• LB District 4 Elects Supernaw as its New Councilman

    Photos and brief by Diana Lejins
    LONG BEACH — Lifelong District 4 resident Daryl Supernaw will soon join the Long Beach City Council.

    Supernaw beat Herlinda Chico and Richard Lindemann in a winner-take-all special election April 14. He took 52 percent of the vote. Chico got 42.4 percent of the district vote and Lindemann only took 4.8 percent of the vote.

    The election ushered him into the seat that now-Assemblyman Patrick O’Donnell vacated.

    The new councilman-elect said the election sent a message to constituents.

    “It shows that a truly independent candidate can win,” he said. “I hope to continue serving the 4th District and the city for many years.”

    Read More
  • Mark Twain is Alive, Shakespeare is the Question

    By John Farrell, Curtain Call Writer

    Everybody knows Sam Clemens.

    Sure, he has been dead for more than 100 years, but Hal Holbrook brought him back to life 60 years ago. His linen suit and bushy eyebrows, his wry humor and slick way around a sentence are still a part of everyday American life.

    Will Shakespeare, on the other hand, well, we know he wrote all those great plays (or do we?) but as for his appearance, his habits, his way of speaking – well, he was an actor and probably a bit of a chameleon. So, except for his plays, he’s pretty much forgotten by the time he died in Stratford upon Avon, (perhaps from partying too hearty with Ben Jonson). (more…)

    Read More
  • The NFL to Carson:

    How a Big Deal was Kept Secret

    By Terelle Jerricks, Managing Editor, and Lyn Jensen, Carson Reporter

    When Carson’s political leaders announced that an 80,000-seat football stadium was going to be built on the San Diego and Harbor freeway juncture a month ago, no one knew a deal was brewing—not members of Carson’s city council and not the city’s planning commission.

    The only clue to this secret was a lawsuit filed against Carson the day after it was announced that a stadium would be built.

    Until recently, 157 acres of this former landfill produced so much methane gas that anything built on top could have spontaneously combusted, like it almost did in the early 1980s when there was a drive-in theater. This and other hazardous waste at the site made it too toxic to build on, thwarting Carson’s chances of landing a professional football team at least two times in the past 20 years.

    But after the announcement, the Department of Toxic Substance Control deemed the land ready for construction once all the extraction wells—built to safely release the methane gas—are installed within the next six months.

    Construction on the Boulevards at South Bay projects was to begin in 2012. But when former Mayor Jim Dear was asked about the project’s progress in 2014, he blamed the economy for the delay and the “thousands of [polyethylene] piles” that still needed to be driven before construction could begin.

    Before the Feb. 20 announcement, council members Lula Davis-Holmes and Elito Santarina appeared unaware of any stadium plan. Santarina talked about how the Boulevards at South Bay was going to open in 2016 and Davis-Holmes complained about the lack of progress on the project.

    Grassroots Solutions, an out-of-state public relations firm, hit the ground running building community support. With a client list that includes major labor and environmental groups—an apt choice given the leftward political leanings of the city—the firm formed Carson2gether.

    With major backing from the Oakland Raiders and [San Diego] Chargers Football LLC, paid circulators swarmed Carson for several weeks, aggressively soliciting signatures on a 309-page spiral-bound initiative—a document based on the Boulevards at South Bay plan with the addition of a stadium overlay zone and the removal of residential housing. Applicable laws regarding site remediation is not as strict for commercial development.

    The group delivered the completed petitions containing almost 14,000 signatures to the Carson City Clerk on March 21.

    The Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder has 30 days (until April 20) to verify that the petitions contain at least 8,041 valid signatures. If so, the initiative may end up on the November ballot, unless the city council acts to change the zoning before then.

    While there’s widespread support for a team in Carson, there are still voices of trepidation in the city on building anything on the former landfill.

    When the city was last in consideration for an NFL team in the early 2000s, several Carson residents, including former Mayor Vera Robles DeWitt, Robert Lesley and Pat Seals raised serious concerns about the remediation of the toxic soil on the property.

    Lesley recently expressed concern about “horrendous” traffic around an 80,000-seat stadium and whether an adequate traffic study was ever completed.

    “They [stadium supporters] don’t understand an 80,000-seat stadium is different from a 30,000-seat stadium,” he said, comparing the proposal to the StubHub Center.

    Carson2gether spokesman Fred MacFarlene said that the stadium project will rely on the traffic studies of previous environmental impact reports such as the one for Boulevards at South Bay and the L.A. Metromall. Random Lengths News was not able to find a traffic study that takes traffic considerations of a stadium in the Boulevards at South Bay plan.

    MacFarlene also told Random Lengths News that the Oakland Raiders and Chargers Football Co. were in the final stages of purchasing the property from Starwood Capital, the latest entity to hold title to the 168-acre piece of land.That information was confirmed by the San Diego Chargers special counsel Mark Fabriani on April 8.

    After all is said and done, this is a big deal. For the city, it has been a 30-year wait for the land to become rehabilitated enough to build on.

    Twenty-four of the 32 NFL team owners have to approve any deal that relocates a team in the Los Angeles market. How this Carson deal came to be is still a billion dollar question.

    NFL in Carson in Context

    NFL team owners have teased Angelino football fans with the prospect of a franchise in Los Angeles since the late 1990s. Each of those times, Carson was a part of the conversation.

    In the late 1990s, the site attracted the attention of Hollywood deal-maker Michael Ovitz, who, along with a few partners including Glimcher Realty Trust, sought to develop the property into a stadium.

    At the time, a union pension plan acquired the property from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. in an auction for $10.8 million. They planned to build the L.A. Metromall, but ultimately ended up selling the land to the Carson Marketplace LLC, a shell company for the LNR Property Corp. The sale was made for $30 million in 2004.

    In 2005, Carson officials including Dear, Jerry Groomes and Ron Winkler met with NFL commissioner Roger Goodell about developing a stadium at the former Cal Compact Landfill. Dear said at the time, there was no NFL team committed to playing in Los Angeles but, “if you build it, they will come.”

    A month later, Carson abandoned the stadium plan. Instead they pursued the Boulevards at South Bay project, a retail and residential space with no stadium.

    The developer of the Boulevards project was LNR Property Corp.’s Commercial Property Group and Hopkins Real Estate Group.

    In 2012, Starwood Capital acquired the property after purchasing LNR Property for $1 billion.

    In 2013, representatives from Starwood Capital submitted a development plan that identified a 43-acre outlet mall to be built along the San Diego Freeway, accompanied by two parking garages. Their plan saw the future buildout of a warehouse discount store along with more than 800,000 square feet of retail space, 209 hotel room, as well as 850 residential units, and 1,150 rental units, all in conformance with the Carson Marketplace plans.

    Rand Properties Jilted Before the Dance

    Now that the former Cal Compact Landfill is just about ready for construction, bit players in Carson’s decade’s-long saga of getting a football team to Los Angeles feel as if the rug has been pulled out from under them.

    This past February, Beverly Hills developer Richard Rand filed a breach of contract lawsuit against the city and Leonard Bloom of U.S. Capital LLC.

    Rand claimed in the lawsuit that he began working through his companies Rand Resources LLC and Carson El Camino LLC to bring one or more NFL franchises to the city and play in a “state of the art” stadium within the city.

    This is not the first time the city and Rand have tangled in the courtroom. In 2003, in a suit against the city and its redevelopment agency, Rand accused then Mayor Darryl Sweeney of soliciting a bribe in exchange for various entitlements in connection with a “$100 million mixed-use development” he had planned for the 91-acre property. Rand said he refused to pay the bribe and as a result, the city denied the entitlement, despite earlier assurances.

    In 2006, a jury sided with Rand, finding that his civil rights had been violated. The city appealed the civil verdict and Rand filed a cross-appeal seeking $20 million in damages.

    In 2008, while the appeal was still ongoing, Rand and Carson’s redevelopment agency entered into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement. The agreement was contingent upon Rand halting his cross appeal and not enforcing the judgement.

    The agreement was first extended for three years, then extended a second time in 2011 to end in 2012. Rand and the redevelopment agency entered a new two-year agreement similar to the first one.

    Gov. Jerry Brown’s dismantling of the state’s redevelopment agencies caused Rand to question his rights. In September 2012, Rand proposed entering into an exclusive agency agreement with the city in exchange for staying his $20 million cross-appeal of the 2003 lawsuit. This agreement allowed Rand to operate as the city’s exclusive agent in talks with the NFL about bringing a team to Carson.

    Under the agreement, no one other than Rand Resources was permitted to represent the city in negotiations with the NFL, and Rand was to shoulder all the cost of meeting with NFL executives and hiring architectural firms to draft proposed stadium designs, among other costs. The agreement was to end in 2014.

    Rand accuses the city of double dealing while the contract was enforced—starting at least in the summer of 2013. He accuses the city specifically of meeting with Leonard Broom of U.S. Capital while his exclusive agreement with the city was in force.

    For perspective, Rand owns 12 acres of a 91-acre piece of land adjacent to the 157-acre brown field. The remaining 79 acres are owned by at least two other parties. Before California’s redevelopment agencies were dismantled, Rand hoped the Carson Redevelopment Agency would use its powers of eminent domain to enlarge the 91-acre property to help entice the NFL. A substantial portion of the 91 acres has the same issues with hazardous waste as the 157-acre field.

    Rand Resources lawyer Joseph Ybarra said he’s confident the courts will find that the city violated the Exclusive Agent Agreement. Councilman Albert Robles said the council was asked not to speak on the NFL stadium just yet.

     

    Read More
  • Rolling With the Derby:

    Photo By Tristan King

    Photo by Tristan King

    The Most Open Sport on Wheels
    By Eric Fujimori, Editorial Intern

    Roller derby is by no means a mainstream sport, but it’s well on its way to becoming a relevant force in the South Bay and Long Beach areas.

    Since its inception four years ago, Beach Cities Roller Derby has been recruiting more members and attracting a bigger fan base each season. The growth in popularity comes from the organization’s commitment to its unaltered mission statement of being a diverse and welcoming community.

    This concept is driven by Beach Cities Roller Derby’s founder and leader, Shayna Meikle. (more…)

    Read More
  • Working Class Kitchen:

    A Butcher Shop That Finally Meats My Expectations
    By Gina Ruccione, Food Writer and Blogger, Photos by Phillip Cooke

    When it comes to dating and choosing a restaurant, my approach is essentially the same: “What are you willing to do to impress me?”

    In the Harbor Area, there is no shortage of restaurants, and God only knows you could walk 10 steps and trip over a man.

    Lately, I’ve been a little underwhelmed by both (men and restaurants) doing very little to pique my interest, hold my attention, or just simply put in the work. But when I stumbled upon Working Class Kitchen in Long Beach, I was immediately intrigued. (more…)

    Read More
  • Unlocking the Secrets of that Flamenco Music

     

    By Lionel Rolfe

    When I was not yet quite a teenager, I spent a few years studying the classical guitar under Dorothy De Goede. She was  a strikingly beautiful woman who had been a student of Andre Segovia. I was, of course, in love with her even though I was barely a decade old. I then wanted to study flamenco, so my parents sent me to Carlos Montoya.  I loved flamenco but Montoya’s best and most patient coaxing did not teach me how to unfurl my right hand with that particular flamenco sweep.

    I should have had some genetic disposition. My dad was half German-Jewish and the other half Portuguese-Jewish. His mother grew up speaking Ladino in Seattle. The few remaining Ladino speakers lived in Seattle at that time — Ladino is a combination of Hebrew and Spanish. Yiddish is Hebrew and German.

    Appropriately my father, a scholarly judge by profession, loved the classical guitar, an instrument whose popularity really began with Segovia. The guitar, like a piano, can be a whole orchestra. My father also loved lutes, and we regularly went to the lute club. My dad loved to play the guitar in his heavily wooded paneled study where he also smoked his fine cigars. Maybe that was the Iberian in him, and I got a bit of it too, by osmosis if not genetics. In retirement, my dad spent a lot of time in Spain and Portugal, acquiring more guitars.

    My dad had been gone for several years when I was contacted by Doranne Croon Cedillo, and she told me her brother Drew Croon had written a “Gypsy Mass” before he died in 2007–he was born in 1951. She was mounting two performances–one in San Francisco and another in Beverly Hills.  The work will be premiered for a second time in Beverly Hills on Sunday, June 21, 5 p.m. at All Saints Parish, 504 Camden Drive.

    I was instantly intrigued. Cedilla said that rarely had anyone written a piece of serious classical music based on flamenco. I knew that the great Spanish composers–Rodrigo and de Falla, among many others, borrowed a lot of flamenco melodies and rhythms, but used them only as embellishments. Would I like to write about it?

    Of course I would. Flamenco’s roots are mysterious–they comes from the Andalusian region of Spain, and were created when the area was part of the crumbling empire of the Moors–an Arab and African people–who ran the south of Spain. The Romani tribes were from India, and had lived as slaves in the Persian empire. Who knows how the two people interacted, but in one way it is known–they call it flamenco. Prominent among the non-Christian outcasts were the Jews.

    At the heart of the ensemble Doranne assembled was Alex Conde, the classically trained pianist from Spain. His father, Alejandro Conde, played Flamenco guitar and sang and in the last decade Alex has spent in the United Sates, he has found his passion returning in the form of Flamenco. He has found a good Flamenco base in Baghdad by the Bay. And, he says with a laugh, the climate suits him better than was the case in Boston.

    He says you have to understand that the Spanish monarchs and Catholic clergy were incredibly harsh on the people of Andalusia.

    “The music is all about the bad things that happened to them,” he says. Particularly despised were the Romani and Jews and the black Moors who were often Muslim.  Alex notes that the great irony is that many of the Romani today are members of evangelical Catholic cults, and rarely play their wonderful music in public. They “believe in God and pray all the time.” He said they are closely knit, and patriarchal. There are many rules for women. The men tend to have the last word. They are very conservative.”

    But the music isn’t “conservative.” Quite the contrary, which is what gives it an enduring appeal. Flamenco is defiantly improvisational; like many great musical traditions such as blues it is music that comes out of suffering and survival, love and death. Conde does not apologize for playing Drew Croon’s Gypsy Mass, even if flamenco purists would object. Just, in fact, as they reject the very notion of flamenco mass that uses a piano instead of a guitar. But he likes Drew’s music for the way it mixes the sacred and the profane, which he thinks is particularly attractive and beautiful.

    Conde is fairly much traditional Spanish by background. His father is from Valencia on the Mediterranean coast, which has Moorish roots, and his mother is from La Mancha–he notes with a smile La Mancha is the same place where Cervantes came from.

    He grants that it is at least an irony that the words of this “serious” piece of flamenco composition are in Latin–but the music is authentically Flamenco–both in terms of melody and rhythm. Yes, the texts are sung in Latin and are very traditionally Catholic, and the result “is a beautiful mix in my opinion.”

    Conde was trained as a classical pianist, but when he came to the United States to pursue his classical studies, he began to miss flamenco tremendously. Perhaps it was a form of homesickness, he confesses.

    He’s aware that there is no central flamenco hierarchy. But many believe you can’t play flamenco unless you’re Gypsy, he says. Some would consider a Latin Mass “a kind of traitorous thing.” Others will be angry because he’s playing on a piano instead of a guitar. Yet the essential purpose of the modern guitar was to be kind of a replacement for the piano.

    In any event, Doranne was lucky to have found Conde. He was a good match for Croon.

    Croon was not Spanish. Doranne says their parents were mainly Swedish and Irish. Croon’s grandfather came from Sweden and Croon is a Swedish soldier’s name and his mother was a McCabe from Ireland.

    “I’m not sure how my brother  came to love Flamenco guitar so much. It was a natural progression. Maybe it was a natural progression for him. When he was 18 he gave up electric guitar to play classical and was drawn to Spanish classical particularly. He was fascinated by and appreciated greatly the Spanish, French and Italian cultures in Europe, the cultures and languages of Latin derivation. He grew up in the Atwater section of Los Angeles before moving to France. Even then he sought out a Flamenco guitar. He ate, drank and breathed flamenco guitar studies eight to ten hours of practice a day–at the same time he was teaching all finger-picking styles at Charles Music in Glendale. When he turned 21, his teacher told him he had nothing more to teach him. Then he started traveling to Spain where he studied with flamenco masters there. When he lived in France, he rode his bicycle from France throughout Spain many summers, spending more time there when he could.”

    For herself, Doranne Cedillo makes it clear she loves his music, and wants the world to hear it. Thus I attended the premiere of “Misa Gitana Andaluza — A Gypsy Mass” from which scores of people had to be turned away at the  Poppy Art House in San Francisco’s Mission District on March 22. There in this wonderfully San Francisco-decorated store, once we were seated, my eyes were instantly riveted on Kindra Scharich, and the moment the opera singer opened her mouth.

    Her voice was so full and complex and warm. I can’t quite describe why, but the voice seemed roomy and resonant as if I were sitting there with a great view of the all the sounds of the universe–in which all the cacophony had been banished.

    She had an angelic face, dark enough that it easily could have been Spanish, but later she explained to me that she’s not. She’s German, in fact German with a lot of Jewish in her. Later when we talked about that, I observed that her “German” family might have come from the Spanish Expulsion of 1492. She said her background included being from a German Village in Russia. Her father was a chemist who was not particularly religious when he came to Midlands, Mich. to work for Dow Chemical after the war. She also has Scottish blood by way of her mother.

    I wondered if her voice would be so beautiful if her face wasn’t so beautiful.  It was kind of an idle thought, perhaps without much real point–yet her unique voice and beauty were plain for everyone to see.

    Kindra says that she’s not quite sure how she was chosen to join the ensemble–Doranne first contacted her, possibly at Conde’s strong suggestion. She knew Conde and Fanny Ara, the dancer, had worked together. She knew of Ara, but had not worked with her. Now that she is, she says it’s “like playing chamber music,” and for most musicians that’s a very good thing. Chamber music generally provides the most satisfaction to the musicians involved. The intimate synergy gets the musicians closer to the source of the music.

    “One of the things that was really challenging is that we didn’t know Drew. We couldn’t be sure of Drew’s absolute intentions.” So Doranne allowed the musicians to be flexible and fluid enough to recreate those intentions in their own way. Kindra says that she understands when a person is in charge of bringing a loved one’s music to life, one has to do so carefully. And she adds, “At so many points it would have been nice to have Drew there.”

    She suspects that she was chosen in part because “it’s notated and they needed someone who was classically trained.” And she’s classically trained. She also understands that he was melding many things, all a reflection of Croon himself who obviously wanted to create a Latin mass with Flamenco music.

    She explains that the words of the masses “are meaningful to her” even if they don’t express her personal belief. As she sees her role, it’s not to express one’s personal beliefs, but to take on the attributes of a particular expression.”

    Kindra says that Croon did an incredible job of “matching the world of the dance to the spirit of the texts.” If he had a particularly energetic text, he chose a very energetic dance. If the text was more reflective, he chose a more subdued dance. “Flamenco comes in many different styles–from vibrant to slow and ponderous to reverential,” she says–and Drew put them together well.

    Next I talked with Fanny Ara, the Flamenco dancer who with her castanets was certainly the visual show stopper. Here you have the pianist and singer mostly following a score, whereas the dancer’s every move is not notated.  For her, Ara told me, dancing is not an intellectual exercise–it’s about what she’s feeling. It’s the feelings she wants to communicate. That’s why she didn’t want to rehearse a lot–she wanted to keep that improvisational door fresh and open.

    Ara is Basque, but from France, not Spain. She admitted to even feeling more French than Basque. Like Conde, she studied piano, ballet and modern dance, but kept returning to Flamenco.

    She went to Spain to study Flamenco. To Ara, flamenco is heavy, about earth emotions, a heavy art form whereas Croon’s work is “airy, like  you’re flying.” And, she said, that’s where the magic comes from.

    “I took the liberty to put more Flamenco into it,” she says. She said she asked to take some liberties, and was given that permission. She said she and Conde made the changes she had written. They then rehearsed them to see how it worked out. She says with satisfaction it worked well. I think my dad would have thought so too.

    * Lionel Rolfe is the author of a number of books, most of which are available on Amazon’s Kindle. Many are also available in paperback.

     

     

    Read More
  • Long Beach’s Renaissance Woman Advocates Arts Diversity, Funding

    By Melina Paris, Columnist, Photo by Phillip Cooke

    Max Viltz, the owner of Village Treasures, is a community servant, promoter of the arts and music, and a major influence for African American culture in Long Beach.

    While Viltz doesn’t believe she’s done anything special, a glimpse into her day planner reveals the contrary. The term “Renaissance woman” is a fitting description, she has responsibilities to a great number of circles in Long Beach’s civic life.
    She recently finished her third three-year term on the Long Beach Arts Council, first on the allocations committee and then serving as the chairwoman of governance.

    Viltz explained that the arts council’s purpose is to make people understand there are all kinds of art, from graffiti to glassblowing.
    Community service, the arts council and arts community are Viltz’ priorities. She says people need to be aware of what is going on and add their support to the arts community, which struggles to attract funding because its value is often not appreciated.

    Viltz envisions Long Beach as a city with more diverse artists and events (galleries, music, theater, dance companies) that engage residents and encourage visitors to choose Long Beach as a premiere destination. Some programs exist, but she emphasizes there needs to be better access and communication through marketing.

    This past year, the arts council received only $300,000 from the city, which speaks to the minimum importance the city puts on the arts. There was a time when the arts council had much more funding, but without it, events had to be removed. It takes money for the arts council to be relevant.
    Viltz compares arts support here to that of New York. The New York City Department of Cultural Affairs had a 2014 fiscal year expense budget of $156 million, according to its website. That figure is for a city of 8,336,697 New Yorkers (in 2013) compared to a population in Long Beach of 469,428 the same year.

    “New York may be the extreme,” Viltz said, but art is the reason people go there, from Broadway to Chelsea. “Things have improved (here) with the [Long Beach] Convention and Visitors Bureau. The facility has been enhanced, but what else? What about music and theater?”
    The arts council particularly wants to involve young people in art and let them know they can have a career in the field, whether it’s as an administrator or in a medium they might decide to explore such as music, painting or sculpture.

    Viltz has a bachelor’s degree in business administration. She approaches her passion for business, as well as the arts, with pragmatism.
    “I don’t know to what extent, or how long it would take for more of the public to understand or acknowledge our relevancy and that art is important,” Viltz said. “It has also been proven [that] the arts will enhance education.”

    Viltz’s first serious entry into the arts as a purveyor came in a business context. In the 1980s, she and her former husband Femi went on an educational tour of Egypt. The goal of the tour was to inspire people to go back to their hometowns to open cultural centers and create study groups from more of an African-American perspective, instead of a Caucasian or Arabic one.

    When the couple returned from the tour in 1988, Max and Femi started the African Cultural Center, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit in Long Beach. It was because of their drum and dance classes that Viltz got involved with the arts council, and has been involved in the art world ever since.

    As they submitted proposals to the arts council to receive grants for their program, Viltz became familiar with everybody. Dixie Swift, the director at Homeland Cultural Center, was in charge of the program on the allocations committee and was ready to retire. She wanted to make sure someone of color took her place and asked Viltz to replace her.

    “Depending on who is on the allocations committee, they can help influence bringing in more diverse programs and people that win these grants,” Viltz said.

    In Viltz’s eyes, the council’s greatest challenge is drawing community support and educating Long Beach residents about their presence and what they offer. Part of the resistance is criticism that the council is not as diverse as it could be and that it does not represent the makeup of the city.
    “When they hear arts or arts council [people] don’t think it’s for them,” Viltz said. “[They think] it’s [for] some elite group.”

    The arts council has incorporated different ways to connect to the community, yet a disconnection still exists.

    “Our role as the arts council is to be as connected as we possibly can be to the many different communities in Long Beach,” said Victoria Bryan, the council’s executive director. “It’s sort of the point of the council.”

    Bryan described how the council looks for diverse representation from community members to serve on panels. They hold quarterly arts forums where each council member and a member of their staff select a delegate from each community in Long Beach to come together with them. From that point, these representatives are able to serve on panels, potentially join committees and even become a board member. Bryan also explained that the council creates combinations of people representing all area’s of the arts community, from individual artists and small arts organizations to large ones such as the Museum of Latin American Art.

    Bryan said that Viltz has contributed to the organization and the community in many ways. From the perspective of her arts-based retail business and her involvement on so many committees, they feel they received a two-for-one with Viltz’s fellowship. Bryan added that with Viltz’s continued involvement and help toward the council, she does not feel like they have said goodbye.

    Viltz has touched the lives of many, including students, artists and musicians, through her business and astute perception for art. A constant supporter and promoter of everything artistic, her work is her philosophy.

    “Some people may not think what they have to offer is enough or relevant, but if more people volunteered (they would find), it’s really rewarding,” Viltz said. “You may not get a certificate or accolade. It’s nice to get those things but it’s important for people to give back to their community.
    “Nothing is too small. Expose your kids to music and art outside their neighborhood or circle and attend other people’s cultural events.”

    Read More
  • Cabrillo Marine Aquarium Announces $25 Million Expansion Plan

    By Eric Fujimori, Editorial Intern

    Cabrillo Marine Aquarium has come a long way from its start as a beachside display table of sea specimens in empty mayonnaise jars in 1935. Since then, it’s evolved into one of San Pedro’s most popular waterfront attractions.

    The success is due in part to the aquarium’s history of creating and executing ambitious yet achievable plans for expansion. Hoping to continue the trend, a $25 million plan has been drawn up and is ready to be put into action.

    The project, which was presented to the Los Angeles Board of Harbor Commissioners March 19, includes plans for a more visible entryway, a new pavilion and a refurbished exhibit hall, among other features. These plans will be officially unveiled at the aquarium’s Grand Grunion Gala on April 25. (more…)

    Read More
  • Taking Sides

    We Can Be Pro-Business and Pro-Labor
    By James Preston Allen, Publisher
     
    I recently found myself involved in a very long conversation about development issues with a local business owner. But something he said stopped me cold.

    “Wait a minute,” I said. “Let me make sure I heard you right. You think that this newspaper is ‘anti-business.’ Is that what you really think?”

    He answered affirmatively citing the many articles written by my senior editor Paul Rosenberg and my managing editor Terelle Jerricks. (more…)

    Read More
  • California Wakeup Call: Preparing for Droughts to Come

    By Paul Rosenberg, Senior Editor

    The satellite photos make it starkly clear: California’s Sierra Nevada snowpack—the lowest ever recorded—is virtually non-existent this year, following a record three straight years of severe drought. The last time a majority of the state was not considered “abnormally dry” or worse was in December 2011, according to weekly data from the Drought Monitor Index. On April 1, Gov. Jerry Brown chose a snow-bare mountain location to announce “an executive order mandating substantial water reductions across our state.”

    “Today we are standing on dry grass where there should be 5 feet of snow,” Brown said. “This historic drought demands unprecedented action… As Californians, we must pull together and save water in every way possible.”

    But as dire and unprecedented as the current situation is, it is only a foretaste of what’s to come, a change that will force California to reinvent itself once again.

    “We’re not going to have that snowpack,” Felicia Marcus, chairwoman of the State Water Resources Control Board, told members of the Environmental Law Section of the California State Bar this past November. “So not only are our reservoirs low, the snowpack is low. If you’re trying to deal with reality in a clear-eyed way, it’s going to take us decades to retrofit ourselves.”

    That’s the stark truth behind the recent headlines about California’s record-breaking drought. Whatever anguish, extreme measures, and conflicts we’ve seen so far, it’s only the beginning of a decades-long process, a process some say is equally long overdue.

    The overwhelming driver will be the impact of global warming, which many scientists argue is already being felt. Others are less certain, citing natural variations, while still saying that current drought conditions are a foretaste of what a global warming future holds for the state.

    Random Lengths News reported in 2014 that for 13 years, more than half the state was under some degree of drought conditions, and that from 2012 until March of 2014, the figures ranged from 87 to 98 percent.

    This year however, just about 100 percent of the state has been under drought conditions.

    For that story, we interviewed Columbia University’s Robert Seager, whose research was the first to put North America’s medieval mega-droughts on the map.

    “Some part of the West has been in or out of drought since 1998,” he told us. Hence, “We are getting up to that 15 year time frame.”

    We also spoke with Aiguo Dai, author of the 2010 paper, “Drought under global warming.” Dai said that the American West, particularly the Southwest, had “reversed the course since around year 2000 towards a much drier climate for the foreseeable future.”

    One year later, we re-contacted both scientists, as well as Seager’s Columbia colleague, Benjamin Cook, who recently published “Unprecedented 21st Century Drought Risk in the American Southwest and Central Plains,” which predicts that “future drought risk will likely exceed even the driest centuries of the Medieval Climate Anomaly.”

    That’s the period Seager first explored in discovering American mega-droughts, which, the paper also notes, “had profound impacts on regional societies and ecosystems.”

    All three scientists view the past year as conforming to the pattern of global warming foretelling of what’s to come, rather than saying global warming caused it. The scientists essentially see this structure as a reflection of how causation works in large-scale systems.

    “In many ways, the current California drought is a taste of the sort of events we can expect to see with increasing frequency,” Cook told Random Lengths. “The fundamental cause of the current California drought is natural climate variability. Basically, [the] circulation patterns in the ocean and atmosphere have gotten stuck in place and have rerouted storms away from California and much of the West Coast.”

    But there’s a difference as well, Cook noted.

    “One thing that makes the current California drought really stand out compared to previous droughts is how hot it really is,” he said. “[This is] due, at least in part, to the long term anthropogenic [human-caused] warming trend over the last 150 years. When things are warmer, this amplifies any kind of natural drought impacts because evaporation is higher, making everything that much drier.”

    Regardless of precipitation patterns, the heat alone ensures that “we can expect to see more and more really hot years in the future which will mean that, when droughts do occur, they will be that much hotter and drier.”

    Cook’s paper—using three drought measures with a suite of 17 models—found that decadal drought risk in the second half of the 20th century ranged from 80 to almost 100 percent in the Great Plains, and from 90 to almost 100 percent in the Southwest. Meanwhile multi-decadal drought risk ranged from about 70 to 90 percent in the Great Plains, and was consistently close to 80 percent in the Southwest for all three measures. So, droughts will almost certainly be much longer, as well.

    “Our results point to a remarkably drier future that falls far outside the contemporary experience of natural and human systems in Western North America, conditions that may present a substantial challenge to adaptation,” Cook and his co-authors concluded.

    It’s that future, and the challenge to California’s ability to adapt that Felicia Marcus was referring. Random Lengths turned to another published climate scientist, Michael Hanemann, who we interviewed last year for an even more refined look at the challenges from a historical perspective.

    In addition to researching economic costs of climate change, Hanemann has a deep background in California water policy, as well as comparative knowledge of what other Western states and Australia have done to modernize their water policy systems in preparation for the coming challenges.

    The first thing Hanemann pointed out was that, with just a single exception, California has always responded to droughts by relying on water users to voluntarily take drought-fighting action. That’s what makes Brown’s and the water board’s, under Marcus, use of governmental authority all the more remarkable. Even if the scope of their action is relatively limited, action such as this was virtually unheard of in the Golden State before.

    “Before 1914 there was no water rights agency in California. The only mechanism for dealing with water allocation was through litigation,” Hanemann explained.

    Most significant were appropriative water rights (originally based on miners working claims on public land) to divert a specific quantity of water from a certain time forward (which makes the issue of “seniority” particularly important). The original controlling agency, the California Water Commission, came into being in December 1914, with authority residing in the State Water Resources Control Board since its founding in 1967.

    Although it has authority over water rights, “It has limited authority” compared to similar boards in other Western states, Hanemann said. “One crucial difference is the authority to supervise distribution of water.”

    The board registers claims, noting both the amounts and the date they were filed, but it has no power to arbitrate disputes.

    “Suppose it’s 1924—that’s a dry year,” Hanemann explained. “Logically you need somebody out there to enforce seniority and to enforce the rights, so you need somebody on the ground to say, ‘Hanemann, you can’t be taking water because Rosenberg has a, senior right.’ You let him take his water first.’ You also need a traffic cop which says, ‘Rosenberg you have a right, but you have a right to 50 cubic feet and you’re taking 60 cubic feet, and that’s a no-no.’”

    Hanemann said that without enforcement on the ground, the make-believe system we have now will continue.

    Hanemann noted that though other states established agencies with enforcement powers, when California’s agency was set up in 1914, that power was withheld.

    “We know this from the historical record; it was withheld because water users objected,” Hanemann explained. There were subsequent requests to grant that authority, “but the legislature never acted on those requests. It still does not have that power today.” The result is “like an intersection with no traffic lights.” The only recourse is individual lawsuits, just one step short of shooting at one another.

    The second thing California was missing was a firm handle on the rights involved. Throughout the West, water rights were originally claimed simply by diverting water, and making a note of it on the spot.

    “There’s actually no mechanisms for recording this,” Hanemann said. “Literally people would put a stick in the ground by the point of diversion, and put a piece of paper saying. ‘I, Michael Hanemann, started diverting 50 cubic feet a second as of April 8, 1920.’” The shortcomings of this method are self-evident.

    “The sticks in the ground don’t always stay in the ground, the paper doesn’t stay there. This is not a system of record keeping. The river might be 50 miles long. So who knows what sticks are in the ground 40 miles upstream from where I am,” Hanemann said.

    This system wasn’t unique to California. It began like that throughout the West—and if there were disputes, you sued. But even that was slapdash, at best. “I sued you, there were 10 other water users along the river, they didn’t take part in the suit,” Hanemann pointed out. “It was a really chaotic system.”

    Hanemann noted that this was eventually replaced by state agencies handing out new water rights and grandfathering all the pre-existing water rights alongside them. But after a few decades, grandfathering ended as well, and all rights were integrated into a single system.

    “California is the only state which still grandfathers the pre-existing [pre-1914] water rights, and we didn’t create our agency, essentially until 60 years after first using appropriative rights, in 1914. So, we have a huge number of water rights that were grandfathered and are still grandfathered to this day.”

    Hanemann noted that other western states have an agency with authority over all water rights. In California, water agencies don’t have authority to supervise the distribution of water, at least not unless the water users in the basin requested to do so. That happened in a few cases which did not include major parts of the Sacramento and San Joaquin valleys.

    Hanemann noted that California water agencies have no authority over pre-1914 rights, rights that make up over half of the water rights.

    Here, Hanemann added another footnote, calling attention to California’s riparian rights (rights to use a body of water adjacent to land you own), which he pointed out are “even more nebulous than appropriative rights” because they are essentially unlimited. The only way they get limited in amount is via a lawsuit. “That happens, but that’s a very rare occurrence, that type of litigation,” Hanemann added.

    California experienced the second-worst single drought year even to this day in 1924. Hanemann noted that at the time, the state didn’t have the power to allocate water because its power was limited to post-1914 rights, which in 1924 was only a tiny fraction of the total number of water rights in California. And, so was born the practice of convening meetings of water users and asking them to work things out amongst themselves.

    “Basically that’s continued in every other drought until now,” Hanemann said.

    Hanemann noted 1977 was the only exception. California was suffering the second dry winter in a row during Jerry Brown’s first stint as governor, and an exceptionally effective leader of the state’s water rights board, John Bryson.

    At the time, the board ordered those with post-1914 rights to stop taking water from the Sacramento River. Hanemann noted that this was actually a well-established power—just one that had never been used before.

    But pre-1914 rights were another matter, Hanemann explained. In 1977, the water situation was so dire that the board directed those with grandfathered pre-1914 riparian rights to stop taking water.

    Hanemann described this as a daring move.

    “It had no authority over those rights, and it also didn’t have the enforcement staff on the ground actually to enforce the restriction,” Hanemann said. The board didn’t even have the staff to enforce the restriction on the post-1914 claims where it did have authority.

    Nonetheless, “It sent letters to the water rights holders. What happened was, in some cases neighbors and others complained, and said so-and-so is violating your order. The state board [then] sent somebody [on the] ground, but it was more the moral effect of trying to get water users to cut back.”

    On top of that, Brown, acting on Bryson’s advice, appointed a high level commission—chaired by a former California Supreme Court Justice—to review water rights in California. Unfortunately for us now, the drought ended, Bryson left the board and Brown’s interest waned, leaving enforcement still stuck in the 19th century. As a result, “In the subsequent droughts, like 1991 and 1992, and then later 2008 and so on, the state board played no role in dealing with the situation,” Hanemann pointed out.

    Now, almost 40 years later, Brown has a rare opportunity for a major do-over.

    “I think he’s very much learned the lesson of, should we say, his ineffectiveness in his first period in office,” Hanemann said. “The other thing is, Jerry Brown gets climate change. He’s been concerned about it for a dozen years or more. He takes it very seriously.”

    Brown is aided by Marcus, another strong board chair, who also enjoys his strong confidence and support. Together, they’ve began modestly cutting off thousands of post-1914 rights holders late last summer. Hanemann called that a “strong initiative,” but was uncertain about what it portended. Now, after another dry winter, it’s “been stepped up with the governor’s order and the events of the last 10 days. That, in my mind, is a big deal. It’s way, way overdue.” But much more remains to be done, including putting an end to grandfathered rights—as all other western states have done.

    “As part of adaptation to climate change, we need to start getting our house in order,” Hanemann said. “If we’re not going to start doing things properly in this round, when the hell are we going to adapt to climate change? This is like, when the house is on fire, that’s a time that you better do something about fireproofing.”

    In her November Bar Association speech, Marcus explicitly embraced the notion that nothing less than a fundamental re-conceptualization of water policy was at hand:

    We’re at this period of paradigm shift. Not to overstate it, but it’s always an uncomfortable period. As in Thomas Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions, he says as things are changing, people become very uncomfortable, and it becomes very messy. The old order is somehow changing yet you see these brilliant strides forward and strides backward. We’re just in a difficult time and the drought exacerbates it.

    Marcus did not explicitly say how deep that re-conceptualization would go, or what it would involve. At this point, it’s probably impossible to say. But Hanemann did cite three basic steps as a common-sense starting point, just to bring California into the modern era.

    First is to create “an accessible database of water rights and legal rulings in California,” including all the appropriate documentation. Complete documentation exists at the county level for post-1914 rights, only, but hasn’t been fully integrated online.

    Second is to implement record-keeping to support real-time water management, meaning a record of all water diversions. This has been legally required for decades, but penalties were not introduced until quite recently, so data only goes back to 2012, and reporting is required only every 3 years. It should be yearly, at least, and monthly during droughts, Hanemann said.

    Third, the board must be given authority to supervise the distribution of water. This exists only in a very crude, limited, emergency form, without real enforcement power. It needs to be fully formalized and written into law.

    Actually, he added a fourth point—the need to verify and consolidate claims, including the resolution of conflicting legal claims, a process called “adjudication,” which can drag on for years and even decades. “It’s been done in many western states,” Hanemann said. “It’s a bonanza for the lawyers,” but it would finally provide clarity as to who has what rights.

    As it stands today, claims are so unreliable, so exaggerated that, for example, “the flow of the Kern River was claimed like 30 times over,” Hanemann said. So, “What California needs is an adjudication of the Central Valley, especially the Sacramento Valley,” just to create a reality-based foundation for moving forward and dealing with future challenges.

    All these are just practical, common sense changes, but California water rights holders have successfully resisted them for more than 150 years now. Overcoming this resistance is the first hurdle.

    But there’s a second hurdle that should also be considered, and that involves a fundamental re-conception of how water policy is handled, down to the very definition of water rights—or possibly even some alternative formulation. Hanemann highlighted the contrast in ways of thinking about the two paradigms.

    The traditional, legalistic way of thinking is in terms of water rights, and the senior water rights that agricultural users have, based on their earliest claims. As we’ve already seen, however, those rights are anything but clear cut, well-defined, and even, in many cases, plausible. So the anarchic “Wild West” nature of the system casts the legitimacy of this approach into doubt—not to mention that it’s the holders of the water rights themselves who have insisted on maintaining this state of chaos. Indeed, Hanemann said, the legacy of this approach, historically, “is massively counterproductive.”

    In contrast, we need to “step back and…say ‘no, let’s take a modern view of this. We live in a modern society. We have competing needs. We have a population of 38 million people. We have large cities…This is not a sensible way of allocating water.’”

    This is a view that makes sense in terms of preparations for dealing with the growing challenges California faces. But it “goes against property rights,” and nobody has the power to simply wipe out all those rights, however questionable they may be.

    Yet, something akin to this process has taken place in Australia over the past 25 years, because starting around 1990, a growing sense of urgency emerged that managing water inefficiently was a threat to the nation’s prosperity and well-being. This led to federal intervention and to legislation that never had been contemplated before. However hard it is to envision in advance, it’s conceivable that a whole new approach to designing water policy could be adopted in California at some point in the future.

    This wouldn’t be without precedent. Prior to the Civil War, slaves were considered property and this reality made it virtually impossible to contemplate slavery’s end. With slavery’s post-war abolition, things looked completely different. In retrospect, the slaveholder’s “rights” were seen to be more like crimes. No one suggests that water rights are like slavery.

    Though seriously flawed, they serve a vital purpose. California’s agriculture is as rare and precious as its tech industry. “We’re one of only five Mediterranean climates that can grow healthy fruits and vegetables and we should honor that,” Marcus said in her speech, “even as we are clear and hard-line and fair and demanding of agriculture to do their part.”

    But the system is as archaic as slavery—if not as evil—and in need of a sweeping overhaul to prepare us for the difficult future ahead.

    Highlighting this need for forward thinking, Marcus referenced Barbara Tuckman’s book, March of Folly, which, she noted, deals with historical examples—King George losing the colonies, the Vietnam War, etc.—in which those in power had all the facts they needed to solve a problem, but ignored them “by fearing change” that ended in disaster. Heeding this lesson, “We need to be thinking forward,” Marcus said, “and looking at the present through the lens of what our future holds, for better or for worse, and what we can do about it, versus looking at today through the lens of the past and stubbornly sticking to it.”

    Highlighting this need for forward thinking, Marcus referenced Barbara Tuckman’s book, March of Folly, which, she noted, deals with historical examples—King George losing the colonies, the Vietnam War, etc.—in which those in power had all the facts they needed to solve a problem, but ignored them “by fearing change,” which ended in disaster. Heeding this lesson, “We need to be thinking forward,” Marcus said, “and looking at the present through the lens of what our future holds, for better or for worse, and what we can do about it, versus looking at today through the lens of the past and stubbornly sticking to it.”

     

     

    Read More
  • 1 100 101 102 247