Thursday, July 9, 2020
Home News Historic Workers’ Rights Bill AB 5 Nears Final Vote

Historic Workers’ Rights Bill AB 5 Nears Final Vote

By Paul Rosenberg, Senior Editor

 A revolution in workers’ rights protection is close to becoming reality, in the form of AB 5, which would put an end to widespread worker misclassification that strips millions of workers of their rights as employees. It has national implications and has been endorsed by presidential candidates Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, with a final vote expected by Sept. 13.

AB 5, which passed the State Assembly overwhelmingly in late May, codifies the California State Supreme Court’s Dynamex decision that established a simple, straightforward “ABC” test of whether a worker qualifies as an employee, along the same lines that port truckers have been arguing and winning protections for most of the past decade.

“There’s still work to do,” AB 5’s author, Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez told Random Lengths News. “But we are confident that over the next month we will get AB 5 to the governor’s desk. We have an opportunity to lead the way in protecting the future of workers, and the country is watching.”

“AB 5 is effective because it is straightforward and simple: It makes full ‘employee’ status the default under state law, which will automatically protect millions of workers,” Warren wrote in Aug. 14 endorsement op-ed in the Sacramento Bee.

“The Dynamex ruling was a moral proclamation by the state’s highest court with a message that rang loud and clear: enough is enough,” Gonzalez told the Senate Committee on Labor, Public Employment and Retirement prior to its 4-1 vote of approval on July 10. “We cannot sit by while companies pass off their own costs of doing business onto California’s taxpayers and responsible businesses, while depriving millions of workers of the labor law protections that they are rightfully entitled to.”

After passing the Assembly, it faced fierce and deeply deceptive opposition from gig companies—most notably Uber and Lyft—but has survived with only modest modifications, which were entirely expected in advance, due to complexities and contradictions in labor law, particularly in specific niches such as emergency room doctors. A final Senate Appropriations Committee vote is expected on Aug. 30, with a floor due by Sept. 13.

“We never expected that what went into print originally was going to be the bill we ended up with,” Steve Smith, communications director for the California Labor Federation told Random Lengths. “We’re engaged in a process all along to talk different industries, different businesses, to try to figure out if there are any unintended consequences to the Dynamex decision that we should be concerned about.”  He noted, for example, realtors and insurance agents, as well as emergency room doctors.

“So we’ve continued to have those discussions along with the author, the Chamber of Commerce, with businesses, with others, but we’re at the point right now where I don’t think there’s going to be many exemptions made,” Smith said. “There might be a few more amendments made prior to the Senate vote, but I think we’re getting toward the end of that process.”

Under the ABC test, a worker is an independent contractor only if (A) “the worker is free from the control and direction of the hirer,” (B) “the worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business,” and (C) “the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business” of the kind they’re hired to perform.

While the trend of treating workers as independent contractors has been ongoing for decades, gig companies have made it foundational to their business models. As reported in June, their role was described in recent report from the National Employment Law Project, “Rights at Risk: Gig Companies’ Campaign to Upend Employment as We Know It.”  The report described “a far-reaching, multi-million dollar influence campaign to rewrite worker classification standards for their own benefit—and to workers’ detriment.”  Their goal is the exact opposite of AB 5: specifically exempting companies from labor law jurisdiction—known as “carve-outs”—starting with ride-sharing companies, and expanding the scope of carve-outs to eventually encompass most or all of the service sector and more—such as construction.

“Gig companies are simply using newfangled methods of labor mediation to extract rents from workers and shift risks and costs onto workers, consumers, and the general public,” the report explained. “This recognition helps to debunk a narrative put forward by gig companies that their ‘innovation economy’ represents an inevitable future of work that must be protected and nurtured exactly as is, at all costs, lest we foil our economic destiny.”

This narrative was central to how Uber and Lyft sought to gain exemptions from AB 5, deceptively arguing that it would mean the end of flexibility for its workers, and using that threat to rally their support. It was part of what Smith called “an all-out disinformation campaign to defend their illegal business models and kill legislation that would protect workers” in a July blog post.

“Uber’s argument on flexibility is clearly a red herring,” Smith told Random Lengths. “Flexibility is entirely up to the employer, it has absolutely nothing to do with employee classification,” he explained. “So they’re using this argument of flexibility to scare drivers.”

In late June, Recode reported some drivers had signed messages from Lyft and Uber asking politicians to support their “job flexibility,” not realizing they were campaigning against being classified as employees.

“One of the reasons drivers say they’ve been misled is because the messages Lyft and Uber have sent don’t mention AB 5 at all,” Recode reported, “and they also don’t mention the potential for drivers to become real employees.” They only focused on the false flexibility claims.

“You always have to be careful when an employer goes to an employee and asks them to sign something. The disparity of power in that situation means often the employee just signs it,” Gonzalez told Recode.

In fact, some Uber drivers told Recode “they thought it was mandatory to sign a petition or send an email to legislators,” since it “resembled other important notifications, such as terms of service updates, that drivers have to accept in order to continue driving.”

“There’s nothing about AB 5 or the Dynamex decision that undergirds it that would mean that drivers will lose their flexibility,” Smith said. “We find this to be really, really an underhanded tactic that Uber is using to try to gin up support for its position that in no way is reflective of the bill or the law.”

“Cake decorators, home researchers, nurses, couriers and restaurant workers have all been found to be employees, despite the fact that they could choose their own schedules,” wrote Nayantara Mehta, in a June report from the National Employment Law Project. “Laws don’t force workers into choosing between having basic workplace protections and having flexibility; companies do.”

On the other hand, there have been some exemptions that make sense and have accepted, such as  freelance writers, graphic designers, fine artists, grant writers and marketing consultants,” Smith said. “With each one of these exemptions, there are some parameters, right?”Smith asked rhetorically. “We want to make sure that we’re not giving company a free pass. For example, the Los Angeles Times decides to make everybody an independent contractor someday. We want to make sure that there are very clear parameters in the bill that ensures that there can’t be any abuses of the law or abuses created by these exemptions.” This mostly concerns workers who are generally less vulnerable to exploitation.

Most Popular

Unfinished Business and the Sins of the Fathers

Trumpism out of step with 157 years of progress “The gods visit the sins of...

Icarus Falls

Former POLA president Nick Tonsich sued for $5 million in fraud complaint “This is a Wright brothers moment!” Pasha...

Community, LAPD Discuss Defunding, Homeless

The City of Los Angeles does not want the Los Angeles Police Department to be the lead agency for homeless outreach, said...

Despite Protests, LB Reluctant to Defund LBPD

By Dayzsha Lino, Editorial Intern “Defund the police” is a rallying cry that has seemed to gain notoriety as...

Recent Comments

DAVID J LEE on Think: George Floyd
M Mackey on Think: George Floyd
Michael S. Motta on Think: George Floyd
Thomas "HOUSE" Houchens on Think: George Floyd
Eliath Mena on Think: George Floyd
Deidre Powell on Think: George Floyd
Marcia Ladymgirl on Think: George Floyd
Jennifer L on Think: George Floyd
Carlos Fisher on Think: George Floyd
Jose "cheMMa" Rodriguz on Think: George Floyd
Aniza Thomas on Think: George Floyd
David Seay on Think: George Floyd
Marc LJ on Think: George Floyd
andre edwards on Think: George Floyd
Terelle Jerricks on From Pop Culture to Cop Culture
Sharon Hislop on Think: George Floyd
Fetteroff on Think: George Floyd
Raul Acevedo Jr. on Think: George Floyd
Mel Grayson on Think: George Floyd
Terelle Jerricks on A Virtual World of Events 
Alice r. Knoop on Lung Health Tips for COVID-19
Melina Paris on Take me to Sardine
Joshua E Chambers on Take me to Sardine
Chad Dorchester on Take me to Sardine
Terelle Jerricks on Change Won’t Be Televised
Melina Paris on Take me to Sardine
Melina Paris on Take me to Sardine
Melina Paris on Take me to Sardine
Bob Kohler on About
Judie M Barker on About
Kim Kaufman on Staff
Kim Kaufman on Staff
Vivian Morales on From War to Lowrider
Robin Doyno on Staff
Publisher on About
Joe Stackhouse on Advertise
Marshariki Haylock on A Stabbing in San Pedro
CARRIE MENDOZA on A Stabbing in San Pedro
Martin Palmiere EMC(SW) ret. on Trouble on the Iowa
Martin A.Palmiere EMC(SW) USN(ret.) on Trouble on the Iowa
John H Winkler on Frequently Asked Questions
J. McVey on Staff
Malou Mariano on Tampering and Collusion
Terrell Williams on The New Gap Band Fills The Gap
Alton C . Thompson, Ph. D. on About
Harold Ericsson on Letters to the Editor
Hillbinkel on Trouble on the Iowa
Ian Gordon on KKJZ Leaves CSULB Campus
larry lebedin on KKJZ Leaves CSULB Campus
Joseph Bianco on Frequently Asked Questions
Deborah Steed on Zerby Family Finds Solace
Don Griffin on Rosenberg
Pete on About
Anne Marie Knudsen on Clem Pennington is the Whole Package
Terelle Jerricks on About
Lyn Jensen on Go Retro with Records
Steven R. Heldt on Fig Trees Are Like Democracies
Joanne Sims on Peacocks, Paseo, Politics
Dave Borst-Smith on Peacocks, Paseo, Politics
Charles Traupmann on The Buscaino Report:
james P. Allen on Across the Great Divide
Allyson Vought on Across the Great Divide
PBinLostAngeles on RL NEWS Roundups: June 14, 2016
davehall on Voter Guide
Chris formica Gringos Tacos on Food Truck Blues
Random Lengths News on Iowa Fever
Tinisha Rodrique on IMG_1761
polos fred perry on Less Than a Side Show
cheap soccer jersey on Less Than a Side Show
le mahjong gratuit on The Surrealness of Knives and Breast
Harry and the Gang on Sherlock Holmes at the LB Playhouse
neufert architect s data pdf on IMG_1761
sewing machine reviews on Annie at the Warner Grand