Scholar Mirya Holman on “The Power of the Badge” — and how county sheriffs enforce American inequality
Sheriffs are unique figures in American politics and American society — but not in the way that many people, especially on the far right, would have you believe. The right-wing conception of the “constitutional sheriff” runs up against the fact that the word “sheriff” appears nowhere in the U.S. Constitution. It’s mentioned in many state constitutions, but not all of them: In fact, Connecticut, which dubs itself the “Constitution State,” has abolished the office altogether. But the myth endures for a reason, reflecting the fact that county sheriffs, while almost always elected officials, are generally not well integrated into the fabric of government with its multiple paths of checks and balances.
As a result, local sheriffs have often been able to resist various reform efforts over the years, and the most recent wave of criminal justice reforms have not been an exception. The anomalous and isolated status of sheriffs is reflected in media coverage and academic research as well. Individual sheriffs like the notorious Joe Arpaio, former sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, may gain significant local or even national attention, but consistent, systemic scrutiny is rare. So “
The Power of the Badge: Sheriffs and Inequality in the United States,” a new book by political scientists Emily M. Farris and Mirya R. Holman, is long overdue.
Read more at: https://www.salon.com/2024/09/15/are-sheriffs-special-in-america-definitely–but-not-the-way-the-far-right-claims/