Briefs

Port Sued Again For Inadequate China Shipping Air Quality Mitigations

SAN PEDRO — The 20-year battle for clean air at the China Shipping Terminal is headed back to court, as the original China Shipping plaintiffs and allies have filed suit to void the City Council’s Aug. 12 vote to certify the Port of Los Angeles’ plan to make up for 11 promised mitigation measures that it never implemented. 

“The Port of L.A. broke the law by abandoning its clean air commitments in the original EIR and, without justification, adopting measures that are far less protective,” said Melissa Lin Perrella, Senior Director of Environmental Justice at Natural Resources Defense Council.

“The Port hid its actions from the public for nearly a decade, resulting in communities shouldering more and more pollution. The Port is not above the law. Our lawsuit seeks to hold the Port accountable.”  

“The Port has shamelessly violated environmental protections it committed to more than a decade ago,” said Dr. John G. Miller, President of the San Pedro and Peninsula Homeowners Coalition. “Residents of San Pedro, Wilmington, and Long Beach face higher cancer risks, asthma rates, cardiovascular mortality rates, and a higher risk of death from COVID-19 in the diesel death zone that surrounds the Port. We refuse to keep suffering with the consequences of pollution from the Port. Today’s lawsuit is yet another chapter in our fight for justice.”   

“The Port legally promised it would adopt health-protective measures to minimize toxic air pollution from ships, trucks, and equipment at the China Shipping terminal,” said Janet Schaaf-Gunter of the San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United, one of the three original activists responsible for initiating the original lawsuit.  “Instead, Port authorities slithered around behind closed doors, abandoning many of its original environmental commitments, which resulted in unfathomable health consequences for residents and dockworkers living and working in this diesel death zone around the Port. We demand better air for our families and our communities.”

A separate suit was also filed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. “We are extremely disappointed that the Port did not  at least require clean fuel or electric trucks,“ said Wayne Nastri, South Coast AQMD Executive Officer.

RLn

Recent Posts

Gov. Newsom Issues Executive Order to Address Economic and Insurance Fallout from Climate Crisis

The California Earthquake Authority or CEA, as the wildfire fund administrator, will evaluate and prepare…

35 minutes ago

Shutdown 2025: What to Expect

This announcement from Rep. Nannette Barragán’s office was sent with the following disclaimer: DISCLAIMER: The…

55 minutes ago

Desperate Times, Desperate Measures: Yes on 50

Gerrymandering is the bane — well, one of the banes — of our so-called democracy.…

21 hours ago

Padilla, Democrats Call on State Department to Restore Gaza Humanitarian and Medical Visas

The Senators requested a full explanation of the circumstances leading to this abrupt decision to…

23 hours ago

San Pedro City Ballet, Arts United Invite Community to Mural Unveiling Oct. 5

Misty Copeland said of the mural: “I’m incredibly honored to be featured in this stunning…

23 hours ago

Port of Long Beach Names Chief Harbor Engineer

LONG BEACH—The Port of Long Beach has named Monique Lebrun as senior director of the…

2 days ago