The Farm to Door Food Delivery Service

    By Gina Ruccione, Cuisine and Restaurant Writer

    We all have guilty pleasures. Mine happens to be watching the Food Network for hours on end and then trying to recreate lavish dinners for my friends and neighbors. It’s a process that can take days on end — especially if I’m trying to plan a Game of Thrones-themed dinner with six courses and a wine pairing.

    Needless to say, this can put a slight strain on both my stomach and my wallet. Actually, “slight strain” is an understatement. I’d be lying if I told you that I have never spent an entire paycheck at Whole Foods. That being said, there is a way to eat fresh, eat well and eat with ease without throwing down wads of cash.

    Enter Terra’s Kitchen, a new farm-to-front door food delivery service, which brings the finest ingredients and chef-designed recipes right to your door.

    Essentially, it’s everything you need to cook great-tasting meals at home. Their goal is quite simple: bring back family dinner night with less hassle and at a fraction of the price.

    Here’s how it works: Go to their website and choose from their menu of seasonal recipes. Unlike some of their competitors, Terra’s Kitchen allows you to swap out or remove recipes. Next, experiment with different cooking techniques and flavor profiles you wouldn’t typically try at home, like chicken with sugar pea and radish salad, or skirt steak with chimichurri and sweet potato fries. Menus are constantly evolving and they only use the best ingredients.

    Then, just wait for your delivery.

    Terra’s Kitchen sources their produce and meat from local purveyors and then preps and portions everything for you. Everything is delivered in a refrigerated vessel with step-by-step, foolproof recipe cards. All you have left to do is cook and enjoy.

    If that doesn’t make your life easier, I don’t know what will.

    Gina Ruccione is a self-proclaimed food critic, has traveled all over Europe and Asia, and has lived in almost every nook of Los Angeles County. You can visit her blog at http://foodfashionfoolishfornication.com.

    Read More
  • Grassroots Fighter Seeks Seat In Congress

    By Paul Rosenberg, Senior Editor

    In April of 2014, Common Cause and the ACCE Institute released a report, “Big Oil Floods the Capitol: How California’s Oil Companies Funnel Funds Into the Legislature.”

    The No. 1 recipient identified was State Sen. Rod Wright, who subsequently resigned following an unrelated criminal conviction. The No. 2 recipient, Isadore Hall III, was the assemblyman who replaced him in a low-turnout special election this past December.

    Now, Hall wants to take his oil-drenched politics to Washington, as the anointed successor to Janice Hahn, who’s running for the board of supervisors. But, while other political insiders have bowed out of the race, he’s now got a very serious grassroots environmental crusader running against him: Hermosa Beach Mayor Pro Tem Nannette Barragan, fresh off her leading role in the March 3 landslide 3-to-1 defeat of “Measure O,” which would have opened up Hermosa to oil drilling for decades to come.

    On April 14, Equal Pay Day, Barragan made her announcement.

    “I’m excited to announce that I will be running for Congress and I am glad to do it on a day that clearly illustrates how much more work needs to be done to make sure that everyone is treated fairly,” Barragan said. “I have always and will always be an advocate for women, families and equal rights. Ensuring women get paid the same as men who do the same work will be a pillar of my campaign.”

    Although living outside the district, Barragan is a Carson area native, born of immigrant parents. She has family in Wilmington and San Pedro as well. “I’m about to move back home, coming back to Pedro,” she said.

    Fighting for, protecting and inspiring working class families like the one she grew up in is a common thread connecting almost every issue Barragan touched on in a recent interview, from raising the minimum wage to protecting children’s health from a polluted environment.

    “In the district, where I come from, the median income is about $44,000, and only 60 percent graduate from high school, and 10 percent go on to college,” she said. “So, I just tell people I’m one of the 10 percenters who beat the odds… I was able to go to college, and I’ve got, I achieved, the American dream. Now, I’m coming home to make sure that others have the same shot at the American dream. So, for me it’s a very hopeful story.”

    The day she announced, Barragan got formal support from Blue America PAC, which supports progressive Democrats. It was announced by influential progressive blogger Howie Klein, Blue America’s treasurer, who also indicated support to come from RL Miller, chair of the California Democratic party’s environmental caucus, and executive director of Climate Hawks Vote, dubbed “a superPAC on a shoestring,” which won 11 of the 17 races it endorsed in 2014, its first active cycle.

    “The contrast between Nanette and her opponent couldn’t be clearer,” Miller said. “One has a proven track record fighting big oil and winning, the other sides with big oil.”

    These seemingly small deeds have since been followed with endorsements from nearby Congress members Linda Sanchez (D-CA 38) and Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA 40), both of whom have previously represented portions of the district, as well as two Arizona Congress members, Ruben Gallego and Raúl Grijalva, and three more from Texas: Joaquín Castro, Rubén Hinojosa and Filemon Vela, as well as BOLD PAC, the fundraising arm of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. She’s also been endorsed by Los Angeles City Councilman Paul Koretz, South Gate Vice Mayor Bill De Witt and Carlos Alcala, the Chicano Latino Caucus chairman of the California Democratic Party.

    If it sounds like it’s shaping up to be a black-Hispanic struggle, that may reflect networks of initial support, but a peek beneath the surface reveals something more troubling. In addition to oil money, Hill and Wright were also neck-and-neck near the top of recipients of tobacco money, which was once strictly off limits for Democrats.In August, the Sacramento Bee reported that Hall was one of six Democrats cited taking more than $20,000 in tobacco money in recent years.

    “All of them represent districts with high poverty,” the Bee noted, “Smoking is more prevalent in poor communities—nearly 28 percent of adults who live below the poverty line smoke, compared with 17 percent of adults who are at or above it, according to data from the national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.”

    In short, the real interests Hall represents are directly threatening to the black community. At the same time, Barragan has a track record of working across racial lines. As a student at UCLA, she had an internship at the Clinton White House doing outreach to the African-American community.

    At first, she could not believe it when a UCLA career center advisor urged her to apply for internships in D.C.

    “I said, ‘Are you kidding me?’ My parents are immigrants from Mexico, I have no political ties.”

    When the Supreme Court rejected her, it confirmed all her fears, but then the White House accepted her.

    The result “was a turning point in my life,” Barragan said. “I saw so many people that looked just like me, so many people that had my story. They didn’t have the political ties, they also came from humble beginnings. And for me, that was really motivational, and inspired me to say, ‘Look if I work hard, I too can do anything that I want.’”

    As a result, she ended up “serving as a facilitator between the president and any African-American organizations,” she said. “Working on a lot of issues that affect a lot of people of color and minorities, and other areas as well… people like Martin Luther King III, and Jesse Jackson and the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition.”

    But that was only a beginning.

    “I loved it so much that I went back in 1999, to work for the NAACP on the hill, to do legislative policy, working on health care policy for the NAACP,” she said. “One of the areas was racial health disparities,” which was an issue being highlighted by the Surgeon General at the time.

    Barragan’s awareness of those disparities clearly influences how she sees the public health side of environmental justice issues, as she made reference to the “toxic tour” conducted by Communities for a Better Environment.

    “It’s pretty startling to hear the members, to see that children are dying of cancer before they graduate from high school. To me that’s just unacceptable.”

    Even without a guided tour, air pollution impacts in the district are unavoidable, Barragan noted.

    “We see children who walk around with inhalers,” she said. “It’s a public health crisis.

    “How do we attract businesses to come in bringing cleaner, greener jobs?” she asks. “How do we make that change?”

    On June 10, Climate Hawks Vote announced its endorsement of Barragan. It explained the endorsement in part by recounting a telling bit inside the drama that’s usually completely hidden from voters:

    Last week during a critical vote on a fracking bill, state legislator Isadore Hall III was sitting on the sidelines and chillin’ with his friends at Western States Petroleum Association as the vote count seemed to stall at 19 (it needed 21 for passage). He told them his voting strategy—he would abstain so as to not cast the deciding vote, but if two others voted for it he’d have to go along so as to not hurt his reputation with the greens. Fortunately for Hall’s entirely undeserved reputation, two others voted yes, so he cast vote No. 22.


    Miller said they hoped the early endorsement would help cut through the fog.

    “I wanted to make an early endorsement, much earlier than usual—the primary is a year away—because I’m really excited about Nannette,” Miller said. “And, partly because I wanted to try to get the word out among the national folk that this race presents a clear, classic difference between a big oil-funded politician, who is very much part of the machine, versus somebody who is an outsider, fresh-faced and is right on all the policy issues.”

    While Hall wrapped up a lot of early endorsements, Miller said many are having second thoughts.

    “I have already started to talk to both elected officials who regret their endorsements, and Democratic club people who regret their early endorsements,” she said.

    It’s not just oil and tobacco interests that have raised questions about Hall.

    In late November, the Los Angeles Times reported that Hall was “facing criticism from competitors for his use of campaign funds to pay for expensive dinners, limousine rentals, luxury suites at concerts, and trips to resorts in Maui, Ojai and Pebble Beach.” Hall reportedly called them a political necessity in the race. “Hall said he has to raise and spend money to introduce himself to those he hasn’t represented in the past.”

    All that money did not buy very many votes, however. Hall did well enough to avoid a runoff election, winning almost 18,000 votes for 55.9 percent. But in the 2012 general election, Wright garnered more than 10 times as many votes, while the badly-beaten Republican tallied three times as many. Now, Hall is trying to use that paltry turnout, purchased in part through lavish spending, to lay claim to a congressional district in which most people have never heard of him.

    Barrragan doesn’t expect to outspend Hall, only raise enough to get her message out and mobilize grassroots support, as she did in the fight against Measure O. She began that fight as an outsider, ran for city council, won, and over time, mobilized such strong support that the council as a whole moved from formal neutrality to outspoken opposition to the drilling plan. And that grassroots connection remains primary for her.

    “We’re proud of the endorsements we’ve received,” she said, “But for us, this is going to be about focusing on people in the district, not the insiders and special interests, but doing what the people of the district want.”


    Read More
  • Keeping the Mic Live and Open

    By Charles Lamont, Guest Columnist, and Terelle Jerricks, Managing Editor

    In what seems like a new addition to San Pedro’s already rich cultural smorgasbord, the open mic scene in San Pedro is a growing phenomenon with at least five venues every week.

    The original open mic scene started at the old Sacred Grounds Coffeehouse back when it occupied the building where Niko’s Pizzeria now stands. At least that’s the way Owen Tirre remembers it. Tirre, has been running the open mic at the Wigwam for several years.

    There are a great number of talented players in San Pedro, but they are fragmented into pockets of players and may never cross paths. The open mic scene is the place where they might meet and play together — creating phenomenal music on the spot. And, the people who return frequently to perform improve noticeably each time.

    The wooden, open ceiling structure and wide open spaces looks and feels like a barn. With a mini seashell stage and a microphone artist of all sorts step to the stage to play original music.

    Many performers seem to fit a type: long haired, fedora wearing artists of age 50 or better. Their music almost always defaults to folk by virtue of their acoustic guitar, but their lyrics come from well-lived lives that come from travel, experience and wiry humor of going through it all, whether bad or good.

    Tirre sees the local open mic scene as a place where artists can play unfettered by the demands of live entertainment venues.

    “A venue was needed for performing artists, poets and spoken word performance artists such as Randy Stodola,” said Robert Brandin, who helps run the open mic at the Wigwam. “The beginners and the performance artist types need a place to start out where the audience is supportive… For many seasoned performers who have stopped playing, the open mics are the way back to playing once again.”

    Stodola is a professional artist who fronted punk bands the Alley Cats and the Zarkons during the 1980s and early ‘90s. After a long hiatus, Stodola has reemerged at various venues from Hollywood to San Pedro. The open mic scene is where he tries out material on where he performed music he hasn’t played in a long time.

    “If you play original music, where do you play in the Harbor area?” Brandin asked. “Bars want mainly danceable cover music.”

    Indeed, there’s an over-abundance of talent in this town and too many venues either requiring artists to pay to play or play covers, providing little opportunity for artists to try new material on live audiences.

    At least at an open mic, there’s a stage and willing ears. But the thirst is deep in San Pedro.

    When Tirre began experiencing burnout earlier this year, he nearly stopped hosting them until local artists Brandin and Richard Sauers picked up the slack with some much needed energy.

    “I like the vibe and the space we created for people to come and do their thing,” Brandin said. “We’ve seen people blossom as a result of having a place to play. Without the availability of a performance place, many players would not have regained the confidence to play again.”

    It’s hard to say whether the growth of open mics in San Pedro is an isolated phenomenon. Long Beach still has lots of open mic venues such as Viento y Agua and 4th Street and Vine.

    It has been my experience that things sometimes just come together at open mic night. The vibe is just right, the combination of performer and audience is just right and the magic just happens.

    Other times it can be awkward or embarrassing but it’s all about the people — the performer and the audience. It couldn’t happen without an accepting and supportive audience.
    Venue: The Royale Hotel, 238 W. 10th St., San Pedro
    Time: 7 p.m. to 10 p.m., Mondays and Saturdays
    Details: (310) 832-5225

    Venue: The Redmen’s Lodge/Wigwam, 543 Shepard St., San Pedro,
    Time: 6:30 p.m, Wednesday
    Details: Redman’s Lodge on Facebook

    Venue: Sacred Grounds, 468 W. 6th St., San Pedro
    Time: 7 p.m. Tuesdays and Saturdays
    Details: Sacred Grounds on Facebook

    Venue: Off the Vine, 491 W. 6th St., #103, San Pedro
    Time: 7 p.m., Every other Thursday
    Details: Off the Vine on Facebook

    Venue: The Corner Store, 1118 W. 37th St., San Pedro
    Time: 3 p.m. First Sunday Ukelele Hootenany; 3 p.m. Last Sunday
    Details: The Corner Store on Facebook

    Venue: Old Torrance Coffee and Tea, 1413 Marcelina Ave., Torrance
    Time: 6 p.m. to 9 p.m., Thursdays
    Details: http://otcoffeetea.com/

    Venue: The Crest Sports Bar and Grill, 1625 Cabrillo Ave., Torrance
    Time: 7 p.m., Thursdays
    Details: http://thecrestsportsbarandgrill.com/

    Venue: Viento y Agua, 4007 E. 4th St., Long Beach
    Time: 7 p.m. Thursdays
    Details: www.vientoyaguacoffeehouse.com

    The Wigwam and The Corner Store are mostly unplugged. There’s a mic and speaker system at Sacred Grounds.

    Read More
  • Pope Francis Speaks Out on Climate Change

    ‘Hear both the cry of the Earth and the cry of the poor’

    By Paul Rosenberg, Senior Editor

    In 1891, Pope Leo XIII’s encyclical, Rerum Novarum, examined the suffering of the industrial working class, endorsed labor rights such as the freedom to form unions, and laid the foundation for Catholic social justice doctrine and activism that continues to this day.

    On June 18, Pope Francis issued a new encyclical, Laudito Si’ (“On Care For Our Common Home,”) which could potentially rival Rerum Novarum in terms of its sweeping impact on human affairs.

    “Our house is going to ruin, and that harms everyone, especially the poorest,” Pope Francis said, on the eve of releasing Laudato Si’.

    The theme of interrelated social and ecological harm runs throughout the document.

    “[W]e have to realize that a true ecological approach always becomes a social approach; it must integrate questions of justice in debates on the environment, so as to hear both the cry of the Earth and the cry of the poor,” it states. “Mine is therefore an appeal for responsibility, based on the task that God has given to man in creation: Till and keep the garden’ in which he was placed.

    “I invite everyone to accept with open hearts this document, which follows the church’s social doctrine.”

    The Archdiocese of Los Angeles sent out an email in support of the encyclical, saying, “Today, Pope Francis called on world leaders and everyday people to come together to tackle climate change.” He urged people to “echo the Pope’s call for climate action! Call on world leaders to reach a meaningful climate agreement in Paris.”

    The encyclical completely undercuts the climate denialism prevalent with the GOP, which is often camouflaged in religious hand-waving. Typically, the two Catholics running for president, Jeb Bush and Rick Santorum, both sought to wave off the encyclical, as if it were a random office memo.

    “I hope I’m not, like, going to get castigated for saying this in front of my priest back home, but I don’t get economic policy from my bishops or my cardinals or my pope,” was Bush’s response.

    “The church has gotten it wrong a few times on science, and I think we probably are better off leaving science to the scientists and focus on what we’re really good at, which is theology and morality,” Santorum said.

    But scientists have applauded the document, which is actually deeply rooted in Catholic social theology, and does not hesitate to label current economic practices as sinful—precisely the sort of “theology and morality” Santorum purportedly was asking for.

    Indeed, the first several pages take pains to situate Laudato Si’ within the context of earlier church teachings, papal encyclicals and other statements. The encyclical takes its name from a passage from St. Francis of Assisi’s Canticle of the Creatures, Laudato si’, mi’ Signore”—“Praise be to you, my Lord,” which continues, “through our sister, Mother Earth, who sustains and governs us, and who produces various fruit with coloured flowers and herbs.”

    After quoting that passage, the encyclical continues:

    This sister now cries out to us because of the harm we have inflicted on her by our irresponsible use and abuse of the goods with which God has endowed her. We have come to see ourselves as her lords and masters, entitled to plunder her at will. The violence present in our hearts, wounded by sin, is also reflected in the symptoms of sickness evident in the soil, in the water, in the air and in all forms of life.


    Turning to more recent social teachings, the encyclical first draws a parallel to Pope St. John XXIII’s encyclical Pacem in Terris, which, “not only rejected war but offered a proposal for peace…to the entire ‘Catholic world’ and indeed ‘to all men and women of goodwill.’ Now, faced as we are with global environmental deterioration, I wish to address every person living on this planet.’”

    The encyclical then goes on to specifically cite environmental concerns, starting with Pope Paul VI in 1970 and 1971, and deepening with St. John Paul II, citing his first encyclical, Redemptor Hominis. That text states “He warned that human beings frequently seem ‘to see no other meaning in their natural environment than what serves for immediate use and consumption.’” He goes on to cite several works of his predecessor, Benedict XVI.

    In short, one framing purpose of the encyclical is to stress that it is not a departure from earlier church teaching, so much as an emphasis on our altered human circumstances.

    From without, however, it was seen by some as most significant that this encyclical came from the first pope from the Third World, and also that it shared a great deal in common with the largely Third World-based climate justice movement. Author and journalist Naomi Klein, who has chronicled the climate justice movement for years and has been invited to speak at an upcoming Vatican conference on the encyclical, made this point on Democracy Now! On June 18:

    A lot of the language of the climate justice movement has just been adopted by the pope—I mean, even of phrases like “ecological debt.” The pope is talking about the debt that the wealthy world owes to the poor. I mean, this is a framing that comes originally from Ecuador, from the movement against drilling in the Amazon. And, you know, this is a phrase that was never heard in mainstream circles until just now, actually. I mean, I’ve never seen such a mainstream use of that term.

    Klein also pointed out that it was not just climate deniers who were criticized by the encyclical:

    I think that it’s too easy to say that this is just a challenge to Rick Santorum and Jeb Bush. Frankly, it is also a challenge to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama and to large parts of the green movement, because it is a rebuke of slow action. It very specifically says that climate denial is not just about denying the science, it’s also about denying the urgency of the science. The document is very strong in condemning delays, half-measures, so-called market solutions. It very specifically criticizes carbon markets, the carbon offsetting, as an inadequate measure that will encourage speculation and rampant consumption.

    Bill McKibben, founder of 350.org, which has coordinated global days of climate protests, said the encyclical was “Neither liberal nor conservative—but definitely radical.” More specifically:

    [T]he heart of the encyclical is less an account of environmental or social destruction than a remarkable attack on the way our world runs: on the “rapidification” of modern life, on the way that economic growth and technology trump all other concerns, on a culture that can waste billions of people. These are neither liberal nor conservative themes, and they are not new for popes: what is new is that the ecological crisis makes them inescapable.


    As the encyclical says, “We fail to see that some are mired in desperate and degrading poverty, with no way out, while others have not the faintest idea of what to do with their possessions, vainly showing off their supposed superiority and leaving behind them so much waste which, if it were the case everywhere, would destroy the planet.”

    But it does not intend to be a message of despair. A primary drafter of the encyclical, Cardinal Peter Turkson of Ghana, on the morning of its release at the Vatican, said, “Pope Francis has a positive outlook for the possibility to change tack on the environmental issue. Humanity says Pope Francis still has the capacity to work to build our common home. Human beings are still capable of intervening positively.”

    “This is really the first Third World encyclical,” Nathan Schneider, a columnist with the Catholic weekly, America, told Democracy Now!

    “[T]his is coming from a pope who was shaped in really significant ways by economic crises during the Cold War in Argentina and being in the middle of a battleground between the First and Second World powers. It was drafted by a cardinal from Ghana,” he said.

    “So this is coming from the side of the world that we don’t normally hear from. And it’s very much in line with things that popes have been saying for decades, you know, going back to Paul VI, then John Paul II, Benedict XVI. So, a lot of the content is actually not so new for Catholics.”

    Considering that Christianity was originally the religion of the Roman Empire’s underclass, it is only fitting that such a cry now be heard.


    Read More
  • The Problem with Cock

    ‘Cock’ Wrestles with Identity, Stereotypes

    By Zamná Ávila, Assistant Editor

    In a time when Caitlyn Jenner and Rachel Dolezal top the list of social media posts, it is easy to see how issues of identity take center stage in today’s society.

    Cock, a play by Mike Bartlett, aims to challenge identity in our culture, in which the human experience is continuously simplified in an attempt to place people in boxes and label them according to various indices.

    “It’s a universal thing; it’s people getting trapped in their labels and feeling that they are representative, more than individuals,” explained director Gregory M. Cohen, who recently brought the theatrical production to The Studio at the Long Beach Playhouse.

    While aspects of Cock are funny, it could hardly be considered a farce. Its efforts to be comical seem to reach only a segment of the audience.

    “Stand over by the fake door!” exclaims the main character at the beginning of the play. Somehow, some people found that breaking of the fourth wall funny because the production had a minimalistic setting. But its effect was both positive and negative.

    On one hand, the actors and their audience were able to concentrate on the language and the acting, which is a good thing. On the other hand, the minimalism — evident not only by the lack of many fixtures on the stage, but also by transition from scene to scene through light dimming — made the play’s time transitions difficult to follow.

    “This is the kind of show that an audience is going to catch up to” Cohen said of the play’s nonlinear structure. “The first few scenes are (just) kind of trying to figure out what’s going on. Then, they’re going to realize that we are skipping through time and then going backwards.”

    Cock, set in London, centers on the life of John, played by Leigh Hayes. Having established a long-term relationship with his male partner (played by Evan Battle), John finds love in the arms of a woman (played by Lexington Vanderberg) during a brief breakup. What ensues is essentially a cock fight for his love.

    Battle said he found things in his own life that helped him relate to the character he played. His character was consistent and emotional, almost to the point of being over-dramatic. However, anyone with experience in relationships knows that some of them are just as passionate.

    “I liked that there is something in it for everyone,” Battle said. “You don’t have to have experienced exactly this to find something in it that you can relate to.”

    The language in the play tries to stay true to its setting, and the actors do an excellent job using British accents.

    “We talked about making it American and we felt that the language was so important to the show. It had to be British… but like I said, it’s universal,” said Cohen, adding there is very little punctuation and no stage direction.

    “Cock” is British slang for “nonsense,” as well as an American missive referring to male genitalia. But it also alludes to the personal struggle the main character faces in the pen, or cock-fighting ring, of his own identity.

    Often weak and insecure, John is the embodiment of a male chicken, juggling the love of two people and too afraid, or too unwilling, to chose one. He is fickle and weak — characteristics that Hayes, a thinly-built, young man­—adroitly conveys in his performance. What’s frustrating about Cock is that there are points in the play when you think John reaches a pinnacle of growth and strength, but quickly reverts to being a spineless twerp, who is unable to take responsibility for his own persona.

    Throughout the play, John is asked to define himself, to take a label, but again and again, he fails to take a stand.

    “Be yourself,” advises John’s female lover (none of the character in the play except John have a name).

    “I have absolutely no idea who that is,” is John’s reply.

    “You are being selfish. I think you need to figure out what you are, fast,” John is chastised by his male partner’s father. “It seems to me you’re confused. Who are you?”

    “I don’t know what I am!” seems to be John’s flaccid response every time.

    John’s responses and demonstrated character flaws make you wonder whether the play is counter-productive in its intentions. While it exposes its audience to yet another spot in the sexuality spectrum, which is good, it also runs the risk of furthering stereotypes about people who do not conform to monosexuality (either heterosexual or homosexual, but not both).

    “It’s a possibility, but I feel that it’s more toward this character’s personality overall,” Hayes, who plays John, opines. “He’s just someone who doesn’t want to deal with conflict.”

    Hayes, a method actor who drew from his own experience to bring out the character’s emotion, believes that John knows what he wants but he’s too afraid to do something about it.

    “He feels that you can’t choose who you have sex with, in terms of sexuality; it’s not a choice. But I think somewhere deep inside he knows that love, you can chose,” Hayes said. “It comes down to how you feel about a person.”

    To accentuate this point, Cohen clarified that the play is not about bisexuality.

    “It’s about someone in a damaged relationship, searching to complete [himself] in another relationship,” Cohen said. “So, the sexuality is a side issue.”

    “The way that the play conveys this message, I feel that it will speak to a lot of people,” Hayes continued. “It really opens people’s eyes to knowing what really goes on in the coming out process, what really goes on with finding one’s sexuality and what really goes on loving someone so much to the point where you break those barriers.”

    Cock is at the Long Beach Playhouse through July 11. Tickets range from $14 for students, $21 for seniors and $24 for adult general admission. The play contains some nudity and language that may be offensive to some people.

    Tickets are available at www.lbplayhouse.org, or by calling (562) 494-1014.


    Read More
  • If You Have a Hammer, Every Problem Begins to Look Like a Nail

    By James Preston Allen, Publisher

    Our fertile subconscious minds conjure up curious images to deal with unresolved conflicts. A friend of mine once recounted waking from a dream in which she collected all the hammers in her house before going to bed so as to protect herself from burglars breaking in during the night. I sometimes think our city leaders have the very same dream and solve problems the same way.

    The Los Angeles City Council has a toolbox full of hammers to address the city’s multitude of problems. Nowhere is this more evident than how it chose to solve the growing number of homeless encampments this past week when it reduced the amount of advanced notice authorities have to give before removing personal possessions of the homeless.

    The number of people without shelter in Los Angeles County rose by 12 percent over the past two years to 44,359. Somewhere close to half of those reside in the City of Los Angeles. And, about 300 of those reside in San Pedro.

    The cities of Los Angeles and Long Beach both have 19 laws on the books targeting the homeless. In their wisdom the city councils have made it illegal for both the rich and the poor to sleep in public parks or anywhere else outdoors.

    Overall, there are some 200 laws and local ordinances criminalizing homelessness in California. The state legislature passed a new version of Penal Code Section 647(E), a misdemeanor charge for sleeping inside of buildings, public or private without permission. This anti-lodging law was made harsher when the penalties were increased to a year in jail and a $2,000 fine if caught doing it twice—as if a homeless person could afford to pay this.

    All of this hammering on the poor seems crazy in light of the barrage of stories published by Los Angeles Magazine expounding on the idea that Los Angeles is on the verge. There are billion-dollar hotels going up near LA Live; there are competing NFL stadium proposals in Carson and Inglewood; a billion-dollar restoration effort of the Los Angeles River; and at every new Metro light rail station new market-rate housing is being erected.

    Yes, Los Angeles is on the verge of becoming divided and unaffordable for working class Angelenos. All while real estate prices soar and foreign capital builds yet another skyscraper hotel.

    Recently the California Supreme Court ruled that San Jose could impose its affordable housing zoning codes on new developments. For Los Angeles, this is a nail worth pounding—staunching the loss of affordable working class housing as previously low-income neighborhoods become gentrified. This should be an immediate priority for the city council to hammer down before passing any more ordinances outlawing sleeping on park benches. In other words, how about providing some lumber in which to hammer those nails.

    This, of course, is not our city’s only dysfunction. In in the words of departing Deputy City Mayor Rick Cole, “[The city] is designed not to work.” That Los Angeles annually spends $100 million on the homeless—$80 million on just policing—is an astounding figure and one of the prime examples of how Los Angeles is designed not to work.

    If Mayor Eric Garcetti and the city council aim to make Los Angeles the sustainable city of the future, then investing some of this $100 million into permanent housing for the homeless must be made as high a priority as the efforts to make the LA River look pretty again.

    In the meantime, the city cannot arrest its way or evict its way out of the growing problem of homelessness. Let’s find some vacant property where we can set up some bathrooms and showers, provide social services, and let them camp out in peace.

    Whatever happened to Ted Hayes Jr.’s Dome Village concept for housing the homeless?

    On Aug. 31, 2006, Hayes announced that the residents of Dome Village were being evicted and that domes would be auctioned off online. Residents were given until that October to get out and move into traditional homeless shelters. At the time, they hoped to recreate Dome Village elsewhere in Los Angeles with the proceeds from the auction. Perhaps it’s time to build a few more domes?

    Read More
  • Camilla to the Rescue

    By James Preston Allen, Publsher and Terelle Jerricks, Managing Editor

    I interviewed Camilla Townsend a few weeks ago about vision, consensus building and leadership—particularly in light of her work with the Port of Los Angeles High School and the on-dock marine research center, AltaSea.

    In my most recent editorial, I wrote about the high turnover of executive directors in the local nonprofit sector, including Angels Gate Cultural Center’s former executive director, Debra Lewis; former San Pedro Chamber of Commerce president and CEO, Betsy Cheek and Port of Los Angeles Executive Director, Geraldine Knatz; and most recently Marymount California University President Michael Brophy.

    What each of these organizations has in common is that they are structured as corporate nonprofit organizations. The decision making of the individuals that make up the boards of these nonprofits is, at various times, less than transparent.

    Camilla Townsend, on the other hand, strikes me as an example of engaged leadership.

    In the past 12 months, Townsend was drafted twice to navigate nonprofits in some state of crisis. The first was POLAHS after the homegrown charter school was rocked by teachers organizing for labor representation this past fall, and student demonstrations staged amid financial impropriety allegations against Executive Director Jim Cross.

    The second was when Townsend was tapped to become the chairwoman of the board of directors of AltaSea after Rachel Etherington, the chief executive officer, unexpectedly stepped down on April 28—to the surprise of almost everyone.

    That Townsend was tapped to act as a first responder for a nonprofit in crisis—a fixer, of sorts—is what made me want to interview her about vision and leadership.

    I said as much to her when we met over a late breakfast recently at Think Café.

    “I like the word, ‘Once again, brought in to save the day.’ I think that should be my subtitle,” Townsend said jokingly, adding, “I don’t ever save the day by myself. It’s always a great team of people.”

    Still, there has to be leadership. POLAHS Executive Director Jim Cross was forced to resign, and many parents during and after the turmoil were asking—justifiably or not—for the head of Jayme Wilson, the president of the POLAHS Board of Trustees.

    In the case of AltaSea, Etherington’s name was drawn from a high-profile search that looked across the pond to the United Kingdom.

    “There has to be leadership,” Townsend said. “What’s similar about the two projects is that even though one is relatively new and the other one is now 10 years old, they were both, in business terms, startup projects.

    “As you know, I’m an educator, and even though I had the opportunity to do a lot of innovative things in education, it’s a little different kind of animal in the business world. And, even the charter high school—even though it’s education—it’s truly a business venture.”

    Startup vs. Governance

    Townsend’s career spans nearly 50 years. Her résumé and accolades are long—too long to be listed here. For the past 27 years she has served as the executive director of the charitable education-focused Max H. Gluck Foundation, which gives millions of dollars every year toward education and arts outreach initiatives from kindergarten through 12th grade and at the university level.

    “Even though POLAHS is an educational institution, it’s different [from AltaSea] in that it’s an independent setup, and it has to be looked at like a startup business or a startup organization,” Townsend explained.

    Townsend noted that the ways in which the two organizations are similar as business ventures is that both experience a maturation process that requires them to operate differently as they grow.

    “When you have a startup organization, you operate one way to get it off the ground… and then it kind of comes to a point where it moves from a startup organization to a sustaining organization,” Townsend explained. “Sometimes, that transition is critical in an organization, because if it doesn’t happen, you’re setting yourself up for another kind of failure. It’s just like growing up. It’s just life.”

    Townsend said POLAHS outgrew its startup phase two or three years ago.

    “What was relevant and very much needed in the first…eight years or seven years…the project was not in the same kind of need in terms of building a building…getting permits, etc,” she explained. “It was time now to say, ‘Hey, it’s here now. This is good. We really need to look at enhancing the basic education program and moving forward now to make sure we’re in sync with the educational needs of students.’ So, in that sense, that’s changing—that transition happens.”

    Regardless of whether a business venture is in the startup phase or the growth phase, transparency is rarely a strong suit for an organization structured as a nonprofit. Townsend noted that this structuring of the POLAHS and AltaSea was intentional.

    “AltaSea has no choice because they are not a public entity. They are a private nonprofit corporation—whereas POLAHS is a public entity because it uses public funds.”

    Townsend said the lack of transparency in POLAHS’ case had posed a particular problem, forcing the 10-year-old institution to incorporate a recordkeeping system that complies with California’s open-access “sunshine laws.”

    Despite being a private entity, Townsend admitted that AltaSea’s pursuit of public dollars from the port and other sources inspires calls for transparency.

    “How that will manifest itself…and how that happens, remains to be seen,” she said. “But AltaSea—even though they’re not a public non-profit right now—are doing everything they can to be transparent in spite of that fact that they don’t have to have Brown Act-ed meetings.”

    In lieu of open board meetings, Townsend noted that the AltaSea Communications Director Pat Means is making a number of moves to further community involvement and community engagement initiatives for AltaSea.

    Learning, Growing and Gaining Experience

    Though Townsend has been repeatedly called to fix critical issues at various civic organizations in town, she denies being some sort of guru. She says she’s just been learning as she goes along.

    “This is a huge learning experience for me,” she said.” I don’t claim to be coming in here with these two projects with any superior knowledge about anything. My life has always been, ‘Keep trying new things. And, if need be, come in to try to fix things that are good, but are having a struggle.’

    “If you were to ask me 10 years ago, ‘What would you be doing,’ I would have said you’re out of your mind. But in the last 10 years, things have evolved—ever since I retired from education.”

    Townsend officially retired from education in 2002, after serving as the principal of Harbor Adult School for 11 years. In 1999, Townsend was appointed to the Los Angeles Commission for Children, Youth and Families by Mayor Richard Riordan. In 2001, she was appointed to the Board of Harbor Commissioners by Mayor James Hahn. From 2006 to 2011, Townsend served as president of the San Pedro Chamber of Commerce.

    “I love it because I really am excited when people want to try new things and do new things that are better for the community,” she said. “I love this community, obviously, and I love Los Angeles—I’m an L.A. girl… I am drawn to these kinds of things rather than things that are just continuing to run and do whatever they do. I’m drawn to the outside-the-box type of things—the visionary thinking.”

    I pointed out that she was also present and involved in the very beginnings of POLAHS and AltaSea, during the design phase of these nonprofit organizations.

    “Helping to design the project… is the part I love the most,” she said. “When you pull all these people together, who buy into a vision, [who] love the vision, [who] have a passion for it and they all bring different expertise to the project, [this] is really exciting.”

    Townsend credits her background in theater for this view of organization building—not from the perspective of an actor, but that of a director.

    “I was a director; I was not an actress; I was not anything else,” she said. “To me, bringing all this talent together to create a work of art in the theater was what I loved the most. And this is no different. Even being principal of the school is really no different than that.”

    I wondered aloud if having the same cast members playing roles on multiple boards could make for a stale and restrictive environment for these nonprofit organizations.

    “I don’t think of the board so much as I think of the people who are basically running and making the organization or making the project work,” she said.

    “Boards are a good thing. Part of POLAHS’ challenge was—over the years—that the board had to learn a lot and move forward, and a lot of it had to do with who was on the board. It has to do with how the board operates and how well the staff understands that the board is their boss.”

    Townsend draws a distinction between management and members of a board of trustees or directors. When she is talking about staff, she’s talking about management staff.

    She noted that in the case of POLAHS, the original leadership that was a part of the charter school’s startup wound up being the same people who ended up on the board—the same people who are on a lot of boards in San Pedro.

    “We have learned a lesson this year at POLAHS,” Townsend said, “A big, huge lesson about board oversight and a board really taking responsibility seriously.”

    Townsend’s takeaway from POLAHS’ recent troubles is that organizations have to be able to adapt.

    “Remember, I am not an expert on this business of boards and governance,” she said. “I’ve experienced a lot of it. But part of the deal here with POLAHS was that it came to a point where it was time to revisit the management structure of the school for good reasons—nothing bad—all good.

    “That was sort of difficult because the board didn’t quite see why that had to happen, nor did the top management staff,” she said.

    The Down and Dirty

    As hard as I tried, I couldn’t get Townsend to assign blame for the school’s inability to adapt fast enough.

    To recap, Executive Director Jim Cross, was placed on paid leave for the second and final time in February following a closed meeting amid renewed allegations of financial impropriety.

    Conflict between Cross and Principal Tom Scotti (who is a relative of District 15 Councilman Joe Buscaino), lack of financial transparency, teacher input on school site spending, and the appearance of cronyism were the dominant issues. An audit of the school’s finances was conducted and ultimately cleared Cross of wrongdoing, though the actual audit report was not released.

    During his tenure, Cross reportedly used personal funds for school expenditures, even as he used school funds for personal expenditures. Following the audit, he was called to reimburse the school the paltry amount of misspent funds and the school was to reimburse him for purchases made on behalf of the school from his personal funds.

    Townsend noted that the people involved in the school’s startup got involved because they loved the school.

    “The board did not provide proper oversight of the management staff,” Townsend said. “They didn’t take that role as seriously as they should have. Not that they didn’t care or anything. Nobody pointed out to them that your job as a board of trustees for a charter school is no different than being the board of education for LA Unified School District.”

    The people that sit on the nonprofit boards of directors are typically people whose professional experience, expertise, professional networks and often wealth could be leveraged to further the long-term goals of the nonprofit.

    As a result, it’s not uncommon to find the same people occupying multiple boards. Sometimes, this phenomenon can be pronounced in places like San Pedro where there are about 50 nonprofit organizations with an elite few individuals or families occupying three to five boards of directors.

    In settings such as these, in which there’s so little diversity and so great a difference in wealth and power among members, the normal tendencies to avert conflict within a governing board is multiplied exponentially.

    Townsend agreed with my belief that resolution can’t come without conflict. When it became clear that Cross wasn’t going to return to POLAHS, she began mentoring and grooming Scotti to occupy the POLAHS chief executive role that now combines the powers of principal and executive director.

    “We knew POLAHS was settled and it was going to be OK…I had decided…for the last six months while we were trying to work out this deal with Jim [Cross]…I was going to focus on making sure everything stayed good at this school,” Townsend said. “So, I just became Tom’s mentor and I was at school almost every day helping everybody feel good and move forward and continue to do all the good things they were doing.

    “I needed to re-establish and prove to the board that Tom, who is a great principal, can run this show. Because sometimes business people on boards think that a principal doesn’t know anything about business,” she said. “Well, it’s probably very true with many principals in the City of LA because they don’t have to handle a lot of that…the school district handles it. But when we get our administrator’s credentials, we are trained in school law, we are trained in school business, you know, and code…So a principal should understand the skills or what’s needed to do that.”

    Townsend noted that the power imparted to the roles of both principal and executive director was a decision made intentionally by the founders of POLAHS and that played a role in the well-documented friction between Scotti and Cross.

    “We saw this coming,” Townsend said. “It wasn’t a problem in the beginning because the executive director had millions of things to do regarding the building of the facility.

    “Tom focused on the instructional program and building that program and that would fund her for the first few years. But then, as you move forward, it has to come together, because the education program needs to drive the budget not the other way around. Even though you have limited funds from the state, you say, ‘OK, here’s how much we have in the education program. What is needed and how best can we spend that money? You know, so that wasn’t really happening.”

    AltaSea and Changing Leadership

    Townsend became chairwoman of the board at AltaSea following the departure of Etherington, right after much of the hard work at POLAHS was concluded in May. Townsend it wasn’t a good fit, despite Etherington’s stellar credentials.

    “You start with belief in the project,” Townsend said. “But in order to do that, you have to have money… you really need somebody that can really get out there and be the visionary and excite the people to give money to the project.

    “You have both elements. Sometimes you can find a person who’s good at both, but rarely. Two years ago…there was no board. There was an advisory encampment.” The advisory board just formed a year-and-a-half ago. “When that happened…they hired a firm…That’s what they wanted, to fulfill both obligations.

    “I think what happened was—because Rachel is an extremely dynamic, energetic woman, she’s very bright, extremely articulate both verbally and in writing, and she’s devoted to the environment…I think that’s what probably motivated them thinking of the day-to-day operations running of that too, and that she could get out there and raise the money… I had all hopes that she could,” Townsend said.

    Before Port of Los Angeles Executive Director Knatz resigned, she bequeathed a 50-year lease to AltaSea, pledging a total of $210 million to be matched by a legal minimum of $408 million. AltaSea was to raise $549 million by 2019. A quarter of that money—$139 million—was to be raised by 2017.

    With $54 million in hand from the port and matching funds commitments elsewhere, the change in leadership comes at a critical juncture. Townsend, however, believes the challenges are the same as they were when AltaSea was formed.

    “Yes, $100 million is a lot of money,” Townsend said. “However, it takes a while, first of all to generate the connections to roll the money out. So, for a year, that’s been going on.

    “You just don’t go out there…They need to learn about the project. They’ve never heard about it before. And it’s a lot of the people who are in this world who are in philanthropy…That’s where the money’s going to come from. We don’t have it here in San Pedro.”

    Townsend noted that philanthropists must be shown that something is happening on the site, even while money is being raised to actually build the project.

    She explained that AltaSea has been working on an interim use plan that does exactly that, by laying out what is going to be built, how it will be used and who will use it during the development of the marine science hub.

    When the interim plan has reached a critical milestone, Townsend said the community will get to provide comment on the plan before it moves forward.

    The recent news that aerospace manufacturer SpaceX is partnering with AltaSea to base its rocket and spacecraft retrival operations in the Harbor Area might just be the milestone they are waiting for.

    Read More
  • Mishi Strudel Looking for Buyers

    By Terelle Jerricks, Managing Editor

    I was shocked and a little sad to learn on Facebook that Aniko and Michael Schueller were looking to sell their pastry shop, Mishi’s Strudel.

    The comment thread is full of local regret. “Say it ain’t so” and expressions of hope that the shop will retain its Hungarian cuisine and homespun character in the hands of a buyer.

    “Bittersweet to be sure,” the Schuellers posted for their Facebook followers. “We love how this wonderful community has welcomed us over the past 8-plus years, and we love all the close friends we’ve made just by sharing our passion for delicious Hungarian food, culture and most of all, flaky strudel, in our little cafe.”

    The Schuellers described the closing as a transition into their next adventure. I, for one, will miss their Arabica coffee and the warm smells of cinnamon, vanilla nut and almond.

    Michael Schueller, for whom the cafe is named (Mishi is the Hungarian derivation of Michael), recounted taking his aunt’s traditional Hungarian strudel recipes and updating them for today’s more health conscious consumer.

    “[In the old days] there was no concern about healthiness,” he told me. “The recipes were extensively modified. My wife, Aniko, is very well-versed in health foods. She reads a lot of health food articles. I’m not allowed to eat bad things.”

    Said the biggest changes to his aunt’s traditional recipes include dropping the use of coloring in the cherries and replacing shortening with butter.

    Recognizing the fan base they have built, the Schuellers trademarked their logo and name to allow for the possibility that Mishi Strudel could live on beyond them.

    Strudel lovers can only hope a buyer is found that is committed to preserving Mishi’s authenticity. But even then, it may not be the same.

    More Entrée News on page 16 of www.RandomLengthsNews.com

    Read More
  • Former POLA Executive to Direct Port Authority of New York, New Jersey

    NEW YORK — Former Port of Los Angeles Executive Director Molly Campbell has been chosen to become the next port of commerce director at the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.

    Campbell will succeed Richard Larrabee, who is retiring after 15 years, on July 27. One of Campbell’s first tasks will be continuing Larrabee’s work on helping coordinate implementation of 23 recommendations issued this past year by a port performance task force appointed to find ways to improve efficiency and reliability, and reduce congestion and delays.

    The port authority also is in the midst of a $1.3 billion project to raise the roadway of the Bayonne Bridge, which now prevents large ships from serving most port container terminals. The existing bridge roadway is scheduled to be raised next year.

    Campbell joined the Port of Los Angeles in 2000 as chief financial officer and in January 2007 was promoted to deputy executive director. In that post, she was responsible for strategic development projects, operations and maintenance and management of the port’s annual operating and capital budgets.

    Recently, she was named director of financial management systems at Los Angeles World Airports for Los Angeles.

    At the Port of Los Angeles, Campbell served as vice chairwoman of the International Association of Ports and Harbors’ finance committee and the chairwoman of the American Association of Port Authorities’ maritime economic development committee.  She also was a member of the city planning commission in Long Beach.


    Read More
  • Trade Connect Offers Online Training — RL NEWS Briefs June 18, 2015

    POLA ‘Trade Connect’ Website Offers Online Training
    SAN PEDRO — Trade Connect, the Port of Los Angeles’ export education outreach program, formally debuted its new website, LATradeConnect.org on June 18.
    Visitors to the website will find detailed information about Trade Connect curriculum, services, data and industry partners in a user-friendly format. The video content includes a summary of Trade Connect’s 101 introductory export course and its entire 301 Export University advanced training series The 301 training series is free, and viewers need only register online to access it. For those who can attend in person, the new website has a calendar of upcoming programs. The next event, June 25, is the Export University Session: “Logistics and Shipping Documents.” July 9 is the “Export Plan & Panel” during which companies pitch their export business plans to a panel of experts.
    Established in 2007, Trade Connect is a one-stop resource for small and midsize U.S. businesses looking to learn the nuts and bolts of exporting their made-in-America goods and services. The program offers a wide variety of beginning, intermediate and advanced export workshops, as well as regional trade forums focused on import/export opportunities with key international markets.
    Visitors to the website will find detailed information about Trade Connect curriculum, services, data and industry partners in a user-friendly format. The video content includes a summary of Trade Connect’s 101 introductory export course and its entire 301 Export University advanced training series. The latter is a package of seminars — each approximately 30 minutes in length — on topics such as how to develop an export business plan, international logistics, documentation requirements, Internet export marketing, legal and regulatory compliance, and cultural business practices. The 301 training series is free, and viewers need only register online to access it.
    Current international trade statistics, information on existing and pending free trade agreements, the Los Angeles Regional Export Plan and the International Trade Compliance Institute’s extensive database are also available on the new website. It also links visitors to the Inland SoCal Link iHub, a multiagency partnership established to promote manufacturing and logistics innovation and job creation in Los Angeles, Riverside and San Bernardino counties and encourage foreign investment to further economic development in the Inland Empire trade corridor that connects the Port to the rest of the nation.
    Trade Connect partners with other agencies, institutions and professional associations to offer most of its programs at little or no cost. Speakers include government, international trade, legal and financial experts, and successful Trade Connect graduates and entrepreneurs. To date, Trade Connect workshops and seminars have drawn more than 32,500 attendees.

    Marymount Announces Interim Leadership
    RANCHO PALOS VERDES — On June 17, Marymount University trustees announced the appointment of two interim co-presidents.
    The board of trustees unanimously selected provost and dean of faculty, Ariane Schauer, and senior vice president of finance, Jim Reeves.
    Schauer and Reeves are collaborating with current president, Michael Brophy to ensure the university’s progress toward its 2015-2016 priorities. Brophy leaves the university in August to serve as president of Benedictine University in Illinois.
    The trustees will select a consultant to guide a national search for the next university president.
    Schauer joined the Marymount faculty in 1998. She has served as Marymount’s chief academic officer for the past six years, leading the institution’s academic transformation from a two-year college to a university with bachelor’s degrees, and the addition of master of business administration and master of science degrees. Schauer serves as a peer evaluator for the Western Association of Schools and Colleges’ Senior College and University Commission and regularly presents to higher education peers. Schauer earned a philosophy doctorate in economics from the University of California Los Angeles.
    Reeves joined Marymount in 1978 as a member of the faculty and quickly moved into a leadership role. Serving three university presidents, Reeves was appointed dean of Student Affairs in 1982, and since 1994 has served in the senior leadership role of vice president. He was promoted to senior vice president in 2013. Reeves’ oversight of the institution’s finances and operations has helped grow the student body and expand to sites in San Pedro and Lake County, California. His work in managing the institution’s real estate assets, including playing a key role in the acquisition of Marymount’s two student residential sites, is viewed as a milestone in advancing the student experience at Marymount. Reeves earned a master’s degree in education from California State University Dominguez Hills.
    Details: www.MarymountCalifornia.edu.

    POLB Sees Strongest May in Nine Years
    LONG BEACH — On June 17, the Port of Long Beach announced Cargo rose at the Port of Long Beach by 6 percent in May.
    A total of 635,250 TEUs (twenty-foot equivalent units) of containerized cargo were moved through the Port in May. Imports numbered 327,317 TEUs, a 4.8 percent increase from the same month last year. Exports decreased 7.4 percent to 135,855 TEUs. Empty containers rose 22.6 percent to 172,078 TEUs. With imports exceeding exports, empty containers are sent overseas to be refilled with goods.
    Cargo volume is up partly due to a stronger retail market. The port is also attracting new services in order to boost cargo growth.
    Through the first five months of 2015, cargo is up 1.1 percent overal
    For all the latest monthly cargo numbers, click here.
    For more details on the cargo numbers, please visit www.polb.com/stats.

    Building Records Now Accessible Online
    LOS ANGELES — On June 13, Mayor Eric Garcetti announced a new customer service tool from the Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety, the LADBS Online Building Records system.
    The system will offer users a quick and easy way to research building records and obtain digital images of original documents online.
    The Online Building Records system allows 24-hour access to key records such as building permits and certificates of occupancy without requiring customers to make a trip downtown and wait in line at the records counter.
    The system contains more than 13 million records dating from 1905 to the present, including building permits, building modifications, grading information, and commission files. Since the system’s soft launch in May, it has been accessed more than 27,600 times by nearly 3,700 unique users.
    Access to Online Building Records is from LADBS.org under the “Online Services” tab, or directly at http://ladbsdoc.lacity.org/idispublic. Records can be retrieved by address, legal description, County Assessor Parcel Number, or document number.
    Permits and certificates of occupancy, the most requested and used documents, were converted to digital image first, and more than 4.7 million of them are now available. Conversion of historic microfilm and paper documents is in progress, and those images will be placed online as they are converted.
    LADBS serves about 65,000 records customers annually. Primary users include homeowners, contractors, architects, engineers, escrow agencies, banks, and permit expediters. Real estate industry users may use records to validate use and occupancy for a building being sold or purchased. Development industry users might use records to review permits and certificates of occupancy, address code enforcement issues, or bid on jobs. Homeowners preparing to obtain new permits, sell their homes, or wanting to satisfy curiosity and concerns may also seek records.

    Board of Supervisors Approve County Assessor Systems Modernization
    LOS ANGELES — On June 16, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved more than $12.7 million as the first installment to replace the Los Angeles County Assessor’s antiquated technology systems.
    This technology upgrade guides the creation and management of Los Angeles County’s $1.2 trillion assessment roll, which includes the assessment of each of the County’s 2.6 million properties. The assessment roll results in the accurate assessment of billions of dollars of revenue which funds social services and programs such as schools, public safety, hospitals and countless quality of life services in local communities.
    The current technology systems used by the Office of the Assessor includes more than 120 aging applications that are not well integrated, relying on outdated green-screen technology that is substantially paper-based, inflexible, and inefficient for staff. The current system also makes it difficult for the Office of the Assessor and other county departments to respond to taxpayer inquiries efficiently.
    The new technology replacement project will construct a modern assessment roll database, rewrite the interface for both computers and mobile devices, build data storage and Proposition 13 functionality that will increase staff productivity, and contribute to the Assessor’s Open Data initiative. The project will also consolidate existing databases into a single, easily-accessible system. All Assessor employees will have complete access to all data, thus eliminating lengthy delays required to research paper records or access different systems.
    Once completed, the new technology system will be much more user-focused and user-friendly. The public will have direct access to information and benefit from faster responses to their questions. Furthermore, the assessor’s modernization project will set new standards for transparency and accuracy, while supporting modern and future business and compliance requirements. Finally, the project will implement advanced security features will protect sensitive county and public information.

    Unsung Heroes of World War II Storm Capitol Hill
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – On June 17, a delegation of World War II Merchant Marine veterans stormed the Hill, visiting with members of Congress in the Capitol as they seek to raise awareness and gain greater recognition of their important service as part of the “the fourth arm of defense.”
    Now in their 80s and 90s, the men might not move as quickly or have the strength they did more than 70 years ago during their wartime service, but they remain just as patriotic and are fiercely determined in advocating on behalf of the surviving Merchant Marine veterans.
    Military and political leaders including Eisenhower, Churchill, and MacArthur praised their service and credited the Merchant Marine for their important role in the Allied victory.
    They risked their lives, facing attacks by U-boats and enemy planes and traveling through mined waters. As many as 9,000 mariners were killed – and thousands more maimed and injured – during the war. In fact, the casualty rate among the Merchant Marine was higher than for any branch of our armed forces in World War II.
    However, despite their dedicated wartime service to the nation, Merchant Marine veterans were not eligible for the benefits others received under the G.I. bill. This means they never received the college tuition subsidies, the home loan guarantees or other provisions of the G.I. Bill that helped millions of veterans transition seamlessly into civilian life and lifted many of their families into the middle class.
    Merchant Mariners were even excluded from Veterans Day and Memorial Day events. Only in 1988, following a class-action lawsuit, were they recognized as veterans, entitling them to care at Veterans Affairs hospitals.
    The group met with Rep. Janice Hahn (CA-44), who has introduced the Honoring Our World War II Merchant Mariners Act of 2015 (H.R. 563) and has been a leading advocate for them in the U.S. House of Representatives.
    The men shared stories of how they and their colleagues transported vital supplies and equipment to troops overseas, of their ships being sunk by torpedoes and their fellow Mariners who never made it home. They also talked about the indignity and injustice they experienced over the many years after their service, not being credited for their work and the risks they endured and not being recognized as veterans, unlike those whom they served alongside and supported.
    Clint Quirk, 91, from Arizona, said, “Like many, I couldn’t pass the physical, but I wanted to help with the war effort.”
    He dropped out of college and joined the Merchant Marine. At one point, he wound up manning the gun on his ship and serving as the shooter, despite not being enlisted in the military or having combat training.
    Charles Mills, from Texas, who will celebrate his 95th birthday while in Washington, DC, explained that the Navy assigned 16 gunners per ship, not enough to man all the guns, so commanders assigned mariners to those duties.
    Eugene Barner, 89, from Kansas, recalled being anchored at Okinawa preparing invasion forces when the atomic bomb was dropped on Japan and later sailing into Tokyo harbor and going ashore seeing the devastation. (His mother was like Rosie the Riveter, working in a Kansas plant where B-25 bombers were produced.) He is proud of his service and the role he and other Merchant Mariners played during the war and hopes H.R. 563 will pass into law.
    Charles Mills agrees, adding, “Merchant Mariners were promised to be part of the G.I. bill. I expected to be able to rely on the G.I. bill to go to college. But we weren’t included.” Decades after this disappointment, he explains that by supporting H.R. 563, “We are trying to get benefits we feel entitled to from the government in lieu of what we lost. And we also welcome the respect this would bring us.”
    He notes that unlike the U.S., our allies including Great Britain, France and Canada compensated maritime veterans or gave them pensions.
    Gabriel Frank, 87, from New York grew up in group homes after his mother died when he was 6. While in high school, he shined shoes and worked in factories. Virtually penniless, hungry and without a home, he got permission to join the Merchant Marine when he was 16 and served a total of 23 years including during both World War II and the Korean War.
    The group attended an event on Capitol Hill that a veterans organization hosted. A Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation subcommittee hearing and
    were introduced and acknowledged warmly at both events.
    A film crew accompanied the group during their Capitol Hill visit for a forthcoming documentary called The Sea is My Brother. (The trailer for that film can be viewed at https://vimeo.com/117332721 )

    Read More
  • 1 85 86 87 241