Briefs

Councilmembers Push for Comprehensive Review of LAPD Disciplinary Practices in New Legislation

 

LOS ANGELES — In response to continued concerns about the Los Angeles Police Department’s disciplinary system, councilmembers introduced a motion July 31 calling for a comprehensive review of the current disciplinary system. The authors of the motion hope this review will guide the city council and mayor in presenting a ballot measure to the voters of Los Angeles that reflects the proposed reforms.

The initiative follows Mayor Karen Bass’ recent veto of a related item, where she highlighted police officers’ collective frustrations with the existing disciplinary system. In her veto message, the mayor said she looked forward to working with the council to do a “thorough and comprehensive review with officers, the department, and other stakeholders to ensure fairness for all.”

The motion calling for this comprehensive review was introduced by Councilmember Tim McOsker, Council President Paul Krekorian, Council President Pro Tempore Marqueece Harris-Dawson, Public Safety Committee Chair Monica Rodriguez, and Neighborhoods and Community Enrichment Committee Chair Eunisses Hernandez.

“Engaging with everyone, from police officers to community members, and doing a top-to-bottom review of our current system is essential to create the much-needed reforms in our police disciplinary system,” said Councilmember Tim McOsker. “This initiative represents a timely opportunity to work together to ensure fairness, transparency, and accountability in how we handle police misconduct.”

The motion invites the participation of the mayor’s office, LAPD, the board of police commissioners, city council offices, community stakeholders, and community safety advocates. It seeks to review all aspects of the disciplinary process, including:

Generation, filing, and receipt of complaints;

Investigation timelines and processes;

Rules and processes for hearings;

Selection of advocates and quasi-judicial officers;

Due process before, during, and after administrative hearings;

Burdens of proof;

Authority and responsibilities of the Chief of Police;

Range of disciplinary actions, including dismissal, suspension, and demotion;

Legal rights and remedies of parties post-process;

Reporting and transparency to public bodies and the public;

And, any other relevant aspects.

The motion also calls for regular community meetings throughout the city to discuss matters related to the disciplinary system and the pending review. These meetings would be held with the participation of the mayor’s office, LAPD, the board of police commissioners, city council offices, community stakeholders, and community safety advocates.

The motion has been referred to the rules, elections and intergovernmental relations committee and the public safety committee.

Reporters Desk

Recent Posts

From Chemical Fumes to RV Lawsuits to the Brown Act

The Harbor Gateway’s Unfinished Business By Rick Thomas, Columnist A new year is usually a…

2 days ago

This is Not About Protecting Americans

And so, we might be urged to ask if you haven’t swallowed the current BS…

4 days ago

Letters to the Editor: Santa Clause’ Helpers, Illegal Military Strike & Fifth Anniversary of the Insurrection

Santa Claus’ Helpers Came to Town! This holiday season, Santa Claus’ Helpers from Lomita brought…

4 days ago

ALERT: Town Hall Meeting

  The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) announces three community open houses in January and…

4 days ago

The Party’s Over, the Beets Remain

  By Ari LeVaux, Columnist I call it Christmas Sweater because of the color scheme…

4 days ago

Seeds For Liberation, Tracing the Fight for Liberation from Gaza to the Streets of LA

By highlighting the perspectives of Palestinians, prominent members of The Black Panther Party, La Raza,…

4 days ago