|
October 1, 204
Censored!
Top Ten Stories the American News Media
Ignored
Second in a Two Part Series
by Camille T. Taiara, San Francisco Bay Guardian
Introduction by Paul Rosenberg, Senior Editor
In 1974,
Richard Nixon became the first President to resign from office because he
faced certain impeachment and removal from office for his involvement in
Watergate and the subsequent cover up. Yet, despite the fact that the
break-in was discovered in the midst of the 1972 presidential election,
the story never became a factor in the 1972 election.
This amazing situation—a
publicly-known story of epochal impact, utterly sidelined from the
national debate—gave rise to Project Censored, founded by Carl Jensen at
Sonoma State College (now University) and continued under the leadership
of Peter Phillips. Every year, between 700 and 1000 stories are submitted
that fit the same general profile—stories of clear and compelling
importance that are effectively censored from the mainstream of public
awareness by the gatekeepers of the corporate press.
Last issue, we covered the
first five of Project Censored’s Top Ten Stories of 2003-2004. We
continue with the rest of the Top Ten.
The Sale of Electoral Politics
The Help America Vote Act
required that states submit blueprints for switching to electronic voting
systems by last Jan. 1, and for implementing those plans in time for the
2006 elections. But critics say that if Americans don’t want a repeat of
the 2000 Florida elections fiasco—on a much grander scale—the
administration’s plans must be halted in its tracks.
The transfer represents the
privatization of the voting process into the hands of a select few fervent
GOP supporters who’ve insisted on keeping their operating systems and
codes a trade secret—meaning they enjoy absolute control over the entire
voting process, including ballot counting and oversight. There is no paper
trail.
One prime example is
Diebold Inc., which already operates more than 40,000 machines in 37
states across the country. Many of these are in Georgia, which last
November became the first state to conduct an election entirely with
touch-screen machines. Oddly enough, incumbent Democratic governor Roy
Barnes lost to Republican candidate, Sonny Perdue, 46 percent to 51
percent—“a swing from as much as 16 percentage points from the last
opinion polls,” wrote Andrew Gumbel in the Independent. In the same
election, incumbent Democratic Senator Max Cleland likewise lost to his
Republican challenger, Saxby Chambliss, thanks to “a last-minute swing
of nine to 12 points.” And in and around Atlanta, 77 memory cards went
missing or were otherwise temporarily unaccounted for before the votes
they’d registered could be counted.
Similar upsets occurred “in
Colorado, Minnesota, Illinois, and New Hampshire—all in races that had
been flagged as key partisan battlegrounds, and all won by the Republican
Party,” Gumbel continued.
“It makes it really hard
to show their product has been tampered with if it’s a felony to inspect
it,” voting systems specialist and research fellow at Harvard’s John
F. Kennedy School of Government Rebecca Mercuri told the Independent.
The other top two e-voting
machine manufacturers, Sequoia and Election Systems and Software
(ES&S), are equally suspect. All three companies are prominent
Republican Party donors.
Sources:
“Voting machines gone wild,” Mark Lewellen-Biddle, In
These Times, December 2003.
“All the President’s Votes?” Andrew Gumbel, Independent
(UK), Oct. 13,2003.
“Will Bush backers manipulate votes to deliver GW
another election?” Amy Goodman and the staff of“ Democracy Now!”
Sept. 4, 2003.
7. Conservative Organization Drives Judicial
Appointments
Ever since the Reagan
Administration, the neocons have pursued an aggressive campaign to stack
the federal courts with rightwing judges. Their main vehicle: the
Federalist Society, an organization founded in 1982 by a small group of
radically conservative law students at the University of Chicago.
With the help of
Republicans in Congress, 85 extra federal judgeships were created under
Presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush (the First); Bill Clinton got
nine. Now, seven out of 12 circuit courts are anti-abortion. Seven of the
nine Supreme Court Justices are Republican appointees—and it’s been 10
years since a post has opened up, meaning another right-winger or two
could be appointed sometime soon. During Bush Sr.’s tenure, one White
House insider boasted that no one who wasn’t a Federalist ever received
a judicial appointment from the president.
One of George W.’s
earliest moves in office was to consolidate the Federalist Society’s
power even further: He “simply eliminated the longstanding role in the
evaluation of prospective judges by the resolutely centrist American Bar
Association, whose ratings had long kept extremists and incompetents off
the bench,” wrote Martin Garbus in American Prospect. “Today the
Federalists have more influence in judicial-selection than the ABA ever
had.”
The Federalists have
consistently acted in favor of property rights over rights of the
individual, business deregulation, creationist teachings, and much of the
rest of the right-wing agenda. But one of the principal victims has been
the democratic process itself: it was the Supreme Court that stopped a
hand count of 175,000 uncounted (largely Democratic) ballots in Florida,
which could have cost Bush the 2000 presidential election. They have
interfered with redistricting efforts to empower black and Latino voters,
and have erected barriers to the participation of third party candidates
in the electoral process.
Sources:
“A hostile takeover: How the federalist society is
capturing the federal courts,” Martin Garbus, The American Prospect,
March 1, 2003.
“Courts vs. citizens,” Jamin Raskin, The
American Prospect, March 1, 2003.
Secrets of Cheney’s Energy Task Force Come to Light
As the Bush Administration
continues to protect the iron wall of secrecy around Vice President Dick
Cheney’s Energy Task Force, at least two documents show that Bush
Administration’s foreign policy is being driven by the dictates of the
energy industry.
When George W. Bush took
office in January, 2001, he said that tackling the country’s energy
crisis would be a top priority. The United States faced nationwide oil and
natural gas shortages, and a series of electrical blackouts were rolling
across California. The president established the National Energy Policy
Development Group and appointed Vice President and former Halliburton CEO
Dick Cheney as its head.
One of the big issues on
the table was oil, which accounted for 40 percent of the nation’s energy
supply and provided fuel for the vast majority of the country’s
transportation—as well as its vast war machine. But rather than lay the
groundwork for converting the economy to alternative, renewable sources,
NEPDG’s report, released in May, 2001, promoted a central goal of “mak[ing]
energy security a priority of our trade and foreign policy.” In other
words, Cheney’s group wanted to find additional sources of oil overseas,
and ensure U.S. access to that oil—whatever it took.
Documents recently obtained
from Cheney’s Energy Task Force as the result of a Freedom of
Information Act lawsuit filed by the public-interest group Judicial Watch
indicate that Cheney and his colleagues had their sites on the black gold
under the Iraqi dessert well before 9/11.
Last July, the Commerce
Department finally turned over records that included “a map of Iraqi oil
fields, pipelines, refineries, and terminals, as well as two charts
detailing Iraqi oil and gas projects, and ‘Foreign Suitors for Iraqi
Oilfield Contracts’,” according to Judicial Watch’s subsequent press
release. There were similar maps and charts for Saudi Arabia and the
United Arab Emirates. The documents were dated March, 2001.
“The media remains
reluctant to explain the close link between the energy policies of the
Bush Administration and US military strategy,” wrote Michael Klare in Censored
2005.
Sources:
“Cheney Energy Task Force documents feature map of
Iraqioilfields,” Judicial Watch staff, Judicial Watch, July 17, 2003.
“Bush-Cheney energy strategy: Procuring the rest of
the world’soil,” Michael Klare, Foreign Policy in Focus, January 2004.
9. Widow Brings RICO Case Against U.S. Government for
9/11
As the National Commission on
Terrorists Attacks Upon the United States, also known as the 9/11
Commission, completed its first year, Ellen Mariani and her attorney held
a press conference to announce her own startling conclusions. Mariani,
wife of Louis Neil Mariani, who died when terrorists flew United Airlines
flight 175 into the World Trade Center’s south tower, had come to
believe that top American officials—including President Bush, Vice
President Cheney, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, and others—had
foreknowledge of the attacks, purposefully failed to prevent them, and had
since taken pains to cover up the truth.
The administration, she
argues in a federal lawsuit, allowed Sept. 11 to happen so that Bush and
Co. could launch their seemingly endless, global “war on terror” for
their own personal and financial gain. The suit uses the Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act to charge the nation’s leaders
with conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and wrongful death.
Her lawyer, Philip J. Berg,
a former deputy attorney general of Pennsylvania, filed a 62-page
complaint including 40pages of evidence. “Compelling evidence … will
be presented in this case through discovery, subpoena power by this Court,
and testimony at trial,” he wrote in a press release. At the very least,
the case presents the potential to uncover and publicize critical
documents and testimony about the Bush Administration’s handling of the
Al-Qaeda threat and its aftermath. But only Fox News showed up to the
press conference; and it never ran anything on the topic.
Sources:
“911 victim’s wife files RICO case against G.W.
Bush,” Philip Berg, scoop.co.nz, Nov. 26, 2003.
“Widow’s Bush treason suit vanishes,” W. David
Kubiak,scoop.co.nz, Dec. 3, 2003.
10. New Nuke Plants: Taxpayers Support, Industry
Profits
If you thought nuclear energy
was dead, think again: The Bush Administration’s energy bill—based on
Cheney’s industry-stacked Energy Task Force—offers no incentives for
companies to switch to renewable energy sources. But it does provide as
much as $7.5 billion in tax credits to build six new nuclear reactors, in
a secretly-crafted provision of the bill, released late on a Saturday
night last November. This in addition to almost $4 billion set aside for
other nuclear energy programs. “Nuclear power already has had 50 years
of subsidy totaling over $140 billion, ”reported Nuclear Information and
Resource Service’s Cindy Folkers.
The administration also
removed terrorism protection provisions included in the House version of
the bill, and reversed a previous ban on the export of enriched uranium,
which may be used to construct nuclear bombs. The press has been “woefully
silent on the bill’s nuclear provisions” wrote Folkers and Michael
Mariotte in their update for Project Censored’s book, Censored 2005.
Sources:
“Nuclear energy would get $7.5 billion in tax
subsidies, US taxpayers would fund nuclear monitor relapse if energy bill
passes,” Cindy Folkers and Michael Mariotte, Nuclear Information and
Resource Service, Nov. 17, 2003.
“US Senate passes pro-nuclear energy bill,” Cindy
Folkers and Michael Mariotte, WISE/NIRS NuclearMonitor, Aug. 22, 2003.
To
Read the entire Story, please pick up a FREE copy of Random Lengths
|
|