Monday, October 6, 2025
spot_img
spot_img
Home Blog Page 459

Former County Counsel Mary Wickham To Lead New Blue-Ribbon Commission on Homelessness

LOS ANGELES — The newly formed Blue-Ribbon Commission on Homelessness has a new executive director, former Los Angeles County Counsel Mary Wickham. The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors appointed Wickham Aug. 31.

The Blue-Ribbon Commission on Homelessness was established following the July 27 motion authored by Supervisor Kathryn Barger and co-authored by Supervisor Hilda L. Solis, to research and provide recommendations to the board for a new homelessness governance model that is appropriate for Los Angeles County.

The commission will be made up of 12 members, with one appointed by each of the five Supervisors, one by the mayor of Los Angeles, three from the Los Angeles City Council president, two from the Councils of Government, and one nominated by the Contract Cities Association. The new commission will be housed under the executive office of the board.

Wickham, who retired in July 2021 after 23 years of service, will lead the study of the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority or LAHSA governance to identify intrinsic challenges of the existing system and provide recommendations for improvement to the board within a six-month time frame.

Details: bos.lacounty.gov.

Port News POLB’s Best August, POLA Grants Awarded

Port of Long Beach Achieves Best August

LONG BEACH The Port of Long Beach reported its peak shipping season started strong, lifting the port to its strongest August on record.

Dockworkers and terminal operators moved 807,704 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) of container cargo last month, an 11.3% increase compared to August 2020. Imports were up 11.7% to 407,426 TEUs and exports decreased 5.3% to 119,485 TEUs. Empty containers moved through the port rose 19.7% to 280,794 TEUs.

The Port of Long Beach has broken monthly cargo records in 13 of the last 14 months. Cargo moving through the port was boosted by heightened inventory replacement and the start of the peak shipping season, which traditionally runs from August to October as retailers prepare for the upcoming holiday season.

Although consumer demand softened slightly from a month earlier, overall retail sales in August were roughly 18% above pre-pandemic levels.

The port has moved 6,346,377 TEUs through the first eight months of 2021, a 29.2% increase from the same period in 2020.

Port of Los Angeles Awards $1 Million in Grants to 27 Local Organizations

SAN PEDRO — The Port of Los Angeles Sept. 2, awarded $1 million in grants to 27 local organizations to support programs, projects and events benefiting a wide variety of communities, both locally and statewide. A total of 49 organizations applied for Fiscal Year 2021/22 funding from the port’s Community Investment Grant Program.

Grants were awarded in three categories, small (less than $5,000), medium ($5,001-$99,999) and large (more than $100,000) in support of local workforce development, education, the environment and LA Waterfront. All grant funding is self-supported by port shipping and lease revenues, and not taxpayer-funded. All 2021 grant applications were additionally reviewed for adherence to COVID-19 safety protocols and policies.

The two organizations that received grants in the large funding category were EXP and the Los Angeles Maritime Institute or LAMI. EXP will use its grant on next-generation workforce development, supporting youth maritime education programs and career preparation in the maritime industry. The LAMI award will support TopSail, its on-the-water, experiential education sailing program for at-risk youth.

Recipients in the medium grant category include Clean Wilmington with a $60,000 grant, Friends of the Cabrillo Marine Aquarium with a $30,000 grant and San Pedro’s International Bird Rescue Center. which received a $15,000 grant.

Final grant awards were reviewed and made by a committee of six individuals — three from the port’s community relations division, one each from the Wilmington and San Pedro Chambers of Commerce and one from Los Angeles Council District 15.

Details: https://www.portoflosangeles.org/community/grants

Feuer Calls Out Buscaino for Being “Day-Late, Dollar Short” on Houselessness

LOS ANGELES — LA City Councilmember and Mayoral Candidate Joe Buscaino Sept. 3, attempted to take credit for a “new” homelessness measure that had previously been written and proposed by city attorney and mayoral candidate Mike Feuer last year. In response to Buscaino’s stunt, Feuer is setting the record straight and challenging him to a substantive debate on the issue of houselessness.

 

According to Feuer:

“Day late, dollar short. Last year I gave the council a proposed law coupling an offer of shelter with enforcement. Instead of effectively advocating for that law, Mr. Buscaino has failed even to show up for recent hearings of the council committee tackling homelessness on which he is supposed to serve.

“As for his proposal, where’s the rest? Any serious homelessness plan should include a State of Emergency, concrete goals for reducing street homelessness, ideas for creating shelter and housing faster and cheaper, transforming mental health interventions, steps to prevent homelessness in the first place, and more. My plan does that.

“L.A. needs more from its next mayor than theater and slogans — especially when it comes to our homelessness emergency. That’s why I’m challenging Mr. Buscaino: I’ll debate you on homelessness, and any other issue, any time, anywhere. And unlike being AWOL when your council committee grapples with homelessness, you’d have to actually show up.”

Details: www.youtube.com/watch/feuer-on-houslessness

Newsom beats back recall handily; now he has to decide who his friends are

Labor and grassroots Democrats kept him in office. Will he remember that when it comes to making policy?

By Tim Redmond for 48hills, Sept.14.

https://48hills.org/2021/09/newsom-beats-back-recall-handily-now-he-has-to-decide-who-his-friends-are

It wasn’t that many months ago that some pundits were writing Gavin Newsom’s political obituary. A GOP-led recall campaign was gaining traction, and some polls showed the vote too close to call. Newsom was doing himself no favors by acting aloof and disconnected from the political process.

And tonight? Newsom — and the Democratic Party in California and nationwide, which went all out to block this recall — are triumphant. It appears Newsom will win by at least 30 points.

That vote of confidence will make it much more difficult for any progressive challenger to take on the incumbent governor in 14 months, when he will be up for re-election. And any Republican will have a very, very difficult time making the case for a change.

This is what happened in 1983, when then-Mayor Dianne Feinstein faced a recall in San Francisco. She defeated it, resoundingly — and any hope of a progressive challenging her in the next election vanished.

The biggest factor in Newsom’s victory was Larry Elder. Until he entered the race (and he almost didn’t make the cut) Newsom was having trouble linking the recall and his opponents to Donald Trump.

After Elder became the GOP frontrunner, that was easy.

But Newsom needs to have a moment of self-reflection here.

He turned things around and won handily for two reasons: He had endless money (more than $70 million). And there was a massive outpouring of grassroots organizing to get out the vote.

Some of that money came from real-estate and telecom. But the single biggest source of his support—$13 million—came from organized labor. Health-care unions alone put up $3.5 million of their members’ money.

And it was labor and generally progressive local party groups that did the real work of convincing Democrats that this was a real threat and they should vote.

Remember, earlier this summer there was a huge “enthusiasm gap.” Republicans cared more about getting rid of Newsom than Democrats did about keeping him.

It wasn’t the big money that changed the situation. It was the people who were not huge Newsom supporters, or people who he has completely let down, who shook off their doubts and made sure the GOP didn’t win this one.

(Newsom ran as a supporter of single-payer health care, getting him strong support from the California Nurses Association. He backed off on that pledge almost immediately after getting elected. CNA still went all out to defeat the recall. He totally screwed tenants in a housing deal this year; they still voted to keep him in office.)

If Newsom goes back to taking that grassroots support for granted, there are going to be a lot of angry people talking about alternatives next year. And since Newsom shows no signs of ending his career when he finishes his time in Sacramento, he’s going to have to answer to those people who saved his political future when he (inevitably) tries to run for president.

This, of course, has both national and local implications.

If California is any indication (and in the long term, it tends to be a trend-setting state) then Democrats can do very well running against Trump, even if he’s not on the ballot. At least in this state, a connection to Trump is political poison.

That, of course, puts Republican candidates in a tricky position. Republican primary voters still like Trump, and it’s hard in many districts to win a primary while opposing Trumpism. We shall see how this plays out in the Congressional midterms.

On a local level, the overwhelming rejection of a costly and pointless recall in the middle of a term could help District Attorney Chesa Boudin make the case that the proper time to hold an election is on Election Day.

The normal Election Day.

To Avert Failure, Biden Should Listen to the “Radicals” – Not Corporate Media

By Jeff Cohen

If President Biden fails to act boldly and quickly in improving the material lives of poor, working-class and struggling middle-class Americans of all colors, the right wing is likely to come storming back into power through the 2022 and 2024 elections.

With Biden’s popularity lagging, success or failure for his administration hinges on who he listens to on various pressing issues. Will he side with the “radicals” or with the go-slow, yes/no, status-quo corporate media?

*** STUDENT DEBT: Biden should listen to Senate leader Chuck Schumer, not exactly a Marxist-Leninist, who has spent months publicly pressuring the president to use his executive authority under the Higher Education Act of 1965 to cancel up to $50,000 in federal student debt for each person holding such debt. This executive order would dramatically stimulate the economy well in advance of the 2022 election – and would be an important step forward on racial justice as well as economic equity.

But too much like President Reagan who — when asked about government help to poor people — would habitually invoke the anecdote of a welfare-grabbing, Cadillac-driving, fur-wearing “woman from Chicago,” Biden repeatedly answers questions about student debt cancellation by invoking Ivy Leaguers and his aversion to forgiving “billions of dollars in debt for people who have gone to Harvard and Yale and Penn.” It’s a Reagan-like myth: almost none of the $1.7 trillion owed in student debt is held by Ivy Leaguers. Half of those with student debt attended public colleges, and a whopping 25 percent attended for-profit colleges, including unscrupulous ones. Nearly 78 percent of black students take out federal student loans, as do 57.5 percent of white students.

Biden seems to have shelved even his meager campaign pledge to get Congress to cancel — due to COVID — $10,000 in college debt per person.

*** GUNS VS. BUTTER: The aforementioned Schumer joined Bernie Sanders last year in championing a historic but failed amendment in Congress to cut 10 percent of the military budget and reinvest that $74 billion in “jobs, education, health care and housing” in poor and working-class communities. An expansive domestic agenda will help Democrats win in 2022 and 2024 — and cuts in the military budget (which soaks up half of all federal discretionary spending) would help pay for that agenda. But the Biden administration rejected such cuts and instead proposed an increase in military spending even beyond Trump’s bloated military budget.

The other way to fund a progressive domestic agenda is also popular with voters: taxing wealthy elites. Which side is Biden on as Sen. Joe Manchin and other pro-big business Democrats in Congress fight to protect those elites from tax increases and to shrink the proposed $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation package?

*** MEDICARE EXPANSION: Instead of all the myths and propaganda about healthcare that Biden hears from corporate media, he’d be smart to listen to one of his own cabinet members, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, who strongly supported Medicare for All during his 24 years in Congress. Today, as the battle rages among Democrats in Congress over the size of the budget reconciliation proposal, progressives are pushing to include a significant expansion of Medicare — by providing seniors with dental, vision and hearing coverage, while lowering eligibility from age 65 to 60, and granting Medicare the power to negotiate with Big Pharma for lower drug prices.

Medicare expansion faces resistance from corporatist Democrats and their powerful and frenzied corporate sponsors. Biden should sit down privately and talk with Secretary Becerra, who might tell him that a major expansion of Medicare in 2021 (even if not full Medicare for All) would help Democrats in 2022 — especially with older voters, the ones who rarely miss an election. (It’s worth remembering that even Hillary Clinton, hardly a militant socialist, called for Medicare to be open to those 55 and over during her 2016 presidential campaign.)

Prominently displayed above the fireplace in Joe Biden’s Oval Office is a portrait of Franklin Roosevelt, the most popular and successful president in modern U.S. history. FDR succeeded and won repeated reelection in alliance with genuine radicals and socialists — often heeding their proposals and advice. These were not establishment figures like Chuck Schumer.

At this crucial juncture, if Biden won’t even heed Schumer’s urgent advice to give the country an FDR-like push forward — and instead listens to the “go-slow/go-small” warnings of giant corporations and their media — the GOP will win big in 2022 . . . and the Biden era will end quicker than you can say Jimmy Carter.

Jeff Cohen is co-founder of RootsAction.org, a retired journalism professor at Ithaca College, and author of “Cable News Confidential: My Misadventures in Corporate Media.” In 1986, he founded the media watch group FAIR.

My Own Forever War: Afghanistan and 9-11

0

Last week, Fawad Andarabi, a well-known folk singer in Afghanistan, invited the new Taliban leaders to his home to show his compliance and respect. Taliban don’t approve of folk singing. But they enjoyed his luncheon, then took him out and shot him in the head.

The same day I heard of Fawad’s execution, I got an email from a progressive women’s organization, good friends of mine, who invited me to join them via Zoom for a virtual “celebration of the end of the Forever War in Afghanistan.”

Murdered folk singer Fawad Andarabi (center wearing green)

I understand my friends’ glee, and my fellows on the Left cheering what we see as the endgame of George Bush’s chest-beating war-mongering, the comeuppance of imperialist foreign occupation. I get it.

But there’s a problem, and it makes me sick in my heart.

My friends holding the Zoom celebration once visited Afghanistan. They knew many women there. But there were none listed on their party roster. Maybe Afghan women don’t want to celebrate the end of the Forever War. Because, for them, the war is just beginning.

*
In the end, I’m a reporter. Facts are my life and religion.

And these are the facts: In the last year, until Biden’s mad dash for the exits,not one single US soldier died by hostile action in Afghanistan. Not one.

And it’s a fact that combat for US soldiers, the crazy night raids, the hapless “surges”, ended years ago.

It was Donald Trump who coined the catchy phrase: “Forever Wars.” Believe it or not, Trump got the facts wrong.

And Trump’s lies don’t become the truth just because they are repeated by Joe Biden.

We had only 3,000 troops remaining on the ground. If that’s an “occupation,” then Kim Jong-Un is correct to say that 28,000 US troops are “occupying” Korea.

But our tiny commitment, the threat of our power, was enough to keep the Taliban fascists out of Kabul.

…Enough to allow the number of girls in primary school to increase 330% and women’s secondary education to rise by 650% compared to the prior Taliban days.

…Enough to protect 100,000 women enrolled in Afghanistan’s universities—enrolled until this week.

… Enough to finally allow women access to medical services, adding an average 11 years to women’s lives.

And the future for women?

This month, Nagina Anwari and all female news reporters were banned from the air in Kandahar. They’ve escaped, following death threats, an attempted kidnapping and Taliban firing weapons at her mother’s home, hunting for her daughter.

Women have been told not to leave their homes without a related male to accompany them, a rule from the last Taliban regime which resulted in widows’ deaths by starvation and untreated illness.

Will that last? Signs are not promising. Right after Biden’s announcement, three women were gunned down for vaccinating children – and three bombings at girls’ schools in Kabul killed dozens.

Here is a photo of one woman, sitting quietly, about to be machine-gunned by a Taliban. I know you’d rather look away. So would I.


When I said no American soldier died this year in Afghanistan, of course I meant to say, “before Biden surrendered.” His who-the-hell-cares retreat resulted in 13 American soldiers dead (more than killed by hostile action in Afghanistan in five of the past six years).

And let’s not forget, as we often do, the 170 Afghans at the Kabul airport who died with the Americans.

*
I have to tell you, that this week, I came the closest I ever have to just quitting.

When I first raised doubt about abandoning the women—and men—of Afghanistan, I was deluged by nasty notes telling me to “stick to vote suppression in Georgia, Palast.”

I’m sorry, I can’t. Because I’ve been to Central Asia, to every inhabited continent, and seen women effectively caged their whole lives, seen journalists, poets and anyone who dissents, gunned down, strung up, beaten, silenced.

Many applauded when I defended the Cofan indigenous people of the Amazon against their oil company killers. I’m glad those victims met approval. But don’t ask me to fight for democracy, for liberty, in only one part of this globe.

I cannot in my heart agree to care about those poisoned in the Amazon, to care about voters of color in Florida, but not voters in Kabul; about those we now leave to the executioners.

*
Trump excluded the government elected by the people of Afghanistan in his bargaining with the Taliban. We were horrified but not surprised that Trump would ignore democracy. But I am more than surprised that Biden would follow in Trump’s exclusion of the people who would suffer the consequences of what is nothing more than another US-sanctioned coup d’état.

To justify this overthrow of the elected government, we dismiss Afghans’ desire for democracy, to control their own lives.

I’ve investigated elections from California to Kazakhstan. Whatever you think of the Kabul government, they were, I assure you, the choice of the people.

No one elected the Taliban, Joe. Except you and Donald.

*
Facts and history. Facts and history.

This is not the end of a 20-year war. It began forty years ago when the US and Saudi Arabia armed Islamists to overthrow the Soviet-backed government in Kabul. The plan was to use Afghans to bring down the Soviet Union. It worked.

We won. But did the Afghans?

But our victory would have a price. For BBCNewsnight, I tracked the US-blessed Saudi charity that sent the anti-Soviet fighter they called, “that compassionate young man, Osama bin Laden” to Afghanistan.

After we overthrew the Afghan government, the US watched blithely as Sirajuddin Haqqani and other warlords we backed slaughtered 50,000 civilians in a war for control of Kabul.

America couldn’t care less.

That is, until September 11, 2001. Then, the FBI put up a $5 million reward for Haqqani, al Qaida’s ally. Biden should collect it: After all, Biden located Haqqani—he’s now Afghanistan’s new Interior Minister.

*
On September 11, 2001, the Frankenstein we created, the “compassionate young man,” turned on us.

Not that we weren’t warned.

I ask you to read my good friend Michael Griffin’s history of the Taliban—published inJulyof that year, warning that the US was not taking seriously the threats to the USA by the man who funded, and was protected by, the Taliban.

Griffin’s book,Reaping the Whirlwind, warned of the cost of us abandoning Afghanistan. History never forgets. We will, I promise you, reap the whirlwind again.

*
Biden has praised himself for the “extraordinary success” of the evacuation. This was not some mission to save lives before a hurricane. When you turn over a nation to the enemy, and your troops flee, that’s calledsurrender.

And who pays for surrender? Mohammed will pay. We cannot publish his last name for good reason. In 2008, a helicopter carrying two US Senators went down in Taliban territory. In full panic, the US called on Mohammed to risk his life to rescue the Senators, John Kerry and Joe Biden. Today, Mohammed is pleading for his own family’s rescue. But Biden has left him behind. Hey, there was not enough time before the September 11 photo op. “Mission Accomplished”!

The Biden crew even turned over to the Taliban the names of Afghans authorized to fly to the US, naming those who worked for America. Then we left them there. What do you think the Taliban will do with that list?

According to Joe, those Afghans are cowards who “are not willing to fight for themselves.” So, the 66,000 Afghans who have laid down their lives to fight the Taliban were cowards, Joe, their lives and deaths just nothing?

But the American soldiers, who laid down their weapons and fled at your order, are heroic. I wonder if Biden would have tagged Afghans as cowards if they were white as a Delaware Senator’s son?

Would you call the British soldiers who dropped their weaponry and ran to the beach at Dunkirk “cowards” as well? The British, like the Afghans soldiers, fled to Dunkirk because they were suddenly left to die by their supposed ally, the most powerful military on the planet—at that time, the French army, then far larger than the German invaders.

The Brits of 1940, like the Afghans of 2021, relied on their ally for air cover and back-up. Biden not only told our soldiers to flee, but ordered out the contractors who kept the Afghan Air Force flying. Afghans did not ask us to fly the missions, only to maintain the planes.

By the way, they would have loved to keep their own air force flying; but, as I was told by Afghanistan’s former peace negotiator, Yahya Maroofi, the US insisted on giving those contracts to Lockheed and other US privateers.

*
In 1877, the US pulled all our troops out of the defeated Confederate States. The (white) American public was tired of two decades of Forever War and the expensive, dangerous and seemingly endless Occupation. Why the hell should anyone in Illinois give a damn, put their soldier son in harm’s way, to what Northerner’s considered foreign states, to fight the Ku Klux Taliban? So, that year, the US evacuated the army of occupation. America cheered. And night fell on the South. For a hundred years.

*
And let’s stop the nonsense comparison of Afghanistan with Viet Nam.

The difference is simple: In Viet Nam,we were on the wrong side.

*
And now we’re giving currency to ignorant statements such as, “We were lied into these wars.” That’s repeating George Bush’s evil trick: conflating Afghanistan with Iraq.

There were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but there truly were mass destroyers in Afghanistan. Destroyers of New York…and Kabul. Am I only allowed to cry for New York and not the dead of Afghanistan?

*
Facts and history. Why won’t they just shut up?

Hitler did not attack Britain until Britain declared war on Germany. And Hitler certainly had not attacked the USA.

And that was one reason why most Americans were dead set against FDR turning America into the Arsenal for Democracy against Hitler. And Americans did not approve of Roosevelt provoking Japan with a suffocating embargo simply because the Japanese had murdered hundreds of thousands of Chinese.

What the hell was America doing putting itself at risk for yellow people?

Or getting tangled in “the Jews’ war” in Europe, as it was called.

I was just re-reading George Orwell. He wrote that Hitler was encouraged by the English brownshirts of the Far Right and the Communists who defended the Hitler-Stalin Pact; but the worst of all were the “pacifists,” by which he meant those who simply wanted to keep Britain out of Europe’s war.

Yes, you could call FDR and Churchill “war-mongers.” And we should give thanks they were.

And give thanks to those who in 1937, even before Roosevelt and Churchill, took up arms against Hitler and the Fascists in Spain. Men like Orwell and, from the US, the courageous Lincoln Brigade.

During Joe McCarthy’s Red Scare, Lincoln Brigade members were black-listed, vilified as “pre-mature anti-Fascists,” that is, opposing Hitler too soon.

I guess I’m a premature anti-Fascist as well. Having read Griffin’s writing on the Taliban, I called for US intervention in 1999. If others had joined us, I could have lunch this Saturday, September 11, with those who worked on my floor in the World Trade towers.

On this grim anniversary, if you want to honor those I worked with, don’t light little candles. Rather, thank those Afghans who went after their killers.

Because some things really are worth dying for. Even in a nation not our own.

“Not our war.” Facts and history howl at us. America itself would not exist except for Lafayette and the French soldiers who died for our revolutionary cause. It wasn’t their war. But without them, Washington’s men would have been meat on the end of the red-coats’ bayonets.

Do you agree with Trump who said, looking at the graves of American soldiers at Arlington National Cemetery, “I don’t get it. What’s in it for them?”

*
Can we answer Trump?

Is there something you would die for?

Just asking.

One Member of the British Parliament said,

“Many of us who served in Afghanistan have a deep affection for the Afghan people. I had the honor of serving alongside them in Helmand. We trained together, fought together and in some cases, we died together. They were our brothers in arms. But I shudder to think where those men are now. Many will be dead, many now consider themselves to be dead men walking. Where were we in their hour of need? And that is shameful.”

“To see [America’s] ‘Commander-in-Chief’ call into question the courage of men I fought with, to claim that they ran… SHAMEFUL! Those who have never fought for the colors they fly, be careful about criticizing those who have.”

Biden declared that, “Human rights are at the center of U.S. foreign policy.” Should we now laugh or cry?

*
Recently, Ahmad Massoud, an astronomy student at Oxford, left England for the Panjshir mountains. Is he just another Afghan who won’t fight for his country, Joe? His family fought for ours: Al Qaida assassinated his dad on September 9, 2001, knowing that the US would find in Massoud an ally against bin Laden’s Taliban protectors.

Just weeks ago, the younger Massoud begged the US military to give him the weapons we were leaving behind. Massoud specifically invoked FDR and his Arsenal for Democracy.

We turned down Massoud. Instead, we left the Taliban enough lethal supplies to open a multi-billion dollar Walmart for terrorists.

*
In 2006, I publishedArmed Madhouse, a book about the lies, greed and monstrous incompetence that conned us into Iraq.

Lying us into war is a crime. But so is lying us out of one.

In 2003, the US kicked over Iraq’s government and then, eight years later, tired of that Forever War, abandoned the Iraqis, who would soon face the ISIS blood-cult. It was “inevitable” that ISIS would win, having rolled across most of Iraq in weeks, just as the Taliban rolled across Afghanistan.

But, in Iraq, President Obama, facing up to his mistake of withdrawal, accepted his responsibility to Iraqis, and returned troops.

Fifty-four US soldiers died defeating ISIS in Iraq.

Do you think these Americans were evil Imperialists? Dupes and fools? I’m sorry, I don’t. I honor them.

*
When Trump ignored the advice of Gen. Mark Milley, head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, not to abandon the Syrian Kurds, the pundits squealed that Trump was ignoring the advice of the his military experts. And we applauded Defense Secretary James Mattis for resigning in protest.

And when Trump cut out the Afghan government from his dealings with the Taliban, his surrender parading as a “Deal,” the Democrats, for good reason, went wild.

Biden wants to play it both ways. He wants to say his hands were tied by Trump’s deal, yet wants credit for withdrawal.

But let’s be honest. Trump, under pressure from Gen. Milley, held off withdrawal because the Taliban had ignored the deal and launched a spring killing spree.

According to theNew York Times, Milley and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin tried to talk Biden out of withdrawing our remaining small non-combat force. Biden ignored them. Like Japan’s Hirohito, Biden chose surrender “without conditions,” not even demanding the Taliban agree to safe passage of our allies.

Can you imagine if Trump did this? The howls of anger from the Democrats?

And can you imagine if Trump had left our troops to flee in deadly, chaotic retreat? Biden blames the military for closing Bagram air base, but that was only after Biden told the military he would not authorize the additional protective troops needed to keep it open. Why were routes and gates in and out of Hamid Karzai Airport turned over to the Taliban, not controlled by our own soldiers?

For Biden to blame the deaths of soldiers and Afghans on our generals—when they told him not to leave at all—disgusts me, the Trumpian don’t-blame-me façade of an empty man.

*
Which brings us to Biden’s “no good time to leave” canard. Biden’s bug-out was ordered in the middle of the “fighting season.” Waiting until later in the year, when snows in the mountains would stop the Taliban, we could have, at the least, protected our troops and allies, and given the Kabul government leverage to negotiate—and given them the air cover which kept the Taliban at bay for two decades.

But Biden was panicked that he’d miss an important public relations opportunity: to “end the war” before the 20th Anniversary of the September 11 attack. The sad truth is that those 13 Americans and 153 Afghans died for a damned PR stunt.

Imagine the punditocracy if Trump had done that.

And where is Obama? This surrender is Biden’s bitch-slapping his former boss whom Biden tried to talk out of Afghanistan – just as he tried to talk Obama out of the raid on Osama bin Laden.

Obama’s Ambassador to Afghanistan, Ryan Crocker has the guts to lay it out, unvarnished:

“I’m left with some grave questions in my mind about his [Biden’s] ability to lead our nation as Commander-in-Chief. To have read this so wrong – or, even worse, to have understood what was likely to happen and not care. What President Biden has done is to embrace the Afghan policy of President Trump, and this is the outcome.”

Gen. Mattis, disagreeing with Trump’s “Forever War” idiocy, resigned in protest. It makes me fear for our nation that Generals Milley and Austin do not have the integrity to resign, knowing their Commander-in-Chief put our men and morals at risk. Rather, they leak their displeasure to the Times. Cowards with brass ribbons.

*
Why am I so shaken, why do I give a damn about some people in the desert mountains in Asia? Why do I care about universities thousands of miles away that will be closed, or women I’ve never met who will be whipped, or “married” for a night to their rapists?

Blame my father, who could never forgive the world for turning its back on the Holocaust.

If you’re wondering why I care about what happens to the African-American vote today in Georgia, it’s because my father transferred his anger to me, his anger over “Me First/America First“ cruelty.

He was beside himself with anger and grief when white supremacists murdered four little girls in an Alabama church. And he told me, just a little kid, that I had to do something about it.

But now, I admit, I am ready to surrender.

Last week, I spoke to a nice blonde lady holding a Starbucks cappuccino and take-out bag. She was wearing a T-shirt printed with those slogans you see on lawns. You know, “In this house we believe…Women’s rights are human rights” and, “Love is love,” in defense of LGBTQ rights.

I asked her, if women’s rights are human rights, are Afghan women included in “human”? I know that’s not fair. And I’m sure she’s a good person. And she did say she hoped, “someone would come up with something.”

Please, on this September 11, for one day, will you take those virtue-signaling signs off your lawn, to respect those gay Afghans who will be thrown from roofs, the women executed for singing a song or worse, presenting the news.

Maybe Biden and Trump are right. Maybe surrender was our only option, and certainly the cheapest. It’s a shame about the Afghans, but hey, it’s no longer our war.

What now? I just read that the Taliban are hunting a journalist who reported for German broadcasterDeutsche Welle. The Taliban haven’t found him, so last week, they simply shot a member of his family.

*
It was so long ago that my father drafted me into his Forever War against fascists. Fascists in swastikas, in white hoods, in black turbans, in the offices of grinning, conniving voting officials.

My father’s voice haunts me. So I type. My harmless bullets.

It seems that joined my friends’ virtual party from Afghanistan. No one from Afghanistan would celebrate the “end of the Forever War.”

Please forgive me if I don’t join in the celebration either.

Redondo Beach Man Charged with Firearms and Narcotics Trafficking Offenses

0

A federal grand jury indictment unsealed today charges a Redondo Beach man who allegedly sold counterfeit oxycodone pills laced with fentanyl that caused a fatal opioid overdose.

Marcus Michael Takaya Poydras, 32, a dual U.S. and Japanese citizen, was arrested Sept. 9, by agents with the Drug Enforcement Administration. The following day, a United States magistrate judge ordered Poydras held without bond pending trial, which is currently set for November 2.

The five-count indictment that led to Poydras’ arrest charges him with one count of distributing fentanyl resulting in death, one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, one count of possession with intent to distribute fentanyl, and two counts of possession of a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking crime. The five charges relate to three incidents.

In the first incident, Poydras allegedly sold to another drug dealer counterfeit oxycodone pills containing fentanyl. After the Jan. 22, 2020, transaction, the second drug dealer distributed the counterfeit pills to a 43-year-old victim who later suffered a fatal fentanyl overdose at his Marina del Rey residence.

As part of the investigation into the overdose death, DEA agents and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department executed a federal search warrant at Poydras’ residence on July 14, 2020, and, according to the indictment, seized cocaine and a .38-caliber revolver with an obliterated serial number.

In the third incident alleged in the indictment, Redondo Beach Police officers arrested Poydras on Jan. 17, 2021, and recovered several suspected controlled substances, including counterfeit oxycodone pills containing fentanyl. At the time, Poydras was allegedly carrying a loaded 9mm semi-automatic handgun.

The charge of drug distribution resulting in death carries a mandatory minimum sentence of 20 years in federal prison and a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. Additionally, each firearm charge carries a consecutive mandatory minimum sentence of five years apiece. If convicted, Poydras would face a mandatory minimum sentence of 30 years in federal prison.

Governor Newsom Welcomes President Biden to California for Wildfire Briefing and Caldor Fire Damage Survey

Gov. Gavin Newsom today welcomed President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. as he arrived in California to survey damage from the Caldor Fire – now the 15th largest and the 16th most destructive wildfire in state history – and discuss his Administration’s response to recent devastating wildfires in the western U.S.

Following the state’srequestFriday, the White House approved a Presidential Major Disaster Declaration for El Dorado County to assist state, tribal and local governments with Caldor Fire emergency response and recovery costs. This follows thePresidential Emergency DeclarationCalifornia secured earlier this month to support the Caldor Fire response, and a previousPresidential Major Disaster Declarationto support counties impacted by the Dixie and River fires.

“I thank President Biden for traveling to California today to see firsthand the devastating impacts of climate-driven catastrophic wildfires we’re facing across the West,” said Governor Newsom. “California is leading the nation with bold solutions to protect people and the environment, and the Biden-Harris Administration is proposing transformative investments to take on this existential crisis. With their dedicated partnership, we will continue to scale up our forest health and wildfire resilience efforts, and ensure our communities recovering from wildfire have the support they need.”

Following a tarmac greet at Mather Airport, the Governor and President Biden traveled to the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) Headquarters, where they received a briefing on the Caldor Fire response led by CAL OES Director Mark Ghilarducci, CAL FIRE Director Thom Porter and U.S. Forest Service Regional Forester for the Pacific Southwest Region Jennifer Eberlien. They also greeted staff at the State Operations Center supporting statewide emergency response efforts.

Governor Newsom and the President later surveyed damage from the Caldor Fire in an aerial tour of impacted areas in El Dorado County, where the community of Grizzly Flats was devastated by the fire. After returning from the aerial survey, the Governor and President met briefly with elected officials and delivered remarks at a Mather Airport hangar. Governor Newsom thanked President Biden for his commitment to tackling climate change and supporting states on the front lines, and highlighted the strong state-federal partnership on wildfire response and recovery efforts. President Biden discussed how the proposed investments in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal and Build Back Better Agenda will increase our resilience to climate change and extreme weather events, including catastrophic wildfires.

 

Governor Newsom and President Biden deliver remarks in Mather following Caldor Fire damage survey.

President Biden’s visit today follows recent White Housewildfirebriefingswith Western state governors, in which the Governor called for federal investments to support additional firefighting personnel, aerial firefighting equipment and long-term access to satellite technology for early fire detection, as well as Governor Newsom’s meetings with EPA Administrator Michael Regan, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack and Forest Service Fire Chief Randy Moore. Following the White House briefings, the Department of Defense provided additional aircraft support to the region, including three additional C-130s with Modular Airborne Firefighting Systems (MAFFS) and necessary support crews, bringing the total to eight MAFF equipped C-130s available for wildland firefighting. The Biden Administration’s budget proposal includes robust investments for high-priority hazardous-fuels treatments, and the Build Back Better Agenda includes additional funding to support efforts by states, tribes and communities to promote resilience to wildfire and ecosystem restoration improvements.

Governor Newsom has advanced a $1.5 billion package to build wildfire resiliency in California. The package supports a statewide strategy focused on forest health and wildfire resilience, including investments to advance land and forest management efforts and community hardening, and builds on the Governor’s previous budget investments in emergency management and executive actions to help combat catastrophic wildfires. Governor Newsom surged CAL FIRE’s firefighting ranks in March by authorizing the early hire of1,399 additional firefightersand in July supplemented the department’s capacities with12 additional aircraft. The Governor earlier this year launched an expanded and refocused Wildfire and Forest Resilience Task Force, with federal, local and tribal leaders, to deliver on key commitments in hisWildfire and Forest Resilience Action Plan.Last year, the Newsom Administration and the USFS announced a shared stewardship agreement under which they are working to treat one million acres of forest and wildland annually to reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfire.

With climate-related disasters occurring at an increasing speed and scale, the Governor in partnership with the Legislature has advanced more than $10 billion over three years that will assist communities in preparing for climate impacts – including wildfires, extreme heat and drought – with additional funding to address environmental justice priorities impacting vulnerable areas. The California Comeback Plan includes a $3.9 billion package to hit fast-forward on our zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) goals, tackling a major contributor of emissions driving climate change. The Governor has made ahistoric commitmentto require that sales of all new passenger vehicles be zero-emission by 2035 and aggressively decarbonize heavy-duty vehicles. The Governor applauded the Biden Administration’s ambitious climate agenda, including the new target to make half of all new vehicles sold in 2030 ZEVs and the recent move to advance smart fuel efficiency and emissions standards, inspired by theCalifornia Framework Agreementssigned in 2019 to serve as a path forward for clean vehicle standards nationwide in the face of Trump Administration rollbacks.

As War Keeps Poisoning Humanity, Organizing Continues to Be the Antidote

Last weekend, U.S. corporate media continued a 20-year repetition compulsion to evade the central role of the USA in causing vast carnage and misery due to the so-called War on Terror. But millions of Americans fervently oppose the military-industrial complex and its extremely immoral nonstop warfare.

CodePink and Massachusetts Peace Action hosted a national webinar to mark the 20th anniversary of 9/11the day before Sunday’s launch of the Cut the Pentagon campaignand the resulting video includes more than 20 speakers who directly challenged the lethal orthodoxy of the warfare state. As part of the mix, here’s the gist of what I had to say:

When we hear all the media coverage and retrospectives, we rarely hear and certainly almost never in the mass media hearthat when people are killed, whether it’s intentional or predictable, those are atrocities that are being financed by U.S. taxpayers. And so we hear about the evils of Al Qaeda and 9/11, and certainly those were evils, but we’re not hearing about the predictable as well as the intentional deaths: the tens of thousands of civilians killed by U.S. airstrikes alone in the last two decades, and the injuries, and the terrorizing of people with drones and other U.S. weapons. We’re hearing very little about that.

Part of the role of activists is to make those realities heard, make them heard loud and clear, as forcefully and as emphatically and as powerfully as possible. Activist roles can sometimes get blurred in terms of becoming conflated with the roles of some of the best members of Congress. When progressive legislators push for peace and social justice, they deserve our praise and our support. When they succumb to the foreign-policy “Blob” when they start to be more a representative of the establishment to the movements rather than a representative of the movements to the establishment we’ve got a problem.

It’s vital for progressive activists to be clear about what our goals are, and to be willing to challenge even our friends on Capitol Hill.

I’ll give you a very recent example. Two leaders of anti-war forces in the House of Representatives, a couple of weeks ago, circulated a “Dear Colleague” message encouraging members of the House to sign a letter urging the chair of the House Armed Services Committee, Adam Smith, to stand firm behind President Biden’s 1.6 percent increase in the Pentagon budget, over the budget that Trump had gotten the year before. The point of the letter was: Chairman Smith, we want you to defend the Biden budget’s increase of 1.6 percent, against the budget that has just been approved by the Senate Armed Services Committee with a 3.3 percent increase.

That kind of a letter moves the goal posts further and further to the liking of the military-industrial complex, to the liking of war profiteers, to the liking of the warfare state. And so, when people we admire and support, in this case Rep. Mark Pocan and Rep. Barbara Lee, circulate such a Dear Colleague letter, there’s a tendency for organizations to say: “Yeah, we’re going to get behind you,” we will respond affirmatively to the call to urge our members to urge their representatives in Congress to sign this letter. And what that creates is a jumping-off point that moves the frame of reference farther and farther into the militarism that we’re trying to push back against. For that reason, my colleagues and I at RootsAction decided to decline an invitation to sign in support.

I bring up that episode because it’s indicative of the pathways and the crossroads that we face to create momentum for a stronger and more effective peace and social justice movement. And it’s replicated in many respects. When we’re told it’s not practical on Capitol Hill to urge a cutoff of military funding and assistance to all countries that violate human rights and when we’re told that Israel is off the table it’s not our job to internalize those limits that have been internalized by almost everyone in Congress, except for the Squad and a precious few others.

It’s our job to speak not only truth to power but also about power. And to be clear and candid even when that means challenging some of our usual allies. And to organize.

At RootsAction, we’ve launched a site called Progressive Hub, as an activism tool to combine the need to know with the imperative to act.

It’s not easy, to put it mildly, to go against the powerful flood of megamedia, of big money in politics, of the ways that issues are constantly framed by powerful elites. But in the long run, peace activism is essential for overcoming militarism. And organizing is what makes that possible.


Norman Solomon is the national director of RootsAction.org and the author of many books including War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death. He was a Bernie Sanders delegate from California to the 2016 and 2020 Democratic National Conventions. Solomon is the founder and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy.

State Legislature Passes Two Bills by Senator Gonzalez

Keeping Workers Safe During COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond

SACRAMENTO — The California Legislature Sept. 9, greenlighted SB 4 by Senator Lena A. Gonzalez (D-Long Beach) and AB 14 by Assemblymember Cecilia Aguiar-Curry (D-Winters), both landmark digital equity bills that will help get families connected to high-speed internet throughout the state. The bills will complement the State’s broadband deployment efforts to ensure infrastructure projects are realized and prioritized for communities that need it most.


California Legislature Passes Landmark Digital Equity Bills

SACRAMENTO The State Legislature Sept. 10, approved SB 606 – Workplace Safety Enforcement by Senator Lena A. Gonzalez (D-Long Beach) which would implement stronger enforcement measures for egregious and flagrant violations in order to keep workers safe, especially as California continues to fight the COVID-19 pandemic.

“During this pandemic, workers in all industries have bravely contributed their time and labor to keep our economy going despite the unprecedented challenges we have faced and all of them deserve to have a safe working environment now and in the future. We must prioritize worker safety as we continue to reopen our economy and protect workers from large corporations who have a complete disregard for their wellbeing. We can achieve this by giving Cal/OSHA the resources it needs to hold employers accountable for health and safety workplace violations via SB 606,” Senator Lena Gonzalez (D-Long Beach) said.