Briefs

LA Superior Court Issues Preliminary Injunction in Money Bail Lawsuit

LOS ANGELES — The Los Angeles Superior Court May 17 issued a preliminary injunction or PI ensuring that people will no longer be detained because they are unable to pay cash bail. The injunction requires the LA Sheriff’s Department and Los Angeles Police Department to follow a policy enacted during the pandemic in Los Angeles, home to the largest jail system in the country, that does not require people arrested in low-level, non-violent offenses to pay money bail before they are released.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Lawrence Riff ruled that the plaintiffs in a class action lawsuit had demonstrated they are likely to succeed in showing that it is unconstitutional for LA County and City of LA to jail people between arrest and their first court date simply because they cannot afford to pay money bail. This ruling follows a months-long hearing, which included weeks of testimony from experts on the harms of wealth-based detention, which demonstrated that money bail undermines public safety. The court concluded: “[T]he uncontroverted evidence shows the PI will reduce the incidence of new criminal activity and failures to appear for future court proceedings . . . and decrease overcrowding at these Defendants’ jail facilities.”

The court also noted that the defendants “do not dispute” the plaintiffs’ arguments, and that “many public officials in California” including LA’s own Probation Department and Board of Supervisors have expressed “profound doubts about the wisdom, fairness, and constitutionality of the pretrial money bail system that operates to detain arrestees in jail solely because they are too impoverished to pay money bail.”

Pursuant to today’s preliminary injunction, effective May 24, 2023, LAPD and the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department will no longer be able to jail individuals who would have been released under LA’s most recent “emergency bail schedule,” which was implemented to reduce jail overcrowding during the pandemic. The parties will then have until July 5, 2023 to work together to design “constitutionally sound, effective, concrete, administrable, and enforceable plans and procedures” for pre-arraignment release of arrested individuals. The court expects the lawsuit to proceed to a trial on the merits in 2024.

Learn more about the case here.

Reporters Desk

Recent Posts

Queen Mary 2 and the Historic Queen Mary will Reunite for a Royal Rendezvous – 20 Years Since Last Meeting

The public is invited to see this royal rendezvous from the decks of the Queen…

18 hours ago

Arts Council for Long Beach Honors Griselda Suarez’s Legacy as Executive Director

  After ten years of transformative leadership, Griselda Suarez will step down as executive director…

19 hours ago

Port of Los Angeles Awards Record $1.85 Million in Community Grants

LOS ANGELES – Jan. 29, 2026 – The Los Angeles Board of Harbor Commissioners Jan.…

19 hours ago

Thousands of SoCal Kaiser Pharmacy and Lab Workers to Begin Unfair Labor Practice Strike Feb. 9

UFCW Kaiser employees will launch their ULP strike to raise their concerns at the same…

20 hours ago

Newsom Spotlights Major Anduril Investment in SoCal which Includes AI Weapons Development

At that time, OpenAI maintained that the partnership is focused on defensive measures to protect…

20 hours ago

Christopher Chase Named Director of Cargo Marketing at Port of Los Angeles

  LOS ANGELES –  2026 – Maritime and cruise industry veteran Christopher Chase Jan. 29…

21 hours ago