Friday, October 10, 2025
spot_img
spot_img
Home Blog Page 524

Public Health Confirms Second Case of U.K. Coronavirus Variant in L.A. County; Identifies Four Additional Cases of MIS-C

The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health or Public Health, Jan. 30, has confirmed the second case of COVID-19 variant B.1.1.7, the same variant discovered in the United Kingdom. The specimen, submitted by a clinical facility, was sequenced as part of routine surveillance by the Los Angeles County Public Health Laboratory. Public Health announced the first confirmed case of COVID-19 variant B.1.1.7 on January 16.

Public Health Jan. 30, confirmed 316 new deaths and 6,918 new cases of confirmed COVID-19. To date, Public Health has identified 1,111,089 positive cases of COVID-19 across all areas of L.A. County and a total of 16,647 deaths.

Public Health believes the B.1.1.7 and other variants are already spreading in the county, and is continuing to test samples.

Viruses constantly change through mutation, and new variants of a virus are expected to occur over time. Multiple variants of the virus that causes COVID-19 have been documented in the United States and globally during this pandemic. Currently, there is no evidence that it causes more severe illness or increased risk of death.

Presence of the  B.1.1.7 variant in Los Angeles County means virus transmission can happen more easily, and residents and businesses must more diligently implement and follow all of the personal protective actions and safety measures put in place to prevent additional cases, hospitalizations, and deaths. This includes wearing a face covering properly over your nose and mouth, physically distancing, and not gathering with people from outside your household. With community transmission still at a very high level, staying home as much as possible is the best protection. These strategies will only be effective in slowing the spread of any variant strain of COVID-19 if they are used by everyone all of the time.

Four additional cases of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) are also being reported by Public Health. This brings the total cases of MIS-C in L.A. County to 66 children including one child death. All 66 children with MIS-C in L.A. County were hospitalized and 44% of the children were treated in the ICU. Of the children with MIS-C, 32% were under the age of 5 years old, 38% were between the ages of 5 and 11 years old, and 30% were between the ages of 12 and 20 years old. Latino/Latinx children account for nearly 74% of the reported cases.

MIS-C is an inflammatory condition associated with COVID-19, and symptoms include fever that does not go away and inflamed body parts, including the heart, lungs, kidneys, brain, skin, eyes, or gastrointestinal organs. If you believe your child is displaying MIS-C symptoms, contact your primary care or an urgent care provider. Seek emergency care for critical or life-threatening conditions. If you do not have a primary care provider, dial 2-1-1 and L.A. County will help connect you to one.

Join Online for State of the Port to Recap A Historic 2020

The annual State of the Port address will tell the story of how the Port of Long Beach mobilized to overcome the challenges of the global pandemic to record its best year ever, moving ahead with ambitious environmental initiatives and opening an iconic West Coast bridge.

Starting at the virtual address will feature Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia, Port of Long Beach Executive Director Mario Cordero and Long Beach Harbor Commission President Frank Colonna.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this year’s State of the Port is a pre-recorded program, available online instead of an in-person event.

Time: 9 a.m. Feb. 4

Details: www.polb.com/stateoftheport

Don’t Grade President Biden on a Curve

Unless consciously resisted, one of Donald Trump’s lasting triumphs will be the establishment of such a low bar that mediocre standards will prevail for his successor. Of course, providing a clear contrast to the atrocious Trump presidency is irrefutably necessary — but it’s hardly sufficient.

To give high marks merely for excelling in comparison to right-wing Republicans is to cheer high jumps over very low standards. And the opening months of President Biden’s term are an especially bad time to grade him on a curve, as top appointees take charge and policy directions are set.

With corporate forces fully mobilized and armies of their lobbyists deployed to constantly push the new administration, the need for activating grassroots counterpressure from the left should be obvious. Yet an all-too-common progressive refrain now is along the lines of “Step back and give Biden a chance!”

The refrain is understandable. And mistaken. It’s essential to vigorously advance progressive agendas that are morally compelling and tactically effective — to deliver notable improvements in people’s lives and prevent the Republicans from recapturing Congress (as happened in 1994 and 2010 with big GOP victories just two years after the corporate-friendly Democratic presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama took office).

One of Trump’s overarching “achievements” was to move the frame of feasible political options rightward. Now, the achievable options must be moved in a decidedly progressive direction — not simply back to the future with a “third Obama term” aiming to reinstate the gist of a pre-Trump status quo.

Encouraging as some of Biden’s first executive orders may be, they’re not transformative. Last week, under the headline “Biden’s Executive Actions Just Scratch the Surface,” the editor of The American Prospect offered a sober assessment. “What Biden is doing, even if it extends only to reversing Trump-era rules and actions, will help a lot of people,” David Dayen wrote. But, “in a lot of ways on these executive actions, the style is doing a fair bit more than the substance.”

On January 28, when Biden signed an executive order on Obamacare, he emphasized his self-imposed restraint. “There’s nothing new that we’re doing here other than restoring the Affordable Care Act and restoring Medicaid to the way it was before Trump became president,” Biden said. And: “I’m not initiating any new law, any new aspect of the law. This is going back to what the situation was prior to Trump’s executive order.”

Prior to Trump, tens of millions of people in the United States were already uninsured or underinsured — and that was before Covid struck.

Some reporting indicates Biden might now realize that chasing after Republican partners in Congress would be a fool’s errand. Yet Biden has a bad history of reaching across the aisle to make harmful deals. “Mr. Biden finds himself managing the outsize aspirations of the progressive wing of his party while exploring the possibilities of working with a restive opposition that has resisted him from the start,” the New York Times reported in a front-page story on Sunday.

Whatever the phrase “outsize aspirations” means, a key reality is that progressives must keep building pressure during this time of extreme crises — with several thousand Americans dying from the coronavirus every day, economic catastrophes deepening for many, racial injustice continuing to fester, and the climate emergency still worsening.

Much of what Biden can do would require no congressional action. Dayen points out that, as per the Constitution, presidents “are implementers” — and “they should implement to the maximum potential allowed by law.”

When gauging the Biden presidency, we should throw away yardsticks that are designed to measure its distance from the Trump presidency.

So many people are dying from lack of health care, and Biden has yet to take — or call for — the magnitude of steps that are urgently needed to save lives. One proposal, initiated by Rep. Ilhan Omar and gaining support in the House, would provide recurring stimulus payments. A comprehensive plan, put forward by Sen. Bernie Sanders, would establish free health care as a human right for everyone in the United States, in effect Medicare for All, for the duration of the pandemic.

How to pay for such momentous programs? One bill, introduced by Rep. Peter DeFazio, provides for a transaction tax on Wall Street that would raise vast amounts of revenue from people most able to afford it. One bill after another has sought to substantially cut the military budget and make the funds available to meet crying human needs.

Only continuous and intense pressure from grassroots activism can induce Biden to support such vital measures.

“We should have learned a lesson from the Obama-Biden years, where many progressive forces gave a honeymoon to the administration, believing that they needed space and believing that they were gonna be under a lot of pressure so we should back off. It was the worst possible thing that we could have ever done,” said Bill Fletcher Jr., a former senior AFL-CIO staffer who is now executive editor of GlobalAfricanWorker.com. “We need to stand behind Biden-Harris at nose length so that they cannot retreat without running smack into us.”

Progressive journalist Sonali Kolhatkar said: “Biden has already faced relentless calls for so-called ‘unity’ from pro-Wall-Street and pro-war corporate Democrats and media pundits, which is of course code for capitulating to centrism and even conservatism. He needs to hear even stronger calls from his constituency, calls that are loud enough to drown out the Wall Streeters and warmongers.”

In the words of progressive populist Jim Hightower, “The question is not whether Biden will produce the transformative change that America urgently needs. He won’t. Rather the question is how hard, far and persistently we progressives will push him.”

If President Biden is pushed hard and far and persistently enough, some truly great changes are possible.

_____________________________________

Norman Solomon is the national director of RootsAction.org and the author of many books including War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death. He was a Bernie Sanders delegate from California to the 2016 and 2020 Democratic National Conventions. Solomon is the founder and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy.

Project South Bay Heroes

0
Torrance Memorial frontline workers receive donations from South Bay Mommies and Daddies Project South Bay Heroes Program

South Bay Mommies and Daddies, a local social media group has shared an important event that gives community members a way to support healthcare and frontline workers through this pandemic.

Editors note: The group is still doing the South Bay Hero’s event, but is waiting for more funds so that they can schedule more food deliveries to frontline workers. 

Project South Bay Heroes #SouthBayHeroes

According to South Bay Mommies and Daddies, bringing people together is what  they are all about and the group’s actions speak loudly. You can join the Facebook group along with Tower 60 Foundation, Fueling the Fearless, South Bay Credit Union, and OneNinth Media, to create a special fundraising campaign called Project South Bay Heroes. This campaign will support front line healthcare workers in local hospitals. South Bay Mommies and Daddies will purchase food from local restaurants, and provide meals for local heroes on the front line in South Bay Hospitals.

Here’s what the group has so far done:

If you are a restaurant owner that would like to be considered, please fill out this application.

You can also make a donation today, thank healthcare heroes and support local South Bay restaurants. South Bay Mommies and Daddies is raising money to purchase food from local restaurants to provide meals to front-line heroes at our local South Bay Hospitals.

Additionally, you can show your support by printing our Thank You Sign, coloring it in and placing it in your windows to help lift up healthcare workers and all frontline workers. Post your photos on social media using our Hashtag #SouthBayHeroes

South Bay Mommies and Daddies asked everyone to do their part to support healthcare and frontline workers and help stop the spread. When the group asked medical professionals how it could show support, these were their top requests. : 

  • Stay home unless absolutely necessary to leave.
  • Wear a face mask whenever around other people.
  • Check in with your neighbors, family members and friends to make sure they are ok.
  • AND BE KIND! It’s very important during this incredibly stressful time in our lives to be kind to one another, especially to medical professionals who are doing their best under less than ideal circumstances.

Details: Donate to www./tower60.com/south-bay-heroes

Lila Downs, Beautiful New Song to Essential Workers

Iconic Grammy and Latin Grammy Award winning singer Lila Downs is one of the most singular and powerful voices, whose compelling stage presence and poignant storytelling transcend all language barriers.

Raised in Oaxaca and Minnesota, Lila’s exquisite artistry bridges traditions from across the Americas, with influences ranging from the folk and ranchera music of Mexico and South America to North American folk, jazz, blues and hip-hop.

As a passionate human rights activist, Lila’s lyrics often highlight issues relating to social justice, sharing stories that too often go untold.

Dark Eyes, a new song, has a powerful and honest message to support the essential workers that have been risking their lives for others. It is a song that defines courage and humanity above everything, and that seeks for hope in these uncertain times.

The song benefits the Binational Center for the Development of Oaxacan Indigenous Communities (CBDIO), a non-profit organization created by the Indigenous Front of Binational Organizations (FIOB).

Since their foundation, FIOB and CBDIO have made known the presence and existence of indigenous migrant communities, emphasizing the economic, work and cultural contributions indigenous migrants make to this country.

The lyric video that accompanies the song features photographs of essential workers taken by David Bacon, Martin Escamilla and Jennifer Pochat.

To listen to this song, dedicated to the essential workers who have kept us safe, clickhere.

Take the Vaccine. Reject anti-Science Vaxxers, Rightists, Conspiracy Theories

0

A dangerous coalition of anti-science, anti-vaccine organizations such as Freedom Angels has joined with right-wing militias in denouncing efforts to stop the spread of coronavirus, and impeding healthcare advocates, doctors and scientists. This, plus the general distrust in the government has meant that 30% of the population, including a third of health care professionals, have decided NOT to take any of the available vaccines against the coronavirus.

What is the science and why I urge everyone to get the vaccine when offered, continue to use masks and physical distancing to stop this pandemic and avoid large gatherings regardless of your political beliefs? More than 350,000 people in the United States and 2 million people in the world have died from the disease, and it is accelerating.

Visit the World Health Organization website, an organization Trump refused to fund, on the importance of vaccination and its safety. 

What is a vaccination?

“Vaccination is a simple, safe, and effective way of protecting people against harmful diseases, before they come into contact with them. It uses your body’s natural defenses to build resistance to specific infections and makes your immune system stronger.

Vaccines train your immune system to create antibodies, just as it does when it’s exposed to a disease. However, because vaccines contain only killed or weakened forms of germs like viruses or bacteria, they do not cause the disease or put you at risk of its complications. The World Health Organization estimates that vaccines save between 2 and 3 million lives every year.  The anti-COVID-19 vaccines contain viral RNA.

Only by an overwhelming majority of the population being vaccinated and thus immune to Covid-19, will we develop what is called “herd immunity.” Immunity can arise either from the vaccination or by having and recovering from a coronavirus infection.

This is what has been accomplished thru other vaccines like Polio, Measles/Mumps/Rubella, smallpox, cervical cancer (HPV- affecting many male and female sexually active youth), Yellow fever, rabies, cholera… and your annual flu shot.  The science works—and all children must receive vaccinations to attend public school. Where this has not happened, such as in some religious communities, there is a disease outbreak that threatens many.

Individual freedoms are important, but when that negatively impacts the rest of society and the right of survival and health of the majority, it should not prevail. One’s religion should not be an excuse either to exempt people. If that stood, we would never reach societal immunity.

Are vaccines safe?

The World Health Organization deem vaccination as a safe and effective means to protect us from disease and that the side effects, such as a sore arm or mild fever, are minor and temporary. More serious side effects are possible, but extremely rare. The World Health Organization warns that we are far more likely to suffer injury by a vaccine-preventable disease than by a vaccine.

And now to address the lies circulating on the internet and by irresponsible media.

Is there a link between vaccines and autism?

There is no evidence of any link between vaccines and autism or autistic disorders. This has been demonstrated in many studies, conducted across very large populations.

In 1998, British Dr. Andrew Wakefield and colleagues published a case study in the medical journal Lancet, suggesting that the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine may “predispose behavioral regression and developmental disorder in children.”  Almost immediately afterward, epidemiological studies were conducted and published, refuting the alleged link between MMR vaccination and autism. Lancet published a retraction, Wakefield lost his medical license.

Despite his study of only 12 children, the uncontrolled design and the speculative nature of the conclusions, the paper received wide publicity, and MMR vaccination rates began to drop because parents were concerned and outbreaks of the disease expanded in many countries. This was the beginning of the modern day anti-vaxxer movement.

Yes, as with any vaccine, including the annual flu shot, some people will have reactions more than a sore arm or a slight fever.  A few may die.  But this number is far lower than the number who will die without the vaccine. Does anyone today advocate that children not get the vaccine for polio or measles?  A few anti-science vaccines do, but it is a minuscule number.

Just over 5 million people in the U.S. had received their first dose of a coronavirus vaccine as of, according to the CDC, and only a handful of reactions to them had qualified as anaphylaxis, a severe and potentially life-threatening allergic reaction. THERE HAVE BEEN NO DEATHS.

Will COVID-19 vaccines provide long-term protection?

It’s too early to know if COVID-19 vaccines will provide long-term protection. However, it’s encouraging that available data suggest that most people who recover from COVID-19 develop an immune response that provides at least some period of protection against reinfection – although we’re still learning how strong this protection is, and how long it lasts.

The first vaccines for prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States were authorized for emergency use by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).

With the Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Moderna vaccines approved for use and distribution, healthcare workers in hospitals, clinics etc. and nursing home workers and residents are getting the first doses.  Phase one has just rolled out with approximately 49 million persons, including frontline essential workers (non–health care workers) and persons over the age of 75 are recommended to receive a vaccine. Cuba has also developed a successful vaccine and will have the entire population of 12 million vaccinated in record time.  By contrast the rollout of the vaccines and their administering in the United States has been criminally slow. If the United States does not reach the 90 percentile level of vaccination, there will be NO herd immunity and the pandemic will continue with devastating consequences for years to come.

It is ironic that some politicians, the most outspoken calling it the “COVID hoax,”  and rejecting mask wearing and statewide physical distancing at restaurants were the first to jump to the front of the line for the vaccines. These included: rightwing republican Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell and rabid anti-communist Texas Senator Ted Cruz. Such hypocrisy.   As these same people publicly disclaim science, denounce medical experts of the Center for Disease Control (CDC) they vote against financial assistance for working people, extension of unemployment insurance, a moratorium on evictions of renters WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and President Donald Trump.and small businesses assistance. They reject physical distancing and mask wearing as a way to reduce the spread.

The government has the money to help the millions of unemployed, didn’t they just appropriate $686 billion for the military, and give them a 3 percent raise while stonewalling needed aid for individuals and small businesses?

Government Mistrust is Real and Justified. But trust the Science

The widespread mistrust in the US government and its Democratic and Republican administrations is completely justified.  They lie to the American people every day, violate the sovereignty of other people around the world such as Cuba, Venezuela and Iran, engage in wars aimed at bolstering the profits of US corporations, have whittled away at meager environmental protections and a woman’s right to choose, and the list goes on. 

The for-profit hospital industry turns away those needing life-saving treatment after reducing capacities for years and nursing home residents are crammed into conditions that ensure rapid spread of the virus. Pharmaceutical bosses insist on the inviolability of their patents, motivated only by profit, guaranteeing large swaths of the semicolonial world won’t see vaccination for months, maybe years. Pfizer says its doses won’t reach millions in the U.S. until June or later, while other plants capable of producing the vaccine are not used.

The CDC was erroneous in all of its recommendations at the beginning of the pandemic by failing to take it seriously, by botching the removal and dispersal of those with infections from the cruise ships, and bending to the pressure of the Trump administration by not countermanding and explaining how slowing the rate of infection through mask use and physical distancing was real. Their recommendations were often political, not medically sound due to pressure from the anti-science Trump administration.

However, science has prevailed in the ability to produce effective vaccines in China, Cuba, Britain, US, Russia. 

Although acceptance of the vaccine is notching up, Black and Hispanic Americans — among the groups hardest hit by the coronavirus pandemic — remain among the most reluctant to roll up their sleeves. 

A leading anti-vaccine organization, Freedom Angels 2.0 banners it’s Facebook with: “We Will Not Comply with Tyranny.” “Health officials are Tyrants.” Denise Aguilar, Co-Founder, advocates restaurants violating the take-out only code, advises on how to counter the teacher’s union demand of safe school opening by forming your own school. “Public health is Public Enemy No. 1.”  We shall come to your area and help you organize for a fee… We will teach you firearm training, help in keeping your business open by blocking CDC staff. 

The website is filled with conspiracy theories including that the pandemic is a communist conspiracy, the pandemic is no worse than the common flu and it promoted and spoke at the Jan 6 march and insurrection in Washington in support of Donald Trump.

“We are here to recruit you”, said one of its leaders Denise Aguilar. “We are done with bills. We are done with newsletters…we are boots on the ground, and it’s our responsibility to take our government back.”

These pro-Trump forces such as Blue Lives Matter and the Proud Boys Boogaloo have been launchingr rallies at the California state capitol.

Melanie Smith, head of analysis at Graphika, a social media analytics firm that tracks misinformation, said the fringe QAnon movement has gained influence with anti-vaccine communities online, boosting momentum and pushing unfounded claims about COVID vaccines into the mainstream. She told the NY Times

“QAnon at its core is an anti-government conspiracy — and we are existing in a time where communication with governments is extremely important, particularly for public health — so you have QAnon turning its attention to vaccinations,” said Smith, who has been studying the intersection of vaccine misinformation and conspiracy theories since the pandemic began.

One of the most popular political conspiracies in the U.S. right now, she noted, is that the vaccines implant a microchip created by Bill Gates for citizen surveillance.

Other top COVID anti-vaccine theories include claims that the nation’s top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, is directly profiting from COVID vaccines, and those who choose not to get the shots will be denied food stamps, according to social media analytics firm NewsGuard

The final message. Adhere to CDC guidelines to reduce infection rates, take the vaccine. Trust scientists not politicians. Publicly and actively we and our unions should campaign for free medical care for all, end the for profit “healthcare” system. Health care is a right not a privilege.

Hundreds Caravan in LA for Immigrant Rights

LOS ANGELES — On Jan. 27, a demonstration of several hundred people in their vehicles celebrated the repeal of the Trump administrations Muslim travel ban and called on President Joseph Biden to go further by raising the the immigrant refugee caps and grant citizenship to the 11 million immigrants in the United States. 

Representatives of at least a dozen immigrant rights organizations were present in the caravan, including CHIRLA 

Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, Council of American Islamic Relations (CAIR-LA), Arab American Civic Council, a Korean immigrant rights organization, members of the Mobile Workers Alliance (LYFT, UBER, DoorDash, Instacart…), L.A. US hands Off Cuba Committee, YES to Immigrants Forward, Jews Against Fascism and SEIU local 721.

While there’s relief that there’s a new administration in the White House, organizers were keen on expressing solidarity and their aspirations for more protections of immigrant refugees. 

“We are on the frontlines challenging the band of Muslims and mobilizing support for their families,” said Ishraq Ali, who represents a national Muslim empowerment organization.  

Representing CHIRLA, as its Director of External Affairs, Polo Morales echoed Ali’s sentiments to the demonstration’s attendees. 

 Today is about solidarity among refugees and immigrants in this nation. We came together at LAX, which is the gateway to this country for many refugees, and we commemorated the suffering of thousands of families because of the past administration’s hateful policies,” Morales said. “We recognized that we cannot move forward if we do not move together, and we intend to stand up for each other until all of us have access to citizenship in this country.”

Lamba Najib of the Council of American Islamic Relations called for the Biden administration to close any loopholes that target immigrants or refugees.  

SEIU 721 with its 95,000 members was a key organizer of this demonstration.

Prior to the caravan circling LAX where thousands of immigrants work and enter into the country, SEIU  721 labor organizer, Felipe Caceres communicated the urgency of immediate action on behalf of undocumented immigrants. 

“We know undocumented workers are essential,” Caceres said. “For my whole life I’ve heard promises of immigration reform and been told to wait. We shall not wait any longer. We want legislation that gives citizenship to our families, the 11 million undocumented workers in this country.”

Carceres continued, saying the immigrant rights advocates won’t  stop fighting until undocumented workers have citizenship and are protected from the coronavirus with personal protective equipment. 

“We demand action by the Biden administration and will keep demonstrating till we get it,” Carceres said. “Never again will we criminalize our immigrants. We want citizenship status for all.”

Other groups echoed the reality that the Biden administration won’t have much of a honeymoon period.

“While we celebrate the end of the Muslim and African [travel] bans [and immigrant restrictions], it’s not lost on us that such a policy should never have existed in the first place. We will continue to be in solidarity with Muslim and African immigrants until they are reunited with their families and free from ICE prisons,” said the executive director of MPower Change, Linda Sarsour.  

CAIR-LA Executive Director Hussam Ayloush noted that repealing the Muslim and African ban was an important first step toward undoing the anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant policies of the previous administration. 

“We will continue to advocate for the elimination of systemic injustices within the federal government that have resulted in the religious and racial profiling of Muslims and immigrants under past administrations,” Ayloush said.

CAIR-LA also welcomed the Biden administration’s move to preserve and fortify protections for DREAMers; inclusion of all persons — including the undocumented — in the U.S. census count; ordering the removal of barriers preventing minorities and underserved communities’ access to federal programs and institutions; and other impactful executive orders.”

“Hanin Sharif, with the Arab American Civic Council fellow, Hanin Sharif who was invited to speak, expressed pleasure at seeing the many local organizations that came out in show of support for Muslims, immigrants and others affected by the Trump Administration’s travel ban. 

“When we are able to stand by our brothers and sisters when they are attacked, we can accomplish great things,” Sharif said. “I am hopeful by using our collective power we are able to create a more humanitarian and empathetic future.”

The Impossible Task, The Unreasonable Demands

Restaurateurs and regulators are wary as dining returns to outdoor spaces

For reasons that are inexplicable, California has outdoor dining again. Gov. Gavin Newsom says his sudden reversal of the ban has nothing to do with the recall effort that was sparked by pandemic closures, but he hasn’t been able to muster a coherent alternate explanation. Given recent reports of more contagious variants of the Covid-19 virus, ICU occupancy rates topping 85 percent across the state and short supplies of vaccines, there certainly hasn’t been any rational reason to reduce caution.  

As is often the case when something happens for opaque reasons, a variety of individuals and organizations are claiming credit. A group of winery owners who filed a lawsuit demanding the end of restrictions are claiming this as their victory. This is despite the fact that the lawsuit is generally regarded as a PR stunt with almost no chance of success. Restaurant associations, entertainment companies and other pressure groups have also cited the change as evidence of their clout. It’s convenient for them that there’s no way to disprove their claims.  

Though the decision to open has been made, it’s worth considering the arguments on both sides. At one end of the spectrum are people who see the decision to relax restrictions as a cave to special interest groups and a setback for getting the disease under control. They’re not likely to patronize restaurants inside or out, but are affected if they are called back to work and threatened with job loss if they don’t show up. On the other end are people with many reasons for advocating reopening. Some are fans of conspiracy theories that the pandemic is a hoax in order to justify dictatorship. Some advocate “herd immunity” despite the unanimous horror of the medical profession, and others are restaurant and small business owners who are desperate to pay their bills.   

The most extreme of these are rebels who defiantly did what they opened their businesses to do: serve food to customers who came there to dine. The owners said they had no choice, because revenue from serving everything to go was too low. They railed against regulations they characterized as “one size fits all,” so that their outdoor tables are treated differently than the same seating in a nearby park. Resistance to these restrictions ranged from subtle to confrontational. When outdoor dining was allowed, some restaurants skirted the rules, defining indoor spaces with big windows as outdoor patios and serving until they got caught. Governor Newsom’s lavish dinner in just that sort of environment got him a well-deserved slagging in the press while giving ammunition to his critics. 

Some didn’t even pretend to follow the rules. Dana Tanner at Restauration in Long Beach openly and publicly defied the orders, going so far as to publicize a New Year’s Eve dinner with a DJ and open bar. Other owners took legal action, like a Bay Area coalition that filed a lawsuit claiming unequal treatment because malls and big box retailers were allowed to remain open.

Regulators and law enforcement leaders counter these arguments by pointing out that the Centers for Disease Control studies show a high correlation between dining out and disease spread. They point out that interactions in retail stores can be arranged with little or no contact between employees and customers, and a mask can be worn at all times in a retail store, neither of which is true in a restaurant dining situation. 

After looking at both arguments in detail, one comes to an uncomfortable conclusion: they’re both right. 

On the restaurant side, there’s no question that overall traffic is much lower, and customers who order take-out are spending much less in each transaction. In a normal dining situation people around a table will order extra appetizers, sides, desserts, and drinks as the meal progresses, and restaurants lose those impulse buys in a to-go environment. Alcohol sales, which are the difference between profit and loss for many establishments, have been particularly affected. So have sales of fresh seafood and shellfish, which are high-ticket items almost everywhere that they are served. When it comes to the dining environment, eatery owners argue that a blanket ban on both indoor and outdoor dining is unfair, because it doesn’t take the situation at their establishment into account. 

Regulators counter that the problems with decreased traffic aren’t their prime concern while public health is. Most agree that closing all restaurant dining areas isn’t a perfect solution and point to the impossibility of assessing risks and enforcing bans on an individual basis. 

Suppose someone devised a metric by which restaurant spaces could be judged on airflow, distance between diners, and other concerns, and those that were judged safe were allowed to have on-site dining. The amount of data that would need to be collected and the number of in-person inspections required to verify that data are insurmountable barriers. They would involve measurements taken in each area of each room of every restaurant, plus all outdoor spaces and waiting areas. 

Given that there were 70,000 eating and drinking establishments in Los Angeles County at last count, the number of inspectors that would be required to conduct evaluations is enormous. Restaurants currently only see a health inspector between one and three times a year, and that is to conduct a far less rigorous survey of health conditions. 

The most confrontational restaurant owners now face a business risk rivaling the pandemic closures thanks to their actions. Regulators have been citing scofflaws, revoking health permits, and having utilities turned off. It’s an open question whether those businesses will have their service restored. It’s also an open question how long the reopening will last, since a closure that was both enacted and repealed on short notice may be reinstated again.

If it is, the group of winery owners will undoubtedly resurrect their lawsuit, but its prospects are questionable. An attorney who has looked at the case, David Bosko, says “I don’t think the restaurants’ argument is that strong,” even though “Pandemic fatigue has infiltrated judgment, even within the judiciary. The government cannot act in an arbitrary and capricious way, but this is not exactly arbitrary and capricious. We know that people getting together increases risk.  The mere fact that life is not fair, and that some things are open and some things are not, may not be sufficient to show this is arbitrary. The government is doing its best. It cannot close everything so it closes what it can.”

When asked about the difference in customer behavior between restaurants and retail environments, Bosko affirmed that it is a weak point in their case. 

“[The lawsuit] boasts that coalition members have provided masks and mandated them for customers and employees. But it says nothing about the point you raise – that customers simply cannot wear their masks while eating and drinking. This is another significant reason supporting the argument that the ban is not arbitrary and capricious that I would expect a court to consider.”

The argument on both sides is escalating in stridency and theatrical strategies. Even during the complete closure, some restaurants went underground and ushered customers inside via back doors and alleyways, after covering their windows so passers-by couldn’t see inside. Because these culinary speakeasies are illegal and hidden, the windows are shut tight and the risk of disease transmission correspondingly greater. The staff are in a bind; they have bills to pay so keep working but live in fear of both the knock at the door that means a shutdown, and the fever that indicates that they worked one shift too many. 

Dining outdoors is open for now, but as health professionals advocate for tighter restrictions, restaurateurs are surely working out strategies to evade them. The only thing that can be said with certainty is that like the pandemic itself, the argument about how to react to it won’t be over any time soon.

Join Online for State of the Port to Recap A Historic 2020

The annual State of the Port address will tell the story of how the Port of Long Beach mobilized to overcome the challenges of the global pandemic to record its best year ever, moving ahead with ambitious environmental initiatives and opening an iconic West Coast bridge.

Starting at the virtual address will feature Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia, Port of Long Beach Executive Director Mario Cordero and Long Beach Harbor Commission President Frank Colonna.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this year’s State of the Port is a pre-recorded program, available online instead of an in-person event.

Time: 9 a.m. Feb. 4

Details:www.polb.com/stateoftheport

Biden/Harris: A Peaceful Transfer Of Power In Most Secure Inauguration In U.S. History

0

By Dannys Marrero

Pittsburgh Current Contributing Writer

On January 20, Joseph R. Biden was sworn in as the 46th president of the United States. Normally a spectacle, this wasn’t a traditional inauguration. In fact, It looked and felt like no other in this country’s  modern history.  

But it comes after the presidency of Donald Trump, another period unlike any other in modern history. The nation has spent the past four years drowning in a river of turmoil, misinformation and intentional polarization Trump peddled conspiracy theories, made inflammatory statements against his political adversaries and the media, pushed racist rhetoric and refused to denounce white nationalists. Trump created an army of supporters who would do whatever he told them to do. That blind commitment to Trump is what led to the Jan. 6 insurgency at the U.S. Capitol.

Read more at: www.pittsburghcurrent.com/biden-harris-a-peaceful-transfer-of-power-in-most-secure-inauguration-in-u-s-history