|
October 1, 2004
Cover Up
Bush’s Missing Guard Duty
What CBS News Didn’t Find
By Paul Rosenberg, Senior Editor
For over 35 years, a pattern
of favoritism, secrecy, and cover-ups have surrounded George W. Bush’s
evasion of military duty during the Vietnam War. The latest example is the
distracting controversy over forged memos used by CBS News of real memos
that said precisely the same thing—that Bush was gaming the system, with
help from friends in high places.
The cover-up findings in no way depend upon the
apparently fraudulent memos from Lt. Colonel. Jerry B. Killian, used by
CBS News recently—memos whose contents are apparently true, according to
Killian’s secretary, Marian Carr Knox. “I know that I didn’t type
them,” Knox said of the memos in a broadcast interview, “However, the
information in those is correct.”
Instead of depending on those memos, the analyses
of Bush’s official records illustrates a pattern of disobedience and
official cover-up that is perfectly consistent with Knox’s assertion.
Bush’s problems began in late Spring on 1972,
when he first tried to transfer to a non-flying unit1—a back doorway of
breaking his signed service agreement2 approved by his Texas superiors,3
but rejected at the federal level.4 He then failed to take a mandatory
flight physical and was suspended from flying,5 stopped attending drills
for at least six months,6 and was not observed by his superior officers
for a full year.7 (He never took another physical again, and was,
apparently, never disciplined for it.) A hurried spate of training
unlawfully packed into a brief two-month period8 was then followed by his
discharge from the Texas Air National Guard (TXANG),9 but he never
fulfilled his obligation to finish his service at a unit in Massachusetts
when he returned to New England to get an MBA at Harvard Business
School.10
Bush has unsigned pay and points records
documenting training drills during part of his missing year, presumably in
Alabama. However, no other documents support this evidence, which gives
credit for drills outside the legally allowable time-frame,11 and
overstates the points earned. (November 13 and 14, 1972, and January 4, 5,
8, 9, 10 were weekdays, for which only seven points total should be
credited. Bush received fourteen.12) A variety of such documents would
normally exist for each of the drills. No one observed him at any of these
drills. Other documents—such as his Chronological Listing of Service13
and his Military Biography14—show no record of him being stationed in
Alabama. There is no document authorizing his presence in Alabama after
December 1972, or for the sessions he was paid for there in October and
November.15 He missed the sessions he was assigned to those months.16
Bush himself has never been seriously questioned
about all these contradictions, much less given a straight answer. For
years, his all-purpose response has been that he served honorably, because
he got an honorable discharge. But his honorable discharge was
fraudulently obtained, according to analysis by Colonel Gerald Lechliter
(Retired), posted on the New York Times website,17 and corroborated
by a similar analysis by independent researcher Paul A Lukasiak,18
prominently cited by Salon magazine for his role in analyzing and
decoding the significance of Bush’s military record.
While their arguments go into considerable
detail, a handful of documents readily reveals major contradictions in
Bush’s defense. A memo released by the White House in February 2004,
written by Lt. Colonel Albert Lloyd,19 is clearly in error in claiming
that Bush fulfilled his obligations with 56 points in 1972-73 and 50
points in 1973-74—the bare minimum accepted. For the later year, a
document in Bush’s file (released by the White House that same week)—“ARF
Retirement Credit Summary,” dated January 30, 1974—clearly states that
he earned only 40 points for 1973-74, ten points short.20 That alone is
enough to discredit his honorable discharge.
In his analysis, Lechliter concludes that, “The
pay records released by the White House this past winter prove Bush
received unauthorized, i.e., fraudulent, payments for inactive duty
training, even if he did show up for duty.” 21
Lukasiak adds that the documents “also reveal
that Bush’s personnel files were tampered with to disguise what had
occurred.” 22
Both men examined Bush’s records in light of
military regulations in force at the time. Both reached similar
conclusions—that Bush failed to make up for a substantial number of
missed drills, but received fraudulent credit on the way to getting out of
his duty. Lechliter explicitly confirms earlier research from 2000 by
Martin Heldt—a self-educated researcher whose pioneering work was
occasionally referenced by the corporate media, but generally ignored—and
by the Boston Globe.23
Surprisingly, Bush’s records were never
carefully examined following a massive document release on February 13,
2004. Lloyd’s memo, issued the same week, stated that he had examined
the documents, and that “the record clearly shows that 1LT. George W.
Bush has satisfactory years for both 72-73 and 73-74 which proves that he
completed his military obligation in a satisfactory manner.” 24
But Lukasiak points out that Lloyd is hardly
impartial. He has a long-standing relationship with Bush, and was one of
those commanding officers who pulled strings for him during the period.25
Not only was Lloyd biased toward Bush over a
period of 30-plus years, he was flat-out wrong on two additional counts,
beyond overlooking the Retirement Credit Summary. First, he failed to
examine whether the points even could have been properly earned. A
decisive number could not. They violated policy on several different
grounds, and could not have reflected actual, credited service. 26
Second, As Lechliter explains, “Lloyd’s most
serious error obliterates the distinction between a satisfactory RR
[retention/retirement] year and ‘satisfactory participation’ as a
condition of service.” 27
The RR year begins when an individual’s service
begins, and is of primary concern for career officers. A minimum of 50
points is required, which can include up to 15 gratuitous points in
addition to points for specific drills. But points for “‘satisfactory
participation’ as a condition of service” are calculated by fiscal
year, and typically require more than the RR minimum. 28
Bush needed 59 points, divided into two categories:
Annual Active Duty for Training (“ANACDUTRA”) and Inactive Duty for
Training (“INACDUTRA”), which in turn fell into two categories—individual
and group training (known as “UTA”). 29
Lechliter continues, “Even a cursory review of
his attendance at ANACDUTRA and INACDUTRA for the FY July 1,1972, through
June 30, 1973, results in an unequivocal ‘no’ for that fiscal year.”
30
Even if all Bush’s points were legitimate, “he
earned 15 ANACDUTRA points to satisfy this requirement, but only 36
INACDUTRA points, woefully short of the minimum 44 INACDUTRA points he was
required to earn,” Lechliter reports. 31
Bush earned even fewer points the following
fiscal year—just 25 total ANACDUTRA and INACDUTRA points32—compounded
by the fact that he failed to report for duty in Massachusetts when he
relocated there to attend Harvard Business School, despite signing a
statement saying he would do so. The White House has never disputed this.
Bush clearly failed to meet the minimum service
record requirements, and thus he did not earn his honorable discharge. But
a closer look shows that he didn’t even meet the RR requirements—primarily
because he was credited with make-up drills that were not timely.
Missed group training could only be made up with
strict guidelines—“within 15 days immediately before or 30 days
immediately after the regularly scheduled UTA but before the next month’s
first scheduled UTA (whichever is earlier) and within the same fiscal year”
33—and with the approval of a commanding officer on a specific form.34
However, Lechliter notes, “In November 1972 and
January 1972, supposedly while in Alabama, Bush was given credit and paid
for 12 UTA periods (six days) that were outside this time envelope; in
July 1973, while in his TXANG unit, Bush was given credit and paid for
eight UTA periods (four days) that were outside the time limitation.
Moreover, there is no evidence whatsoever that the absences were
authorized: no requests and no approvals.” 35
Even more damningly, Lechliter continues, “These
payments also explain why Bush requested a discharge on October 1, 1973,
instead of any earlier date, although his counseling statement is dated
July 30, 1973. Finance certainly would not have paid him for INACDUTRA
after he was discharged. It clearly and convincingly demonstrates intent
to defraud the government both on Bush’s part and those in the TXANG who
approved the payments.”36
Removing the irregular drills from Bush’s
record reduces even his RR credits to 44 for 72-73, and 42 for 73-74—well
below the 50 point minimum for both years.
Although this proves that Bush did not earn his
honorable discharge, it only begins to scratch the surface of what’s
wrong with Bush’s records.
For starters, Lloyd gave Bush 15 gratuitous
points for 73-74, but because he served far less than the whole year he
was only entitled to 5, as reflected on the ARF Retirement Credit Summary,
mentioned above.37 Another 12 points Bush received in 72-73 were for
drills which lacked prior written authorization. Thus, according to Bush’s
existing records, he legally earned only 32 points for both his last two
RR years—less than 2/3 of what was required.38
But the problem isn’t just a lack of proper
points; it’s various indications that strings were being pulled to keep
Bush out of trouble. There are at best only the barest records supporting
the claims that Bush performed most of these drills.
On Sept. 15, 1972, he was ordered to report to
Lt. Col. William Turnipseed, deputy commander of the 187th Tactical
Reconnaissance Group in Montgomery, Ala., for training on the weekends of
Oct. 7-8 and Nov. 4-5, 1972.39
But aside from the questionable pay records,
there’s no evidence he ever showed up in Alabama. In 2000, Turnipseed
told the Boston Globe he never saw Bush.
“Had he reported in, I would have had some
recall, and I do not, ‘’Turnipseed said. ‘’I had been in Texas,
done my flight training there. If we had had a first lieutenant from
Texas, I would have remembered.’’40
Nor did anyone else see him in at the 187th,
except for one would-be witness, John Calhoun, who claims to have seen him
numerous times, beginning well before Bush was assigned there. 41
Rewards have been posted for anyone who can
corroborate Bush’s presence with the 187th. They were first offered in
2000. The most recent offer $50,000 from Texans For Truth, was good
through September 30, 2004. So far, no one has claimed a penny.
Despite a sprinkling of print media coverage, the
corporate broadcast media remains utterly ignorant of how devastating Bush’s
actual military records are. Instead, they are locked into a feeding
frenzy focused on CBS’s embarrassment of relying on the wrong documents.
But that doesn’t mean that Bush’s evasion of duty didn’t happen. One
outlet that has begun to cover the story is the Air Force Times, available
on the web. How far their coverage goes could have enormous influence in
the weeks ahead. Depending on who is the next commander in chief, they
might even get to the very bottom of the story.
Footnotes #1-41 that substantiate these allegations are available on
our website at www.randomlengthsnews/bush-guard/index.html. The three
primary sources relied upon are Lechliter’s memo at http://www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/opinion/lechliter.pdf
in PDF, and in HTML at http://www.glechliter.glcq.com/critical_analysis.htm,
Paul A Lukasiak’s research at http://www.glcq.com, and documents from
Bush’s military file available in PDF at http://www.usatoday.com/news/2004-02-14-bush-docs.htm,
the most salient of which are available in gif or jpeg form at
www.randomlengthsnews/bush-guard/docs/.
To
Read the entire Story, please pick up a FREE copy of Random Lengths
|

Quotes Of The Week
“Those who seek to bestow legitimacy must themselves embody it,
and those who invoke international law must themselves submit to
it.”
—Kofi Annan U.N.
Secretary-General
“We know that dictators are quick to choose
aggression, while free nations strive to resolve differences in
peace.”
—President George W.Bush

Bush’s military service
George W. Bush joined the Texas Air National Guard in 1968 and was
discharged in 1973. Some important dates:
1968
May: Bush recommended for a direct
commission to second lieutenant (without prior training or other
qualifications) and acceptance to pilot school. Joins May 28.
August: Completes basic
training.
November: Begins pilot
training at Moody Air Force Base in Georgia.
1970
January: Completes flight training and
is assigned to the 111th Fighter Interceptor Squadron at Ellington
Air Force Base, south of Houston.
1971
Fulfills his military obligations as a weekend warrior at
Ellington.
1972
April: Flies for the last time.
Beginning of six month absence from any record of duty.
May 24: Requests permission to transfer
to non-flying unit, 9921st Air Reserve Squadron at Maxwell Air
Force Base in Montgomery, Ala.
May 26: Lt. Colonel Reese H. Bricken,
Commander of 9921st, approves Bush’s transfer.
June 5: Major Charles K.
Shoemake, TXANG, approves Bush’s transfer.
July: Fails to take his required flight
physical, due by end of month. Transfer to a non-flying unit at
Maxwell rejected by Federal authorities.
September 5: Suspended from flight
status. Requests permission to train with 187th Tactical
Reconnaissance Group at Dannelly Air Base in Montgomery for Sept.,
Oct. and Nov.
September 15: Receives permission to
train with 187th on Oct. 7-8, Nov. 4-5.
October-November: Beginning of 6-month
period when pay/points records fail to match other documents,
regulations. Misses scheduled training. Receives credit for Oct.
28-29, Nov. 11-14, but without authorization. Given two unearned
credits. No proof he actually attended. Not observed by any
commanding officer.
1973
January: Receives credit for January
4-6, 8-10. Receives two points for each day, instead of one point
for each weekday. No record of where this was. Not observed by any
commanding officer. Only two of six days are within regulation
time-limits.
April: Receive credit for April
7-8. No record of where this was. Not observed by any commanding
officer.
May: Commanding officers rate Bush as
“not observed” for previous year. Serves 14 days in May.
June: Serves five days. On June 30,
signs a statement promising that if he left his Texas Ready
Reserve unit, “it is my responsibility to locate and be assigned
to another Reserve Forces unit or mobilization augmentation
position. If I fail to do so, I am subject to involuntary order to
active duty for up to 24 months.”
July: Serves 19 days. Four
days are outside regulation time-limits. Credit given is unlawful.
September: Requests a discharge to
attend Harvard Business School.
October: Receives an honorable
discharge from TXANG, transferring him to Headquarters, Air
Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) in Denver with eight months
remaining on military service obligation (MSO). Has only 40 points
for RR year.
Oct.- Nov.: Fails to report to a
Massachusetts unit, as promised on June 30.
1974
January-May: Fails to report to a
Massachusetts unit as promised on June 30, 1973
March 7: ARPC strips Bush of fighter
pilot status, changes to Executive Support Officer.
May 1:ARPC issues order transferring
Bush to the Inactive Status List Reserve Section (“ISLRS”) in
the Standby Reserve, effective May 27—the completion date for
his MSO. He still has additional obligated service time, incurred
as a result of his flight training.
November 21:Discharged from
ISLRS.
|