Monday, September 29, 2025
spot_img
spot_img
Home Blog Page 138

Mayor Secures $500 Million EPA Grant to Reduce Goods Movement Pollution in L.A

LOS ANGELES – The Office of Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass worked to help secure $500 million in grant funding from the Environmental Protection Agency or EPA to reduce pollution related to goods movement, which was announced the week of July 22. The mayor’s office contributed to the successful grant application as a member of the climate pollution reduction grant program regional steering committee. Los Angeles received the largest award out of more than 25 grant recipients.

Administered by the Southern California Air Quality Management District, the half-billion dollars in funding will go toward:

Installing over 1,000 medium and heavy-duty vehicle chargers and deploying 800 medium- and heavy-duty electric vehicles and 18 electric locomotives.

Establishing a partnership with IBEW local 11 to support workforce training

Reducing air pollutants from diesel emissions in low-income and disadvantaged communities.

Creating hundreds of new high-quality jobs

Educating communities about electric vehicles to accelerate their deployment.

Building resilience in goods movement and supply chain by modernizing vehicles and developing a skilled workforce to be better prepared for the future

The Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach also pledged $5 million from the clean truck fund rate to support charging infrastructure projects funded with this new grant money. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been secured by collaborating with the state and federal governments, including more than $77 million recently awarded to electrify Metro’s bus fleet.

Earlier this year, EPA Administrator Michael Regan visited the Port of L.A. to highlight sustainability progress and upcoming federal investments in zero-emission port equipment and infrastructure, air quality planning projects and enhanced efforts to protect the health of communities near U.S ports. During her 2024 State of the City address, Mayor Bass announced the creation of a new climate cabinet to bring forward accountability for city departments in order to reach Los Angeles’ climate goals, including reaching 100% clean energy by 2035.

Details: See Mayor Bass’ investments on climate.

Bipartisan Senators Pass Children’s Mental Health Resolution; County Revamps 24/7 Helpline for Mental Health and Substance Use Services

Padilla, Tillis Pass Bipartisan Resolution to Combat the National Crisis in Children’s Mental Health

WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Senators Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), co-founders of the bipartisan Senate Mental Health Caucus, July 26 passed a Senate resolution to raise the alarm about the mental health care crisis American children face and highlight the urgent need to increase our investment in mental health care for children and adolescents.

During the past few decades, mental health disorders have steadily risen among children and adolescents, with nearly half of adolescents in the United States facing a mental health disorder at some point in their lives. Youth mental health has become a major public health concern: suicide is the second leading cause of death among 10- to 14-year-olds in the United States. Many children and adolescents in rural or underserved areas lack appropriate mental health care infrastructure to meet their needs.

“As the father of three school-aged boys, I’ve witnessed firsthand the struggles that young Americans experience every day,” said Senator Padilla. “Our country is facing a children’s mental health crisis, and I’m proud to see the Senate come together unanimously to say we need to step up and speak up to find bipartisan solutions to address it head on. Our resolution recognizes the urgent need to provide America’s youth with accessible, humane mental health care — because no one should be forced to suffer in silence.”

Specifically, the resolution expresses the need for the federal government to work collaboratively to increase awareness of mental health disorders for children and adolescents and promote evidence-based prevention and treatment strategies. The resolution also highlights the need to empower rural and underserved communities with adequate mental health resources for young people. The Senators encouraged states to adopt community-based mental health care, reaffirming their commitment to destigmatizing mental health challenges.

Details: Full text of the resolution is available here.

 

County Revamps 24/7 Helpline to Provide Integrated Mental Health and Substance Use Support

LOS ANGELES — The Los Angeles County Departments of Mental Health or LACDMH and Public Health or DPH have centralized access to mental health and substance use services into one 24/7 call center at 800-854-7771.

As of July 9, residents reaching the call center will experience more streamlined menu options to better access mental health and substance use services across the county. Previously, residents needed to call two separate helplines — LACDMH’s 24/7 Help Line and DPH’s Substance Abuse Services Helpline or SASH. These 24/7 helplines are often the first point of contact for residents seeking wellbeing resources.

Now, when calling the centralized help line and selecting from more than a dozen languages, callers will have the opportunity to: “press 1” for crisis and mental health resources; “press 2” for substance use disorder services; or “press 3” for veteran and military family support. Residents who call the SASH line at 844-804-7500 will hear a message informing them of the new number and will be automatically redirected.

Mental health issues and substance use disorders commonly occur together. According to the most recently published 2022 National Survey on Drug Use and Health data, more than one-third of adults aged 18 or older who had a mental illness in the past year also experienced a substance use disorder.

The centralization of services between LACDMH and DPH’s Substance Abuse Prevention and Control Bureau is the first landmark in a long-term plan to enhance the consumer experience and streamline the California Department of Health Care Services’ oversight functions.

Project 2025 Comes For Would-Be Homeowners

Project 2025 has a lot of very unpopular, easily understandable proposals wrapped up in it, as Navigator Research revealed in early July. Such as these, with percentages opposed:

      • Allowing employers to stop paying hourly workers overtime (87%)
      • Allowing the government to monitor people’s pregnancies to potentially prosecute them if they miscarry (85%)
      • Removing health care protections for people with pre-existing conditions(82%)
      • Eliminating the National Weather Service, which is currently responsible for preparing for extreme weather events like heat waves, floods, and wildfires (82%);

But some of the things in Project 2025 are a bit more obscure—though over time they could bite just as hard—or even harder. One of them is their plans to make homeownership more difficult, actually putting it out of reach for who knows how many Americans—particularly in the working class.

“So uh on top of decimating HUD… Project 2025 is proposing to kill the 30 year mortgage. good luck ever buying housing again,” Mike Eliason, a Seattle-based climate-adaptive architect noted on Twitter. He went on to note that in Seattle it would increase the monthly mortgage on a median townhome from $4,850 to nearly $5,640 a month, adding “Nothing says ‘wealth building’ like a sweet little >20% increase.”

Well, it’s actually “only” 16+%, but that’s scant comfort. The rationale for all this is that Project 2025 says it’s supposed to increase wealth-building: “FHA should encourage wealth-building homeownership opportunities, which can be accomplished best through shorter-duration mortgages.”

Naturally, we wanted a local perspective, so we turned to real estate broker Carl Clark, who writes regularly for Random Lengths. Here’s what he said:

“The statement that “they” are trying to eliminate the 30 year mortgage is possibly correct in the longer term. The immediate attack is defined as an increase in the mortgage insurance premium, which is effectively a surcharge increasing the monthly cost of a HUD-guaranteed mortgage for home purchasers who have been unable to save up the 20% down payment. That 20% is considered by lenders to be sufficient ‘skin in the game’ to prevent low down payment purchasers from walking away if they can’t make the payments. I am not aware of any research proving that home owners are more or less inclined to try to retain their home dependent upon the size of their down payment.”

So it’s not as bad as Eliason said—for now. But, what would it mean here in San Pedro, if things unfold along the lines suggested? Clark provided calculations to explain what would happen to low down payment buyers using a HUD guaranteed mortgage. There would be a similar 16+% increase from $5,471 to $6,376 a month for a median priced single-family home. Prices are higher in LA generally, and exceed FHA limits for a single-family home. But for a duplex the similar 16+% increase would be from $8,102 to $9,442 a month.

And it’s credible to think this might happen down the road, given the underlying rationale. As Clark explained, “This is the key statement from the Mandate for Leadership, page 510 (under Housing and Urban Development):

”FHA leadership should increase the mortgage insurance premium (MIP) for all products above 20-year terms and maintain MIP for all products below 20-year terms and all refinances. FHA should encourage wealth-building homeownership opportunities, which can be accomplished best through shorter-duration mortgages.39”

What could ensure shorter-duration mortgages more than simply getting rid of the longer-duration ones? But the logic is faulty, Clark argues:

“If the goal is to “encourage wealth-building” I can’t agree that “shorter-duration mortgages” are the best way to do that. The real estate industry has through trial and error arrived at a mortgage policy that allows a larger number of potential homeowners to afford the monthly payments necessary to amortize down the loan.”

In short, it’s not as if faceless minions of the administrative state have been handing policy down from on high, as Project 2025 seems to suggest. Regulators work with the industry, they share information continuously and learn what works best over time. But this is not how Project 2025 sees things, as Clark goes on to explain:

“Footnote 40 states “FHA did not facilitate the widespread use of 30-year mortgages until the 1950s when, interacting with Federal Reserve policies, federal agencies began broader adoption of the mortgages, which, despite lowering the monthly repayment terms, result in slow equity accumulation and wealth-building opportunities.’ What it doesn’t say is that prior to the availability of 30 year mortgages, most people in the USA could not afford to own their home. They couldn’t pay rent and simultaneously save up the requisite 20% down payment.”

In short, the federal government, through the FHA, played a crucial role in helping to build the middle class as we’ve known it for the past 70 years. Not coincidentally, union membership was at a historical high in 1950, and wages had risen dramatically from the depths of the depression two decades before. So there was both political and the pocketbook power to make mass homeownership possible, including for much of the working class, which had previously been sharply distinct from the middle class.

Needless to say, reversing these policies would take us back to how things were before the 1950s. Far from helping the working class, as the GOP routinely tries to portray itself under Trump, these policies would once again deepen the divisions between working class and middle class America—divisions that Republicans would gleefully continue to exploit for political power.

That is the long-term prospect for what’s implicit in the Project 2025 plan. It’s what the underlying logic clearly points to. But what if were just the immediate MIP increase plan? Here’s what Clark said about that:

“The size of the impact would depend on the size of the increased MIP requirement. Some percentage of potential home owners would no longer be qualified because the monthly payment would increase beyond a lender’s qualification requirements. So, an unknown percentage of the populace would become forever tenants, with rental rates which typically increase at a faster rate than purchase prices.”

In short, even the immediate plan would mean a growing number of people locked out of the dream of homeownership. It would mean a growing class divide, rather than shared prosperity bringing people together. Clark continued:

“My ’back of the envelope’ analysis of cost increases in the Los Angeles South Bay during the pandemic found that purchase prices jumped in the 20-30% range, while rental prices went up at 40-50%. I don’t know what that would mean in terms of a percentage of the populace becoming homeless, but it would seem to be a given that we would increase the problem of equitable distribution of wealth.”

Which is precisely the problem we ought to be trying to solve. One last thing Clark noted:

“The strange thing is how this only applies to lowest incomes among our citizens. Somehow, the Heritage Foundation seems to have lost track of the idea of charging wealthy people a premium on their purchases to help them increase their wealth building opportunities. Or, perhaps I just misunderstand. Perhaps the premium paid by those with the least in our society is intended to facilitate the growth of wealth by those with the most?”

I think Clark got that last part right. It would certainly be in line with the Trump University plan. And it goes right along with Trump’s newly promised tax cuts for the rich.

LA County Property Values Assessed at More Than $2 Trillion

 

LOS ANGELES — Los Angeles County Assessor Jeff Prang announced the 2024 assessment roll has increased by $97 billion or 4.85% over last year, marking 14 years of continuous growth, as well as breaking for the first time the $2 trillion ceiling in net total value.

The 2024 assessment roll’s growth translates to a record $2.094 trillion in total net value that will put more than $20 billion property tax dollars towards public services such as public education, first responders and healthcare workers, as well as other county services.

The assessor establishes the assessed value of all taxable property in Los Angeles County each year as required by the state Constitution. The assessed value of that property is placed on a list called the assessment roll and assessments are based on the value of property on Jan. 1, 2024.

“As I said when I presented the forecast to the Board of Supervisors in May, this has been a challenging year highlighted by an economy in flux,” Assessor Prang said. “However, property values, with a few exceptions, continue to grow. In fact, the Assessment Roll increased over the May forecast and that’s good news for property owners, and for local schools and cities, because they rely on the subsequent property taxes for important public services.”

The assessment roll provides insight into the state of the real estate market as well as the local economy and works as a valuable tool for local governments as they prepare their annual budgets in anticipation of property tax revenues.

To access the 2024 assessment roll, go to: https://assessor.lacounty.gov/news-information/annualroll

Although sales volume declined significantly compared to 2022, home prices remained strong through 2023, with the median single-family home value reaching as high as $900,000 in September. Property transfers (i.e., sales) are the largest contributor to the 2024 assessment roll, adding more than $53 billion.

The inflation adjustment mandated under Proposition 13 is the second most significant factor contributing to the Assessment Roll. This year the California Consumer Price Index trended well beyond the full 2% allowable. This resulted in a $39 billion increase to the 2024 assessment roll.

Newly certified appraisers focused much of their effort on new construction, resulting in relatively strong growth for this component compared to recent years. Major construction projects such as the Intuit Dome in the City of Inglewood also contributed significant value. New construction added nearly $9 billion to the 2024 assessment roll.

In fact, the City of Inglewood had the highest growth rate of the 88 cities in Los Angeles County with a 20.2% increase over 2023.

However, the growth does not mean property owners will be subject to a corresponding increase on their annual property tax bills. Most property owners will see only a 2% adjustment prescribed by Proposition 13.

The 2024 assessment roll consists of 2,395,924 taxable real property parcels, 163,565 business property assessments, 32,685 boats, and 3,033 aircraft.

Pothole Economics: The Disastrous Saboteurs of Our Future

For the past forty-plus years, Republicans — just like dysfunctional HOAs — have been stealing from America’s future…

The GOP’s 43-year tax-cuts-for-billionaires-while-we-ignore-the-needs-of-the-country grift has an analogy in condos and homes across America that might help voters understand how it works and how they’ve gotten away with it.

Fully 84% of all homes and apartments built and sold in 2022 came with a homeowner’s association or HOA, and an estimated 27% of all homeowners nationwide currently live in a property controlled by an HOA.

And many are very unhappy about the experience.

According to a survey by Rocket Mortgage, only 47% of HOA residents think their HOA has made their community better, only two-thirds (64%) believe their HOA “honestly handles its finances,” and one in ten people nationwide who have an HOA cite the HOA itself as their main reason for moving.

How and why is this?

Louise and I have lived in five communities with HOAs in two different states. Three (including where we now live) were well managed, kept up the community, and set aside money from the dues every month for the inevitable future maintenance. I was on the board of one of them. The other two ran, essentially, a shell game or reverse Ponzi scheme, which led us to eventually quit those communities and move.

I remember attending a board meeting in one of those “shell game” HOA communities we’d lived in. There were multiple common-area maintenance issues needing attention, but a group who called themselves “low-tax conservatives” had run the board for over twenty years.

There was almost nothing in reserves, so maintenance had been continuously postponed until things hit a crisis level. Then they’d hit us all with a series of “special one-time assessments” ranging from a few hundred to a few thousand dollars to pay for the upkeep. They refused to raise the monthly HOA fee, referring to it as a tax, because, they said, they were “low-tax conservatives”; in fact, they were just cheapskates.

That HOA board had been, in the past and the present, stealing from future homeowners.

They did it so they could enjoy the community during the first 30 or so years — when maintenance costs were minimal — without setting aside money for the future, when things would rot or wear out and need replacement or upgrade.

For the first three decades, they were able to coast with $200/month in dues and no assessments; by the time we arrived when the units were pushing 35 years old, though, the assessments were hitting $3000 to $9000 a year, and, when the buildings’ roofs need repair (soon) it’ll be twice that amount or more.

Fortunately, once we saw the handwriting on that particular wall we were able to sell our condo and move to a well-run community. Americans, though, don’t have that option: Republicans have been running this same shell game or reverse Ponzi scheme against all of us (except the very rich) across the entire country ever since Reagan successfully pitched trickle-down economics to the nation in 1981.

If you’ve ever lived in one of these shell game HOA’s, you now perfectly understand Reaganomics and why it seems that America has deteriorated so badly over the past 40 years.

You could call it the disaster of pothole economics: all across America, roads, bridges, water systems, schools, and other vital public infrastructure have been underfunded and neglected ever since Reagan popularized the idea of “austerity” among Republicans.

In order to pay for the second most massive tax cut for the morbidly rich in history (Reagan cut the top tax bracket from 74% down to 25%), his administration cut spending on education, housing, roads and bridges, and pretty much every other aspect of America’s infrastructure. George W. Bush did the same thing, and Donald Trump tripled down on the scheme.

The result was a $51 trillion transfer of wealth — over a mere forty-three years — from the homes, retirement accounts, and savings of average working families into the money bins of the extremely wealthy. Thirty-four trillion of that transfer show up as our national debt, which was a mere $800 billion ($0.8 trillion) when Reagan first came into office and started this scam.

President Joe Biden and his Vice President, Kamala Harris, ran the first administration of either party to significantly repudiate Reagan’s neoliberalism by injecting trillions into rebuilding our nation (over 35,000 projects) while raising taxes on rich people and corporations to pay for it.

The result was immediately visible, just like in the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s: we now have the best economy on planet Earth with unemployment lower than any time since the 1960s (and lower than any time in history for women, Blacks, and Hispanics). Inflation has been at or below 0% for the past two months and is annually running around 3% (Reagan never got inflation below 4.1% in his entire 8 years); all across America we’re putting our rural areas, towns, and cities back together.

For the past forty years, Republicans and their administrations have focused almost entirely on taking cash away from working class people and handing it off to the billionaires who own and finance their party. At the top of the list of ways they did this was a series of five tax cuts for the morbidly rich and big corporations adding up to over $30 trillion since 1981.

But they’ve also been cutting spending to compensate for their tax breaks for the billionaire class: They blocked extending the child tax credit this year, throwing millions of American children back into poverty. They’ve fought lifting the cap on Social Security taxes so people making over $168,600 will begin paying on all of their income (millionaires and billionaires currently pay only a tiny fraction of the percentage to support Social Security that the rest of us do).

Fully 100% of congressional Republicans voted against Biden’s Build Back Better program that’s now putting America back together and his American Rescue Plan that lifted millions out of poverty and put millions more back to work. They successfully blocked the Paycheck Fairness Act that would have penalized employers for wage discrimination based on gender; they’ve refused to expand Medicaid in almost a dozen Red states; they even filibustered an attempt to raise the minimum wage from $7.25 to $10.10.

For the past forty-plus years, Republicans — just like these dysfunctional HOAs — have been stealing from America’s future; our infrastructure deficit alone is several trillion dollars, meaning Americans will be paying more in taxes to make up for all those decades of neglect.

Democrats want those tax increases to hit people earning over $400,000 a year; Republican tax proposals, on the other hand, mostly focus on increasing income taxes and fees on working class people while continuing or even expanding tax breaks for the very wealthy.

One of the “low tax” HOAs we used to live in, instead of raising their monthly fee or instituting an assessment, recently negotiated a million-dollar-plus 20-year loan with people’s properties as the collateral to fund painting and repairing serious rot on the buildings.

This should have been paid for with an increase in HOA fees twenty years ago, anticipating the future maintenance and upkeep needs.

But instead they kept the fee low, never built up a reserve, and are now borrowing from the bank. In other words, they’re continuing the all-too-common HOA board scam of requiring future generations to pay for current repairs, just like the GOP budget proposals we’ll see when they return from summer vacation in September will require future generations to pay for their past tax cuts.

It’s the equivalent of Reagan, Bush, and Trump jacking up the national debt to keep things glued together, forcing future generations to pay it off when the bill comes due, while their wealthy corporate funders rob us blind.

Homeowners across America are waking up to these toxic HOA boards, as social media sites for HOA members are forming and local homeowner uprisings are happening against boards, either replacing the board members or, in some cases, even suing them. Some states are even starting to require they build up reserves for future maintenance.

Hopefully, Americans will realize how successfully Republicans have inflicted this very same scam on voters and working class people over the past forty-plus years and vote the bums out this fall.

Josh Shapiro Would Be a Dangerous Choice for Harris Running Mate

 

By Jeff Cohen and Norman Solomon

Kamala Harris has gained strong support as the presumptive Democratic presidential candidate. Putting Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro on the ticket would likely fracture that support.

The most divisive issue among Democrats is the U.S.-enabled Israeli war against the civilian population of Gaza. To unify the party and defeat Trump’s MAGA forces, Harris needs to distance herself in a meaningful way from Joe Biden’s Gaza policy. If she does so, she can win back the votes and energy of young activists, progressives, racial justice organizers, Arab Americans and Muslims – many of whom devoted weeks or months of their lives in 2020 to defeating Trump on behalf of the Biden-Harris ticket.

But a Harris-Shapiro ticket would jeopardize all that.

Today, parallels are apparent with pivotal events of 1968, when President Lyndon B. Johnson – increasingly unpopular among Democrats and others because of his Vietnam War – stunned the political world by announcing he would not seek reelection. At the Democratic convention in Chicago, the party nominated LBJ’s vice president, Hubert Humphrey, as its standard-bearer. Humphrey’s halting efforts to distance himself from Johnson’s war policy were too little, too late, and he was unable to connect with many of the dedicated Democratic activists and voters who were antiwar. Failing to detach himself sufficiently from the president’s war policy, Humphrey lost a winnable election to Republican Richard Nixon.

If Harris now chooses a running mate who intensely connects her to Biden’s policies on the Gaza war that are so unpopular with much of the Democratic base, party unity – and the chances of defeating Trump – would be undermined.

Overall, Josh Shapiro is liberal and sometimes progressive on domestic issues (though notably not on fracking or tax subsidies for private schools). But on the contentious issue of Israel’s relentless war against Palestinian civilians in Gaza, Shapiro sounds much less bothered by the lethal violence than by U.S. ceasefire activists, many of whom he has demonized. Here’s a bit of the history:

In 2021, after Ben & Jerry’s (a company founded and led by Jewish Americans) refused to sell its products in Israel’s illegal settlements, then-Attorney General Josh Shapiro threatened the company by urging Pennsylvania state agencies to enforce a constitutionally suspect law targeting advocates of Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions or BDS against Israel over its discriminatory policies. Shapiro smeared such advocates by claiming that “BDS is rooted in antisemitism” – although the effort has wide support globally, including from many Jews, as a thoroughly nonviolent tactic in advancing Palestinian rights.

After the horrific Hamas attack of Oct. 7, several dozen Pennsylvania-based Muslim groups wrote a letter protesting Governor Shapiro’s one-sided comments: “Not only did you fail to recognize the structural root causes of the conflict, you chose to intentionally ignore the civilian loss of life in Gaza.” Responding to the letter after Israeli bombs and missiles had killed more civilians in Gaza than had been killed by Hamas in Israel on Oct. 7, the governor’s spokesman said: “We all must speak with moral clarity and support Israel’s right to defend itself.”

Last December, after he amplified the Capitol Hill demagoguery of MAGA Congresswoman Elise Stefanik, Gov. Shapiro contributed to the firing of the University of Pennsylvania president. Referring to UPenn’s president, Shapiro said: “I thought her comments were absolutely shameful. It should not be hard to condemn genocide.” By then, after two months of Israeli bombing, more than 17,000 Gazans had been killed, mostly women and children – and later that month, Israel was charged with violations of the Genocide Convention in South Africa’s filing at the International Court of Justice.

In early April, after Democratic governors in other states had called for a ceasefire in Gaza, Muslim leaders in Philadelphia criticized Shapiro for his refusal to do so.

Beginning in late April, Gov. Shapiro and his office repeatedly prodded campuses to “restore order” and take action against student encampments, including the University of Pennsylvania Gaza Solidarity Encampment which called on the college administration to provide greater transparency on university investments, divest from Israel, and reinstate the banned student group Penn Students Against the Occupation.

On May 9, Shapiro invoked student “safety” in demanding the encampment be shut down. Police shut it down the next day, arresting 33. In two different interviews, Shapiro seemed to compare campus ceasefire activists, many of whom are Jewish or students of color, to “white supremacists camped out and yelling racial slurs” and “people dressed up in KKK outfits or KKK regalia making comments about people who’re African American.”

In May, as activism continued to grow over Israel’s lethal violence against civilians in Gaza, Gov. Shapiro issued an order aimed at Israel’s critics that revised his administration’s code of conduct to bar state employees from “scandalous or disgraceful” conduct – a vague and subjective directive criticized by the legal director of Pennsylvania’s ACLU as a possible violation of free speech protections.

In a July 23 tweet on X, progressive leader and former Ohio State Senator Nina Turner wrote: “Choosing Governor Josh Shapiro for Vice President would be a mistake. Governor Shapiro compared pro-peace protesters to the KKK. That’s simply unacceptable & would stifle the momentum VP Harris has. Hopefully she is looking to build a broad coalition to beat Trump.”

A broad coalition to defeat Donald Trump and the fascistic MAGA movement is exactly what we need. Making Josh Shapiro the nominee for vice president is exactly what we don’t need.

_____________________________

Jeff Cohen is co-founder of RootsAction.org, a retired journalism professor at Ithaca College, and author of Cable News Confidential: My Misadventures in Corporate Media. In 1986, he founded the media watch group FAIR.

Norman Solomon is national director of RootsAction.org and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. He is the author of many books including War Made Easy. His latest book, War Made Invisible: How America Hides the Human Toll of Its Military Machine, was published in summer 2023 by The New Press.

LASD Homicide Bureau Responding to a Death Investigation, E. Carson Plaza

 

Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Homicide investigators are responding to the suspicious death of a female adult that was found floating in the Dominguez Channel with obvious signs of trauma to her body. The incident was reported July 28, 2024, about 6:53 p.m., on the 500 block of E. Carson Plaza Drive, in the city of Carson.

The victim was pronounced deceased at the scene. There is no additional information available at this time.

Anyone with information about this incident is encouraged to contact the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department’s Homicide Bureau at 323-890-5500 or anonymously, at 800-222-8477; http://lacrimestoppers.org

Department of Art and Culture Awards Over $6.4M to Arts, Cultural, Social Justice and Social Service Organizations

 

To support local arts nonprofits and the communities they serve, the Los Angeles County Department of Arts and Culture or Arts and Culture has announced more than $6.4M in grants to 318 nonprofit organizations through its 2024-2025 Organizational Grant Program and Community Arts Impact Grant awards.

Thanks to leadership from the Board of Supervisors, there was a larger allocation of funding this year, due to a $1.2M increase to the organizational grant program or OGP, the first increase in more than 15 years for LA County’s longest-running arts grant program. OGP grants will go to 238 organizations, 34 of which are first time applicants to the program. The total allocation for grantees this year is $5,668,000, and awards range from $700 to $122,300.

OGP strengthens the Los Angeles region’s cultural ecosystem with funding to organizations of every artistic discipline, budget size, and geography. Grantees can use these funds to support critical needs, from staffing and organizational infrastructure to public arts programming in museums and visual arts, performing arts, film, arts education, arts service organizations, literary arts and more. Grantees can also access Arts and Culture’s slate of professional development opportunities—programs designed in-house, as well as scholarships for trainings and conferences. OGP addresses systemic inequity in arts funding; 94% of the organizations that were awarded have budgets under $5M and 50% of those have budgets under $200K. These organizations are often underfunded and include those that reflect and serve communities of color, historically marginalized, and rural communities.

Different than Arts and Culture’s longstanding funding for nonprofits with a primary focus on the arts, the Community Impact Arts Grant (CIAG) supports arts-based programs of social justice and service organizations. CIAG was designed to address two priorities: making arts services available to LA County residents who might not experience them through traditional arts venues and outlets, and encouraging integration of the arts in cross-sector work at local nonprofits. Grantee programs span art forms and communities reached, from therapeutic visual arts, to social justice filmmaking, music education for youth, dance empowerment, and memory programs for dementia.

There were 80 awarded organizations in CIAG this year, 19 of which were new awardees—making this year’s grantee pool the largest in the program’s history. The total CIAG allocation is $750,000, and awards range from $6,300 to $10,600. A complete list of CIAG grantees, and the programs and events this funding will support, can be found here.

Details: Find a list of OGP grantees, and the programs and events this funding will support here.

Community Groups Receive Nearly $1 Million in Port of Long Beach Sponsorships

 

The Long Beach Board of Harbor Commissioners July 25 approved 268 sponsorships totaling $926,150 to local nonprofit groups for upcoming programs. The Port of Long Beach’s community sponsorship program funds community events and activities that help inform residents about the port. The awards support a variety of community nonprofits centered on the environment, education, social justice, the arts and historic preservation.

This award is the third of three calls of the 2024 fiscal year; half of the applications were first-time requests. This latest round saw a record number of requests. To accommodate increased demand from community organizations, the Harbor Commission approved a significant increase in funds for the third call.

The next open application period for sponsorships will be Sept. 1-30; find out more at www.polb.com/sponsorships.

Among the events and programs sponsored in this week’s awards are Act Out Theatre Company’s Summer Youth Arts Workshops, Wonder Tech and Innovation Festival and Food Finders Thanksgiving Food Distribution.

Find a list of the approved sponsorships here. The port accepts sponsorship applications three times a year, in January, May and September.

Details: www.polb.com/sponsorships.

Reps. Barragán, Lieu Introduce Bill to Transfer Ballfields on Federal Land to Cities of Los Angeles and Lomita

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Rep. Nanette Barragán (CA-44) and Congressman Ted Lieu (CA-36) July 25 introduced a bill to transfer 11 ballfields located at the Navy’s Defense Fuel Support Point or DFSP San Pedro to the Cities of Los Angeles and Lomita. The DFSP ballfields have been used and maintained by nonprofit organizations such as the San Pedro Girls Softball Association, the San Pedro Athletic Complex, and the Lomita Little League for nearly 50 years.

In June of 2020, the Secretary of Defense issued a memo stating that the Department of Defense or DoD would no longer provide non-reimbursable support to non-DoD entities. As a result, the Navy informed local organizations that it would dramatically increase the user fees for the DFSP ballfields at 2981 N. Gaffey Street and 3181 N. Gaffey Street in San Pedro, and 26800 S. Western Avenue in Lomita, effectively pricing out the organizations and community from using the fields.

“Baseball is America’s pastime, and our communities in the Los Angeles Harbor area have long relied on these fields to provide access to youth athletic programs and other outdoor recreation activities,” said Rep. Barragán. “Our communities should not lose access to these fields or have to pay an unjustifiably high price for kids in the Harbor Area to get outside and play. This bill will transfer the land over to the local cities and ensure the fields that these communities have maintained and played on for years will continue to be available.”

Specifically, the bill authorizes the Secretary of the Navy to transfer the San Pedro ballfields to the cities of Los Angeles and Lomita and requires a mutually satisfactory agreement for the transfer. This proposal builds on the Congresswoman’s efforts to protect community field access, which includes a direct meeting with U.S. Navy Secretary Carlos del Toro and her work on an interim agreement that allowed community organizations access to the fields. In addition, Congresswoman Barragán and Congressman Lieu sent a letter in September 2021 to the Secretary del Toro that helped prevent a dramatic fee increase.

“I can’t overstate the importance of youth sports—it helps our children’s physical, mental, and social development and shapes these young people into healthy, confident, and well-rounded adults,” said Los Angeles Councilman Tim McOsker. “I’m grateful to Congresswoman Nanette Barragán for preserving access to these fields by transferring ownership to the City of Los Angeles, where our Department of Recreation and Parks and community group partners can provide affordable programming and leagues for young Angelenos, ensuring they have the opportunity to thrive.”

Details: The text of the bill can be found here.