Tim McOsker’s official position on community issues isn’t the problem. His relationship to the monied and the politically connected is. Some consider this to be his strength as a candidate for Los Angeles City Council District 15 representative, but a growing number of people like his opponent Danielle Sandoval, consider this a deficit and a potential source of conflicts of interest or loyalty.
Corruption at city hall isn’t always about the dishonest and/or illegal behavior of powerful electeds and other influential people. Or even the inducement to do wrong by unethical and/or unlawful means such as bribery. Corruption at city hall is the departure from the original intent and correct purpose of city hall, which is to serve the citizens of Los Angeles, not the monied elites.
But there are many examples that show that any place where power and influence gather, it is bound to subvert or corrupt decisions made in government at the expense of everyday Angelenos who don’t have money, power and influence to affect their communities.
The history of corruption at LA City Hall goes back more than a century to the Owens Valley water scandal (remember the film Chinatown) and the reforms from the Progressive era that diversified political power in a reformed city charter.
Over the past four decades, Tim McOsker has worked with three of the most prominent and politically connected law firms in the city, firms that have grown to become some of the most prominent [powerful] firms in the country with clientele that range from industry titans and city governments, to Hollywood moguls and music industry scions.
Because of this experience, he is likely one of the most informed and brightest individuals in the room when it comes to policy and leveraging resources to benefit everyday citizens of the 15th District. By that same token, everyday citizens should be concerned about whether their voices will be heard over the clamor of individuals and business entities that have worked with McOsker over the past 35 years vying for his attention and favor if he’s elected.
At the Oct. 5 community forum at San Pedro’s Warren Chapel CME Church, residents who don’t live in San Pedro got a chance to see this at work. Topics ranged from encouraging better relationships between the community and Los Angeles Police Department’s Harbor Division while holding officers accountable in excessive force incidents; from ensuring a collaborative approach to economic development plans to safeguarding communities from oil and gas operations to housing the unhoused without chasing them from one community to the next.
There’s very little daylight between Danielle Sandoval and McOsker in their policy positions. But what stood out during the Oct. 5 candidates’ forum was the depth and specificity of McOsker’s thoughts on development in Watts and arguably the rest of the 15th District.
McOsker spoke of utilizing a tool called the Enhanced Infrastructure District to use tax-increment financing (echoing the ways the defunct Community Redevelopment Agency financed local developments) for new development projects. When Gov. Jerry Brown dissolved local community redevelopment agencies in 2011-12, the city was forced to act on its remaining 19 redevelopment projects before time ran out on properties from North Hollywood to San Pedro. The governor appointed a three-member governor board that included McOsker back when he was still employed by Mayer Brown LLP. It was during the time the Watts Cultural Crescent was made a part of the city’s 50 Parks Initiative — an initiative with the goal of bringing parks to densely populated neighborhoods and communities lacking open space and recreational services.
This was supposed to be the fulfillment of a 55-year dream — the development of an arts-driven community gathering place with the potential to raise property values on par with any budding arts community. The confluence of two factors changed the trajectory of the Watts Cultural Crescent: the need for more housing to stem the tide of rising homelessness and the ending of the CRA which would spell the end of a pot of money to address the issue.
In December 2014, city staff determined that the planned Watts Historic Train Station Visitors Center was instead an opportunity for a transit-oriented mixed-use housing development — a density housing plan stakeholders and residents didn’t ask for. The crescent-shaped swath of land was zoned for public facilities and open space as late as 2017. By 2018, the crescent was a part of the $2.8 million Thomas Safran and Associates deal for a 213-unit senior housing project.
This is important because the Watts Labor Community Action Committee, a nonprofit founded just before the Watts Rebellion in 1965, and formed a development corporation and built a 64-unit housing complex for the formerly incarcerated and the unhoused.
“Sixty-four families live in that complex,” Timothy Watkins, the head of the WLCAC, said in an interview with Random Lengths News last year. “We’ve renovated about 300 units of other property that we already owned to refresh and renew those living conditions and we’ve got close to another 400 units that we’re planning to renovate for ourselves and others,” he said.
The WLCAC wasn’t even in consideration for developing a part of the Watts Crescent. Thomas Safran and Associates, however, is a donor to McOsker’s campaign alongside a few employees of the development firm.
Watkins said they planned to build 2,000 units in Watts on land already owned by the WLCAC. But they’ve been waiting for the right timing. With the development rush that’s occurring all over the city, Watkins believes now is the time to execute the organization’s development dreams.
In the case of the WLCAC, it wasn’t as if no one knew Watkins and his nonprofit organization. It’s just that nonprofit organizations like WLCAC and others aren’t in the pockets of electeds the way developers such as AEG, LINC Housing, or Bold Communities are. Sandoval dinged McOsker for taking oil money, but McOsker denied it and then challenged her to provide evidence that said otherwise.
Maybe McOsker can be forgiven for not realizing Phillips 66 and Vopak are some of the nearly 1,800 donors as of Oct. 10 to his campaign.
If his donor list were organized by city or zip code, the majority would hover around the Port of Los Angeles. Clearly, the corporate power structure of the Port of LA is backing McOsker over Sandoval and this has local environmentalists uneasy.
Sandoval, for her part, doesn’t need to be as knowledgeable and come to the table with the same level of expertise as McOsker. What she did need to do was remind voters that as a woman of color with working-class roots, her origin story is more like the majority of the 15th District.
Throughout the two-hour forum, Sandoval referenced her story as a teenage single mother who had to figure things out after her child’s father was murdered.
Indeed, one of the first questions posed to the candidates was in regard to the violent LAPD detention of a Harbor City teen last month after filming another arrest. That it happened at an LAPD-sponsored Summer Night Lights event intended to bring the department and community members closer together shocked community members. At the forum, the question was asked: What would you do to support holding Harbor Division accountable when there are excessive force issues on community members?
McOsker gave a good answer. He noted that Summer Night Lights is designed to create safe spaces for kids and that that incident was the exact opposite of what we try to promote at events like Summer Night Lights. McOsker went on to note that in cases of excessive force, he would call it out and look to make sure that the incidents are fully investigated and that the department and officers are held accountable for acts that are illegal.
However, Sandoval called out the hypocrisy of politicians who on the one-hand claim they would call for accountability in abuse cases but then raise defund the police fears when actual transparency and reforms are called for.
Sandoval did this by demanding an apology from McOsker for spreading rumors that she wanted to defund the police. She called the rumors irresponsible and an example of fear-mongering in our communities.
McOsker for his part didn’t deny the accusation, but said in reply that his campaign relies on public information and that each candidate has a record and a history of serving our communities.
“So it is relevant to make sure we rely upon our votes, records or actions by each one of us. So I will stick with the truth and verifiable information for anything I may say during my campaign,” he said.
Later, the question was posed to the candidates; what would they do to ensure African Americans get some of the contracts connected to the port and other economic hubs throughout the district?
McOsker said he would ensure that there’s verifiable local hiring with any project or development in the district and prevent situations where companies agree to local hiring but do another [thing] later in the development process. He also said his administration will not move forward with city projects unless there’s real inclusion of African American and Latino owned companies and women, veterans and disabled persons owned companies “to make sure that we are bringing equity to the goal.”
But Sandoval, with a quick jab, retorted, “Great answer. But I don’t understand how that can happen when you’re beholden to a lot of developers who are gentrifying our communities and taking away small businesses,” reminding the audience, (who by the way were largely African American and Latino), of McOsker’s relationships, connections and monies to which McOsker is likely beholden.
By the end of the candidate forum, it became clear that this race was about whose voices will be heard the loudest in the next council person’s office; which candidate can be trusted to protect the interests of the entire district.
McOsker still has a campaign war chest that is more than ten times the size of Sandoval’s. Since the LA Times wage theft allegations from Sandoval’s former employees, the San Pedro Chamber has been mounting a fierce campaign to wring from her the endorsements she has. We have also heard reports that the San Pedro Chamber has been bullying chamber members to remove Sandoval posters from their windows.
Sandoval’s candidacy comes with baggage. Particularly the wage theft allegations as reported in the Los Angeles Times during her short stint as a restaurateur eight years ago. To be clear, the problem with McOsker candidacy isn’t that he’s not qualified enough or doesn’t have the skill sets and relationships. It’s clear that he does. The problem is that in the 113-year history of this district, the only voices that counted were those connected to money and power, whether connected to downtown Los Angeles or the Port of Los Angeles.