Monday, October 13, 2025
spot_img
spot_img
Home Blog Page 542

Birds: It’s For the Stuffing

0

Thanksgiving, as we observe it today, doesn’t have much in common with the original feast of 1621. The temperature of the vibe between the Pilgrims and Wampanoag was above comfort level at the dinner table, with some participants arriving ready to rumble.

Come to think of it, maybe today’s Thanksgiving table hasn’t strayed too far, being notable for bringing together people from warring political tribes to break bread together, with notoriously mixed results. And this election year, especially, it seems like only social distancing measures might be able to keep apart drunk family members ready to get angry and sloppy.

There was no pumpkin pie, because butter and flour were unheard of or sorely missed, depending on ones’ affiliation, but wild fowl was likely on the menu, which leads me, among others, to conclude there was stuffing. Historians point to their evidence, while I point to the simple fact that both Pilgrims and Indians are human beings, and human beings know how to cook. And cooks don’t let an empty body cavity go unstuffed, especially during a 3-day feast.

Unfortunately, we seem to take this for granted in today’s America, where we think nothing of passing around side dishes filled with savory bread pudding called “stuffing” that has never seen the inside of a bird. That’s the fight I’ll pick this year.

Technically, this never-stuffed material is “dressing,” not “stuffing.” The reason this distinction is important is because the stuff that comes out of the bird is so much better than the side pan, even if the same went into both vessels. The juices from a baked bird impart an unmistakable, irreplaceable joy to the stuffing.

On the east coast, the local diet was heavy on seafood like clams, scallops, seaweed, oysters, mussels, eels and fish. I grew up in coastal Massachusetts, where we would sometimes dig a hole in the beach and fill it with ingredients like those above, and hot rocks, and have a clambake.

Somewhere along the way, in my Thanksgiving ruminations and experimentations, I decided it would be a good idea to stage a clambake inside a bird. In order to make it taste more like stuffing, I add breadcrumbs, herbs, lemon and aromatic veggies: onions, carrots and celery. This recipe depends on a diversity of quality seafood. It’s good to have at least one with the shell on, like clams or mussels, because that makes it seem more like a real clambake. Scallops and shrimp work great too. I must have a jar of oysters, like you can get at the seafood counter of many stores. And I really like imitation crab, like what you get in a California roll. It soaks up the juices like a thirsty sponge.

Chickens, ducks and turkeys all work fantastic. Rabbit tastes like chicken, so that should work too. But whatever bird you are able to stuff, large or small, you might find yourself with more stuffing than you can possibly cram into your bird.

The easiest thing to do is to stuff it around the bird, along with the potatoes, and let it melt in the pan juices. Although not literally stuffed, it sucks up enough of the juices to potentially rule out gravy, and tastes like all the flavor and fat it absorbs.

Another option for too much stuffing: pull the skin away from the bird and stuff it on up between the skin and bird. If basted properly, this layer of stuffing can help keep the bird moist. The skin might split, especially if you cram shells up there, but the crusted stuffing becomes a new skin, absorbing as many bastings as you care to pour.

And finally, we can do the almost unthinkable: bake that excess stuffing in a side pan. Put it in a pan as if you are making a dish of dressing. Put a bunch of chicken wings on top, and cook it until they melt into the dressing. And just like that, after all of my huffing and puffing, I have figured out a way to make it taste like stuffing.

But my favorite part of this fishy bird dish is the clam juice brine. You’ve probably heard of clam juice as a mixer, adding deep umami notes from earth and sea to your Bloody Mary.  And we can thank James Beard for nationalizing the idea that you should brine a chicken before baking it, because the salt gets in the meat, and salty meat absorbs more water than non-salty meat, so it stays moist.

My salty clam brine combines the two concepts and brings them deep into the meat. It flavors the stuffing via the fat, and adds delicious authenticity to the feast. It may not dissolve the animosity at the table, but perhaps it will at least help keep everyone’s mouths too stuffed with food to talk. And that, my friends, is the true point of Thanksgiving.

The Right Stuffings

Since chicken tastes good with lemon, and seafood tastes good with lemon, I add a lot of lemon.

Some clam juice is salty, some isn’t. Sometimes the salty ones don’t mention salt in the ingredients, but it will show up in the RDA values for sodium. I’ve seen it with zero grams, 40 grams and 100 grams of added sodium, with different bottle sizes. So the salt can be a little tricky. Taste your clam juice, and if it’s really salty, reduce the added salt by a teaspoon or two.


Serves 6

1 4-pound bird

1 10-oz bottle clam juice

6 teaspoon salt

2 tablespoons olive oil

2 cups minced onion

2 cloves garlic, minced

1 cup chopped celery

1 cup chopped carrots

1 apple, red or green, chopped

1 teaspoon black pepper

3 tablespoons chopped fresh sage

2 tablespoon chopped fresh thyme

1 tablespoon chopped fresh rosemary

2 pounds seafood (for example; 1 pound mussels or clams on the shell, 1 10-oz tub of oysters and their juices, 6 ounces scallops,  6-oz imitation crab)

½ cup white wine

1 cup crouton-sized breadcrumbs

3 lemons, cut into quarters

4 potatoes, quartered, to surround the bird


Rinse the bird, take out any giblets stashed in the cavity, and brine the bird in the clam juice with the salt and two cups of water.

Push down on the bird hard, so the body cavity fills with brine. Turn it occasionally, and marinate for at least four hours in the fridge.

Rinse the bird, pat it dry, and put it in a roasting pan. Add the oil to a fry pan and saute the onions, garlic, carrots, celery and apple with the black pepper, thyme, rosemary and sage on medium heat. After 10 minutes, add the seafood, wine and lemon juice and squeezed lemons, and cook a few minutes longer, but don’t try to cook all the seafood. Add the breadcrumbs, stir it all together and stuff it into the bird. Place the potatoes around the bird, along with extra stuffing if you go that route.

Cover with foil and place in the oven preheated to 350. After 90 minutes remove the foil. The skin of an extra-stuffed bird will have receded like the tide, leaving a bunch of mussels clinging to the bird like it’s a beach rock.  The stuffing on top, including the seafood, will hold the baste like a sponge. Turn the oven down to 300 degrees. Baste every 15 minutes until done. After about an hour, use a meat thermometer to make sure the bird’s internal temp is at least 165 degrees. Rest, serve and eat.

Gov. Newsom Announces Emergency Allocation of $62 Million to Local Governments to Protect People Living in Project Roomkey Hotels

SACRAMENTO – Gov. Gavin Newsom Nov. 17, announced plans to immediately direct $62 million in one-time funds from the State’s Disaster Response Emergency Operations Account to counties around the state to continue providing housing to current Project Roomkey participants. The Administration is making these available immediately to local governments with Project Roomkey sites so that clients living in motel or hotel rooms under this life-saving program will not be forced to return to street homelessness while the COVID-19 pandemic continues to impact California.

The State has been in regular communication with all Project Roomkey counties and tribes, and the need for additional local support is clear. Since being announced in April, Project Roomkey has used CARES Act funding and FEMA cost-sharing to shelter more than 22,300 individuals experiencing homelessness and who are at highest risk of COVID-19. 

The $62 million will come from the Disaster Response Emergency Operations Account and will be provided by the Department of Social Services to counties implementing Project Roomkey on a formula basis, to be used as follows:

Project Roomkey Operations – $24 million to support continued Project Roomkey operations while local communities develop re-housing plans so that no one is forced to leave a Project Roomkey unit and become unsheltered.

Rehousing – $35 million to develop and implement plans to transition individuals from Project Roomkey into permanent housing. This money can be used for rental subsidies, case management, housing navigation and landlord incentives, among other things.

Technical Assistance – $3 million to contract with experienced housing providers to deploy housing specialists and provide intensive technical assistance to communities to help them create plans for permanent re-housing of all Project Roomkey occupants.

Random Letters: 11-12-20

0

Trump’s Hubris

Regardless of the election results, the Presidency of Donald Trump will be over by the spring of 2021 if the Democrats win the United States Senate.

Trump was impeached for soliciting aid from Ukraine to debase Joe Biden. He was only saved by a Republican-dominated Senate. He would stand no such fortune in the hands of a Senate controlled by Democrats.

Assuming Trump remains in office either by winning the election or by way of a complying Attorney General Barr, he will be subject to continuing claims of violating his oath of office. An active House might simply impeach him for violating the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution. On July 25 of this year a US District Court Judge permitted a suit to continue claiming such a violation. Another threat is the New York District Attorney pursuing Trump for possible banking frauds.

It is doubtful that Trump and his inner circle are not aware of the danger facing him, win or lose. Trump has for four years played to a base that at times seems cultish. Why Trump never sought to widen his base support that would have protected him from the pending catastrophes he and his family are exposed to will remain a question that will cause debate by historians for years to come.

Ed Horn, Baldwin, LI


Supporters of Humanity

Love and always read your column and the paper. I don’t live in San Pedro, but I’ve been there and I am a long-time subscriber to Random Lengths. That said, regarding your column of Oct. 29-Nov. 11, 2020:  Please don’t give up on the ILWU. I’ve studied the union for 51 years, and I assure you that the overwhelming majority of ILWU members are still supporters of the party of humanity. There may be a few people who complain, but the union is still the best and the most democratic collective bargaining organization around. It will always be there when the chips are down.

Harvey Schwartz, El Cerrito, Calif.


Thanks From Long Beach

This is long past due … I’m a businessman, 76 yrs old. [I’ve]resided in five European and Middle East countries in my career  — and yes — still working.

These past four years have been quite a ride, not knowing sometimes what to say to my long time Middle Eastern,  Australian and other clients.

So my Thanks is for your column that my wife and I have looked forward to for some time, a breath of fresh air every week.

Hope all continues well with you and yours,

Oscar and Anne Gallo, Long Beach

Community Voices Displeasure with San Pedro Development

The Los Angeles City Planning Commission hosted a hearing for a proposed development at 2111-2139 Pacific Ave. on Oct. 28. It is a four-story apartment building with 100 units, 11 of which are affordable units. The plans have 84 parking spaces and 1,800 square feet of retail space on the ground floor. No formal action was taken at the hearing.

Jonathan Lonner, a representative of the developer, RKD 2111 Pacific, said that the 11 affordable housing units, making up 16% of the density of the building, allowed the project to qualify for three bonus incentives. Density bonuses allow special relaxing of regulations based on the amount of affordable housing included by the project, including a menu of incentives.

One of the incentives the project qualified for is an off menu-density bonus. Typically, an on-menu density bonus will allow a project an 11-foot extension in height, Lonner said.

However, because of Community Planning Implementation Overlay design requirements, or CPIO, the project is asking for 15.5-foot increase. In addition, it is asking for an increase in floor area and a reduction in parking stalls from 121 to 84.

The Coastal San Pedro Neighborhood Council opposed the project at its Oct. 11 meeting. Robin Rudisill, chair of the council’s Planning, Land Use and Transportation Committee, reiterated her council’s objection to the project at the hearing.

“The density bonus projects allow for on-menu and off-menu bonuses as an incentive for providing affordable housing,” Rudisill said. “This project is an outrageous and egregious use of the density bonus regulations and the San Pedro community plan. The applicant is proposing, and the [city] council’s office is supporting development bonuses way beyond what the regs allow.”

Rudisill said that the developer only qualified for a 35% density bonus for the number of units, but it asked for 46%. For parking, it asked for a 45% reduction from what the density bonus regulations allow, a reduction of 41 spaces.

“The density bonus regulations are not meant to be used as a blank check for the applicant to request, and the [city] council office to support, any amount of bonuses,” Rudisill said.

In addition, Rudisill pointed out that the developer is trying to violate density bonus regulations by requesting an off-menu floor to area ratio bonus, or FAR, of 3.26 to 1. The normally permitted FAR is 1.51 to 1, meaning the developer is requesting a bonus of 117%.

Rudisill said the developer is not allowed an unlimited bonus amount as an off-menu request, as the density bonus law states that off-menu requests are for development standards not on the menu of permitted incentives. FAR is on the menu, as is height, which the developer requested a bonus for as well.

“The applicant justifies these outrageous bonuses by simply stating that they need them in order to build 11 units of affordable housing,” Rudisill said. “That’s outrageous, where does it end? 117% FAR bonus is unacceptable, would you approve 150% FAR bonus if they said they needed it?”

Lonner said that he understands the community’s concern that the project is not compliant with the community plan, CPIO, and redevelopment plan. However, he argued that density bonus legislation and other ordinances at the city level allow the project to conform to the said local plans without considering the bonuses. 

“The state has made it very clear that a project is compliant with local plans if the elements that extend beyond those local plans — height specifically — are related to those density bonus requests,” Lonner said. “The height, in this case, is related to our density bonus request. And therefore, we are compliant with the CPIO, the community plan, and the redevelopment plan, because our height is granted through state legislation.”

Lonner said this project and the project at 1309-1331 S. Pacific Ave., which he is also representing, should not be considered together.

Lonner said that because the projects were more than 500 feet from each other and not within a clear line of sight from each other, there would be no impact in regard to noise. Lonner also said that particulates do drift, but not over this big of a distance, meaning they would not impact each other’s air quality. In addition, there are seven lots of existing buildings between them, which provide obstacles to the noise and the particles. 

Noel Gould, a member of the Coastal San Pedro Neighborhood Council, said that the project did not have enough parking spaces.

“It is woefully under-parked,” Gould said. “There is already totally inadequate parking in the area, if you just drive around, even for 10, 15, 20 minutes at night, trying to find a parking space over about a 10 block area, you’d be lucky if you find one.”

John Smith, a 16-year resident of San Pedro, said the developer’s expectation of people using “alternative” transportation, i.e. using the bus instead of a car, was unrealistic.

“People in San Pedro typically work at a variety of places, industrial settings, so forth, where there are no bus lines that are convenient,” Smith said. “People need their cars. Even people who may take mass transportation to work, if they’re rich enough to be able to afford this apartment house, they’ll probably also have a car for other uses.”

Smith also pointed out that while this project and the project at 1309-1331 S. Pacific Ave. were seven blocks apart, this project is four stories tall, and none of the buildings within those seven blocks reach that high. The tallest buildings are only three stories.

“This is a very tall building and it’s butting up right against single-story houses on 22nd Street,” Smith said.

Elise Swanson, president and CEO of the San Pedro Chamber of Commerce, said the chamber approved of the project after careful consideration.

“We understand the need for housing in Los Angeles and are advocates for increased housing production in our community to support our workforce,” Swanson said.

Swanson said the chamber worked with the developer on the design of the project and its parking committee worked with the developer on the design of the building.

“We spent much time with the developer with our parking subcommittee on developing innovative ways to address transportation in our community,” Swanson said.

Even though the developer worked with the chamber, it did not work with the Coastal San Pedro Neighborhood Council. San Pedro resident Fran Siegel said that council made recommendations back in November 2019, but the developer did not address any of them.

“Why waste taxpayer money, time and lawyers, instead of sitting down with us to make modifications that actually conform to San Pedro’s community plan?” Siegel said.

Siegel pointed out that the project is about 90% market-rate housing, even though there are already hundreds of market-rate apartments sitting empty in San Pedro.

“Is this another [Jose] Huizar virus, as a pay-to-play crowdsource investment scheme that uses the community as a dumping ground with a growing infection of cheap, out-of-scale cookie-cutter blocks that no one can even afford to live in?” Siegel said.

The project’s next hearing is tentatively set for Dec. 17.

Dignity Health – St. Mary Medical Center Honors Veterans with Virtual Celebration and Musical Tributes

0

On Wednesday, November 11, Dignity Health – St. Mary Medical Center (SMMC) hosted its first Annual Virtual Veterans Day Celebration recognizing the military men and women who continue to serve our community. SMMC is proud to have more than 40 Veterans and Reservists on staff at the hospital who shared their personal stories of service.

The special event included a prayer by Sister Celeste Trahan, CCVI, SMMC Vice President of Mission Integration, a personal story from Dr. Jonathan Pryor, St. Mary surgeon, and Captain in the United States Navy Reserve. All attendees enjoyed musical performances by Westerly Elementary students, Dr. Harding Young, and the New Albany Junior ROTC.

California Scales Back “Blueprint For A Safer Economy” to Curb COVID-19 Transmission

SACRAMENTO – As COVID-19 cases increase sharply across the country and California, Gov. Gavin Newsom and state public health officials announced immediate actions Nov. 16, to slow the spread of the virus. The state is pulling an emergency brake in the Blueprint for a Safer Economy resulting in 94.1 percent of California’s population in the most restrictive tier. This change is effective Nov. 17. The state will reassess data continuously and move more counties back if necessary. California is also strengthening its face covering guidance to require individuals to wear a mask whenever outside their home, with limited exceptions.  

“We are sounding the alarm,” said Governor Newsom. “California is experiencing the fastest increase in cases we have seen yet –faster than what we experienced at the outset of the pandemic or even this summer. The spread of COVID-19, if left unchecked, could quickly overwhelm our health care system and lead to catastrophic outcomes. That is why we are pulling an emergency brake in the Blueprint for a Safer Economy. Now is the time to do all we can – government at all levels and Californians across the state – to flatten the curve again as we have done before.”

The rate of growth in confirmed COVID-19 cases is faster than it was in July, which led to a significant peak in cases. This requires a swift public health response and action from all Californians to slow the spread of the virus. Immediate action will help protect individuals at higher risk of severe illness or death from COVID-19 and will help keep the state’s health care delivery system from becoming overwhelmed.  

The 28 counties moving back into Tier 1(Purple/Widespread) include: 

Alameda Napa Santa Cruz 
Butte Nevada Siskiyou 
Contra Costa Orange Solano 
El Dorado Placer Sutter 
Fresno San Benito Trinity 
Glenn San Joaquin Tuolumne 
Kern San Luis Obispo Ventura 
KingsMendocino Merced Santa Barbara Santa ClaraYoloYuba 
   

The nine counties moving back into Tier 2 (Red/Substantial) include: 

Colusa Marin Plumas 
Del Norte Modoc San Francisco 
Humboldt Mono San Mateo 

The two counties moving back into Tier 3 (Orange/Moderate) include: 

Calaveras Sierra 

This action will remain in effect until the State Public Health Officer determines that it’s appropriate to make modifications based on public health conditions and data. 

To prepare the state for an increase in COVID-19 cases, California has developed additional testing capacity to allow cases to be quickly identified, recently opening a new laboratory in Valencia that is already processing thousands of tests a day. California is averaging 164,345 tests over the last seven days. To support California’s health care delivery system, the state has an additional 1,872 beds available at alternate care sites outside of the system that can be made available quickly if needed to respond to a surge in cases.

California will continue to update the Blueprint for a Safer Economy based on the best available public health data and science.

Details: covid19.ca.gov.

San Pedro Man Extradited to Face Charges of Making ‘Virtual Kidnapping’ Extortion Calls While Imprisoned for Murder in Mexico

            LOS ANGELES —  A San Pedro man has been extradited from Mexico to Los Angeles to face federal charges that he perpetrated a “virtual kidnapping” scam where at least 30 victims in Southern California and elsewhere were duped via telephone into paying thousands of dollars in ransom to free their family members, who in reality hadn’t been kidnapped at all.

         Julio Manuel Reyes Zuniga, a.k.a. “Muneco,” 48, arrived at Los Angeles International Airport Nov. 11, after being extradited by Mexico.

Reyes Zuniga, a reputed member of the Rancho San Pedro street gang who had been imprisoned in Mexico since 1996 for two murder convictions, was taken into custody by the United States Marshals Service. Reyes Zuniga finished serving his prison sentence in Mexico last year and has been held since for extradition on this case.  He was arraigned Nov. 12in United States District Court in downtown Los Angeles.

         A federal grand jury in September 2019 returned a 31-count indictment against Reyes Zuniga. He is charged with one count of conspiracy to commit extortion, 27 counts of extortion, two counts of foreign communication of threats with intent to extort money, and one count of conspiracy to launder monetary instruments.

         “Virtual kidnappings” happen when an unsuspecting victim is told via telephone that his or her family member has been kidnapped. When the victim answers the phone, there is typically a panicked or gasping voice on the phone pleading for help. Then, through additional deception and threats, the criminal coerces the victim to pay a ransom. The criminal also threatens harm to the purported kidnap victim if the scam victim contacts law enforcement or alerts authorities. No one is physically kidnapped in these schemes, but they are often traumatic for everyone involved. On average, the family sends thousands of dollars to the scammers before contacting law enforcement.

The indictment alleges that from Sept. 2015 to June 2018, while he was serving a murder conviction in a prison outside Mexico City, Reyes Zuniga and others acting at his direction falsely represented to victims on the phone that they had kidnapped the victims’ child or loved one, and planned to harm them unless a ransom was paid for their release. In reality, no kidnappings had taken place. Reyes Zuniga and others working at his direction allegedly then demanded ransom payments in the form of wire transfers, cash drops at locations, or the purchase of electronics such as iPhones or iPads. Once the funds were transferred, individuals in Mexico delivered the proceeds to the imprisoned Reyes Zuniga.

‘Stacey Abrams Shill’ Says What We Must Do

How to prevent Jim Crow from Stealing US Senate

“It is unfortunate that the ACLU hired [Greg Palast] a known Stacey Abrams shill.”

So said the flak for the Republican Secretary of State of Georgia. And I’m sure that GOP Senator David Perdue thinks it “unfortunate” as well – now that their program to systematically purge Black voters in Georgia was busted, and Sen. Perdue must face a run-off against contender Jon Ossoff.

A “Stacey Abrams shill”? I’ve been called worse.

What raises the political hacks’ hackles is not the weird political conspiracy they’ve fantasized, but rather that the American Civil Liberties Union of Georgia issued our report, “Georgia Voter Roll Purge Errors,” identifying 198,351 voters wrongly removed – overwhelmingly voters of color, low income and young voters. [If you haven’t watched our 14-minute film, The Purged and its one-minute version, do it now…and pass it on.]

What angers (and worries them) is that the ACLU, Black Voters Matter and yes, Stacey Abrams’ non-partisan organization Fair Fight, simply made our investigative findings public and returned thousands of victim voters to the rolls.

They are panicked. They lost the state for Trump, and now they could lose control of the US Senate in the upcoming January 5 run-offs between Sen. Perdue and Ossoff and between Rev. Raphael Warnock and Sen. Kelly Loeffler.

I get it: the state’s Red Rulers want me to go away. Well, I’ve bought a new mask and I’m marching to Georgia. (OK, flying discount.)


No miracle

The GOP’s crushing in Georgia was not a miracle nor did it just surf in on a Blue Wave.

I’ve been investigating Georgia for seven tough years, ever since Martin Luther King III told me, in Atlanta, “Greg, Georgia is a Blue state…if they’d let us vote.”

Honestly, it’s not by job to turn Georgia blue, green or orange.  Our sole focus is to expose vote suppression trickery by either political party.  But the math is clear:  if you illegally remove low-income voters, the Democratic vote will increase when the crime is busted.

So what happened on Tuesday in Georgia? I know this: Black Voters Matter took our report and sent 98,000 postcards to wrongly purged voters to warn them to re-register. The ACLU issued our findings. (No, Mr. Secretary of State. The ACLU didn’t “hire” us. The implication is that our results were bought. No way: the ACLU independently reviewed our work and made it public.)

And we didn’t start in this Election Year. We worked on getting out the word on Georgia’s Jim Crow election games in press briefings sponsored by the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and the NAACP. We partnered with Helen Butler of the Georgia Coalition for the Peoples Agenda and successfully sued Brian Kemp and his successor as Secretary of State.

And good old investigative reporting. I’ve only been digging into the Georgia vote cesspool for seven years—in other states I have put in decades—and the King family has been at it for generations.

We also had a huge response to our Purged videos (7 million views, 800 million impressions)—which directed voters of Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin and North Carolina to our re-registration website, SaveMyVote2020.org. Maybe that’s one reason that this time, the President was chosen by the voters, not the purge.

But the next two months require the same massive effort and more. This is not partisanship—it’s citizenship.

This Sunday, I’ve been working with our team of 15, including experts, lawyers and crew already in or on their way to Georgia to cover the run-offs and investigate the new tricks we can’t yet imagine.

It’s not just The Purge. During our investigation for Democracy Now! on the 2017 Congressional race between Ossoff and Republican Karen Handel, we discovered other, cruder tricks: shifting voting stations from Black to White neighborhoods. For Rolling Stone and Al Jazeera, we discovered the state had threatened, and effectively shut down, a Korean-American voter registration drive. And, yes, with Stacey Abrams’ help, we discovered that the state simply refused to add newly registered young voters to the rolls.

And along the way, we had to file suits, get insiders to pass us the incriminating information, create websites to inform voters, attend a Trump rally or two and even get busted by Georgia Smokeys for trying to ask now-Gov. Brian Kemp about his purge operations. (Let me not over-dramatize: It was a quick catch-and-release to prevent embarrassing questions while cameras rolled.)

The changing of the political order does not ride in on a wave. It takes years of work … and the next two months will be the capstone.

But this is a truly non-partisan effort. (And Lord knows, the Democratic Party is not happy when I turn my attention to their own shenanigans.) Indeed, I not only gave our information to the ACLU and Black Voters Matter, we also offered our entire file to Secretary of State Raffensperger.

Republican or Democratic, our government should be concerned about wrongly taking away any American’s sacred right to vote.

My foundation even offered to pay the cost of correcting the state’s lists. So far, the response has been a series of gross prevarications and nasty ad hominem attacks. I can live with that.

It’s not my business to defeat a candidate, but it is my business to defeat Jim Crow.

We did not plan for this post-election election. But the War on Voting is now about to get nastier—and we have the unique skills to expose the attacks.

I’m asking you to help with a donation of any amount.
A $100 tax-deductible donation will get you a supporter screen credit in our upcoming film. And for those with deep pockets, get a co-producer credit for $500 and a producer credit for $1,000.

Candidates of all parties will drown in donations for this run-off. But there’s no sense winning over voters—whose right to vote has vanished.

Little-known Trump appointee is kneecapping Biden’s transition team

By Kerry Eleveld 

Daily Kos Staff

If there’s one thing today’s Democrats can count on when they retake the White House from Republicans, it’s that they will inherit a toxic waste zone of a mess. With the pandemic entering a terrifying stage of spread, President-elect Joe Biden will be no exception. But his task of reinvigorating the federal government to deal with the nation’s biggest public health challenge in a century is meeting with an extra hurdle: A little-known Trump appointee is delaying an essential piece of the transition process that makes critical government resources available to the transition team.

Read more at, www.dailykos.com/Little-known-Trump-appointee-is-kneecapping-Biden-s-transition-team

Corporate Democrats Are to Blame for Congressional Losses — So Naturally They’re Blaming Progressives

Corporate Democrats got the presidential nominee they wanted, along with control over huge campaign ad budgets and nationwide messaging to implement “moderate” strategies. But, as the Washington Post noted, Joe Biden’s victory “came with no coattails down ballot.” Democratic losses left just a razor-thin cushion in the House, and the party failed to win a Senate majority. Now, corporate Democrats are scapegoating progressives.

The best members of Congress are pushing back — none more forcefully or eloquently than Rashida Tlaib, the Michigan congresswoman who just won her second term in one of the nation’s poorest districts. She was the most outspoken against an anti-progressive pile-on during a Nov. 5 conference call of House Democrats. And she continues to hold high a shining lantern of progressive principles.

Tlaib has pointed out that “Democratic candidates in swing districts who openly supported progressive policies, like Medicare for All and the Green New Deal, won their races.” And she refuses to retreat.

“We’re not going to be successful if we’re silencing districts like mine,” she told Politico days ago. “Me not being able to speak on behalf of many of my neighbors right now, many of which are black neighbors, means me being silenced. I can’t be silent.”

Politico reported that Tlaib was “choking up as she expressed frustration” near the end of an interview as she said: “If [voters] can walk past blighted homes and school closures and pollution to vote for Biden-Harris, when they feel like they don’t have anything else, they deserve to be heard. I can’t believe that people are asking them to be quiet.”

In an email to supporters, Tlaib was clear: “We’ve got to focus on working class people. We are done waiting to be heard or prioritized by the federal government. I won’t let leaders of either party silence my residents’ voices any longer.”

Tlaib offers the kind of clarity that should guide progressive forces no matter how much “party unity” smoke is blown in their direction: “We are not interested in unity that asks people to sacrifice their freedom and their rights any longer. And if we truly want to unify our country, we have to really respect every single voice. We say that so willingly when we talk about Trump supporters, but we don’t say that willingly for my black and brown neighbors and from LGBTQ neighbors or marginalized people.”

When Rashida Tlaib talks about “pushing the Democratic Party to represent the communities that elected them,” she actually means what she says. That’s quite a contrast with the usual discourse coming from dominant Democrats and outfits like the Democratic National Committee.

Let’s face it: Most of the nearly 100 members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus are not reliable when corporate push comes to shove, assisted by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. What has been startling and sometimes disturbing to entrenched Democrats is that Tlaib — along with House colleagues Alexandria Ocasio-CortezIlhan OmarRo Khanna and some others — repeatedly make it clear that they’re part of progressive movements. And those movements are serious about fundamental social change, even if it means polarizing with Democratic Party leaders.

Anyone with a shred of humane values should be aware that Republican lawmakers are anathema to those values. But that reality shouldn’t blind us to the necessity of challenging — and, when feasible, organizing to unseat — elected Democrats who are more interested in maintaining the status quo that benefits moneyed interests than fighting for social justice.

While satisfying their impulses to blame the left for centrist failures, corporate Democrats and their mildly “progressive” enablers — inside and outside of Congress — are striving to paper over basic fault lines. The absence of a functional public-health system, the feeble government response to the climate emergency, the widening and deadly realities of income inequality, the systemic racism, the runaway militarism and so many other ongoing catastrophes are results of social structures that constrict democracy and serve oligarchy. Those who denounce the fight for a progressive agenda are telling us that, in essence, they don’t want much to change.

_______________________

Norman Solomon is the national director of RootsAction.org and the author of many books including War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death. He was a Bernie Sanders delegate from California for the 2020 Democratic National Convention.