights, put together by 19 actors and eight playwrights for eight short plays.

These 29 people have won Emmy and Golden Globe awards and have been nominated for Oscars. The level of talent and imagination is on display two more Wednesday nights at the Whitefire Theatre in Sherman Oaks. If you want to hang out with plenty of Hollywood’s professionals, you’ve just got to head up to there for an evening you’ll remember. While you are there have a great dinner on Ventura Boulevard.

All 8 of the short plays (never more than 10 minutes in length) are unashamedly comic. Maybe it’s because all the playwrights were in a funny mood. Or, more likely, it’s because these plays are ones that could be quickly adapted to television — if there still were variety programs out there. (None of them would do as a reality TV episode.)

The first play is simple and funny. In Let’s Get Merged, Wayne Robbins explores (just a little) the experience of a couple who want to get their checking accounts merged before marriage. They find it hard indeed to do. Bryan Rasmussen is the less-than-understanding Russian banker who meets with Will (Gregory James) and Alice (Camille Thornton-Alson) and makes a lot of waves.

LA Public Safety Summit

0

Youth, families, public safety leaders, neighborhood watch block captains and engaged neighbors will converge at the Coastal San Pedro Neighborhood Council’s Interactive LA Public Safety Summit, starting at 12:30 p.m., at the Elks Lodge San Pedro.

Topics include prevention, education, identification and transportation.

Venue: Elks Lodge San Pedro
Location: 1748 Cumbre Drive, San Pedro

Pick of the Vine

0

By John Farrell, Curtain Call Writer

Little Fish Theatre continues a long (and a little heroic) tradition withPick of the Vine: Season 12,their annual selection of the best of the hundreds of plays that are submitted to them every year.

This year more than 600 plays were considered and winnowed down to eight.

The heroism is in the selecting process: all the plays are read by several members of the company and the best are given a cold reading before the eight finalists are selected. Think about how much work that takes, multiply it by a dozen, and if that isn’t heroic it is at least exhausting.

This year, the eight plays, directed variously by James Rice, Perry Shields and Danielle Ozymandias, are all comic — even when they deal with a serious subject.

McDonnell Announces Run for LA County Sheriff

0

 

LONG BEACH — Long Beach Police Department Chief Jim McDonnell announced, Jan. 13, his intention to run for the Los Angeles County Sheriff in the June 3, 2014.

News that Sheriff Lee Baca was leaving his post made news this past week.

McDonnell has headed the LBPD since 2010. He also served as the second in command in the Los Angeles Police Department, where he served for 29 years with different ranks.

McDonnell also has served on the Citizens’ Commission on Jail Violence, an independent blue ribbon panel.

Billboards Call for Higher Minimum Wages, Expose Poverty in LA

0

LOS ANGELES — The Los Angeles County Federation of Labor AFL-CIO unveiled a billboard publicizing poverty wages in Los Angeles, Jan. 14, near the intersection of Wilshire and Hoover.

Labor activists hope are promoting the campaign in hopes of bringing higher wages to Los Angeles.

“The stunning number of working poor, uncovered by the study, seems more applicable to Calcutta than Los Angeles,” said Maria Elena Durazo, the leader of Los Angeles County Federation of Labor AFL-CIO.

The billboards — several are placed throughout the city — follow an Economic Roundtable study that the federation released, showing low wages in the city. The study shows that about 810,864 Angelinos live with “poverty” wages of less than $15 an hour.

“Some may not like the fact that we are using billboards to release the findings of this study in the way that we are but any discomfort it may cause pales in comparison to the discomfort of raising a family in Los Angeles on $9 an hour,” Durazo said.

“Los Angeles, City Limited, Poverty Wage Pop. 810,864” are among seven signs near downtown Los Angeles, on the west side of the city and near the Los Angeles International Airport.

City of Long Beach’s “Year in Review” Admits Only the Good

As it does every year, the City of Long Beach has published a “Year in Review.” This year the 16 full-color pages—available both online and in print—document a long list of City accomplishments, ranging from recognitions received (we’re one of the country’s top 10 “Digital Cities” for the third year in a row) to how many citations were issued for illegal garage conversions (42) to the exact number of trees that trimmed (29,276). Also mentioned are more significant happenings, such as the City’s pension-reform agreements with all nine local employee associations.

Based on this “review” you might think there were no setbacks in 2013, nothing to report but good news. There’s no mention of the uptick in homicides or the spike in officer-involved shootings, no mention of the City’s continued inability to activate years-vacant spaces like the Edison Theatre and the former Acres of Books building, no reference to the 600+ marijuana-related arrests or the loss of a dozen woodland acres to a developer.

If it is worthwhile to inform residents of what transpired in their city during the year that was, isn’t a relatively complete picture better than an intentionally one-sided portrayal? Wouldn’t it benefit residents to know that the Environmental Protection Agency once again ranked Long Beach as having some of the worst air pollution in the state, and that just three months ago Heal the Bay noted that Long Beach had more failing grades for water quality than any other city in Los Angeles and Orange Counties? Isn’t that information at least as valuable to pass along as the fact that there were 363,625 searches for library books made using the “Go LBPL” mobile app?

For whatever reason, as with prior years, in reviewing 2013 the City opted for a vanity project, a self-congratulatory combination of minutia and a view of Long Beach through rose-colored lenses. Does such a choice signal a certain Pollyannaism, an inability or unwillingness to be self-critical? There is, after all, obvious pragmatic value in being able to take a hard look at oneself. How else do we seriously confront our own shortcomings? How else do we redress our past failures and find ways forward that are better than the well-worn paths we have trod?

Long Beach’s leaders might consider whether residents would be made to feel more confident about the city’s future by receiving a strong indication that city staff are willing and able not only to praise what happens within city limits, but also to identify the work that still needs to be done, the problems that exist in Long Beach, the areas in which 2014 can be better than the 12 months that came before.

This is not an indictment of the job our government did in 2013. The simple fact is, when considering something as complex as running a city over the course of a year, there will always be failures, and there will always be ways to do better next year.

No doubt every city official in Long Beach would admit as much; we just can’t tell from their “Year in Review.” And so here’s an easy improvement for next year: have “2014: The Year in Review” provide a more complete, more intellectually honest snapshot of what happens during the next 12 months. After all, aren’t we more likely to fix the things that we’re willing to admit are broken or at least can be improved?

Local Artist Succumbs to Cancer

0

By Andrea Serna, Contributing Writer

The San Pedro arts community recently lost a strong advocate.

Debbie Marr, an award winning artist and owner of the Lazy Dog Gallery at 361 W. 7th St. in San Pedro, died on Jan. 3, 2014 at the Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center.

An accomplished painter, Marr was recently included in a national photo realism exhibition in Tempe, Arizona.

She studied art at El Camino College and later graduated from the University of California Los Angeles with a degree in computer animation and illustration. She worked as a graphic artist and also as an interior designer before launching her San Pedro studio. Her varied interests included astrology and in 2013, she organized a lecture by astrologer Steve Judd at MaGriffe Gallery.

Although she was a resident of Inglewood, her primary passion was the art community in San Pedro. Many of her paintings focused on the rich history of her adopted home, which she wished to preserve. She published an art book titled, San Pedro: Faces and Places. The volume is a compilation of work by five local artists portraying local landmarks and residents.