Monday, November 3, 2025
spot_img
spot_img
Home Blog Page 608

SEE-LA Launches Farm Box Program Amid Pandemic

0

Sustainable Economic Enterprises of Los Angeles, also known as SEE-LA, announced on April 15, that they will be launching a program called Farm Box, which would provide families in South LA affected by COVID-19 with farm fresh produce such as eggs, fruit, and vegetables.

As farmers’ markets across the state close down due to the coronavirus, SEE-LA plans to give away produce to 1,100 families every Wednesday for the next four weeks. A number of groups in Los Angeles such as UNITE HERE Local 11, the Los Angeles Football Club, and Banc of California Stadium have also contributed to the program by donating much-needed assets such as protective gear for volunteers and packaged food.

Details: https://tinyurl.com/SEE-LA

Launch of the Angeleno Card by Mayor’s Fund for Los Angeles

I hope you are healthy and safe. Tonight, the Mayor announced the launch of the “Angeleno Card” by the Mayor’s Fund for Los Angeles. This initiative is funded by private donations and is not a City program.

The Angeleno Card is an effort led by Mayor Eric Garcetti and the Mayor’s Fund for Los Angeles to provide direct financial assistance to Angelenos facing extreme economic hardship as a direct result of the COVID-19 crisis. The Angeleno Card aims to help low-wage hourly workers who had jobs in homes and restaurants, seasonal workers, and other workers such as day laborers, street vendors, or self-employed individuals who are experiencing heightened financial hardship because of COVID-19. This economic hardship may be due to job loss, severe reduction of work hours, or furloughs. This includes Angelenos who qualify for federal and state assistance but may not receive that financial support for weeks or longer.

To be eligible, applicants must provide documentation that confirms that 1) their household is in the City of Los Angeles, 2) their income fell below the Federal Poverty Level per household size before the COVID-19 crisis (see table below), and 3) they have fallen into deeper economic hardship during the crisis because at least one household member lost a job or had a reduction in income of at least 50%. Immigration status is not considered in determining eligibility. Since this program is privately funded, any assistance received is not considered a public benefit and is not subject to the Public Charge rule.

Applications for the Angeleno Card will be available only online by visiting hcidla.lacity.org.

Individual applications can only be completed Tuesday April 14 through Thursday April 16, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. People without internet access or who need help applying online may call 213-252-3040, Tuesday April 14 through Thursday April 16, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Those who pre-qualify based on their online or telephone applications will be given an in person appointment at a designated community center. These centers cannot help anyone without an appointment. Applicants will need to provide documentation at this in-person appointment, and may be able to upload pictures or digital copies of documentation in advance. Approved applicants will receive a card in an amount ranging from $700-$1500 depending on income and household size.

PLEASE NOTE: Due to limited resources, if the number of qualified individuals exceeds the number of available Angeleno Cards grants, the City of Los Angeles Housing and Community Investment Department will randomly select among the qualified individuals to receive the Angeleno Card grants. The Angeleno Card grants are privately funded through donations to the Mayor’s Fund for Los Angeles and do not consist of any public or taxpayer funds.

We hope that you can share this information with those most affected by the COVID-19 public health crisis and target outreach with those Angelenos most likely to qualify. Given the limitations of the program, we also ask that you judiciously inform your stakeholders and members – rather than promote the program – so that we don’t create unmeetable expectations.

For questions:

Department of Neighborhood Empowerment
200 N. Spring Street, Suite 2005
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Downtown Office:(213) 978-1551
Downtown Fax:(213) 978-1751

Long Beach Coronavirus Relief Fund Exceeds $1,000,000 and Expands Priorities Funded

LONG BEACH— The city of Long Beach,in partnership with the Long Beach Community Foundation, has raised more than $1,000,000 from members of the community, businesses and family foundations to address coronavirus-related issues in Long Beach. Approximately half of the amount raised has already been granted into the community to address the current public health crisis, and the momentum continues this week with updated priority funding announced.
The Coronavirus Relief Fund began accepting donations on March 18, via credit card, text-to-give, PayPal and check contributions from public donors at, [https://longbeachcf.org/donate/long-beach-disaster-relief-fund]. The Long Beach Community Foundation began collecting donations while simultaneously developing a program to distribute the funds quickly back into the community to support five defined funding priorities which include:
-Serving low-income individuals affected by COVID-19 to pay for critical expenses;
-Microloans and/or funds to small businesses affected by COVID-19 to pay for critical expenses and adapt business models during this crisis;
-Providing emergency funds for workers laid off as a result of COVID-19;
-Providing assistance to individuals experiencing homelessness for sheltering, food, sanitation supplies to mitigate the spread COVID-19, and to quarantine as a result of COVID-19 exposure, and
-Providing food and critical supply delivery to those who are home-bound.
Additional funding priorities were added april 13, to continue to support the most pressing current needs in Long Beach:
-Support for Emergency Health Workers
-Support for Mental Health & Domestic Violence Sheltering
More than $475,000 has been distributed to 31 nonprofits that are keeping families fed, sheltering people experiencing homelessness, providing key resources to businesses and supporting fragile populations quarantined during this public health crisis. Individual organizations are awarded up to $20,000 each, and the grant application process will be available for as long as funding allows.

California, Oregon and Washington Announce Western States Pact

0

SACRAMENTO — Today, California Governor Gavin Newsom, Oregon Governor Kate Brown and Washington Governor Jay Inslee April 13, announced an agreement on a shared vision for reopening their economies and controlling COVID-19 into the future.

A joint statement from the Governors:

COVID-19 has preyed upon our interconnectedness. In the coming weeks, the West Coast will flip the script on COVID-19 – with our states acting in close coordination and collaboration to ensure the virus can never spread wildly in our communities.

We are announcing that California, Oregon and Washington have agreed to work together on a shared approach for reopening our economies – one that identifies clear indicators for communities to restart public life and business.

While each state is building a state-specific plan, our states have agreed to the following principles as we build out a West Coast framework:

-Our residents’ health comes first. As home to one in six Americans and gateway to the rest of the world, the West Coast has an outsized stake in controlling and ultimately defeating COVID-19.

-Health outcomes and science – not politics – will guide these decisions. Modifications to our states’ stay at home orders must be made based off our understanding of the total health impacts of COVID-19, including: the direct impact of the disease on our communities; the health impact of measures introduced to control the spread in communities —particularly felt by those already experiencing social disadvantage prior to COVID-19; and our health care systems’ ability to ensure care for those who may become sick with COVID-19 and other conditions. This effort will be guided by data. We need to see a decline in the rate of spread of the virus before large-scale reopening, and we will be working in coordination to identify the best metrics to guide this.

-Our states will only be effective by working together. Each state will work with its local leaders and communities within its borders to understand what’s happening on the ground and adhere to our agreed upon approach.

Through quick and decisive action, each of our states has made significant progress in flattening the curve and slowing the spread of COVID-19 among the broader public. Now, our public health leaders will focus on four goals that will be critical for controlling the virus in the future.

Protecting vulnerable populations at risk for severe disease if infected. This includes a concerted effort to prevent and fight outbreaks in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities.
Ensuring an ability to care for those who may become sick with COVID-19 and other conditions. This will require adequate hospital surge capacity and supplies of personal protective equipment.
Mitigating the non-direct COVID-19 health impacts, particularly on disadvantaged communities.
Protecting the general public by ensuring any successful lifting of interventions includes the development of a system for testing, tracking and isolating. The states will work together to share best practices.

COVID-19 doesn’t follow state or national boundaries. It will take every level of government, working together, and a full picture of what’s happening on the ground.

In the coming days the governors, their staff and health officials will continue conversations about this regional pact to recovery

In Harm’s Way

Workers at high risk of unemployment in the COVID-19 pandemic

By Daniel Flaming and Patrick Burns

In just one month, the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has spread from infecting a few, distant countries to become a global pandemic, bringing large parts of California’s economy to a standstill. Public health directives for consumers to stay at home and nonessential businesses to close for an indeterminate amount of time are causing a profoundly disruptive economic shock. We are seeing the economic fabric of workers earning wages from employers and employers receiving revenue from customers disintegrate as workers lose jobs and are unable to pay for basic needs such as housing, and employers lose customers and are unable to pay basic operating costs for preserving their businesses.

Meeting the basic needs of unemployed workers throughout this economic downturn is essential for preserving our social fabric and civic institutions. California needs to take direct action to address the economic emergency caused by COVID-19 that is causing widespread business closures and extremely high unemployment. Forty-three percent of California workers have a high risk of unemployment.

The burden of unemployment is unequally distributed. It rests most heavily on young adults, Latinos, and workers in restaurant, hotel, personal care, and janitorial jobs. Young adults graduating from school and attempting to enter the job market face extremely difficult challenges.

A consequence of social distancing and business closures to protect public health during the pandemic is to transform the health risks of older individuals, who are most vulnerable to COVID-19, into economic risks for low wage workers, who often are younger individuals and service workers who perform tangible rather than conceptual tasks, and who have the highest risk of unemployment. The assumption underlying this transfer of risk is that we all have an obligation to protect each other’s life. The reciprocal obligation is to protect each other’s economic well-being, specifically, employment and wages for workers whose jobs have been sacrificed to protect the lives of others.

Many workers who still have jobs are risking their health. Health care workers have uniquely high risks of being infected with COVID-19 because they have very frequent direct physical contact with infected individuals. The risk of being infected by the coronavirus as a result of working in close proximity to other people is greatest among physicians, nurses, and medical technicians. There also are elevated risks of infection for low income workers, African Americans, Latinos, young adults, health care support workers such as home health aides, personal care workers such as child care workers, and protective service workers such as police officers and firefighters.

Many households already have unpaid rent, bills and loan obligations. Half of California’s workers earn $40,000 or less a year. These workers are likely to have little or no financial reserves and many are encumbered with debt. Workers in this group who are unemployed, or become unemployed, need immediate wage replacement.

Similar financial safety nets need to be extended to small and medium size businesses in order to preserve California’s employment base. California has over 940,000 employment establishments, and over 800,000 of these establishments have less than 20 employees. This is an extraordinarily large and diverse employment community to locate, engage, and provide with timely, effective financial support.

As workers lose their jobs, businesses close and family incomes vanish, California needs to rapidly provide assistance and economic relief to workers, their families and their employers. The following ten policies and actions are recommended for the State of California, counties and cities:

  1. Maintain and increase staffing for programs that provide financial support to ensure that eligibility determination, enrollment and provision of funds or benefits to applicants occurs very rapidly. This includes Unemployment Insurance and CARES Act payments, Pandemic Unemployment Assistance, public assistance benefits, disability insurance, and Paid Family Leave.
  2. Suspend consumer debt collection and impose a long-term moratorium on evictions, foreclosures and utility shut-offs.
  3. Provide philanthropic and public support for food banks to maintain food inventories and staffing that is commensurate with the number of people seeking help.
  4. Use state and local economic development and workforce development programs adaptively, responsively, innovatively to provide access to capital for businesses.
  5. Implement work sharing programs to retain workers on employers’ payrolls and their eligibility for employee benefit programs, including health insurance.
  6. Ensure that health care is available for all California residents.
  7. Rethink local land use policies that have prioritized industries that produce sales tax revenue and led to a service-intensive industry structure in the Los Angeles region that is proving very vulnerable to a sudden downturn in consumer demand for personal services, food services and travel, as well as land use policies that do not account for the negative public balance sheet resulting from low-wage industries, for example the large-scale development of warehouses in the Inland Empire.
  8. Ensure that front-line workers in hospitals, medical clinics, public safety organizations, and grocery stores have all needed protective equipment.
  9. Ensure that front-line workers in hospitals, medical clinics and public safety organizations have the right to speak out about dangerous job conditions.
  10. Provide hazard pay for health care workers and others who have frequent direct physical contact with COVID-19 patients.

Supervisors Hahn, Solis, Propose Countywide Emergency Rent Assistance Program Amid COVID-19 Crisis

SAN PEDRO—Los Angeles County Supervisors Janice Hahn and Hilda Solis have proposed creating an Emergency Rent Assistance Program during the COVID-19 crisis. The program would provide up to $1000 per month for three months to renters who have lost income due to the coronavirus pandemic.
The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors has implemented a rent freeze and eviction moratorium to prevent families from losing their homes during this epidemic. However, renters will still need to pay back rent owed in the months after the crisis. Rent assistance through the proposed program would not need to be paid back and could prevent families from falling into even worse economic hardship.
The number of families that would be helped by the program would depend on the level of funding. Funding for the program would come from the second round of funding Los Angeles County expects to receive from the Federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act). Additional funding could come from philanthropy and private sources.
The Emergency Rent Assistance Program proposal will be voted on during this Tuesday’s virtual meeting of the Board of Supervisors. Read the full motion here.www.tinyurl.com/emergencyrentalassistance

Rep. Lowenthal Shares Updated Resources, Public Health Agency Updates

0

Public health agencies across the nation have been regularly issuing updates and guidance on different aspects of the coronavirus crisis. Here is a selection of those issued this week from
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Use of Cloth Face Coverings to Slow Spread of COVID-19 April 4 www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/diy-cloth-face-coverings.html

How to Protect Yourself April 4 www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/prevention.html

Tips to keep children healthy while school’s out April 3 www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/daily-life-coping/children.html

Caring for someone at home April 2 www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/if-you-are-sick/care-for-someone.html

Disinfecting your home if someone is sick April 2 www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/disinfecting-your-home.html

People with Asthma and COVID-19 April 2 www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/asthma.html

Talking with children about COVID-19 April 2 www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/daily-life-coping/talking-with-children.html

City of Long Beach Develops System to Connect Providers to Personal Protective Equipment and an Online Exchange Platform for Facial Coverings

0

LONG BEACH – The City of Long Beach has developed a system to connect providers with personal protective equipment (PPE), as well as a way for people to donate goods and services and access to facial coverings through an online exchange platform.
Request for Medical PPE:
Various qualifying organizations in need of PPE, including healthcare facilities, medical providers, shelters, adult day care and long-term care facilities, may request supplies via the City’s longbeach.gov/COVID19 website, under “Resources for Healthcare Providers.”
Equipment Donations to the City:
To streamline and manage the donations and offers of assistance to the City of Long Beach, the City also has developed an online form at, http://longbeach.gov/health/diseases-and-condition/information-on/coronavirus/help/
The new form can be completed by local businesses and community volunteers interested in providing assistance.
The form will help the City organize donation offers such as business facility use, transportation and delivery services and personal protective equipment. Additionally, donations of food and hygiene kits for persons experiencing homelessness and offers of volunteer services in a variety of skill areas are captured by the form. All information provided is electronically safeguarded for privacy and reviewed to determine the best match with City operational needs.
Creation of an Online Exchange for Facial Coverings:
Face masks and coverings for an individual’s personal use can be purchased through a marketplace created by the Long Beach Post in partnership with the City of Long Beach. Mask makers and businesses can register via the Vendor Registration form. https://shop.lbpost.com/vendor-registration

How to Borrow CARES Act Money and Legally Not Pay it Back

0

Since publishing ourdeep diveon the subject last week, we have heard from many readers who completed the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) application and are anxiously awaiting an official reply from the feds. Meanwhile, there are various mediareportsabout the SBA’s electronic loan processing system [known asE-Tran] struggling under the weight of application activity, while lenders are experiencing difficulties accessing the system and are also frustrated.

Remember, be kind and be patient. Also, as you prepare to receive funding, it is time to consider the full impact of the forgiveness provisions. This is a big deal and you do not want to hit any potholes. Forgiveness depends upon payroll and headcount, so let’s start with the latter.

Understanding FTEs

FTE is business shorthand for “full-time equivalent” employees. While headcount simply records the number of persons employed, FTE attempts to rationalize that in some manner. Consider an ice cream shop with 10 staffers who work 40-hours each for a total of 400 paid hours a week. Compare that to a shop with one 40-hour worker, one 30-hour worker, six 28-hour workers, and nine 18-hour workers. That might be 17 workers, but it still adds up to 400 hours of paid time. FTEs attempt to provide a common form of measurement. We are spending extra time on this issue for the benefit ofrestaurants,bars, and retailers who often hire less than full-time workers.

The PPP has 10 mentions of “full-time equivalent employees,” but does not define this term within the text of the CARES Act, so we turned to hunting around the SBA website (as we keep repeating, rule number one for this stuff is to only trust information from dot-gov websites). Any guidance we found was applicable to other programs.

The Pennsylvania tax firmDrucker & Scaccettimaintains an informativeblogon their site, and according to CPA and partner Dan Marques:

One of the biggest questions surrounding the law remains the definition of a full-time equivalent employee as this determination impacts the eventual loan forgiveness. Based upon prior loan programs, a full-time equivalent employee is typically defined for the specific program. As of this writing, no definition has been put forward. The recent Treasury guidance put forward a definition of how the SBA normally counts employees. It’s possible the same definition may be used for full-time equivalent employees but this requires confirmation by the SBA.

A 2014 definition underEmployer Shared Responsibilityprovisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) defines a full-time employee as “an employee who is employed on average at least 30 hours per week,” and an FTE Employee as “a combination of employees, each of whom individually is not a full-time employee because they are not employed on average at least 30 hours per week, but who, in combination, are counted as the equivalent of a full-time employee.” The definition from one program might not apply to another, but it serves as a starting point.

Paul Carelis, vice-president of HR services at MassPay, a national HR firm serving more than 3 million employees, offered:

In speaking with a number of legal experts and employment law firms, we’re finding that the vast majority are confident that the SBA will use the ACA definition of ‘Full Time Equivalent.’ The goodnewsis that many payroll platforms are already set up to calculate this figure as it pertains to compliance with the Affordable Care Act. That said, we’ll all sleep a little better once that guidance is formally published.

The devilish details

What appears to be clear is that the PPP instructs applicants that “the average number of full-time equivalent employees shall be determined by calculating the average number of full-time equivalent employees for each pay period falling within a month.” With this in mind, if you have a meaningful number of less-than-full-time staff, we suggest you add up all of their hours worked per pay period, and ask your lender whether to divide that total by 30 or by 40 to determine FTEs for an SBA 7(a) loan (the CARES Act and PPP are SBA 7(a) loan products).

We do not recommend adding all staff hours if you routinely have staff that worked over 40 hours per week, just the part timers. Consider a restaurant with four employees who each averaged 50 hours per week. If you add all the hours and divide by 40, you will need to show five people to not lose any of your loan forgiveness (see below for further discussion). But do check with your lender.

Limited forgiveness

The amount of loan forgiveness shall not exceed the principal amount of the applicable PPP loan. If you increase staffing or have unusually high rent, your forgiveness deduction is capped at the amount of the loan, even if you spend more on “forgivable” expenses. Several factors can reduce your forgiveness. We discuss them below.

Just cause you got it now doesn’t mean you can keep it later

Expect that if you miscalculate or misrepresent your qualification figures and obtain a larger loan than you are qualified to receive, the excess might not be forgiven, regardless of your expenses. There will come a day, some time well into the future, when the government will audit these loans. Expect the impact of misrepresentations to be painful. At reported application rates, the $349 billion will be gone within a few weeks, and even if an additional $251 billion is approved by Congress, it is unlikely that will last past the first week of May. Once lenders have completed issuing these loans, expect them to turn their attention to the forgiveness with a fine-tooth comb.

The SBA does not require personal guarantees or collateral for PPP loans. Credit worthiness is not considered. The bank’s role is to confirm that based upon a reasonable review of the documents provided by an applicant, and the applicant’s certification, that amount requested is appropriate. The bank will also review documentation to confirm the forgiveness requested is supported by facts. It is likely the banks will be held responsible by the SBA for loans that should not have been forgiven. Hence, one might expect the scrutiny to increase when the forgiveness train pulls into the station.

Forgiveness reduction based on use of loan proceeds

At least 75% of the loan proceeds must be used for wages (which includes benefits and state payroll taxes). Any expenditure for non-payroll expenses exceeding 25% of the loan proceeds is not forgivable.

Forgiveness reduction based on pruning the number of employees

STEP ONE: Calculate “the average number of full-time equivalent employees per month employed by the eligible recipient during the covered period.” The “covered period” is the eight weeks following the day you receive the loan proceeds. Tempus fugit, pursuant to fresh SBA guidance, an applicant must accept loan proceeds no later than 10 days after approval. “The average number of full-time equivalent employees shall be determined by calculating the average number of full-time equivalent employeesfor each pay period falling within a month.”

We suggest you calculate the average number of full-time equivalent employees per pay period and use those figures to calculate the monthly employment totals. Below is an illustration:

You pay staff weekly and based upon counting full-time staff and converting part-time staff to full-time equivalent (based upon your lender’s direction as to whether you use 30 hours or 40 hours), you have determined your FTE employee headcount at 14.5 for week #1, 16 for week #2, 15 for week #3, 16.5 for week #4 and 16 for weeks 5 through 8. Add them up (14.5 + 16 + 15 + 16.5 + 4 x 16 = 126). Divide by two to determine “the average number of full-time equivalent employees per month.”

STEP TWO: Calculate the base period. Applying the same methodology, calculate “the average number of full-time equivalent employees per month employed by the eligible recipient during the period beginning on February 15, 2019 and ending on June 30, 2019”; or “the average number of full-time equivalent employees per month employed by the eligible recipient during the period beginning on January 1, 2020 and ending on February 29, 2020.” If your business is a seasonal employer (as determined by the SBA), you are instructed by the CARES Act to use “the period beginning on February 15, 2019 and ending on June 30, 2019.”

STEP THREE: Add your costs. Those include “payroll costs,” “any payment of interest on any covered mortgage obligation (which shall not include any prepayment of or payment of principal on a covered mortgage obligation), “any payment on any covered rent obligation,” and “any covered utility payment.” “The term ‘covered utility payment’ means payment for a service for the distribution of electricity, gas, water, transportation, telephone, or internet access for which service began before February 15, 2020.”

The amount of loan forgiveness shall be reduced (but not increased) by multiplying your costs (step three above) by the quotient obtained by dividing your average monthly headcount during the covered period (step one) by the average monthly headcount during the base period (step two).

PRO TIP: Calculate your average headcount per pay period along the way—at each pay period. Know that number and track whether you are ahead or behind. Do not wait until the end of the eight-week covered period.

Forgiveness reduction relating to salary and wages

“The amount of loan forgiveness … shall be reduced by the amount of any reduction in total salary or wages of any employed … during the covered period that is in excess of 25 percent of the total salary or wages of the employee during the most recent full quarter during which the employee was employed before the covered period.” Total salary or wages includes tips for hourly workers.

As to highly paid employees [earning above $100,000], assume their wages were $100,000 “during the most recent full quarter during which the employee was employed before the covered period.” The specific text of the law reads: “an employee described in this subparagraph is any employee who did not receive, during any single pay period during 2019, wages or salary at an annualized rate of pay in an amount more than $100,000.” We interpret this to mean that as to employees who earned above $100,000 in 2019 (or pro-rated if they worked less than a full year), their wage rate can be reduced to an annualized $75,000 rate without forfeiting forgiveness.

Forgiveness exemption for rehires

In the event there is a reduction in the number of FTE employees from February 15, 2020 to April 26, 2020 [30 days after the March 27 enactment date of the CARES Act], and not later than June 30, 2020, the eligible employer has eliminated the reduction in the number of FTE employees; and/or there is a reduction in the salary or wages of one or more employees from February 15, 2020 to April 26, 2020 [and not later than June 30, 2020], the eligible employer has eliminated the salary or wages of such employees; then the reductions to forgiveness described above under the two prior headings for lower FTE headcount or lower salary or wage levelswill not apply.

Bear in mind that if payroll levels were reduced and slowly brought back up to the pre-existing levels, there simply may be less payroll to be forgiven. If the same holds true for headcount, there may also be less payroll paid out. Fewer eligible costs means lower forgiveness. Don’t forget that no more than 25% of the loan proceeds can be used for non-payroll purposes. Hence, if you have to ramp staffing levels back up, you will have less money to use for rent, utilities, and interest costs.

Landlord anxiety

For those of you anxious because you are unable to pay rent, don’t fear retribution for the time being. You generally cannot be evicted while waiting for a loan [not because the law protects you] because most courts have sidelined much of their civil work so an eviction simply cannot be processed until things return to normal, and by then these loans will be processed.

If you are anxious, bookmark thislinkto find the SBA programupdates. Trying times, we know. Just remember, breathe, and only trust dot-gov domains!

This article is syndicated by theBoston Institute for Nonprofit Journalism’sPandemic Democracy Project. Contactpdp@binjonline.org for more information.

Will Trump’s GOP Finally Kill American Democracy?

By Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman, Columbus Free Press

For Donald Trump’s GOP followers, the real issue in the 2020 election is democracy itself.

They want it abolished.

Their primary allies are the Coronavirus, state legislatures like those in Ohio and Wisconsin, and the US Supreme Court.

The campaign just hit a new level in Wisconsin. Using the Pandemic, its gerrymandered GOP legislature made voting in the April 7 primary as dangerous as possible. The US Supreme Court, with its usual 5-4 death hammer, has backed them up.

That 5-4 margin selected George W. Bush (Bush v. Gore) in 2000, and cemented the corporate purchase of our elections with Citizens United (2010), Arizona Clean Elections (2011), Shelby County(2013) and McCutcheon (2014).

In recent years Republican governors and legislators have done all they can to limit the franchise. With discriminatory laws demanding voter ID, de facto poll taxes, abolition of early voting, elimination of neighborhood precincts, failure to deliver ballots and voting machines, bans on voting by alleged ex-felons and more, the GOP has assaulted the ability of citizens of poverty, youth and color to vote.

Now the 2020 Pandemic has made it all but impossible to run voting stations. With social distancing and other necessary precautions, operating 116,990 precincts for some 138,000,000 voters, as in 2018, would be impossible.

The Brennan Center for Justice now estimates it would take about $2 billion to federally fund absentee balloting for the whole nation. All registered voters would be mailed a ballot which they would send back to election boards or voting centers. Social distancing and other challenges raised by the pandemic would be eliminated.

An all paper vote-by-mail system may be the clearest route to a fair election. With ballots mailed to all registered voters, citizens would have the option of mailing or walking them back in to election boards. Centralized election centers would handle voting for those with special needs, and would provide for late registration and mass voting, as in the black community’s “souls to the polls” tradition.

Managing a paper-based universal system poses a wide range of serious challenges. But it can circumvent the main obstacles posed by a Pandemic, and offers a welcome alternative to the chaotic hodge-podge of hackable voting machines and rigged polling places that have cursed so many recent elections.

With a well-run universal paper-based mail-in system, we have every reason to believe that voter turnout would soar and reliable vote counts and recounts would be reasonably do-able.

Which is exactly what the Trump Cult most fears. For them, an easily accessible, reliably verifiable voting process is the ultimate enemy. If such a system were put in place, says Trump, “the Republicans would never win another election.”

In other words, for Trump and his ilk to stay in power, democracy must be crushed.

This week’s disaster in Wisconsin may be exactly what the Republicans have in mind. Trump’s ineptitude and greed have deepened and prolonged the Pandemic. Now he has used it in Wisconsin to crush democracy itself.

Thousands of Wisconsin citizens were denied their right to vote when ballots were not mailed out in time to be returned by a tight artificial deadline, which the Trump courts upheld. Voting stations throughout the state were closed or badly run. In Milwaukee, where 180 were planned, just five operated. Incredibly brave poll workers were scarce and terrified. Their jobs were hampered by the demand for social distancing, face masks (when they could get them) protective gear and more.

As usual in urban areas, incredibly brave, dedicated citizens waited hours to vote—-this time amidst a highly contagious Pandemic. At least some are likely to die from the experience.

In choking off the popular vote, Wisconsin Republicans entrenched a right-wing extremist on the state supreme court for ten more years.

In Ohio, the gerrymandered GOP legislature has blocked mailing ballots directly to registered voters, favored by the Republican Ohio Secretary of State and Ohio voting rights groups. Instead the legislature demands that voters must fill out an application to request an absentee ballot from their board of elections. The ballot is mailed to them, which must then be filled out, put inside an envelope, fill out personal information on the outside of that envelope, put that envelope inside another mailing envelope and either mail it or drop it off at the board of elections.

Strangely, the instructions are: “Important: Your voted ballot must besealedin this envelope for your ballot to be counted.” The bold letters are theirs, implying that if your inner envelope was not properly sealed, your vote won’t be counted. Even stranger, the pre-paid postage stamp on the return mailing envelope appears on the back side of the envelope, not the side with the mailing address.

These mail-in ballots must be postmarked no later than April 27 to be counted.

Voter registration advocates have taken to dumping piles of absentee ballot applications in grocery stores like Kroger in hopes that people will pick them up and get their votes in on time.

Should enough Trump legislatures lock up their states like Ohio and Wisconsin, Trump’s “election” will be a foregone conclusion.

As back-up, he might use the Pandemic he has prolonged to cancel actual voting. The GOP legislatures, which are entrenched in states with an Electoral College majority, might then simply proclaim his “victory.” The Supreme Court, which has just adjourned until October, would rubber stamp the process, 5-4.

The American people now have just seven months to prevent this from happening. It won’t be easy. But our lives depend on it.

Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman have co-authored seven books on election theft, which are atwww.freepress.org, which Bob edits, and which hosts Bob’s Fitrakis Files. Harvey is author of The People’s Spiral of US History and Solartopia! Our Green-Powered Earth, both atwww.solartopia.org.