Briefs

Three Companies Charged of Negligent Conduct During Offshore Oil Leak

A federal grand jury Dec. 15, accused three companies with illegally discharging oil during a pipeline break in early October by acting negligently in at least six ways, including failing to properly respond to eight separate leak alarms over the span of more than 13 hours and improperly restarting the pipeline that had been shut down following the leak alarms.

An indictment filed Dec. 15, charges the companies that own and operate the 17-mile-long San Pedro Bay Pipeline with one misdemeanor count of negligent discharge of oil. The charged defendants are Amplify Energy Corp.; Beta Operating Co. LLC (a wholly owned subsidiary of Amplify doing business as Beta Offshore); and San Pedro Bay Pipeline Co. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Amplify).

The pipeline, which was used to transfer crude oil from several offshore facilities to a processing plant in Long Beach, began leaking on the afternoon of Oct.1, but the defendants allegedly continued to operate the damaged pipeline, on and off, until the next morning. As a result of the allegedly negligent conduct, what is estimated to be about 25,000 gallons of crude oil were discharged from a point about 4.7 miles west of Huntington Beach from a crack in the 16-inch pipeline.

The indictment alleges that the defendants acted negligently by:

  • Failing to properly respond to eight alarms from an automated leak detection system that were activated between 4:10 p.m. Oct. 1 until the final alarm at 5:28 a.m. the following day;
  • Shutting down and then restarting the pipeline five times after the first five alarms were triggered on Oct. 1, resulting in oil flowing through the damaged pipeline for a cumulative period of more than three hours;
  • Despite the sixth and seventh alarms, pumping oil for three additional hours late on Oct. 1 into the early morning hours of Oct. 2 while a manual leak test was performed;
  • Despite the eighth alarm, operating the pipeline for nearly one hour in the predawn hours of Oct. 2 after a boat they contacted failed to see discharged oil in the middle of the night;
  • Operating the pipeline with crewmembers who had not been sufficiently trained on the automated leak detection system; and
  • Operating the pipeline with an understaffed and fatigued crew.

An indictment contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

For a corporate defendant, the charge of negligently discharging oil carries a statutory maximum penalty of five years of probation, as well as fines that potentially could total millions of dollars.

The Coast Guard Investigative Service; the U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Inspector General; the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Criminal Investigation Division; and the FBI are investigating the oil leak.

Reporters Desk

Recent Posts

Letters to the Editor: Deadly Merger, Disability Rights, War of Choice, and the Call for Peace and Voting

Stop the Deadly Merger Like many Americans, I am opposed to my tax dollars continuing…

9 hours ago

The Myth Behind The J6 Insurrection Is Back — And California Is In Its Crosshairs

Voter fraud is as rare as hen’s teeth. A Brookings Institute study of vote-by-mail ballot…

1 day ago

Trick Versus Trust

  The scariest part of this post-Halloween election will come after the votes are cast…

1 day ago

Champagne, Sparkling Wine, and the Stories in the Glass

By Lynn NIshimura, Columnist   Champagne has a fascinating relationship with popular culture. One of…

1 day ago

Harbor Commission Votes to Replace Pacific Harbor Line With Union Pacific/BNSF Subsidiary

But The Story Is Far From Over Pacific Harbor Line has provided short line rail…

1 day ago

Discover 12,000 Years of Culture at San Pedro’s AKM Cultural Fair

  San Pedro is an established destination for art, and starting on November’s First Thursday…

1 day ago