|
October 15, 2004
Kerry KO’s Bush in Debates
SP Viewers Hope Bush Will Be Out for the Count
By Peter Chuong, Reporter
They were a week apart and
miles away, yet public viewings of the first two presidential debates in
San Pedro then Long Beach had Harbor residents conducting themselves in
much of the same ways. Solemn silence and sporadic applause followed a
Democratic candidate John Kerry message, whereas observers hung on
President Bush’s every word, waiting for any opening to howl at the
first sign of a verbal miscue.
Every individual interviewed believed that Kerry
had won the debate by a decisive margin. Democrat, Victor Ezelle, was
clearly convinced of Kerry’s win after slight apprehension leading up to
the debate.
“Kerry gave great responses back to Bush. He
knew what he was saying and was short and to the point, while Bush was
stumbling,” said Ezelle. “Kerry was strong on all the issues. Bush
looked totally distracted and nonchalant, repeating himself over and over.
His blank looks were scary.”
The public reiterated Bush’s tendency to repeat
the same stance, attack or phrase throughout the debate. “With
everything on Iraq, Bush really repeated himself, contradicted himself and
had his back to the wall,” said Joey Super, a Republican who is voting
for Kerry.
Janice Montgomery, Democrat, was one of many that
took offense at Bush’s misguided actions both on national and
international soil. “As far as homeland security is concerned, they don’t
even check incoming containers and they also outsource jobs in our
community. And what about Africa? There is total genocide and it’s not
being addressed at all. With Kerry, at least there is an opportunity that
he will care about jobs in the US. We are in a war we shouldn’t be in,
without United Nations backing. Bush went in there like a cowboy and didn’t
seem to care about the people of the US.”
But Kerry wasn’t perfect either. He remains
plagued by the claim that he takes multiples stances on an issue. “On
Iraq, both candidates had the same information and voted the same way.
Now, Kerry is calling Bush out and saying it isn’t right. Bush is a
popular candidate who was forced to make many unpopular decisions. It’s
easy to criticize from the sidelines,” said Democrat Matt Jilson, the
sole Bush supporter interviewed at San Pedro Brewing Company.
As far as character assassination, the general
consensus was that the two did well to avoid it, as they took time to
praise one another in a painful, tight-lipped manner.
“I felt that they were both pretty civil, Bush
wasn’t nasty,” said Ezelle, “he leaves that to his attack dogs.”
Many viewers believed Kerry would gain votes with
the debate results, as evidenced by one Republican, who wished to remain
anonymous, who found himself swayed by Kerry’s words, citing his clarity
in contrast to Bush. He noted that people watching should have seen a
clear difference, with Kerry’s opinions well spoken and better thought
out.
“This debate will definitely help Kerry,”
Jilson said. “But most people that should be watching aren’t. The
people that matter the most don’t give a crap about these debates.”
Kerry supporters were also wary of a letdown for
the upcoming debates. “Kerry definitely won, there was a definite
difference in how they addressed the issues, not to mention how they are
perceived around the world,” said Democrat Althea Robinson. “Bush was
there but not there, but [Kerry] still needs to be as strong and
consistent in the next several debates.”
In an eerie flashback, both candidates claimed
victory in Florida following the debate, and it remains to be seen how the
final result will pan out. As far as it went at San Pedro Brewing Company,
pleased Democrats and converted Republicans looked to be united under the
mantra, “Stop Mad Cowboy Disease!”
It was more of the same during the second of
three scheduled debates, as a packed house at the 2000+ Bookstore in Long
Beach watched from two televisions. While Kerry was given the edge, many
agreed that Bush had recovered well from his first performance. “Bush
helped his cause tonight, he looked well coached and told his constituents
what they wanted to hear,” said Dr. Dan O’Connor, Political Science
professor at Cal State University of Long Beach.
Now it is a matter of how this improvement is
received by the electorate, who have now watched three Democratic
victories in as many tries. While it could simply serve as damage control
for the Republican campaign, the turn-around may also nullify any gains
the Democrats may have made throughout the course of the debates pending
nothing noteworthy occurs Wednesday.
The last of the three presidential debates took
place as this edition went to press on Wednesday Oct. 13.
To
Read the entire Story, please pick up a FREE copy of Random Lengths
|

|