Briefs

California Sues to Stop Trump from Using Public Safety Funding to Pressure States on Elections

 

SACRAMENTO – Gov. Gavin Newsom July 23 announced, in partnership with Attorney General Rob Bonta, that California is leading a multistate lawsuit to block unlawful federal attempts to condition public safety funding on political demands tied to elections. California will not accept the use of federal dollars meant to keep people safe as leverage to pressure states on how they run free and fair elections. 

“President Trump has little support for both his mass deportation agenda and his baseless claims of election fraud, so instead, he’s trying to bully state and local governments into adopting his preferred policies in exchange for much-needed funding,” said Attorney General Bonta. “The Administration has already lost similar fights in court, and we expect this latest unlawful attempt to fail as well. Our communities deserve better than to have essential resources caught up in political games.”

About the grants

The funding that is at stake is an annual $150 million in congressionally approved public safety funds, administered by the Department of Homeland Security or DHS and the Federal Emergency Management Agency or FEMA to help states and their cities prevent, mitigate, respond to, and recover from acts of terrorism and other catastrophic security incidents. 

Most people do not know this funding by its formal name — the Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) — but they know what it pays for. California is suing to safeguard the funding that supports state-level efforts to help train first responders, strengthen cybersecurity, improve emergency communications, buy critical equipment, and help public agencies prepare for serious threats. 

Money meant to keep people safe should not be turned into a political weapon.

About the lawsuit

The coalition of states suing argues that the Trump administration’s requirements are unlawful because Congress never gave DHS or FEMA authority to impose sweeping conditions on these federal grants, the agencies failed to follow required decision-making procedures, and the requirements violate the Spending Clause by coercing States through vague and ambiguous funding conditions that are entirely unrelated to the purposes of the funding programs.

This lawsuit is part of a broader effort to push back on attempts to interfere with California’s election administration. In May, Gov. Newsom signed Senate Bill 73 to strengthen California’s election protections, including tighter safeguards around ballots, voting technology, and interference by law enforcement in the election process.

Reporters Desk

Recent Posts

Watts Community Leader Sheila Lewis Joins Los Angeles Harbor Commission

  LOS ANGELES — The Los Angeles City Council Sept. 16 confirmed the appointment of…

16 hours ago

Caltrans to Host Community Open Houses on the Vincent Thomas Bridge Deck Replacement Project

Caltrans announces three community open houses in October focused on the start of major construction…

18 hours ago

Home Sales Volume Shrinking

Carl Clark, Sept 14 Sales volume, the number of homes sold in a given area,…

2 days ago

LA County Launches “LA Youth: Know Your Rights” Campaign to Empower Youth and Strengthen Civic Participation

  LOS ANGELES — Young people across Los Angeles County are speaking up, organizing and…

2 days ago

Overnight Closures of Northbound State Route 47 at the Vincent Thomas Bridge Through Sept. 18

Caltrans is conducting five overnight closures of northbound State Route 47 (SR-47) between Harbor Boulevard…

3 days ago

Port of Long Beach: Progress on Cooperative Agreement and ‘Port Partners’ Business Opportunity

Port Shares Progress on Cooperative Agreement LONG BEACH —The Port of Long Beach will host…

3 days ago